<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://xml.world-of-newave.info/larry-king.atom.xsl" media="screen"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en-us">
<title>Larry King - World-of-Newave.info</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://answers.world-of-newave.info/larry-king.htm"/>
<author>
<name>World-of-Newave.info</name>
<url>http://www.world-of-newave.info/</url>
</author>
<modified>2008-08-29T23:34:45Z</modified>
<tagline>Latest news and articles about Larry King</tagline>
<copyright>Copyright (c)2004-2008.§/Newave SARL. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Boehlert: Fox News and Jerome Corsi, living in the past</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">It sure felt like déjà vu all over again, didn't it? 

No election watcher could forget the summer of 2004, when
Fox News repeatedly invited Swift Boat author John O'Neill onto cable
prime time and allowed
him to air his scurrilous allegations about Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam War
record. Even before the partisan Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group unveiled
its infamous television ads, it was on Fox News where the controversy was
birthed. It was Fox News that allowed O'Neill a mostly unobstructed platform on August 10,
17, 19, and 24, 2004,
to libel Kerry and to gin up a controversy that eventually swamped the
Democratic candidate for most of that crucial summer month. 

Then, almost exactly four years later to the dates (on July
31, August 3, 12, and 14),
Fox News presented its White
House campaign sequel. It welcomed O'Neill's Swift Boat writing
partner, Jerome Corsi, to publicize his new attack
book, The Obama Nation. Laying out his fever-swamp allegations about Obama's drug
use and his supposed connections to Islam, Corsi enjoyed the type of national
exposure, courtesy of Fox News, that every author craves. 

It was an audience that helped propel The Obama
Nation to No. 1 on the bestsellers list, which then ignited wide-scale mainstream coverage
for Corsi and his book. 

In other words, everything was going according to plan. The
sequel had been set up -- had
been marketed -- just
like the Swift Boat predecessor, and now all conservatives had to do was sit
back and watch the fun, as the Obama campaign became engulfed in Corsi-led
controversy. 

Right?

It hasn't worked that way. The Obama Nation's allegations, as
slight and flimsy as they are, have taken a back seat to questions about
Corsi's own credibility. In fact, journalists have likely spent more time
dissecting the errors in Obama Nation
and highlighting Corsi's controversial path, including the hateful,
bigoted items he used to post in online forums, than they have focusing on the
allegations Corsi wanted to broadcast.

As the conservative National Review Online noted with
frustration, "The media narrative thus becomes 'Corsi refuted' rather than 'Obama embattled.' "

Add in the fact that some conservatives have stepped forward
to publically denounce Corsi and
his brand of slime, beseeching the
movement to divorce itself from Corsi's unsubstantiated attacks, and
suddenly the sequel is in real distress.

Oh sure, it's selling. (Thanks in part to bulk sales,
a right-wing marketing staple.) But in terms of affecting the race, in terms of
gumming up the works for the Obama campaign, the book has so far been a bust.

What happened? How did a sure-fire follow-up hit turn into
such a trouble-plagued production? And why isn't Fox News' Swift
Boat formula working? 

Simple. Both Corsi and the Fox
News team are living in the past and failed to realize how dramatically the
media landscape has shifted since the shady Swift Boat accusers were able to
deftly use the media to spread their lies. 

First and foremost, the progressive movement has spent the
last four years bulking up its infrastructure, and specifically readying itself
to respond
to media-driven attacks from the right; the way Media Matters for America immediately blanketed The Obama
Nation and documented its egregious errors (often floated on Fox
News) and also raised doubts about the author's veracity and integrity. And thanks
to the larger Netroots community, Corsi hasn't had any breathing room to
spread his misinformation.

But there were also key marketplace changes within the cable
news industry that affected the Corsi coverage, I think. Because remember that
in 2004, Fox News drove the Swift Boat saga; it was practically a co-sponsor of
the anti-Kerry crusade, devoting endless hours to promoting the Vietnam-era
allegations. By sheer force of repetition, Fox News, then the dominant player
in cable news, forced its competitors to not only acknowledge the Swift Boat
story, but to go all in as well. And soon all the cable news outlets were
treating the Swift Boat saga with Fox News-like breathlessness. (CNN aired
nearly 300 segments referencing
the topic.)

