<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://xml.world-of-newave.info/michelle-williams.atom.xsl" media="screen"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en-us">
<title>Michelle Williams - World-of-Newave.info</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://answers.world-of-newave.info/michelle-williams.htm"/>
<author>
<name>World-of-Newave.info</name>
<url>http://www.world-of-newave.info/</url>
</author>
<modified>2008-08-30T03:52:41Z</modified>
<tagline>Latest news and articles about Michelle Williams</tagline>
<copyright>Copyright (c)2004-2008.§/Newave SARL. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Juan Williams says Michelle Obama "sometimes uses" a "kind of militant anger"</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/juan-williams-says-michelle-obama-sometimes-uses-20080848738.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">During the August 25 edition of Fox
News' America's Newsroom, NPR
news analyst and Fox News contributor Juan Williams asserted of Michelle
Obama's upcoming speech at the Democratic National Convention:
"Well, she's got to be herself, but I do not think she can go for
it all out in terms of this kind of militant anger that she sometimes uses, you
know. She can be, it seems, rather cynical or dismissive of people," adding,
"I don't think she wants to get anywhere near the race issue,
anywhere near the militance issue." Williams gave no examples of what he
claims to be "this kind of militant anger" that Michelle Obama
"sometimes uses." 

Earlier in the segment, co-host Megyn
Kelly asserted that "there's been all sorts of rumors about
Michelle Obama, and controversy around her, whether it was real or imagined,
including what was her college thesis about; did she use the term 'whitey' -- something that was
never substantiated." Kelly then said, "But a lot of the nation,
because you get these emails, may believe that stuff about her." But
Kelly did not note that, in addition to "emails," Fox News has
provided a platform for a Republican operative to spread the rumor that Michelle Obama
"use[d] the term 'whitey,' " and Fox News host Sean Hannity has repeatedly distorted the content of Michelle
Obama's college thesis. 

During the June 1 edition of Fox
News' America's Election HQ, Republican
strategist Roger Stone asserted
that "there is a buzz, which I believe now to be credible, that some
indelible record exists of public remarks that Michelle Obama allegedly made,
which are outrageous at worst -- but at best, but could be termed racist,
including some reference to white people as 'whiteys,'
allegedly." No such "indelible record" has ever surfaced, as
Kelly noted during the segment; the Obama campaign has stated that "no such tape
exists"; and, as the Obama campaign noted, the day after appearing on America's Election HQ, Stone admitted on the June 2 broadcast of Sean
Hannity's nationally syndicated radio program that he had "not yet
spoken to anyone who has eyeballed the video." 

From the August 25 edition of Fox
News' America's Newsroom:


KELLY:
You know, Juan, there's all -- there's been all sorts of rumors
about Michelle Obama, and controversy around her, whether real or imagined,
including what was her college thesis about; did she use the term"
whitey" -- something that was never substantiated.

WILLIAMS:
No.

KELLY:
But a lot of the nation, because you get these emails, may believe that stuff
about her when they walk -- when they see her take to the stage tonight. Does
she even try to deflate that? Does she go anywhere near that? Does she just try
to seem like an empathetic, kind, and laudable potential first lady? 

WILLIAMS:
Well, I think she stays away from that kind of the "whitey" stuff
altogether -- doesn't give any credence to it. To the contrary, what she
wants to present is that she is a family person: talk about her dad, talk about
her kids, you know, talk about how this is a family that's trying to hold
together in a new way, in a new generation -- the more pressures on families
where two people are working. And to say to people, "You know what, this
-- I understand what is going on in your household. Just as I admire Barack
Obama, I want you to know he's like your husband." And that is the
way she wants to tell this story. She wants to come across as one of us. 

KELLY:
How hard is it for her and, for that matter for Cindy McCain, sort of stepping
into the shoes potentially of Laura Bush, who is demure, who the nation loves?
Notwithstanding President Bush's approval ratings, Laura Bush is still
through the roof. But Michelle projects as a strong personality, and that has
the potential to alienate some. Does she tone that down, or does she just go
for it? She's a different person than Laura Bush. 

WILLIAMS:
Well, she's got to be herself, but I do not think she can go for it all
out in terms of this kind of militant anger that she sometimes uses, you know.
She can be, it seems, rather cynical or dismissive of people. In fact, I think
that's one of the things she's going to say tonight is, when she
first met Barack Obama, she didn't think much of this kid who was from
Hawaii, although they both were Harvard Law graduates. And so she's going
to say, "You know what? I got to know him, and then I was impressed, and
that is how you can get to know him, and you'll see that there's real
substance to him." That's going to -- but to come back to her own
issues. I don't think she wants to get anywhere near the race issue,
anywhere near the militance issue.

KELLY:
What about the patriotism issue?

WILLIAMS:
I don't think she -- you know what, it's just got to be that
she's talking about family, she's talking about love of her
husband, and that people will pick it up.

KELLY:
But what about love of her country? Do you expect to hear themes of that
tonight?

WILLIAMS:
No, I think it's going to be all around her, though. I think you're
going -- I mean, obviously you've seen that backdrop that we've
shown here on Fox. The flag -- she's going to be draped in the flag,
literally, and that's going to be part of the effort to try to transform her
from this angry face to someone who is in fact the face of a new and more
diverse America.


From the 2 p.m. ET hour of the June 1
edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ:


GERALDO
RIVERA (anchor): Let's talk about that and about the future going forward and
the rest of the controversies with Democratic strategist Michael Brown and Republican
strategist Roger Stone. Roger, I want to start with you because I think you
have some news, or at least your own incendiary prediction, on Michele Obama's
alleged vulnerabilities. What do you know, or at least, what do you think you
know? 

STONE:
Well, there is a buzz, which I believe now to be credible, that some indelible
record exists of public remarks that Michele Obama allegedly made, which are
outrageous at worst -- but at best, but could be termed racist, including some
reference to white people as "whiteys," allegedly. And
there's been a race here, Geraldo, between --

RIVERA:
Wait a sec -- wait a second, Roger. You can't -- Roger, you can't just
say that and say you have no proof for it and make a comment like that. 

STONE:
No, no, let me finish. There's been a race here between the Clinton research people,
who are seeking this -- seeking this tape -- and the Republican opposition
researchers at the Republican National Committee. I now believe that a network
has this tape; I believe that reliably. Something like that could roil the
race, which explains why, to me, Hillary Clinton is staying in this race. What
other reason is there for her to stay in this race, other than hoping that
there is a bomb? And high-level Clinton
operatives say there is a bomb of this nature. I have heard that from people I
believe to be credible. 

RIVERA:
Hold it there. Hold it -- OK. We hear that you heard it. Let me go to Michael
Brown for his response and also let me point out that Roger Stone was the
person who said he heard that New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was using the
services of prostitutes. At least in that incendiary allegation, there was
facts behind it and ultimately it was proven true. But Michael Brown, I want
you to respond to what you just heard from Roger Stone. 

BROWN:
I'm not going to question whether he believes what he's saying is true,
but I will say that Republicans are up to the usual stuff -- when they cannot
beat Democrats on issues, they always go personal negative. That's what
this is all about. We're going to see this for the next six months from
the Republican Party. This is what they do. I don't know why we should be
shocked, Geraldo. This is -- I think they're starting a little early.
They're probably off their timeline a little bit, but I'm not
surprised by this. It has nothing to do with anything except flat-out
politics, and it's ugly, and these are the kind of things that don't help
the American people come to the polls to vote, they don't keep people inspired,
and I'm sure the Obamas will obviously prevail on issues like this and stay
focused on issues, assuming he's the nominee. 

STONE:
This is really more about --

RIVERA:
OK, Michael Brown, Roger Stone, if you two -- you guys hold by, hold on.
I'm going to bring you back after this quick commercial break, so you two
stand by. 

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/juan-williams-says-michelle-obama-sometimes-uses-20080848738.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-25T23:45:14Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-25T23:45:14Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808250013</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/juan-williams-says-michelle-obama-sometimes-uses-20080848738.htm"><b>Juan Williams says Michelle Obama "sometimes uses" a "kind of militant anger"</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/juan-williams-says-michelle-obama-sometimes-uses-20080848738.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - During the August 25 edition of Fox
News' America's Newsroom, NPR
news analyst and Fox News contributor Juan Williams asserted of Michelle
Obama's upcoming speech at the Democratic National Convention:
"Well, she's got to be herself, but I do not think she can go for
it all out in terms of this kind of militant anger that she sometimes uses, you
know. She can be, it seems, rather cynical or dismissive of people," adding,
"I don't think she wants to get anywhere near the race issue,
anywhere near the militance issue." Williams gave no examples of what he
claims to be "this kind of militant anger" that Michelle Obama
"sometimes uses." 

Earlier in the segment, co-host Megyn
Kelly asserted that "there's been all sorts of rumors about
Michelle Obama, and controversy around her, whether it was real or imagined,
including what was her college thesis about; did she use the term 'whitey' -- something that was
never substantiated." Kelly then said, "But a lot of the nation,
because you get these emails, may believe that stuff about her." But
Kelly did not note that, in addition to "emails," Fox News has
provided a platform for a Republican operative to spread the rumor that Michelle Obama
"use[d] the term 'whitey,' " and Fox News host Sean Hannity has repeatedly distorted the content of Michelle
Obama's college thesis. 

During the June 1 edition of Fox
News' America's Election HQ, Republican
strategist Roger Stone asserted
that "there is a buzz, which I believe now to be credible, that some
indelible record exists of public remarks that Michelle Obama allegedly made,
which are outrageous at worst -- but at best, but could be termed racist,
including some reference to white people as 'whiteys,'
allegedly." No such "indelible record" has ever surfaced, as
Kelly noted during the segment; the Obama campaign has stated that "no such tape
exists"; and, as the Obama campaign noted, the day after appearing on America's Election HQ, Stone admitted on the June 2 broadcast of Sean
Hannity's nationally syndicated radio program that he had "not yet
spoken to anyone who has eyeballed the video." 

From the August 25 edition of Fox
News' America's Newsroom:


KELLY:
You know, Juan, there's all -- there's been all sorts of rumors
about Michelle Obama, and controversy around her, whether real or imagined,
including what was her college thesis about; did she use the term"
whitey" -- something that was never substantiated.

WILLIAMS:
No.

KELLY:
But a lot of the nation, because you get these emails, may believe that stuff
about her when they walk -- when they see her take to the stage tonight. Does
she even try to deflate that? Does she go anywhere near that? Does she just try
to seem like an empathetic, kind, and laudable potential first lady? 

WILLIAMS:
Well, I think she stays away from that kind of the "whitey" stuff
altogether -- doesn't give any credence to it. To the contrary, what she
wants to present is that she is a family person: talk about her dad, talk about
her kids, you know, talk about how this is a family that's trying to hold
together in a new way, in a new generation -- the more pressures on families
where two people are working. And to say to people, "You know what, this
-- I understand what is going on in your household. Just as I admire Barack
Obama, I want you to know he's like your husband." And that is the
way she wants to tell this story. She wants to come across as one of us. 

KELLY:
How hard is it for her and, for that matter for Cindy McCain, sort of stepping
into the shoes potentially of Laura Bush, who is demure, who the nation loves?
Notwithstanding President Bush's approval ratings, Laura Bush is still
through the roof. But Michelle projects as a strong personality, and that has
the potential to alienate some. Does she tone that down, or does she just go
for it? She's a different person than Laura Bush. 

WILLIAMS:
Well, she's got to be herself, but I do not think she can go for it all
out in terms of this kind of militant anger that she sometimes uses, you know.
She can be, it seems, rather cynical or dismissive of people. In fact, I think
that's one of the things she's going to say tonight is, when she
first met Barack Obama, she didn't think much of this kid who was from
Hawaii, although they both were Harvard Law graduates. And so she's going
to say, "You know what? I got to know him, and then I was impressed, and
that is how you can get to know him, and you'll see that there's real
substance to him." That's going to -- but to come back to her own
issues. I don't think she wants to get anywhere near the race issue,
anywhere near the militance issue.

KELLY:
What about the patriotism issue?

WILLIAMS:
I don't think she -- you know what, it's just got to be that
she's talking about family, she's talking about love of her
husband, and that people will pick it up.

KELLY:
But what about love of her country? Do you expect to hear themes of that
tonight?

WILLIAMS:
No, I think it's going to be all around her, though. I think you're
going -- I mean, obviously you've seen that backdrop that we've
shown here on Fox. The flag -- she's going to be draped in the flag,
literally, and that's going to be part of the effort to try to transform her
from this angry face to someone who is in fact the face of a new and more
diverse America.


From the 2 p.m. ET hour of the June 1
edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ:


GERALDO
RIVERA (anchor): Let's talk about that and about the future going forward and
the rest of the controversies with Democratic strategist Michael Brown and Republican
strategist Roger Stone. Roger, I want to start with you because I think you
have some news, or at least your own incendiary prediction, on Michele Obama's
alleged vulnerabilities. What do you know, or at least, what do you think you
know? 