And just like Fox, they weren't asking the tough
questions. Instead, they gave the Swift Boat accusers the same free ride that
Fox News did. They became media enablers, too.

Not this time around. With Fox News no longer the dominant cable news king -- and with Fox News no longer driving the campaign
narratives -- its competitors opted for a
much different approach to covering Corsi. And I think the coverage from the
competitors sent a subtle, yet simple, message: We no longer take our cues from
Fox News' lead, because they no longer dictate campaign coverage.
Instead, we're going to exult
in our role as a counterbalance, as a fact-checker, to the Fox News-produced
Corsi attack campaign. In fact, we're gonna help pull the curtain back on
Corsi. 

Just look at how MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer greeted Corsi, as he
ventured for the first time beyond the friendly TV confines of Rupert World:


BREWER: You say it's a
comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers that are going
through this book page by page and picking apart what they see as factual
errors. ... If they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility?


CNN's Campbell Brown introduced
a prime-time report by
announcing, "Obama
Nation is riddled with pretty much every unsubstantiated
rumor you ever heard about Obama."

And on Larry King Live,
Corsi was forced to face off
against Media Matters Senior Fellow Paul Waldman, who refused to let the
author spread his misinformation uncontested.

All the above represented precisely what the press, and most especially the
cable outfits, should have done --
but mostly refused to do --
in 2004.

They refused to allow articulate, independent critics onto
the national stage to debunk the patently false Swift Boat charges. Instead,
the press most often treated the Swift Boat story as a political one, which
meant amplifying the partisan charges and then going to the Kerry campaign for
a quote, or inviting a Kerry campaign surrogate on the air to debate a Swift
Boat liar. 

Rather than forcefully labeling the Swift Boat attacks a
charade and IDing the attackers as pranksters, and instead of holding the Swift
Boat accusers accountable, the press played dumb
and abandoned its traditional campaign role. 

As Greg Mitchell at Editor
&amp; Publisher noted,
"The mainstream press gave the charges -- carried in ads, in books and articles, and
in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a respectful airing
mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting to shoot them down
as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false."

In the infamous words of former Washington Post executive editor Len Downie, upon being pressed about the paper's
Swift Boat coverage in August 2004:
"We are not judging the credibility of Kerry or the [Swift Boat] Veterans, we just print the facts."

Talk about abdicating your role as journalists. During the
Swift Boat hoax, Downie and his team at the Post
essentially walked off the field, refusing to officiate the smear
campaign. Wasn't judging the credibility of the previously unknown Swift Boat
accusers precisely what the Post and the rest of the press
should have been doing in August 2004? 

Thankfully, that kind of cowardice has been replaced by
actual journalism when dealing with the Corsi sequel. And on TV, I'd
suggest that about-face has been fueled by Fox News' fall from ratings
grace, as its competitors, flush with confidence, realize they no longer have
to follow. 

Instead, they can lead. 

Of course, the fact that Corsi won't admit or correct
obvious errors in his book has only emboldened the press to pose tough questions. His often loopy logic
has also not helped him, like suggesting we cannot believe Obama when he said
he stopped taking drugs in college because, according to the author, "self-reporting, by people who have used
drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently unreliable."

When Corsi stumbled down that twisted path on CNN's Larry King Live last week, Media Matters' Waldman was waiting
to pounce: 


WALDMAN: You put up on
right-wing websites a whole series of bigoted and hateful posts in 2002 and
2003 that you later had to admit to when you got found out -- all kinds of
really vile, malicious stuff.

CORSI: OK. If you --

WALDMAN: Now, you say that you've stopped that. You say that you've
stopped that and you don't put up those kinds of vile, bigoted, malicious,
hateful posts on right-wing websites. But all we have is your word. I mean, do -- can we really
trust you? People who do that kind of thing, well, you know, they're not really
very trustworthy.

CORSI: We have --

WALDMAN: So can we trust you? Are you still doing that?

CORSI: You have more than my word. You've got the record of everything
I've written since then.

WALDMAN: Can you prove that you're not doing it anonymously? Can you
prove it? 


I'm hard-pressed to recall the last time I saw an
author get so thoroughly discredited on
national television the way Corsi was at the hands of Waldman. (The encounter
simply confirmed why conservatives often refuse to go head-to-head with reps
from Media Matters in public settings.)

That undressing proved infectious within the mainstream media,
as it began to spell out, fairly and accurately, what Corsi and his book were
about. The Associated
Press' Nedra Pickler reported, "Corsi suggests, without a shred of
proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama has acknowledged using
marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit when he went to college
and hasn't used drugs since."

The New York Times' political
blog, The Caucus, set aside space to detail Corsi's
touting of radical 9-11
theories that suggest explosives detonated inside the Twin Towers
were also responsible for the destruction, not just the terrorist-piloted jumbo
jets. And Politico noted how Corsi had
"left a trail of wild
theories, vitriol and dogma that have called into question his
credibility." 

Is it some sort of collective penance journalists are
serving for the media's Swift Boat failures of 2004? Who knows? But it's exactly what
journalists ought to be doing when mischief-makers like Corsi climb onto the
national stage (ladder, courtesy
of Simon &amp; Schuster), and start making unsubstantiated charges about
presidential contenders. 

Conservatives now whine about the press taking sides, that
it's teaming up on Corsi. In fact, the press is simply doing exactly what
it should have done in 2004, and
that's vet the accuser. Period. 

The game has changed. But somebody forgot to tell Corsi and
his friends at Fox News. 
    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-19T16:00:57Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-19T16:00:57Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/columns/200808190001</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm"><b>Boehlert: Fox News and Jerome Corsi, living in the past</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - It sure felt like déjà vu all over again, didn't it? 

No election watcher could forget the summer of 2004, when
Fox News repeatedly invited Swift Boat author John O'Neill onto cable
prime time and allowed
him to air his scurrilous allegations about Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam War
record. Even before the partisan Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group unveiled
its infamous television ads, it was on Fox News where the controversy was
birthed. It was Fox News that allowed O'Neill a mostly unobstructed platform on August 10,
17, 19, and 24, 2004,
to libel Kerry and to gin up a controversy that eventually swamped the
Democratic candidate for most of that crucial summer month. 

Then, almost exactly four years later to the dates (on July
31, August 3, 12, and 14),
Fox News presented its White
House campaign sequel. It welcomed O'Neill's Swift Boat writing
partner, Jerome Corsi, to publicize his new attack
book, The Obama Nation. Laying out his fever-swamp allegations about Obama's drug
use and his supposed connections to Islam, Corsi enjoyed the type of national
exposure, courtesy of Fox News, that every author craves. 

It was an audience that helped propel The Obama
Nation to No. 1 on the bestsellers list, which then ignited wide-scale mainstream coverage
for Corsi and his book. 

In other words, everything was going according to plan. The
sequel had been set up -- had
been marketed -- just
like the Swift Boat predecessor, and now all conservatives had to do was sit
back and watch the fun, as the Obama campaign became engulfed in Corsi-led
controversy. 

Right?

It hasn't worked that way. The Obama Nation's allegations, as
slight and flimsy as they are, have taken a back seat to questions about
Corsi's own credibility. In fact, journalists have likely spent more time
dissecting the errors in Obama Nation
and highlighting Corsi's controversial path, including the hateful,
bigoted items he used to post in online forums, than they have focusing on the
allegations Corsi wanted to broadcast.

As the conservative National Review Online noted with
frustration, "The media narrative thus becomes 'Corsi refuted' rather than 'Obama embattled.' "

Add in the fact that some conservatives have stepped forward
to publically denounce Corsi and
his brand of slime, beseeching the
movement to divorce itself from Corsi's unsubstantiated attacks, and
suddenly the sequel is in real distress.

Oh sure, it's selling. (Thanks in part to bulk sales,
a right-wing marketing staple.) But in terms of affecting the race, in terms of
gumming up the works for the Obama campaign, the book has so far been a bust.

What happened? How did a sure-fire follow-up hit turn into
such a trouble-plagued production? And why isn't Fox News' Swift
Boat formula working? 

Simple. Both Corsi and the Fox
News team are living in the past and failed to realize how dramatically the
media landscape has shifted since the shady Swift Boat accusers were able to
deftly use the media to spread their lies. 

First and foremost, the progressive movement has spent the
last four years bulking up its infrastructure, and specifically readying itself
to respond
to media-driven attacks from the right; the way Media Matters for America immediately blanketed The Obama
Nation and documented its egregious errors (often floated on Fox
News) and also raised doubts about the author's veracity and integrity. And thanks
to the larger Netroots community, Corsi hasn't had any breathing room to
spread his misinformation.