STONE:
Well, there is a buzz, which I believe now to be credible, that some indelible
record exists of public remarks that Michele Obama allegedly made, which are
outrageous at worst -- but at best, but could be termed racist, including some
reference to white people as "whiteys," allegedly. And
there's been a race here, Geraldo, between --

RIVERA:
Wait a sec -- wait a second, Roger. You can't -- Roger, you can't just
say that and say you have no proof for it and make a comment like that. 

STONE:
No, no, let me finish. There's been a race here between the Clinton research people,
who are seeking this -- seeking this tape -- and the Republican opposition
researchers at the Republican National Committee. I now believe that a network
has this tape; I believe that reliably. Something like that could roil the
race, which explains why, to me, Hillary Clinton is staying in this race. What
other reason is there for her to stay in this race, other than hoping that
there is a bomb? And high-level Clinton
operatives say there is a bomb of this nature. I have heard that from people I
believe to be credible. 

RIVERA:
Hold it there. Hold it -- OK. We hear that you heard it. Let me go to Michael
Brown for his response and also let me point out that Roger Stone was the
person who said he heard that New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was using the
services of prostitutes. At least in that incendiary allegation, there was
facts behind it and ultimately it was proven true. But Michael Brown, I want
you to respond to what you just heard from Roger Stone. 

BROWN:
I'm not going to question whether he believes what he's saying is true,
but I will say that Republicans are up to the usual stuff -- when they cannot
beat Democrats on issues, they always go personal negative. That's what
this is all about. We're going to see this for the next six months from
the Republican Party. This is what they do. I don't know why we should be
shocked, Geraldo. This is -- I think they're starting a little early.
They're probably off their timeline a little bit, but I'm not
surprised by this. It has nothing to do with anything except flat-out
politics, and it's ugly, and these are the kind of things that don't help
the American people come to the polls to vote, they don't keep people inspired,
and I'm sure the Obamas will obviously prevail on issues like this and stay
focused on issues, assuming he's the nominee. 

STONE:
This is really more about --

RIVERA:
OK, Michael Brown, Roger Stone, if you two -- you guys hold by, hold on.
I'm going to bring you back after this quick commercial break, so you two
stand by. 

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Juan Williams says Michelle Obama "sometimes uses" a "kind of militant anger" {...} Fox News&#39; Juan Williams asserted of Michelle Obama&#39;s upcoming speech at the DNC: "Well, she&#39;s got to be herself, but I do not think she can go for it all out in terms of this kind of militant anger that she sometimes uses." Williams gave no examples of what he claims to be "this kind of militant anger" that Michelle Obama "sometimes uses."   {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 25, 2008, 11:45 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 26, 2008, 9:28 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;25KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{RESOURCES &gt; NEWS AND MEDIA} - Serena given workout in Stanford</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/sports/resources/news-and-media/serena-given-workout-in-stanford-20080754423.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">Serena Williams is given a scare by 15-year-old Michelle Larcher de Brito at the Bank of the West Classic.</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/sports/resources/news-and-media/serena-given-workout-in-stanford-20080754423.htm</id>
<issued>2008-07-17T07:34:02Z</issued>
<modified>2008-07-17T07:34:02Z</modified>
<author>
<name>News.Bbc.Co.Uk</name>
<url>http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/tennis/7510940.stm</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/sports/resources/news-and-media/serena-given-workout-in-stanford-20080754423.htm"><b>Serena given workout in Stanford</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/sports/resources/news-and-media/serena-given-workout-in-stanford-20080754423.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">News.Bbc.Co.Uk</span> - Serena Williams is given a scare by 15-year-old Michelle Larcher de Brito at the Bank of the West Classic.<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">BBC SPORT | Tennis | Serena given workout in Stanford {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> July 17, 2008, 7:34 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> July 17, 2008, 11:01 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;32KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/sports/">Sports</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/sports/resources/">Resources</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/sports/resources/news-and-media/"><b>News and Media</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - What you've been missing: NBC, CBS nightly news shows fail to report on McCain's campaign loan    </title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/what-you-ve-been-missing-nbc-cbs-nightly-news-shows-20080637936.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">As Media
Matters for America noted, in a February 29 post on MSNBC.com's
First Read political blog, NBC News political director Chuck Todd, deputy
political director Mark Murray, and political researcher Domenico Montanaro
wrote: "We've noticed today the [Sen. John] McCain/FEC stories -- that
McCain very well might have to abide by spending limits before the GOP
convention -- are starting to roll in. But why is this only now starting to get
more traction, compared with all the stories about [Sen. Barack] Obama waffling
on his pledge to accept public funds in the general?" The post continued:
"For one thing, the McCain story is much more complicated; certainly the
Obama pledge hedge was an easier one to tell. But is this starting to become a
problem for McCain? At the very least, it makes it MUCH more difficult to
criticize Obama for waffling on public funds." But NBC's Nightly News and the CBS Evening News have yet to cover the
loan, although they have both repeatedly reported on Obama's decision not
to take public financing for the general election and McCain's earlier
attacks on Obama for not committing to public financing.

First Read's summation of the story
-- "that McCain very well might have to abide by spending limits before
the GOP convention" -- stems from a loan agreement the McCain campaign signed
during the primary season that could have forced him to remain in the race --
even if he had no chance of winning -- in order to be eligible for public
matching funds to repay the loan. In a February 19 letter, Federal Election Commission (FEC)
chairman David Mason took the position that McCain cannot legally opt
out of public financing for the primary season without FEC approval and, in the
same letter, asked the McCain campaign to expand upon its assertion that it had
not "pledged the certification of Matching Payment funds as security for
private financing," citing provisions of the loan agreement, the
associated security agreement, and a modification to those agreements. In the
letter, Mason cited a prior FEC advisory opinion stating that a candidate is
allowed to withdraw from the matching funds program so long as "the
candidate ... had not pledged the certification of Matching Payment Program funds
'as security for private financing.' " If McCain is not
allowed to withdraw from the public financing system and if he is found to have
knowingly raised and spent money beyond the public financing limits, his
actions "could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in
prison," according to The Washington Post.

Earlier, on August 28, 2007, the FEC announced: "John
McCain today became the first 2008 presidential candidate to be declared
eligible by the Federal Election Commission (FEC/Commission) to receive federal
matching funds" for the 2008 primary. As part of the packet McCain
submitted for eligibility, he wrote in an August 13, 2007, letter that he was
"a candidate seeking to become eligible to receive Presidential primary
matching funds."

Notwithstanding the question articulated
on First Read -- "why is this only now starting to get more
traction" -- according to a Media
Matters search* of the Nexis and Factiva news databases, NBC has not
covered the loan on Nightly News.
Nor has the CBS Evening News covered the loan.

By contrast, on the February 22 edition
of ABC's World News with Charles
Gibson, chief Washington
correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported:





[T]hey
received a letter from the chairman of the Federal Election Commission saying
that he believes that John McCain has to stay in the public financing system.
Here's the import of that. If he stays in, he's limited to spending $54 million
between now and September. He's already spent $49 million. That would leave him
only $5 million for the next five or six months. The Democratic nominee is
likely to have 10 times that.

At
issue is whether he used -- John McCain used those public funds as collateral
when he got a loan earlier this year for his campaign. The McCain campaign disputes that. They say they're going to be able to
answer this ruling. They're confident they're going to be able to go on. But
this letter from the FEC chairman does put that into question.

On the February 23 edition of ABC's
World News Saturday,
correspondent Liz Marlantes again reported on Mason's letter (although
she did not note the loan): "This week, he [McCain] took another hit on
that front after he received a letter from the Federal Election Commission
saying he may not be allowed to withdraw from the public financing system, and
then said he would do so anyway."

While ignoring the
issue of McCain's loan, NBC's Nightly News covered the issue of whether Obama
would take public financing and McCain's attacks over general-election public
financing on February 15, February 20, June 19, June 21, and June 22, and the CBS Evening News
covered Obama and general-election public financing on February 20, June 19,
and June 25.

The following is a chronology of events
surrounding the loan that Nightly News and
the CBS Evening News have yet to
report on in the context of the loan:

November
14, 2007

The McCain campaign took out a loan from
the Fidelity &amp; Trust Bank in Bethesda,
 Maryland. Under the original loan agreement, if McCain were to
withdraw from the matching funds program before the end of 2007 and if he were
then to finish more than 10 percentage points behind the winner of the January
8 New Hampshire primary, McCain would have been required to "remain an
active political candidate," to reapply for matching funds, and to
"grant to Lender, as additional collateral for the loan, a first priority
perfected security interest in and to all of Borrower's right, title and
interest in and to the public matching fund program." In other words, the
agreement could have required McCain to remain in the race, regardless of
whether his candidacy was viable, in order to be eligible for matching funds to
pay back the loan.

From the John McCain 2008
Inc. Business Loan Agreement:





Additional
Requirement. Borrower and Lender agree that if Borrower withdraws from the
public matching fund program by the end of December 2007, but John McCain then
does not win the New Hampshire primary or place at least within 10 percentage
points of the winner of the New Hampshire Primary, Borrower will cause John
McCain to remain an active political candidate and Borrower will, within thirty
(30) days of the New Hampshire Primary (i) reapply for public matching funds,
(ii) grant to Lender, as additional collateral for the loan, a first priority
perfected security interest in and to all of Borrower's right, title and
interest in and to the public matching fund program, and (iii) execute and
deliver to Lender such documents, instruments and agreements as Lender may
require with respect to the foregoing.

[...]

COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION'S MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM. Borrower agrees
and covenants with Lender that while this Agreement is in effect, Borrower
shall not exceed overall or state spending limits set forth in the Federal
Matching Funds Program, if applicable. 

[...]

STATUS
OF CURRENTLY HELD CERTIFICATIONS OF MATCHING FUNDS. Borrower and Lender agree
that any certifications of matching fund eligibility currently possessed by
Borrower or obtained before January 1, 2008 and the right of John McCain 2008,
Inc. and John McCain to receive payment under these certifications are not collateral
under the Commercial Security Agreement for this Loan. 

[...]

DEFINITIONS.


[...]

Collateral. The word "Collateral" means all property and assets
granted as collateral security for a Loan. [...] It is expressly understood and
agreed that "collateral" specifically excludes any certifications
of matching fund eligibility currently possessed by Borrower or obtained before
January 1, 2008. 

From the loan's Commercial Security Agreement: 





COLLATERAL
DESCRIPTION. The word "Collateral" as used in this Agreement means
the following described property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
whether now existing or hereafter arising, and wherever located in which Grantor is giving to
Lender a security interest for the payment of the indedbtedness and performance
of all other obligations under the Note and this Agreement: 

[...]

Grantor and Lendor agree that any certifications of matching fund eligibility,
including related rights, currently possessed by Grantor or obtained before
January 1, 2008, are not themselves being pledged as security for the
indebtedness and are not themselves collateral for the indebtedness or subject
to this Security Agreement. Grantor agrees not to sell, transfer, convey,
pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer to any person or entity any of his
present or future right, title and interest in and to the public matching fund
program or any certifications of matching fund eligibility, including related
rights, issued with respect thereto without the prior written consent of
Lender.

December
17, 2007

The loan was modified but still included a
provision that could have required McCain under certain conditions to
"remain an active political candidate and ... reapply for public matching
funds" in order to be able to repay the loan. The loan agreement was modified as follows:





Without
limiting anything set forth in this Modification to the contrary, certain
provisions of the Loan Agreement are hereby modified as follows: 

(a) The
paragraph entitled "Additional Requirement" set forth in the
Affirmative Covenants section of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

"Additional Requirement. Borrower
and Lender agree that if Borrower withdraws from the public matching funds
program but John McCain then does not win the next primary or caucus in which
he is active (which can be any primary or caucus held the same day) or does not
place at least within 10 percentage points of the winner of that primary or
caucus, Borrower will cause John McCain to remain an active political candidate
and Borrower will, within thirty (30) days of said primary or caucus (i)
reapply for public matching funds, (ii) grant to Lender, as additional
collateral for the Loan, a first priority perfected security interest in and to
all of Borrower's right, title and interest in and to the public matching funds
program, and (iii) execute and deliver to Lender such documents, instruments
and agreements as Lender may require with respect to the foregoing. Borrower
and Lender agree that Borrower will provide oral or written notice to Lender at
least 24 hours before notice of withdrawal from the public matching funds
program is provided by Borrower or John McCain to the Federal Election
Commission." 

(b) The
paragraph entitled "COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION'S
MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM" set forth in the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

"COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION'S MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM. Borrower agrees
and covenants with Lender that while this Agreement is in effect, Borrower shall
not, without Lender's prior written consent, exceed overall or state spending
limits imposed under the Federal Matching Funds Program, irrespective of
whether Borrower is subject to such program as of any applicable date of
determination."