But there were also key marketplace changes within the cable
news industry that affected the Corsi coverage, I think. Because remember that
in 2004, Fox News drove the Swift Boat saga; it was practically a co-sponsor of
the anti-Kerry crusade, devoting endless hours to promoting the Vietnam-era
allegations. By sheer force of repetition, Fox News, then the dominant player
in cable news, forced its competitors to not only acknowledge the Swift Boat
story, but to go all in as well. And soon all the cable news outlets were
treating the Swift Boat saga with Fox News-like breathlessness. (CNN aired
nearly 300 segments referencing
the topic.)

And just like Fox, they weren't asking the tough
questions. Instead, they gave the Swift Boat accusers the same free ride that
Fox News did. They became media enablers, too.

Not this time around. With Fox News no longer the dominant cable news king -- and with Fox News no longer driving the campaign
narratives -- its competitors opted for a
much different approach to covering Corsi. And I think the coverage from the
competitors sent a subtle, yet simple, message: We no longer take our cues from
Fox News' lead, because they no longer dictate campaign coverage.
Instead, we're going to exult
in our role as a counterbalance, as a fact-checker, to the Fox News-produced
Corsi attack campaign. In fact, we're gonna help pull the curtain back on
Corsi. 

Just look at how MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer greeted Corsi, as he
ventured for the first time beyond the friendly TV confines of Rupert World:


BREWER: You say it's a
comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers that are going
through this book page by page and picking apart what they see as factual
errors. ... If they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility?


CNN's Campbell Brown introduced
a prime-time report by
announcing, "Obama
Nation is riddled with pretty much every unsubstantiated
rumor you ever heard about Obama."

And on Larry King Live,
Corsi was forced to face off
against Media Matters Senior Fellow Paul Waldman, who refused to let the
author spread his misinformation uncontested.

All the above represented precisely what the press, and most especially the
cable outfits, should have done --
but mostly refused to do --
in 2004.

They refused to allow articulate, independent critics onto
the national stage to debunk the patently false Swift Boat charges. Instead,
the press most often treated the Swift Boat story as a political one, which
meant amplifying the partisan charges and then going to the Kerry campaign for
a quote, or inviting a Kerry campaign surrogate on the air to debate a Swift
Boat liar. 

Rather than forcefully labeling the Swift Boat attacks a
charade and IDing the attackers as pranksters, and instead of holding the Swift
Boat accusers accountable, the press played dumb
and abandoned its traditional campaign role. 

As Greg Mitchell at Editor
& Publisher noted,
"The mainstream press gave the charges -- carried in ads, in books and articles, and
in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a respectful airing
mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting to shoot them down
as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false."

In the infamous words of former Washington Post executive editor Len Downie, upon being pressed about the paper's
Swift Boat coverage in August 2004:
"We are not judging the credibility of Kerry or the [Swift Boat] Veterans, we just print the facts."

Talk about abdicating your role as journalists. During the
Swift Boat hoax, Downie and his team at the Post
essentially walked off the field, refusing to officiate the smear
campaign. Wasn't judging the credibility of the previously unknown Swift Boat
accusers precisely what the Post and the rest of the press
should have been doing in August 2004? 

Thankfully, that kind of cowardice has been replaced by
actual journalism when dealing with the Corsi sequel. And on TV, I'd
suggest that about-face has been fueled by Fox News' fall from ratings
grace, as its competitors, flush with confidence, realize they no longer have
to follow. 

Instead, they can lead. 

Of course, the fact that Corsi won't admit or correct
obvious errors in his book has only emboldened the press to pose tough questions. His often loopy logic
has also not helped him, like suggesting we cannot believe Obama when he said
he stopped taking drugs in college because, according to the author, "self-reporting, by people who have used
drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently unreliable."

When Corsi stumbled down that twisted path on CNN's Larry King Live last week, Media Matters' Waldman was waiting
to pounce: 


WALDMAN: You put up on
right-wing websites a whole series of bigoted and hateful posts in 2002 and
2003 that you later had to admit to when you got found out -- all kinds of
really vile, malicious stuff.