(c) The
paragraph entitled "STATUS OF CURRENTLY HELD CERTIFICATIONS OF MATCHING
FUNDS" set forth in the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

























"STATUS OF CURRENTLY HELD
CERTIFICATIONS OF MATCHING FUNDS. Borrower and
Lender agree that any certifications of matching funds eligibility now held by
Borrower, and the right of the Borrower and/or John McCain to receive payment
under such certifications, are not (and shall not be) collateral for the
Loan." [emphases in original]





(d) The
definition of "Collateral" set forth in the
"Definitions" section of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 





Collateral. The word
"Collateral" means all property and assets granted as collateral
security for the Loan. [...] It is expressly understood and agreed that,
"Collateral" specifically excludes any certification of matching
funds eligibility now held by Borrower and/or John McCain, and any right, title
and interest of Borrower and/or John McCain to receive payments
thereunder." 





[...]

(f) The
paragraph entitled "Collateral Description" set forth in the Security
Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in
lieu thereof:

"COLLATERAL DESCRIPTION. The word "Collateral" as used in this Agreement means
the following described property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
whether now existing or hereafter arising, and wherever located, in which
Grantor is giving to Lender a security interest for the payment of the
Indebtedness and performance of all other obligations under the Note and this
Agreement:

[...]

Grantor
and Lender agree that any certifications of matching funds eligibility,
including related rights, now held by Grantor are not themselves being pledged
as security for the Indebtedness and are not themselves collateral for the
Indebtedness or subject to this Security Agreement. Grantor agrees not to sell,
transfer, convey, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer to any person or
entity any of its present or future right, title and interest in and to the
public matching funds program or any certifications of matching funds
eligibility, including related rights, issued with respect thereto without the
prior written consent of Lender." 

December
20, 2007

The FEC announced it had
certified $5,812,197.35 of primary matching funds to McCain but noted that
"[b]ased on historical patterns, the FEC estimates that funds may not be
available to disburse before March 2008."

February
6, 2008

McCain wrote a letter to the FEC that said, "This
letter is to advise you that I, on behalf of myself and John McCain 2008, Inc.,
my principal campaign committee, am withdrawing from participation in the
federal primary-election funding program established by the Presidential
Primary Matching Payment Account Act. No funds have been paid to date by the
Department of the Treasury, and the certification of funds has not been pledged
as security for private financing."

On the June 19 edition of NBC's Nightly News, chief foreign correspondent
Andrea Mitchell said, "Obama's campaign ... charge[s] McCain himself
waffled on this, applying for public funds during the primaries, then
withdrawing from the public system during the nomination fight," but
Mitchell did not note the loan.

February
16, 2008

The Washington
Post reported that
"John McCain's cash-strapped campaign borrowed $1 million from a Bethesda
bank two weeks before the New Hampshire primary by pledging to enter the public
financing system if his bid for the presidency faltered, newly disclosed
records show."

The Post
reported the McCain campaign's response: 





McCain's
attorneys and the Fidelity &amp; Trust president said the loan agreements were
carefully scrutinized in advance to make sure they would pass muster with
federal banking regulators and the FEC.

"We
stayed in a safe zone, and so did he," said Barry C. Watkins, the bank's
president. "We were being careful not to force either one of us into a
situation we didn't intend."

McCain's
campaign filed the modification to his initial $3 million loan on Dec. 17,
seeking an additional $1 million. The bank asked him to produce something more
than his campaign's assets as collateral.

"They
said, 'You've explained how you can afford to borrow more, and how you can pay
us back if things go well. What happens if things go badly?' " said Trevor
Potter, a McCain attorney.

The
campaign's response, Potter said, was that McCain could reapply in the future
for federal matching funds, and would agree to use the FEC certifications for
those funds as collateral.

Under
the agreement, McCain promised that if his campaign began to falter, he would
commit to keeping his campaign alive and to entering the federal financing
system so the money he had raised could be used to gain an infusion of matching
funds. Had that happened, he would have been forced to abide by strict federal
spending caps before the Republican National Convention in September.

Under
FEC rules, a candidate who uses a certification for federal funds as collateral
for a loan is obligated to remain within the public financing system. "We
very carefully did not do that," Potter said.

February
19, 2008

Mason replied to McCain's February 6 letter,
writing that the FEC previously "stated it would withdraw a
candidate's certification upon written request, thus agreeing to rescind
the contract, so long as a candidate ... had not pledged the certification of
Matching Payment Program funds 'as security for private financing.'
" Mason wrote that the McCain campaign said it had not "pledged the
certification of Matching Payment funds as security for private
financing" and added that "we invite you to expand on the rationale
for that conclusion, including but not limited to addressing" specific
provisions of the original loan agreement and security agreement, as well as
the modified loan agreement (which also amended the security agreement).

Mason also asserted that it required a
quorum of FEC commissioners to opt out: "Just as 2 U.S.C. § 437c(c)
required an affirmative vote of four Commissioners to make these
certifications, it requires an affirmative vote of four Commissioners to
withdraw them. Therefore, the Commission will consider your request at such
time as it has a quorum." 

A February 21 Associated Press article about Mason's letter reported,
"Complicating the dispute is the FEC's current lack of a quorum. The six-member commission has four vacancies and
Senate Democrats and Republicans are at loggerheads over how to fill them. ...
Without action by the Senate, McCain could be waiting
indefinitely." A June 19 Associated Press article noted that the FEC still did not
have "a quorum to act because four of its six seats have been vacant
pending Senate confirmation of presidential nominees."

The Senate confirmed five commissioners to the FEC
on June 24, including a successor to Mason, whose renomination President Bush withdrew on May 6.

February 22, 2008

A February 22 Washington Post article reporting on
Mason's letter stated that "[k]nowingly violating the spending limit is a
criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five
years in prison." The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act
provides in 26 U.S.C. § 9035 that
"[n]o candidate [participating in the public finance system] shall
knowingly incur qualified campaign expenses in excess of the expenditure
limitation applicable under section 320(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Election
Campaign Act of 1971." And 26 U.S.C. § 9042
states: "Any person who violates the provisions of section 9035 shall be
fined not more than $25,000, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. Any
officer or member of any political committee who knowingly consents to any
expenditure in violation of the provisions of section 9035 shall be fined not
more than $25,000, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."

An update to a February 22 blog post on Election Law Blog included a
McCain statement that read in part:





"Senator McCain notified the FEC and the United States Treasury of his
withdrawal from the system in a letter dated February 6th. The current dispute
is simply over whether the FEC has to take any action in response to the
withdrawal notice. It is clear to the campaign, as it is to a number of FEC
experts, that no FEC action is necessary in response to Senator McCain's notice
of withdrawal given the constitutional nature of the right. In our view, the
Senator's letter is all that is legally required to exit from the system. FEC
Chairman Mason, who does not represent the official view of the Commission due
to the current lack of a quorum, has written a letter to the campaign in which
he states his belief that the FEC must formally vote to accept the withdrawal.
In either case the result is the same: the campaign will be out of the public
funding system either because of the letter sent on February 6th, or because of
a future vote by the Commission acknowledging the letter.

"Nevertheless,
the campaign is fully responding to Chairman Mason's request for information
and is confident that the new commissioners, when appointed and confirmed, will
take whatever action they conclude is necessary to confirm Senator McCain's
withdrawal from the system as of February 6, 2008."

February
25, 2008

The Democratic National Committee (DNC)
filed a complaint with the FEC
asserting that McCain "pledged matching funds as collateral for a loan to
his campaign" and that "apart from the ability to obtain the loan,
the McCain Campaign has obtained a material, financial benefit from the
certification of eligibility for matching funds through the ability to avail
itself of the automatic right of access to the ballot, in some states."

On the February 24 edition of the CBS Evening News with Russ Mitchell,
anchor Russ Mitchell reported, "One more political note now. The
Democratic Party says it will file a complaint with the Federal Election
Commission tomorrow against John McCain. The complaint will challenge McCain's
attempt to withdraw from the public campaign financing system." But
Mitchell did not mention the loan or otherwise explain the details of the
complaint. 

March
23, 2008

The
Washington Post reported that
"McCain has officially broken the limits imposed by the presidential
public financing system, according to reports filed last week by the campaign.
McCain has spent $58.4 million on his primary effort. Those who have committed
to public financing can spend no more than $54 million on their primary
bid."

April
14, 2008

The DNC filed a lawsuit asking a
federal court act on its complaint that McCain has violated campaign finance
laws.

May 6,
2008

President Bush withdrew Mason's
nomination for reappointment to the FEC.

May 14,
2008

Citing a "120-day exclusivity
period," federal District Judge John D. Bates ordered the DNC's
complaint "dismissed without prejudice," meaning that while he
found that the DNC could not go forward with its lawsuit, he was not barring
the DNC from refiling the complaint. Bates wrote: 





The
FEC retains exclusive jurisdiction over initial complaints pursuant to FECA. See
In re Carter-Mondale, 642 F.2d at 542 ("[T]he exclusive
jurisdiction of the FEC extends to assure that the Commission's initial
investigation is completed, or the statutory time limit allowed for an
investigation has expired, before any judicial review is invoked."). The
relevant provisions governing judicial review are found in 2 U.S.C. §§ 437g(a)(8)(A)
- (C). Section 437g(a)(8)(A) provides:

Any
party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by
such party . . . or by a failure of the Commission to act on such complaint
during the 120-day period beginning on the date the complaint is filed, may
file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia.

June
17, 2008

The DNC announced that it would
refile its lawsuit asking a federal court act on its complaint against the
McCain campaign. 

June
24, 2008

As promised, the DNC refiled its lawsuit on June 24.

From the February 15 edition of
NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams: 





ANDREA
MITCHELL: And John McCain pressed Barack Obama over strategy
for a fall campaign. How much money would each man be able to spend if
they end up as opponents? Would they raise cash privately or rely on government
funds?

[begin
video clip]

MITCHELL:
A year ago, Obama and McCain each pledged to accept federal financing, $85
million for the general election, instead of raising private funds, where there
are no limits. But that was long before Obama started raising eye-popping sums.

McCAIN:
If Senator Obama goes back on his commitment to the American people, then
obviously we'd have to re-think our position.

OBAMA:
It would be presumptuous of me to start saying now that I'm locking myself into
something when I don't even know if the other side is going to agree to it.

MITCHELL:
Not just a tangle over money, but McCain is looking to question Obama's
credibility.

From the February 20 edition of Nightly News with Brian Williams:






KELLY
O'DONNELL (Capitol Hill correspondent): Before John McCain visited voters at an
Ohio dairy
farm today, he found a way to challenge Barack Obama's credibility with a very
familiar word.

OBAMA:
Something has to change.

O'DONNELL:
McCain played off that idea to accuse Obama of backing away from his pledge to
cap campaign spending by using only a set amount of taxpayer financing if he's
the nominee.

McCAIN:
I think the American people would expect him to hold to that commitment,
especially if we want to bring about change.

O'DONNELL:
McCain was riled by a piece Obama wrote for USA Today where Obama did not
say he would take the taxpayer financing, but suggested starting negotiations
to figure out a limit on private fundraising.

McCAIN:
And that's Washington
doublespeak. I committed to public financing. He committed to public financing.

O'DONNELL:
McCain turned to foreign policy and made a stinging judgment, saying Obama
doesn't grasp the fundamentals after Obama talked publicly about his
willingness as president to strike terror targets inside Pakistan
without telling that government.

From the June 19 edition of Nightly News with Brian Williams:






ANN
CURRY (guest anchor): Now to presidential politics. Barack Obama today became
the first candidate to opt out of accepting public financing for his general
election campaign. Public financing was put in place more than three decades
ago after the Watergate scandal, and Obama's decision created a firestorm
today. NBC's Andrea Mitchell now reports.





[begin
video clip] 





UNIDENTIFIED
REPORTER: McCain says you're breaking your pledge on public financing.

MITCHELL:
Barack Obama wasn't answering questions today.

UNIDENTIFIED
REPORTER: Why did you change your mind?

MITCHELL:
Instead, he announced his decision online.

OBAMA:
The public financing of presidential elections as it is exists today is broken,
and we face opponents who've become masters at gaming this broken system.

MITCHELL:
Now, instead of getting $85 million from the government to campaign next fall,
he can raise hundreds of millions online, overwhelming John McCain, who said
today he will stick to the limits for the general election. McCain in Iowa today.

McCAIN:
He has completely reversed himself and gone back not on his word to me, but the
commitment that he made to the American people. That's disturbing.

MITCHELL:
In fact, Obama did promise to observe the limits if his opponent did, checking
yes on this questionnaire last November. In February, Tim Russert pressed him
on whether he'd keep that pledge.

TIM
RUSSERT (debate moderator): So you may opt out of public financing. You may
break your word?

OBAMA:
What I've said is at the point where I'm the nominee, at the point where it's
appropriate, I will sit down with John McCain and make sure that we have a
system that works for everybody.

MITCHELL:
Obama is already swamping McCain $225 million to $77 million. Only today, Obama
launched a new ad in 18 states, including Republican strongholds.

OBAMA:
I approved this message because I'll never forget those values. 

MITCHELL:
Obama's campaign says that's to counter McCain, who wrapped up his nomination
months ago. And they charge McCain himself waffled on this, applying for public
funds during the primaries, then withdrawing from the public system during the
nomination fight. All this will likely end a campaign finance system McCain
once fought to save, as the Internet enables any candidate, not just the rich,
to spend unlimited dollars if they can inspire a large following online.

Andrea
Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

From the June 21 edition of NBC's Nightly News with Lester Holt: 





LEE
COWAN (NBC News correspondent): McCain's camp fired
back that Obama -- who had his own photo op in the flood zone recently -- also
voted against legislation the McCain camp claims might
have saved the levees, too. It was the latest back-and-forth in a race Obama
predicts is going to get even nastier. At a Friday fundraiser, Obama told
donors the Republicans will use his race, even his wife, to stoke fear.

OBAMA:
They're going to try to make you afraid of me. "Because he's young and
inexperienced and he's got a funny name. Did I mention he's black? He's got a
feisty wife."

COWAN:
Being able to fight those kind of attacks is the rationale he used to opt out
of public financing, counting on his private
fundraising prowess to make up the difference.

So far,
Obama has been able to beat John McCain to the
financial punch by a more than two-to-one margin. But in financial reports
filed late Friday, for the first time, John McCain has
been able to match Barack Obama almost dollar for dollar. McCain
raised $21.5 million in May. That's just shy of the $21.9 million Barack Obama
hauled in. But that parity may not last all that long. Most predict Obama will
get a huge fundraising bump when the numbers come in from this month,
reflecting donors' attitudes after Hillary Clinton conceded. 

From the June 22 edition of NBC's Nightly News with Lester Holt: 





KEVIN
CORKE (NBC News correspondent): First, Obama hopes to blanket the airwaves with
TV ads, reintroducing himself to the American people, part of a 50-state
strategy the Democrats hope will force Republicans to fork out big dollars in
places they hadn't planned to.

JOHN
HARWOOD (CNBC chief Washington
correspondent): He forces John McCain to defend that turf
and spend money that John McCain doesn't have as much
of that Barack Obama does.

CORKE:
Free of spending limits, the Obama campaign thinks it can raise in excess of
$300 million this fall. By comparison, by accepting public
financing, the McCain campaign is limited to a budget of just $84
million. Another Obama strategy, equate a McCain
presidency with a third Bush term.

OBAMA:
This year's Republican primary was a contest to see which candidate could
out-Bush the other, and that's the contest that John McCain
won.

CORKE:
Bush and McCain share similar positions on the war,
immigration, and offshore oil exploration, something the Obama camp hopes to
exploit. 

From the February 20 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:





NANCY
CORDES (transportation and consumer safety correspondent): And so McCain today gave a preview of his campaign playbook in an
Obama matchup.

McCAIN: You don't broadcast
and say that you're going to bomb a country without their permission or without
consulting them.

CORDES:
First, point out Obama's relative inexperience, especially in foreign policy.
Second, highlight Obama's record as the most liberal voter in the Senate.
Third, portray the first-term senator as just another politician, not a
sensation. 

Today, McCain accused Obama of backing away from a written pledge to
take public financing in the general election.

McCAIN: I'll keep my word. I
want him to keep his.

CORDES:
On Monday, Michelle Obama said she was feeling pride in her country for the
first time in her adult life. Cindy McCain responded
sharply.

From the February 24 edition of the CBS Evening News with Russ Mitchell:





RUSS
MITCHELL (anchor): One more political note now. The Democratic Party says it
will file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission tomorrow against
John McCain. The complaint will challenge McCain's attempt to withdraw
from the public campaign financing system.

There
is more disturbing news this Sunday for homeowners.

From the June 19 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:






RUSS
MITCHELL (guest anchor): Now, let's take a look at the presidential race.
Barack Obama abandoned a campaign pledge today when he announced he will forgo
federal funding, worth some $84 million. He figures he can raise a lot more on
his own. In doing that, he'll become the first major candidate to turn down
public money since the program was set up in the mid-'70s. Here's Dean
Reynolds.

[begin
video clip] 









REYNOLDS:
Given Obama's fundraising prowess, forgoing federal money was not a big
surprise, nor was the attempt to make it seem in line with the change he
advocates.

OBAMA:
I'm asking you to try to do something that's never been done before: declare
our independence from a broken system and run the type of campaign that
reflects the grassroot values that have already changed our politics and
brought us this far.

REYNOLDS:
But it is a big reversal. Only months ago, Obama was signaling a willingness to
preserve public financing. No wonder John McCain smelled a flip-flop.

McCAIN:
This is a big deal. It's a big
deal. He has completely reversed himself and gone back not on his word to me,
but the commitment that he made to the American people. That's disturbing.

REYNOLDS:
And yet Obama's camp believes the $84 million that public financing offers can
be easily surpassed by its computerized network of 1.5 million donors. From
January 2007 to April of this year, Obama raised $266 million to McCain's $93
million. For Obama, raising at least 100 million more is probably doable.

KENNETH
VOGEL (Politico
reporter): In which he'll be able to spend money and compete in all 50 states,
even those that have not traditionally favored Democrats.

REYNOLDS:
Obama indicated he's opting out of the system to have enough money to fight the
unlimited spending and what he called the smears from unregulated
Republican-allied organizations, such as the Swift Boat group which attacked John
Kerry in 2004.

OBAMA:
And we face opponents who've become masters at gaming this broken system.

REYNOLDS:
But McCain, on a campaign swing through flood-ravaged Iowa, said Obama's new position should make
people think twice.

McCAIN:
This election is about a lot of things, but it's also about trust, and it's
also whether you can take people's word. 









































[end
video clip]





REYNOLDS:
Senator McCain said late today that he will accept public financing and live
within its limits, though in a year that has become very difficult for
Republican fundraising, it's doubtful that he himself could have drummed up
much more money than what the public system is offering him. Russ.

MITCHELL:
Dean Reynolds in Chicago,
thanks. 

From the June 25
edition of the CBS
Evening News with Katie Couric:





KATIE
COURIC (CBS anchor): Well, both candidates were pretty vocal about the Supreme
Court decision, both decrying the fact that child rapists could not get the
death penalty. But with Barack Obama, you think there's a pattern emerging
here.

JEFF
GREENFIELD (CBS senior political correspondent): I do. And it's, I think, a
relentless march to the center. He's determined not to be defined as [1988
Democratic presidential nominee Michael] Dukakis was and as John Kerry was, as
outside the mainstream. His compromise on how you can wiretap foreign nationals
with the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] compromise, I think, was
one example. He's saying maybe his anti-free trade rhetoric was a little
overblown. And by abandoning public financing, which he
pledged to, he's saying, if I got more money than the other guy, I'm going to
use it. I want to win.

COURIC:
All right. Jeff Greenfield. Jeff, thanks so much. And we'll be right back. 

From the February 22 edition of
ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:





CHARLES
GIBSON (anchor): But what actually may be more of a problem for McCain is the
fact that his -- that his campaign has money troubles.

STEPHANOPOULOS:
It does. And they received a letter from the chairman of the Federal Election
Commission saying that he believes that John McCain has to stay in the public
financing system. Here's the import of that. If he stays in, he's limited to
spending $54 million between now and September. He's already spent $49 million.
That would leave him only $5 million for the next five or six months. The
Democratic nominee is likely to have 10 times that. 

At
issue is whether he used -- John McCain used those public funds as collateral
when he got a loan earlier this year for his campaign. The McCain campaign disputes that. They say they're going to be able to
answer this ruling. They're confident they're going to be able to go on. But
this letter from the FEC chairman does put that into question.

GIBSON:
All right. George Stephanopoulos reporting.

From the February 23 edition of
ABC's World News Saturday: 





MARLANTES:
One of McCain's greatest assets is his reputation as a
crusader for ethics reform. If new details continue to emerge about his
dealings with lobbyists, that reputation could be jeopardized.

[begin
video clip]

MARLANTES:
This week, he took another hit on that front after he received a letter from
the Federal Election Commission saying he may not be allowed to withdraw from
the public financing system, and then said he would do so anyway.

CLYDE
WILCOX (Georgetown
 University government
professor): He's a campaign finance reformer, but he finds himself in the
position possibly competing against a man who's raising money at a record
pace.

MARLANTES:
The move may be necessary for McCain's political
viability. But it could cost him the moral high ground.

* Search terms = SHOW(World News) or
SHOW(Evening News) or SHOW(Nightly News) and McCain and (Federal Election or
loan or Mason or FEC or fidelity or lend! or lent or borrow or matching or
public fund! or public financ! or public money) and date geq (11/1/2007). For
transcripts not in Nexis (the February 24 CBS
Evening News), the following search was used in Factiva: (free text
= "McCain and (Federal Election or loan or FEC or fidelity or lend! or
lent or borrow or matching or public fund! or public financ! or public
money)"; date range = 11/1/2007 - 11/1/2008; source = "NBC
News: Nightly News Or CBS News: Evening News Or CBS News: Evening News - Sunday
Or CBS News: Evening News - Saturday") 

</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/what-you-ve-been-missing-nbc-cbs-nightly-news-shows-20080637936.htm</id>
<issued>2008-06-26T18:06:02Z</issued>
<modified>2008-06-26T18:06:02Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806260001</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/what-you-ve-been-missing-nbc-cbs-nightly-news-shows-20080637936.htm"><b>What you've been missing: NBC, CBS nightly news shows fail to report on McCain's campaign loan    </b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/what-you-ve-been-missing-nbc-cbs-nightly-news-shows-20080637936.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - As Media
Matters for America noted, in a February 29 post on MSNBC.com's
First Read political blog, NBC News political director Chuck Todd, deputy
political director Mark Murray, and political researcher Domenico Montanaro
wrote: "We've noticed today the [Sen. John] McCain/FEC stories -- that
McCain very well might have to abide by spending limits before the GOP
convention -- are starting to roll in. But why is this only now starting to get
more traction, compared with all the stories about [Sen. Barack] Obama waffling
on his pledge to accept public funds in the general?" The post continued:
"For one thing, the McCain story is much more complicated; certainly the
Obama pledge hedge was an easier one to tell. But is this starting to become a
problem for McCain? At the very least, it makes it MUCH more difficult to
criticize Obama for waffling on public funds." But NBC's Nightly News and the CBS Evening News have yet to cover the
loan, although they have both repeatedly reported on Obama's decision not
to take public financing for the general election and McCain's earlier
attacks on Obama for not committing to public financing.

First Read's summation of the story
-- "that McCain very well might have to abide by spending limits before
the GOP convention" -- stems from a loan agreement the McCain campaign signed
during the primary season that could have forced him to remain in the race --
even if he had no chance of winning -- in order to be eligible for public
matching funds to repay the loan. In a February 19 letter, Federal Election Commission (FEC)
chairman David Mason took the position that McCain cannot legally opt
out of public financing for the primary season without FEC approval and, in the
same letter, asked the McCain campaign to expand upon its assertion that it had
not "pledged the certification of Matching Payment funds as security for
private financing," citing provisions of the loan agreement, the
associated security agreement, and a modification to those agreements. In the
letter, Mason cited a prior FEC advisory opinion stating that a candidate is
allowed to withdraw from the matching funds program so long as "the
candidate ... had not pledged the certification of Matching Payment Program funds
'as security for private financing.' " If McCain is not
allowed to withdraw from the public financing system and if he is found to have
knowingly raised and spent money beyond the public financing limits, his
actions "could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in
prison," according to The Washington Post.

Earlier, on August 28, 2007, the FEC announced: "John
McCain today became the first 2008 presidential candidate to be declared
eligible by the Federal Election Commission (FEC/Commission) to receive federal
matching funds" for the 2008 primary. As part of the packet McCain
submitted for eligibility, he wrote in an August 13, 2007, letter that he was
"a candidate seeking to become eligible to receive Presidential primary
matching funds."

Notwithstanding the question articulated
on First Read -- "why is this only now starting to get more
traction" -- according to a Media
Matters search* of the Nexis and Factiva news databases, NBC has not
covered the loan on Nightly News.
Nor has the CBS Evening News covered the loan.

By contrast, on the February 22 edition
of ABC's World News with Charles
Gibson, chief Washington
correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported:





[T]hey
received a letter from the chairman of the Federal Election Commission saying
that he believes that John McCain has to stay in the public financing system.
Here's the import of that. If he stays in, he's limited to spending $54 million
between now and September. He's already spent $49 million. That would leave him
only $5 million for the next five or six months. The Democratic nominee is
likely to have 10 times that.