CORSI: OK. If you --

WALDMAN: Now, you say that you've stopped that. You say that you've
stopped that and you don't put up those kinds of vile, bigoted, malicious,
hateful posts on right-wing websites. But all we have is your word. I mean, do -- can we really
trust you? People who do that kind of thing, well, you know, they're not really
very trustworthy.

CORSI: We have --

WALDMAN: So can we trust you? Are you still doing that?

CORSI: You have more than my word. You've got the record of everything
I've written since then.

WALDMAN: Can you prove that you're not doing it anonymously? Can you
prove it? 


I'm hard-pressed to recall the last time I saw an
author get so thoroughly discredited on
national television the way Corsi was at the hands of Waldman. (The encounter
simply confirmed why conservatives often refuse to go head-to-head with reps
from Media Matters in public settings.)

That undressing proved infectious within the mainstream media,
as it began to spell out, fairly and accurately, what Corsi and his book were
about. The Associated
Press' Nedra Pickler reported, "Corsi suggests, without a shred of
proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama has acknowledged using
marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit when he went to college
and hasn't used drugs since."

The New York Times' political
blog, The Caucus, set aside space to detail Corsi's
touting of radical 9-11
theories that suggest explosives detonated inside the Twin Towers
were also responsible for the destruction, not just the terrorist-piloted jumbo
jets. And Politico noted how Corsi had
"left a trail of wild
theories, vitriol and dogma that have called into question his
credibility." 

Is it some sort of collective penance journalists are
serving for the media's Swift Boat failures of 2004? Who knows? But it's exactly what
journalists ought to be doing when mischief-makers like Corsi climb onto the
national stage (ladder, courtesy
of Simon & Schuster), and start making unsubstantiated charges about
presidential contenders. 

Conservatives now whine about the press taking sides, that
it's teaming up on Corsi. In fact, the press is simply doing exactly what
it should have done in 2004, and
that's vet the accuser. Period. 

The game has changed. But somebody forgot to tell Corsi and
his friends at Fox News. 
    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Fox News and Jerome Corsi, living in the past {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 19, 2008, 4:00 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 20, 2008, 11:12 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;25KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{MOVIES &gt; FAHRENHEIT 9-11} - Dixie Chicks stay defiant for their loyal Canuck fans</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/f/fahrenheit-9_11/dixie-chicks-stay-defiant-for-their-loyal-canuck-20080891419.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">Dixie Chicks stay defiant for their loyal Canuck fans
Review | Buffeted by U.S. backlash, Texans bask in a warm reception at the ACC

Oct. 29, 2006. 01:00 AM
VIT WAGNER
POP MUSIC CRITIC

In TV interviews last week with Oprah and Larry King, the Dixie Chicks were up front about the fact that audiences for the group's current tour have dwindled in some U.S. markets, particularly in the south where </summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/f/fahrenheit-9_11/dixie-chicks-stay-defiant-for-their-loyal-canuck-20080891419.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-18T22:06:43Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-18T22:06:43Z</modified>
<author>
<name>F911.Blogspot.Com</name>
<url>http://f911.blogspot.com/2006/11/dixie-chicks-stay-defiant-for-their.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/f/fahrenheit-9_11/dixie-chicks-stay-defiant-for-their-loyal-canuck-20080891419.htm"><b>Dixie Chicks stay defiant for their loyal Canuck fans</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/f/fahrenheit-9_11/dixie-chicks-stay-defiant-for-their-loyal-canuck-20080891419.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">F911.Blogspot.Com</span> - Dixie Chicks stay defiant for their loyal Canuck fans
Review | Buffeted by U.S. backlash, Texans bask in a warm reception at the ACC

Oct. 29, 2006. 01:00 AM
VIT WAGNER
POP MUSIC CRITIC

In TV interviews last week with Oprah and Larry King, the Dixie Chicks were up front about the fact that audiences for the group's current tour have dwindled in some U.S. markets, particularly in the south where <blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Fahrenheit 911 (and a half): Dixie Chicks stay defiant for their loyal Canuck fans {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 18, 2008, 10:06 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;40KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/">Arts</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/">Movies</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/">Titles</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/f/">F</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/movies/titles/f/fahrenheit-9_11/"><b>Fahrenheit 9-11</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Media denounce Corsi's anti-Obama book</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">While the recent anti-Obama book by Jerome Corsi, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold
Editions), will debut atop the New York
Times bestseller list, many in the media are challenging the book,
noting its numerous falsehoods as well as its author's track record,
which includes a slew of bigoted posts on the
conservative website Free
Republic and co-authorship of a discredited book
attacking Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign. The
media's reaction to The Obama Nation stands
in stark contrast to coverage of that 2004 book, Unfit for Command. As Media Matters for America
has noted, the media were sharply criticized
for taking too long to challenge Unfit's
numerous smears and falsehoods.