At
issue is whether he used -- John McCain used those public funds as collateral
when he got a loan earlier this year for his campaign. The McCain campaign disputes that. They say they're going to be able to
answer this ruling. They're confident they're going to be able to go on. But
this letter from the FEC chairman does put that into question.

On the February 23 edition of ABC's
World News Saturday,
correspondent Liz Marlantes again reported on Mason's letter (although
she did not note the loan): "This week, he [McCain] took another hit on
that front after he received a letter from the Federal Election Commission
saying he may not be allowed to withdraw from the public financing system, and
then said he would do so anyway."

While ignoring the
issue of McCain's loan, NBC's Nightly News covered the issue of whether Obama
would take public financing and McCain's attacks over general-election public
financing on February 15, February 20, June 19, June 21, and June 22, and the CBS Evening News
covered Obama and general-election public financing on February 20, June 19,
and June 25.

The following is a chronology of events
surrounding the loan that Nightly News and
the CBS Evening News have yet to
report on in the context of the loan:

November
14, 2007

The McCain campaign took out a loan from
the Fidelity & Trust Bank in Bethesda,
 Maryland. Under the original loan agreement, if McCain were to
withdraw from the matching funds program before the end of 2007 and if he were
then to finish more than 10 percentage points behind the winner of the January
8 New Hampshire primary, McCain would have been required to "remain an
active political candidate," to reapply for matching funds, and to
"grant to Lender, as additional collateral for the loan, a first priority
perfected security interest in and to all of Borrower's right, title and
interest in and to the public matching fund program." In other words, the
agreement could have required McCain to remain in the race, regardless of
whether his candidacy was viable, in order to be eligible for matching funds to
pay back the loan.

From the John McCain 2008
Inc. Business Loan Agreement:





Additional
Requirement. Borrower and Lender agree that if Borrower withdraws from the
public matching fund program by the end of December 2007, but John McCain then
does not win the New Hampshire primary or place at least within 10 percentage
points of the winner of the New Hampshire Primary, Borrower will cause John
McCain to remain an active political candidate and Borrower will, within thirty
(30) days of the New Hampshire Primary (i) reapply for public matching funds,
(ii) grant to Lender, as additional collateral for the loan, a first priority
perfected security interest in and to all of Borrower's right, title and
interest in and to the public matching fund program, and (iii) execute and
deliver to Lender such documents, instruments and agreements as Lender may
require with respect to the foregoing.

[...]

COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION'S MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM. Borrower agrees
and covenants with Lender that while this Agreement is in effect, Borrower
shall not exceed overall or state spending limits set forth in the Federal
Matching Funds Program, if applicable. 

[...]

STATUS
OF CURRENTLY HELD CERTIFICATIONS OF MATCHING FUNDS. Borrower and Lender agree
that any certifications of matching fund eligibility currently possessed by
Borrower or obtained before January 1, 2008 and the right of John McCain 2008,
Inc. and John McCain to receive payment under these certifications are not collateral
under the Commercial Security Agreement for this Loan. 

[...]

DEFINITIONS.


[...]

Collateral. The word "Collateral" means all property and assets
granted as collateral security for a Loan. [...] It is expressly understood and
agreed that "collateral" specifically excludes any certifications
of matching fund eligibility currently possessed by Borrower or obtained before
January 1, 2008. 

From the loan's Commercial Security Agreement: 





COLLATERAL
DESCRIPTION. The word "Collateral" as used in this Agreement means
the following described property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
whether now existing or hereafter arising, and wherever located in which Grantor is giving to
Lender a security interest for the payment of the indedbtedness and performance
of all other obligations under the Note and this Agreement: 

[...]

Grantor and Lendor agree that any certifications of matching fund eligibility,
including related rights, currently possessed by Grantor or obtained before
January 1, 2008, are not themselves being pledged as security for the
indebtedness and are not themselves collateral for the indebtedness or subject
to this Security Agreement. Grantor agrees not to sell, transfer, convey,
pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer to any person or entity any of his
present or future right, title and interest in and to the public matching fund
program or any certifications of matching fund eligibility, including related
rights, issued with respect thereto without the prior written consent of
Lender.

December
17, 2007

The loan was modified but still included a
provision that could have required McCain under certain conditions to
"remain an active political candidate and ... reapply for public matching
funds" in order to be able to repay the loan. The loan agreement was modified as follows:





Without
limiting anything set forth in this Modification to the contrary, certain
provisions of the Loan Agreement are hereby modified as follows: 

(a) The
paragraph entitled "Additional Requirement" set forth in the
Affirmative Covenants section of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

"Additional Requirement. Borrower
and Lender agree that if Borrower withdraws from the public matching funds
program but John McCain then does not win the next primary or caucus in which
he is active (which can be any primary or caucus held the same day) or does not
place at least within 10 percentage points of the winner of that primary or
caucus, Borrower will cause John McCain to remain an active political candidate
and Borrower will, within thirty (30) days of said primary or caucus (i)
reapply for public matching funds, (ii) grant to Lender, as additional
collateral for the Loan, a first priority perfected security interest in and to
all of Borrower's right, title and interest in and to the public matching funds
program, and (iii) execute and deliver to Lender such documents, instruments
and agreements as Lender may require with respect to the foregoing. Borrower
and Lender agree that Borrower will provide oral or written notice to Lender at
least 24 hours before notice of withdrawal from the public matching funds
program is provided by Borrower or John McCain to the Federal Election
Commission." 

(b) The
paragraph entitled "COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION'S
MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM" set forth in the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

"COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION'S MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM. Borrower agrees
and covenants with Lender that while this Agreement is in effect, Borrower shall
not, without Lender's prior written consent, exceed overall or state spending
limits imposed under the Federal Matching Funds Program, irrespective of
whether Borrower is subject to such program as of any applicable date of
determination."

(c) The
paragraph entitled "STATUS OF CURRENTLY HELD CERTIFICATIONS OF MATCHING
FUNDS" set forth in the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

























"STATUS OF CURRENTLY HELD
CERTIFICATIONS OF MATCHING FUNDS. Borrower and
Lender agree that any certifications of matching funds eligibility now held by
Borrower, and the right of the Borrower and/or John McCain to receive payment
under such certifications, are not (and shall not be) collateral for the
Loan." [emphases in original]





(d) The
definition of "Collateral" set forth in the
"Definitions" section of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 





Collateral. The word
"Collateral" means all property and assets granted as collateral
security for the Loan. [...] It is expressly understood and agreed that,
"Collateral" specifically excludes any certification of matching
funds eligibility now held by Borrower and/or John McCain, and any right, title
and interest of Borrower and/or John McCain to receive payments
thereunder." 





[...]

(f) The
paragraph entitled "Collateral Description" set forth in the Security
Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in
lieu thereof:

"COLLATERAL DESCRIPTION. The word "Collateral" as used in this Agreement means
the following described property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
whether now existing or hereafter arising, and wherever located, in which
Grantor is giving to Lender a security interest for the payment of the
Indebtedness and performance of all other obligations under the Note and this
Agreement:

[...]

Grantor
and Lender agree that any certifications of matching funds eligibility,
including related rights, now held by Grantor are not themselves being pledged
as security for the Indebtedness and are not themselves collateral for the
Indebtedness or subject to this Security Agreement. Grantor agrees not to sell,
transfer, convey, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer to any person or
entity any of its present or future right, title and interest in and to the
public matching funds program or any certifications of matching funds
eligibility, including related rights, issued with respect thereto without the
prior written consent of Lender." 

December
20, 2007

The FEC announced it had
certified $5,812,197.35 of primary matching funds to McCain but noted that
"[b]ased on historical patterns, the FEC estimates that funds may not be
available to disburse before March 2008."

February
6, 2008

McCain wrote a letter to the FEC that said, "This
letter is to advise you that I, on behalf of myself and John McCain 2008, Inc.,
my principal campaign committee, am withdrawing from participation in the
federal primary-election funding program established by the Presidential
Primary Matching Payment Account Act. No funds have been paid to date by the
Department of the Treasury, and the certification of funds has not been pledged
as security for private financing."

On the June 19 edition of NBC's Nightly News, chief foreign correspondent
Andrea Mitchell said, "Obama's campaign ... charge[s] McCain himself
waffled on this, applying for public funds during the primaries, then
withdrawing from the public system during the nomination fight," but
Mitchell did not note the loan.

February
16, 2008

The Washington
Post reported that
"John McCain's cash-strapped campaign borrowed $1 million from a Bethesda
bank two weeks before the New Hampshire primary by pledging to enter the public
financing system if his bid for the presidency faltered, newly disclosed
records show."

The Post
reported the McCain campaign's response: 





McCain's
attorneys and the Fidelity & Trust president said the loan agreements were
carefully scrutinized in advance to make sure they would pass muster with
federal banking regulators and the FEC.

"We
stayed in a safe zone, and so did he," said Barry C. Watkins, the bank's
president. "We were being careful not to force either one of us into a
situation we didn't intend."

McCain's
campaign filed the modification to his initial $3 million loan on Dec. 17,
seeking an additional $1 million. The bank asked him to produce something more
than his campaign's assets as collateral.

"They
said, 'You've explained how you can afford to borrow more, and how you can pay
us back if things go well. What happens if things go badly?' " said Trevor
Potter, a McCain attorney.

The
campaign's response, Potter said, was that McCain could reapply in the future
for federal matching funds, and would agree to use the FEC certifications for
those funds as collateral.

Under
the agreement, McCain promised that if his campaign began to falter, he would
commit to keeping his campaign alive and to entering the federal financing
system so the money he had raised could be used to gain an infusion of matching
funds. Had that happened, he would have been forced to abide by strict federal
spending caps before the Republican National Convention in September.

Under
FEC rules, a candidate who uses a certification for federal funds as collateral
for a loan is obligated to remain within the public financing system. "We
very carefully did not do that," Potter said.

February
19, 2008

Mason replied to McCain's February 6 letter,
writing that the FEC previously "stated it would withdraw a
candidate's certification upon written request, thus agreeing to rescind
the contract, so long as a candidate ... had not pledged the certification of
Matching Payment Program funds 'as security for private financing.'
" Mason wrote that the McCain campaign said it had not "pledged the
certification of Matching Payment funds as security for private
financing" and added that "we invite you to expand on the rationale
for that conclusion, including but not limited to addressing" specific
provisions of the original loan agreement and security agreement, as well as
the modified loan agreement (which also amended the security agreement).

Mason also asserted that it required a
quorum of FEC commissioners to opt out: "Just as 2 U.S.C. § 437c(c)
required an affirmative vote of four Commissioners to make these
certifications, it requires an affirmative vote of four Commissioners to
withdraw them. Therefore, the Commission will consider your request at such
time as it has a quorum." 

A February 21 Associated Press article about Mason's letter reported,
"Complicating the dispute is the FEC's current lack of a quorum. The six-member commission has four vacancies and
Senate Democrats and Republicans are at loggerheads over how to fill them. ...
Without action by the Senate, McCain could be waiting
indefinitely." A June 19 Associated Press article noted that the FEC still did not
have "a quorum to act because four of its six seats have been vacant
pending Senate confirmation of presidential nominees."

The Senate confirmed five commissioners to the FEC
on June 24, including a successor to Mason, whose renomination President Bush withdrew on May 6.

February 22, 2008

A February 22 Washington Post article reporting on
Mason's letter stated that "[k]nowingly violating the spending limit is a
criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five
years in prison." The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act
provides in 26 U.S.C. § 9035 that
"[n]o candidate [participating in the public finance system] shall
knowingly incur qualified campaign expenses in excess of the expenditure
limitation applicable under section 320(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Election
Campaign Act of 1971." And 26 U.S.C. § 9042
states: "Any person who violates the provisions of section 9035 shall be
fined not more than $25,000, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. Any
officer or member of any political committee who knowingly consents to any
expenditure in violation of the provisions of section 9035 shall be fined not
more than $25,000, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."

An update to a February 22 blog post on Election Law Blog included a
McCain statement that read in part:





"Senator McCain notified the FEC and the United States Treasury of his
withdrawal from the system in a letter dated February 6th. The current dispute
is simply over whether the FEC has to take any action in response to the
withdrawal notice. It is clear to the campaign, as it is to a number of FEC
experts, that no FEC action is necessary in response to Senator McCain's notice
of withdrawal given the constitutional nature of the right. In our view, the
Senator's letter is all that is legally required to exit from the system. FEC
Chairman Mason, who does not represent the official view of the Commission due
to the current lack of a quorum, has written a letter to the campaign in which
he states his belief that the FEC must formally vote to accept the withdrawal.
In either case the result is the same: the campaign will be out of the public
funding system either because of the letter sent on February 6th, or because of
a future vote by the Commission acknowledging the letter.

"Nevertheless,
the campaign is fully responding to Chairman Mason's request for information
and is confident that the new commissioners, when appointed and confirmed, will
take whatever action they conclude is necessary to confirm Senator McCain's
withdrawal from the system as of February 6, 2008."

February
25, 2008

The Democratic National Committee (DNC)
filed a complaint with the FEC
asserting that McCain "pledged matching funds as collateral for a loan to
his campaign" and that "apart from the ability to obtain the loan,
the McCain Campaign has obtained a material, financial benefit from the
certification of eligibility for matching funds through the ability to avail
itself of the automatic right of access to the ballot, in some states."

On the February 24 edition of the CBS Evening News with Russ Mitchell,
anchor Russ Mitchell reported, "One more political note now. The
Democratic Party says it will file a complaint with the Federal Election
Commission tomorrow against John McCain. The complaint will challenge McCain's
attempt to withdraw from the public campaign financing system." But
Mitchell did not mention the loan or otherwise explain the details of the
complaint. 

March
23, 2008

The
Washington Post reported that
"McCain has officially broken the limits imposed by the presidential
public financing system, according to reports filed last week by the campaign.
McCain has spent $58.4 million on his primary effort. Those who have committed
to public financing can spend no more than $54 million on their primary
bid."

April
14, 2008

The DNC filed a lawsuit asking a
federal court act on its complaint that McCain has violated campaign finance
laws.

May 6,
2008

President Bush withdrew Mason's
nomination for reappointment to the FEC.

May 14,
2008

Citing a "120-day exclusivity
period," federal District Judge John D. Bates ordered the DNC's
complaint "dismissed without prejudice," meaning that while he
found that the DNC could not go forward with its lawsuit, he was not barring
the DNC from refiling the complaint. Bates wrote: 





The
FEC retains exclusive jurisdiction over initial complaints pursuant to FECA. See
In re Carter-Mondale, 642 F.2d at 542 ("[T]he exclusive
jurisdiction of the FEC extends to assure that the Commission's initial
investigation is completed, or the statutory time limit allowed for an
investigation has expired, before any judicial review is invoked."). The
relevant provisions governing judicial review are found in 2 U.S.C. §§ 437g(a)(8)(A)
- (C). Section 437g(a)(8)(A) provides:

Any
party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by
such party . . . or by a failure of the Commission to act on such complaint
during the 120-day period beginning on the date the complaint is filed, may
file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia.

June
17, 2008

The DNC announced that it would
refile its lawsuit asking a federal court act on its complaint against the
McCain campaign. 

June
24, 2008

As promised, the DNC refiled its lawsuit on June 24.

From the February 15 edition of
NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams: 





ANDREA
MITCHELL: And John McCain pressed Barack Obama over strategy
for a fall campaign. How much money would each man be able to spend if
they end up as opponents? Would they raise cash privately or rely on government
funds?

[begin
video clip]

MITCHELL:
A year ago, Obama and McCain each pledged to accept federal financing, $85
million for the general election, instead of raising private funds, where there
are no limits. But that was long before Obama started raising eye-popping sums.

McCAIN:
If Senator Obama goes back on his commitment to the American people, then
obviously we'd have to re-think our position.

OBAMA:
It would be presumptuous of me to start saying now that I'm locking myself into
something when I don't even know if the other side is going to agree to it.

MITCHELL:
Not just a tangle over money, but McCain is looking to question Obama's
credibility.

From the February 20 edition of Nightly News with Brian Williams:






KELLY
O'DONNELL (Capitol Hill correspondent): Before John McCain visited voters at an
Ohio dairy
farm today, he found a way to challenge Barack Obama's credibility with a very
familiar word.

OBAMA:
Something has to change.

O'DONNELL:
McCain played off that idea to accuse Obama of backing away from his pledge to
cap campaign spending by using only a set amount of taxpayer financing if he's
the nominee.

McCAIN:
I think the American people would expect him to hold to that commitment,
especially if we want to bring about change.

O'DONNELL:
McCain was riled by a piece Obama wrote for USA Today where Obama did not
say he would take the taxpayer financing, but suggested starting negotiations
to figure out a limit on private fundraising.

McCAIN:
And that's Washington
doublespeak. I committed to public financing. He committed to public financing.

O'DONNELL:
McCain turned to foreign policy and made a stinging judgment, saying Obama
doesn't grasp the fundamentals after Obama talked publicly about his
willingness as president to strike terror targets inside Pakistan
without telling that government.

From the June 19 edition of Nightly News with Brian Williams:






ANN
CURRY (guest anchor): Now to presidential politics. Barack Obama today became
the first candidate to opt out of accepting public financing for his general
election campaign. Public financing was put in place more than three decades
ago after the Watergate scandal, and Obama's decision created a firestorm
today. NBC's Andrea Mitchell now reports.





[begin
video clip] 





UNIDENTIFIED
REPORTER: McCain says you're breaking your pledge on public financing.

MITCHELL:
Barack Obama wasn't answering questions today.

UNIDENTIFIED
REPORTER: Why did you change your mind?

MITCHELL:
Instead, he announced his decision online.

OBAMA:
The public financing of presidential elections as it is exists today is broken,
and we face opponents who've become masters at gaming this broken system.

MITCHELL:
Now, instead of getting $85 million from the government to campaign next fall,
he can raise hundreds of millions online, overwhelming John McCain, who said
today he will stick to the limits for the general election. McCain in Iowa today.

McCAIN:
He has completely reversed himself and gone back not on his word to me, but the
commitment that he made to the American people. That's disturbing.

MITCHELL:
In fact, Obama did promise to observe the limits if his opponent did, checking
yes on this questionnaire last November. In February, Tim Russert pressed him
on whether he'd keep that pledge.

TIM
RUSSERT (debate moderator): So you may opt out of public financing. You may
break your word?

OBAMA:
What I've said is at the point where I'm the nominee, at the point where it's
appropriate, I will sit down with John McCain and make sure that we have a
system that works for everybody.

MITCHELL:
Obama is already swamping McCain $225 million to $77 million. Only today, Obama
launched a new ad in 18 states, including Republican strongholds.

OBAMA:
I approved this message because I'll never forget those values. 

MITCHELL:
Obama's campaign says that's to counter McCain, who wrapped up his nomination
months ago. And they charge McCain himself waffled on this, applying for public
funds during the primaries, then withdrawing from the public system during the
nomination fight. All this will likely end a campaign finance system McCain
once fought to save, as the Internet enables any candidate, not just the rich,
to spend unlimited dollars if they can inspire a large following online.

Andrea
Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

From the June 21 edition of NBC's Nightly News with Lester Holt: 





LEE
COWAN (NBC News correspondent): McCain's camp fired
back that Obama -- who had his own photo op in the flood zone recently -- also
voted against legislation the McCain camp claims might
have saved the levees, too. It was the latest back-and-forth in a race Obama
predicts is going to get even nastier. At a Friday fundraiser, Obama told
donors the Republicans will use his race, even his wife, to stoke fear.

OBAMA:
They're going to try to make you afraid of me. "Because he's young and
inexperienced and he's got a funny name. Did I mention he's black? He's got a
feisty wife."

COWAN:
Being able to fight those kind of attacks is the rationale he used to opt out
of public financing, counting on his private
fundraising prowess to make up the difference.

So far,
Obama has been able to beat John McCain to the
financial punch by a more than two-to-one margin. But in financial reports
filed late Friday, for the first time, John McCain has
been able to match Barack Obama almost dollar for dollar. McCain
raised $21.5 million in May. That's just shy of the $21.9 million Barack Obama
hauled in. But that parity may not last all that long. Most predict Obama will
get a huge fundraising bump when the numbers come in from this month,
reflecting donors' attitudes after Hillary Clinton conceded. 

From the June 22 edition of NBC's Nightly News with Lester Holt: 





KEVIN
CORKE (NBC News correspondent): First, Obama hopes to blanket the airwaves with
TV ads, reintroducing himself to the American people, part of a 50-state
strategy the Democrats hope will force Republicans to fork out big dollars in
places they hadn't planned to.

JOHN
HARWOOD (CNBC chief Washington
correspondent): He forces John McCain to defend that turf
and spend money that John McCain doesn't have as much
of that Barack Obama does.

CORKE:
Free of spending limits, the Obama campaign thinks it can raise in excess of
$300 million this fall. By comparison, by accepting public
financing, the McCain campaign is limited to a budget of just $84
million. Another Obama strategy, equate a McCain
presidency with a third Bush term.

OBAMA:
This year's Republican primary was a contest to see which candidate could
out-Bush the other, and that's the contest that John McCain
won.

CORKE:
Bush and McCain share similar positions on the war,
immigration, and offshore oil exploration, something the Obama camp hopes to
exploit. 

From the February 20 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:





NANCY
CORDES (transportation and consumer safety correspondent): And so McCain today gave a preview of his campaign playbook in an
Obama matchup.

McCAIN: You don't broadcast
and say that you're going to bomb a country without their permission or without
consulting them.

CORDES:
First, point out Obama's relative inexperience, especially in foreign policy.
Second, highlight Obama's record as the most liberal voter in the Senate.
Third, portray the first-term senator as just another politician, not a
sensation. 

Today, McCain accused Obama of backing away from a written pledge to
take public financing in the general election.

McCAIN: I'll keep my word. I
want him to keep his.

CORDES:
On Monday, Michelle Obama said she was feeling pride in her country for the
first time in her adult life. Cindy McCain responded
sharply.

From the February 24 edition of the CBS Evening News with Russ Mitchell:





RUSS
MITCHELL (anchor): One more political note now. The Democratic Party says it
will file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission tomorrow against
John McCain. The complaint will challenge McCain's attempt to withdraw
from the public campaign financing system.

There
is more disturbing news this Sunday for homeowners.

From the June 19 edition of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:






RUSS
MITCHELL (guest anchor): Now, let's take a look at the presidential race.
Barack Obama abandoned a campaign pledge today when he announced he will forgo
federal funding, worth some $84 million. He figures he can raise a lot more on
his own. In doing that, he'll become the first major candidate to turn down
public money since the program was set up in the mid-'70s. Here's Dean
Reynolds.

[begin
video clip] 









REYNOLDS:
Given Obama's fundraising prowess, forgoing federal money was not a big
surprise, nor was the attempt to make it seem in line with the change he
advocates.

OBAMA:
I'm asking you to try to do something that's never been done before: declare
our independence from a broken system and run the type of campaign that
reflects the grassroot values that have already changed our politics and
brought us this far.

REYNOLDS:
But it is a big reversal. Only months ago, Obama was signaling a willingness to
preserve public financing. No wonder John McCain smelled a flip-flop.

McCAIN:
This is a big deal. It's a big
deal. He has completely reversed himself and gone back not on his word to me,
but the commitment that he made to the American people. That's disturbing.

REYNOLDS:
And yet Obama's camp believes the $84 million that public financing offers can
be easily surpassed by its computerized network of 1.5 million donors. From
January 2007 to April of this year, Obama raised $266 million to McCain's $93
million. For Obama, raising at least 100 million more is probably doable.

KENNETH
VOGEL (Politico
reporter): In which he'll be able to spend money and compete in all 50 states,
even those that have not traditionally favored Democrats.

REYNOLDS:
Obama indicated he's opting out of the system to have enough money to fight the
unlimited spending and what he called the smears from unregulated
Republican-allied organizations, such as the Swift Boat group which attacked John
Kerry in 2004.

OBAMA:
And we face opponents who've become masters at gaming this broken system.

REYNOLDS:
But McCain, on a campaign swing through flood-ravaged Iowa, said Obama's new position should make
people think twice.

McCAIN:
This election is about a lot of things, but it's also about trust, and it's
also whether you can take people's word. 









































[end
video clip]





REYNOLDS:
Senator McCain said late today that he will accept public financing and live
within its limits, though in a year that has become very difficult for
Republican fundraising, it's doubtful that he himself could have drummed up
much more money than what the public system is offering him. Russ.

MITCHELL:
Dean Reynolds in Chicago,
thanks. 

From the June 25
edition of the CBS
Evening News with Katie Couric:





KATIE
COURIC (CBS anchor): Well, both candidates were pretty vocal about the Supreme
Court decision, both decrying the fact that child rapists could not get the
death penalty. But with Barack Obama, you think there's a pattern emerging
here.

JEFF
GREENFIELD (CBS senior political correspondent): I do. And it's, I think, a
relentless march to the center. He's determined not to be defined as [1988
Democratic presidential nominee Michael] Dukakis was and as John Kerry was, as
outside the mainstream. His compromise on how you can wiretap foreign nationals
with the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] compromise, I think, was
one example. He's saying maybe his anti-free trade rhetoric was a little
overblown. And by abandoning public financing, which he
pledged to, he's saying, if I got more money than the other guy, I'm going to
use it. I want to win.

COURIC:
All right. Jeff Greenfield. Jeff, thanks so much. And we'll be right back. 

From the February 22 edition of
ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:





CHARLES
GIBSON (anchor): But what actually may be more of a problem for McCain is the
fact that his -- that his campaign has money troubles.

STEPHANOPOULOS:
It does. And they received a letter from the chairman of the Federal Election
Commission saying that he believes that John McCain has to stay in the public
financing system. Here's the import of that. If he stays in, he's limited to
spending $54 million between now and September. He's already spent $49 million.
That would leave him only $5 million for the next five or six months. The
Democratic nominee is likely to have 10 times that. 

At
issue is whether he used -- John McCain used those public funds as collateral
when he got a loan earlier this year for his campaign. The McCain campaign disputes that. They say they're going to be able to
answer this ruling. They're confident they're going to be able to go on. But
this letter from the FEC chairman does put that into question.

GIBSON:
All right. George Stephanopoulos reporting.

From the February 23 edition of
ABC's World News Saturday: 





MARLANTES:
One of McCain's greatest assets is his reputation as a
crusader for ethics reform. If new details continue to emerge about his
dealings with lobbyists, that reputation could be jeopardized.

[begin
video clip]

MARLANTES:
This week, he took another hit on that front after he received a letter from
the Federal Election Commission saying he may not be allowed to withdraw from
the public financing system, and then said he would do so anyway.

CLYDE
WILCOX (Georgetown
 University government
professor): He's a campaign finance reformer, but he finds himself in the
position possibly competing against a man who's raising money at a record
pace.

MARLANTES:
The move may be necessary for McCain's political
viability. But it could cost him the moral high ground.

* Search terms = SHOW(World News) or
SHOW(Evening News) or SHOW(Nightly News) and McCain and (Federal Election or
loan or Mason or FEC or fidelity or lend! or lent or borrow or matching or
public fund! or public financ! or public money) and date geq (11/1/2007). For
transcripts not in Nexis (the February 24 CBS
Evening News), the following search was used in Factiva: (free text
= "McCain and (Federal Election or loan or FEC or fidelity or lend! or
lent or borrow or matching or public fund! or public financ! or public
money)"; date range = 11/1/2007 - 11/1/2008; source = "NBC
News: Nightly News Or CBS News: Evening News Or CBS News: Evening News - Sunday
Or CBS News: Evening News - Saturday") 

<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - What you&#39;ve been missing: NBC, CBS nightly news shows fail to report on McCain&#39;s campaign loan     {...} NBC&#39;s Nightly News and the CBS Evening News have yet to cover Sen. John McCain&#39;s campaign loan, despite a February 29 post on the MSNBC.com blog First Read that stated: "We&#39;ve noticed today the [Sen. John] McCain/FEC stories -- that McCain very well might have to abide by spending limits before the GOP convention -- are starting to roll in. But why is this only now starting to get more traction, compared with all the stories about [Sen. Barack] Obama waffling on his pledge to accept public funds in the general?"   {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> June 26, 2008, 6:06 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> June 27, 2008, 10:08 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;64KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - "Media Matters"; by Jamison Foser</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-matters-by-jamison-foser-20080637015.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">If MSNBC is really "leaning
left," why does Chris Matthews keep saying African-Americans aren't "regular
people"?

The past several months have brought a congealing
conventional wisdom among many reporters and pundits that MSNBC is lurching to
the left. It is perhaps
unsurprising that this story line
would emerge. It is,
however, nonsense.

Why is the story line
unsurprising? Quite
simply, several of its most prominent advocates have a clear interest in MSNBC
being seen as liberal.

Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, for example, attacks
MSNBC (and its older sibling, NBC) for purported liberal bias. But O'Reilly is anything but a
disinterested observer. Fox
has always justified its right-wing agenda by claiming it is a necessary
counterbalance to the "liberal media." With more and more Americans realizing how
thoroughly the media are
in the tank for John McCain, Fox's entire rationale for existing, always
dubious at best, is in danger of vanishing altogether. On top of which, O'Reilly and
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann seem to legitimately despise each other and to
delight in their mutual disdain. Finally,
the MSNBC-Fox feud goes beyond the rival anchors: Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes
reportedly
called NBC chief executive Jeff Zucker last year and threatened that if
Olbermann kept criticizing Fox, Ailes would turn O'Reilly loose on MSNBC -- and that the New York Post, Fox's tabloid
sibling, would join in the fight.

Then there is Howard Kurtz, who writes about the media for The
Washington Post and is widely considered
the most influential media analyst in the country. Last week, Kurtz wrote a 1,300-word article
about MSNBC headlined "MSNBC,
Leaning Left And Getting Flak From Both Sides."

Oddly, though, Kurtz didn't actually present criticism
of MSNBC from "both sides" of the debate over whether the cable
channel is "leaning left."
Kurtz detailed claims from John McCain's campaign that
MSNBC is "an organ of the Democratic National
Committee" and is "a partisan advocacy organization that exists for
the purpose of attacking John McCain." And Kurtz included criticism from supporters
of Hillary Clinton that the cable channel has favored Barack Obama. But Kurtz didn't so
much as hint at any concern by anyone that MSNBC routinely traffics in
conservative misinformation and effusively praises John McCain. No, the "both
sides" Kurtz presented were conservatives who see MSNBC as
anti-Republican and Democrats who see MSNBC as pro-Obama. That's Fox-style "balance"
(in which the cable channel features Republicans who criticize Democrats and Democrats who criticize Democrats) in
the pages of The
Washington Post.

Kurtz's transparently skewed assessment of MSNBC
makes it impossible to avoid wondering whether Kurtz's relationship with CNN got in the way of his
judgment. Kurtz hosts a
weekly television show on CNN --
an obvious conflict of interest that Kurtz did not disclose in his MSNBC
article. To borrow an
analogy first made by Charles
Kaiser, this is like The Washington Post allowing a business
reporter to write an article critical of Ford while working on the side for
General Motors --
without disclosing the financial relationship with GM.

Just this week, TVNewser quoted
a "high level source inside MSNBC" referring to the cable channel
as "the in-house network of Barack Obama." In relating the comments, TVNewser reported that "MSNBC has drawn
criticism from pundits from both parties, other journalists and the White
House, for the perceived, and often obvious, leftward shift of their lead
political anchors Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann."

But this increasing chatter about MSNBC's
"leftward shift" overlooks countless examples of the cable channel
spreading conservative misinformation, a small sampling of which follows. (Note: According to the Associated
Press, "The network has emphasized that MSNBC and NBC News are
synonymous." Good
enough for me. The examples
below involve NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC reporters, though the overwhelming majority
occurred on MSNBC, not on the sibling channels.)

One of the defining characteristics of MSNBC's
political coverage is mockery and ridicule of progressives. Hillary Clinton was the target of a great
deal of this, but so were Al Gore (as Bob Somerby has
extensively documented) and John Kerry and Bill Clinton and others. And Barack Obama has
received such treatment from MSNBC personalities in the past and will only face
more now that he is the presumptive Democratic nominee. 

Don't believe me? Almost immediately after Obama went over the
top in the delegate count Tuesday night, Matthews began attacking him. Matthews went on an extended
rant about Obama's purported inability to connect with "most
Americans," because, according
to Matthews, Obama has been poor, and he has been rich, but he has not been
in the middle.

Later, after guest Harold Ford pointed to the fact that
Barack and Michelle Obama were still paying off college loans just a few years
ago as evidence that Obama is familiar with the economic concerns of
middle-class America, Matthews' colleague Keith Olbermann retorted:
"[T]here are
people who are saying, ' "Still
owe money on my student loans?"; we were so poor, we dreamed of having
student loans.' "

So, according to Matthews, Obama's problem is that,
having been poor and wealthy, he cannot relate to the middle class. And according to Olbermann,
Obama's familiarity with middle-class concerns alienates him from the
poor. According to
MSNBC's election-night anchor duo, Obama has been too rich, too poor, and
too middle class to relate to voters.

Given how frequently he invokes what he describes as
Obama's inability to connect with "regular people," one can
only assume Matthews must give the topic great consideration while lounging at
the pool of his multimillion dollar Nantucket
vacation home.

Matthews' election-night portrayal of Obama as out of touch with "most Americans" was
striking in its intensity, but it was not a new theme. MSNBC personnel, particularly Matthews, have
been trying out this anti-Obama theme for months. Matthews has attacked Obama for shooting pool ("[I]t's not what most people
play. People with money play pool these days.") and obsessed over what he claims is Obama's
inability to connect with "regular people" in "a dinette." And Matthews and David Shuster mocked Obama for
the grievous sin of ordering orange juice in a diner.

Matthews has said of Obama,
"[T]his gets very ethnic, but the fact that he's good at basketball
doesn't surprise anybody, but the fact that he's that terrible at bowling does
make you wonder." On
another occasion, Matthews suggested
that Obama's lack of bowling prowess "tells you something about the
Democratic Party." Matthews
has contrasted
"regular people" with "people who come from the
African-American community." He
has suggested Obama
should pick a Jewish running mate because he "need[s] some ethnic
balance." Matthews
has said Obama
"seems a little foreign" and that he and Jeremiah Wright are
"different faces of the same guy." And he has criticized other people,
including comedian Jon Stewart, for using Barack Obama's middle name -- despite the fact that
Chris Matthews was the first person to
invoke Obama's middle name in a political context
in any news report available on Nexis.

Cara
at the blog Feministe has much more on Chris Matthews' troubling
commentary about Barack Obama.

But Matthews isn't alone among MSNBC employees when it
comes to insulting Obama.

Joe Scarborough has described Obama's
bowling as "dainty" and suggested Obama is "prissy" and
not a "real man." He
criticized Obama for
saying that he doesn't share all of his grandmother's beliefs -- less than a week after Scarborough himself had said the same thing about his own
parents. Tucker Carlson
accuses Michelle Obama of having
"a chip on her shoulder."

MSNBC personnel like Scarborough and Pat Buchanan routinely
refer to Obama as the most liberal member of the Senate, apparently relying on
a deeply flawed National Journal
ranking based on only a portion of votes cast during only one year. (A less subjective
survey placed
Obama in a tie for the
ranking of 10th most liberal member of the Senate -- and McCain as the eighth
most conservative. For
some reason, MSNBC doesn't ever get around to telling viewers that McCain
is closer to being the most conservative senator than Obama is to being the
most liberal.)

MSNBC military analyst Jack Jacobs asserted that
"Obama doesn't know what he's talking about" -- and, to support his
assertion, misquoted Obama. That was just one of many times MSNBC reporters have distorted Barack Obama's record.

Howard Kurtz didn't mention any of that (or any other
negative portrayals of Obama) in his article -- though he did quote McCain strategist Steve
Schmidt describing MSNBC as "an organ of the
Democratic National Committee."

Kurtz also quoted Schmidt calling MSNBC "a partisan advocacy organization that exists for the purpose of
attacking John McCain."

In fact, MSNBC reporters have at times seemed like they were
auditioning for a job in McCain's communications shop.

Again
and again, MSNBC anchors and reporters have portrayed McCain as independent by pointing to his differences with his party on taxes, immigration, and other issues -- without noting that McCain has changed positions on those issues in order to align himself with the Republican Party. Other times, they have directly, and falsely,
claimed that McCain has "stood his ground" on those purported
departures from party orthodoxy. And
they have adopted
McCain's false explanations for his shifting views. And they have described statements that
McCain has shifted positions on taxes, and on his own reasons for his
positions, as "claim[s]" rather than clear facts.

John Harwood, among other NBC reporters, has
called McCain a "Maverick" over and over and over. Even
while acknowledging that McCain had a "phase in 2007 when he was getting
a lot of flak for sort of flip-flopping and trying to court the right,"
Harwood declares that McCain's
"maverick brand is intact." In contrast to the cable channel's treatment of
Barack Obama, MSNBC's Mike Barnicle praises
McCain as someone who "absolutely comes off as" an "Irish
Catholic working-class hero."

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski once suggested McCain is "the perfect candidate"
(forgetting to mention that her brother advises McCain). Brzezinski's comment recalls Chris
Matthews' frequent assertions that McCain "deserves to be president." Not to mention
Matthews' statement to McCain that "you're in my heart"
and "you show a lot of courage out there." Matthews has also said
having to report on problems in McCain's campaign is "the worst
part of my job"; described
McCain as "a firm man";
compared
McCain to Martin Luther;
admitted,
"The press loves
McCain. We're his
base"; admitted
he was rooting for "a McCain-Giuliani ticket"; and asserted
that "a lot of people ... like the cut of John McCain's jib."

In a promo for a McCain documentary, MSNBC declared that the Arizona senator has "mastered
the art of straight talk," which raises a few questions: If he has
"mastered" the "art," is it really "straight
talk"? Did McCain
have to practice telling the truth? MSNBC
doesn't seem to care --
they just love repeating the McCain campaign's talking points.

In April, Matthews wondered why people "still
think" McCain is "a straight-talk maverick when he's been in league
with the president." Two
days later, Matthews interviewed McCain ... and told him "you've
been a maverick and a lot of people like you because of that." During the same interview,
Matthews said
"[W]e've had enough softball, Senator. ... Is Barack Obama an
elitist?"

Matthews asserts that McCain's strength is his "integrity." (Matthews has also
described McCain as someone who has "always been honest"
and who displays "candor"
and engages in "straight talk," despite
McCain's numerous false
assertions and inconsistencies.)

David Gregory flatly stated that McCain
"is not going to pander to the right," despite the fact that McCain
already had, again and again. MSNBC
reporters have downplayed
the extent to which McCain actively sought the endorsement of the controversial
Rev. John Hagee. And
Joe Scarborough has claimed
McCain "has never attached himself to these people on the far right that
say if you're gay, you're going to hell, et cetera" -- despite McCain's embrace of John
Hagee and Rod Parsley, and his attempts to cozy up to Jerry Falwell -- who McCain once branded an
"agent of intolerance" --
last year.

Kelly O'Donnell uncritically reported the
McCain campaign's claims that they were surprised by controversial
comments made by a talk-show host who introduced McCain at a rally -- despite the fact that the
host has a long history of making exactly the same inflammatory comments.

Chuck Todd calls McCain a
"moderate" --
a label even John McCain does not apply to John McCain. Mike Barnicle similarly claimed McCain
is "in the middle." In
fact, McCain consistently ranks among the 10 most conservative members of the Senate.

MSNBC repeatedly
gave free air time to a McCain ad that attacked Hillary Clinton over her
support for an earmark --
and MSNBC didn't
tell viewers that McCain hadn't bothered to show up for the vote. And the cable channel repeatedly aired right-wing
advertisements attacking Barack Obama while crediting John McCain for
taking a "very strong" stand against the ads -- but without noting that McCain
didn't actually do anything to stop them. 

During the GOP primaries, David Gregory spread McCain's
false claim that Mitt Romney had "disparage[d] the service and courage"
of World War II veteran Bob Dole. That was not only a false
claim by McCain, it was one that was premised on the notion that any criticism
of a veteran constitutes criticism of the veteran's military service -- not a standard McCain has
applied to veterans like John Kerry, but one that would be advantageous to
McCain were it to take hold now. Naturally, MSNBC
went along with it. 

On another occasion, MSNBC gave free air time to a McCain ad
that accused Romney of "chang[ing] positions like the wind" on his
support for "the Bush tax cuts." Incredibly, MSNBC did not
note that McCain himself flip-flopped on the Bush tax cuts. 

David Shuster asserted that McCain may
be able to "tarnish the image of Obama's political purity" by
criticizing Obama for opting out of the public financing system for the general
election -- but Shuster
somehow forgot to mention that McCain's own "image of ... political
purity" might be tarnished by the possibility that McCain is breaking campaign
finance law on a daily basis.

MSNBC anchors and reporters have sat quietly by as McCain
supporters falsely claimed that McCain called for Don Rumsfeld's resignation. Norah O'Donnell went
further, asserting it herself. When
she corrected the record
the next day, she didn't mention the fact that McCain himself has
dishonestly claimed to have called for Rumsfeld's resignation.

David Shuster uncritically repeated
McCain's spin that he "flew coach" during the 2007 portion of
his presidential campaign --
ignoring the fact that McCain's campaign expenditure reports show he used
his wife's corporate jet.

When John McCain repeatedly confused Sunni and Shiite
Muslims, Joe Scarborough leapt
to his defense, saying that
"99 percent of Americans wouldn't know." (Scarborough did not offer an estimate of the
number of Americans who think it is OK
if the president of the
United States doesn't
know any more about Iraq
than they do.)

Mika Brzezinski suggested, and allowed a
McCain surrogate to directly state, that McCain only once admitted a lack of
economic knowledge. In
fact, McCain has repeatedly admitted he doesn't know much about
economics. And Chris
Matthews has praised Sen. John McCain's "candor" and
"honest[y]" for, in Matthews' words, "admitting that his strong
suit is not the economy" --
while ignoring the
fact that McCain had recently, and falsely, denied making such concessions.

Scarborough praised a
McCain ad, saying it would "probably work" -- but didn't bother to note
that its central claim was false. Two
separate MSNBC anchors claimed
that McCain's proposed gas tax "holiday" would cut gas prices
by 20 percent. Actually,
it would be 5 percent at most. (MSNBC later "apologize[d]
for the confusion.")

Contessa Brewer described a McCain speech
about the housing crisis as "specific and detailed on what the economy
needs." In fact, the
speech was so short on details, National
Journal reporter Adam Aigner-Treworgy responded that McCain
"didn't necessarily roll out any new economic policy today. Much of
what he said, he has said before,"
adding, "I don't
know necessarily whether it showed that he had a really strong grasp on all the
details of a possible solution."

Mika Brzezinski has cherry-picked polling to
claim "McCain's crossover appeal is apparently even greater than" Obama's
-- even though two
polls more recent than the one she cited showed precisely the opposite.

When news broke that John McCain sent a letter to the FCC on
behalf of Paxson Communications, a
company with which McCain had close ties and whose employees had contributed to
McCain's campaign, Contessa Brewer asked "is it unusual if you get
a letter from a constituent or a lobbyist on a matter, and you're concerned
about it, that you would move on it?" A.B. Stoddard, associate editor of The Hill and a regular MSNBC guest,
answered that it is not unusual. Neither mentioned that,
in fact, Paxson is not a "constituent" of McCain's -- the company was based in
Florida, not Arizona --
or that then-FCC chairman William E. Kennard expressed concern about McCain's
letter, calling it "highly unusual." Downplaying McCain's letter was a
pattern on MSNBC: Pat Buchanan said it was "in the
normal course of business of a congressman."

And, unable to argue with a straight face that the media have not been kind to McCain,
MSNBC personnel have instead justified the
media's failure to scrutinize McCain.

Howard Kurtz, though, forgot to include a single example of
MSNBC treating McCain favorably in his assessment of the channel's
purported leftward tilt.

I've written a great deal about
MSNBC's sexist and misogynist treatment of Hillary Clinton and numerous
other women --
progressives, conservatives, and journalists among them. And about the appalling
performance of Tim Russert and Brian Williams during last October's
Democratic debate in Philadelphia. (And about Russert in general.) 

Time and space prevent a full recitation of the evidence of
misogyny at MSNBC, much
of which can be found at the links above. It is worth mentioning, however, that even after David Shuster was suspended for saying Chelsea Clinton was being "pimped out" by the Clinton campaign, and even after Chris Matthews was forced to apologize for one of his many offensive comments about women, the boys at MSNBC -- and that is what they act
like: a collection of 13-year-old boys with below-average wit -- still haven't learned to behave. 

David Shuster and Tucker Carlson drove that point home in
late April as they mocked Clinton's
laughter during a segment
in which Shuster gave Carlson a pen shaped like Hillary Clinton's head,
with a mouth that moves as the pen makes a laughing noise. Thanking Shuster, Carlson said: "I'm
really going to miss that cackle." Somehow, Shuster and Carlson managed to stop
short of accusing Clinton
of having cooties.

Pat Buchanan reinforced the point when he responded to criticism of
his mockery of Clinton's
voice by (incorrectly) quoting Samuel Johnson: "To see a woman speaking
is to watch a dog walking on its hind legs. ... [Y]ou're surprised not to see it done -- not that it's not
done well, but to see it done at all."

Classy guy, that
Pat Buchanan.

But the questionable commentary on MSNBC is certainly not
limited to sexist remarks --
not on the cable channel that brought you Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, and Don
Imus.

On Morning Joe
recently, co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski declared themselves
"sick[ened]"
by the story of a pregnant transgender man:





Scarborough
said, "I'm not going to look at this," and Brzezinski said: "I'm
going to be sick. I am going to be sick." Scarborough
also asked, "What are you doing to me?" ... Later Scarborough
said: "Please, let's move on. I really do feel sick."


In February, MSNBC's Buchanan bravely spoke up on
behalf of white males, whom
he defended as "the only guys signing the Constitution, the Declaration
of Independence" (one assumes that there were quite a few women and black
people in America who would have been happy to sign a Declaration of
Independence, if only the white males had let them). Buchanan went on to falsely assert that
white males accounted for "all the dead at Gettysburg,
all the dead at Normandy."

And just this morning, MSNBC entertainment reporter Courtney
Hazlett said:
"Spike Lee got really uppity about Clint Eastwood and about how there
were no African-Americans
involved in the filming of Flags of Our
Fathers or Letters from Iwo Jima."

***

The examples of conservative misinformation on MSNBC above
are limited to this year, with a very few exceptions -- and they are by no
means a comprehensive accounting of the problems with the cable channel's
political coverage over the past five months. Given that all of that -- and so much more -- has happened on MSNBC in just the past few
months, does that seem like a news outlet that is "leaning left"?

And that brings us to the other key problem with
Kurtz's article (the first being his odd decision not to include a single
example of MSNBC treating McCain kindly or Obama poorly): He suggested the
cable channel is drifting to the left, but made no attempt to assess where
MSNBC was starting from.

Kurtz didn't even mention Michael Savage or Ann
Coulter or Don Imus. Didn't
mention that MSNBC fired Phil Donahue for being critical of the Iraq
war. Didn't
mention any criticism of Iraq
coverage at all. (The
day Kurtz's article appeared, two former NBC reporters -- Katie Couric and Jessica Yellin -- criticized the
network's prewar coverage; Yellin said she actually felt pressure
from colleagues to take a pro-administration approach. Obviously, Kurtz couldn't have included
this information in his article --
but the point that MSNBC --
like other media -- was
excessively pro-war is not a new one.)

Has MSNBC moved slightly leftward over the past six months? Perhaps -- but look where it started: As the network
of Imus and Savage and Coulter and Carlson; of relentless misogyny; of mocking
Democrats as abnormal and weak and ineffectual and elitists; and of absolutely
fawning coverage of John McCain (and, before him, George W. Bush). Even if MSNBC has begun to
move leftward, it has a long way to go before it stops regularly trafficking in
conservative misinformation.</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-matters-by-jamison-foser-20080637015.htm</id>
<issued>2008-06-07T02:18:39Z</issued>
<modified>2008-06-07T02:18:39Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060009</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-matters-by-jamison-foser-20080637015.htm"><b>"Media Matters"; by Jamison Foser</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-matters-by-jamison-foser-20080637015.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - If MSNBC is really "leaning
left," why does Chris Matthews keep saying African-Americans aren't "regular
people"?

The past several months have brought a congealing
conventional wisdom among many reporters and pundits that MSNBC is lurching to
the left. It is perhaps
unsurprising that this story line
would emerge. It is,
however, nonsense.

Why is the story line
unsurprising? Quite
simply, several of its most prominent advocates have a clear interest in MSNBC
being seen as liberal.

Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, for example, attacks
MSNBC (and its older sibling, NBC) for purported liberal bias. But O'Reilly is anything but a
disinterested observer. Fox
has always justified its right-wing agenda by claiming it is a necessary
counterbalance to the "liberal media." With more and more Americans realizing how
thoroughly the media are
in the tank for John McCain, Fox's entire rationale for existing, always
dubious at best, is in danger of vanishing altogether. On top of which, O'Reilly and
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann seem to legitimately despise each other and to
delight in their mutual disdain. Finally,
the MSNBC-Fox feud goes beyond the rival anchors: Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes
reportedly
called NBC chief executive Jeff Zucker last year and threatened that if
Olbermann kept criticizing Fox, Ailes would turn O'Reilly loose on MSNBC -- and that the New York Post, Fox's tabloid
sibling, would join in the fight.

Then there is Howard Kurtz, who writes about the media for The
Washington Post and is widely considered
the most influential media analyst in the country. Last week, Kurtz wrote a 1,300-word article
about MSNBC headlined "MSNBC,
Leaning Left And Getting Flak From Both Sides."

Oddly, though, Kurtz didn't actually present criticism
of MSNBC from "both sides" of the debate over whether the cable
channel is "leaning left."
Kurtz detailed claims from John McCain's campaign that
MSNBC is "an organ of the Democratic National
Committee" and is "a partisan advocacy organization that exists for
the purpose of attacking John McCain." And Kurtz included criticism from supporters
of Hillary Clinton that the cable channel has favored Barack Obama. But Kurtz didn't so
much as hint at any concern by anyone that MSNBC routinely traffics in
conservative misinformation and effusively praises John McCain. No, the "both
sides" Kurtz presented were conservatives who see MSNBC as
anti-Republican and Democrats who see MSNBC as pro-Obama. That's Fox-style "balance"
(in which the cable channel features Republicans who criticize Democrats and Democrats who criticize Democrats) in
the page