In an August 15 article in Editor &amp; Publisher, Greg Mitchell noted the contrast in the
media's reaction to the two books:


Four
years ago this month, with E&P's Joe Strupp, I explored in a number
of articles the belated or conflicted media response to the
"swiftboating" of Sen. John Kerry, then the Democratic nominee for
president. The mainstream press gave the charges-- carried in ads, in books and
articles, and in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a
respectful airing mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting
to shoot them down as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false. This delay, along
with Kerry's own reluctance to face the matter squarely, quite possibly
cost the Democrat the White House. 

Now,
this month, a bestselling anti-Obama book -- by a co-author of the most
prominent "swiftboat" anti-Kerry book in 2004 -- has predictably
been published (by Mary Matalin's imprint) and has gained immediate and wide
attention in the mainstream. But this time, in many cases, the media response
has been a "swift" kick to its credibility.


Below are numerous examples of the
media responding with "a 'swift' kick" to The Obama Nation's credibility:

From an August 15 Washington Post column by Eugene
Robinson:


The
"author," and I use the term loosely, whose vicious lies damaged John
Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign has crawled back out from under his rock to spew
vicious lies about Barack Obama. Right-wing radio talk-show hosts are dutifully
transmitting this concocted venom. This presidential campaign has officially
gotten ugly. 



The
"author" I'm talking about is a man named Jerome Corsi. In a book
published last year, "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico
and Canada," Corsi claimed that George W. Bush was at the heart of a
secret conspiracy to subsume the United States into a post-national,
one-worldish North American Union. Corsi's writings on far-right blogs have
been even more paranoid and delusional. He has written that pedophilia, for
which he used a more graphic term, "is OK with the Pope as long as it
isn't reported by the liberal press." He has referred to Muslims as
"ragheads."

Corsi
would be known as just another visitor from the outer fringe if he had not been
the co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book that slimed Kerry's
exemplary record as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam. The allegations in that
book were discredited, but not before they had been amplified by the right-wing
echo chamber to the point where they raised questions in some voters' minds --
perhaps enough to swing the election.


From an August 13 Politico article by Kenneth P.
Vogel:


The
folks behind "The Obama Nation," the wildly successful but
factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched
work. 

But its
author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called
into question his credibility.

Jerome
Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite
resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments
through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian
and Muslims worship Satan.


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:



RACHEL
MADDOW (guest host): You may remember Corsi for his
sober allegations that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian, that John Kerry is both a
Jew and a Communist, and his allegations that Muslims actually worship Satan.
You may remember Jerome Corsi for his recent book
attacking the liberal myth that oil is a finite resource, since he, Jerome Corsi, has learned how to make new oil. You may remember Corsi for his scholarly rebuke of George W. Bush's
secret plan to merge the United States
into Mexico.

OK,
honestly, you probably don't remember Jerome Corsi
at all, because why would you pay attention to someone with a record like that?
But Corsi's new anti-Obama book will be number one on
that bestseller list for at least two weeks running, despite fact checking by
news organizations, including The New York
Times, showing it to be rife with errors and inaccuracies.

And the
Obama camp is now firing back, issuing a 40-page rebuttal
titled "Unfit for Publication," soon appearing at Obama's Fight
the Smears website. The campaign promising to forcefully respond with all means
at their disposal. Nonetheless, the book is selling well, due, essentially, to
hundreds of right wing talk show interviews, and large volume bulk sales to
right-wing organizations, a tactic to be discussed now with my next guest.


From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the August 5 edition of MSNBC Live:


BREWER:
You say it's a comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers
that are going through this book page by page and picking apart what they see
as factual errors. Let me give you an example. You say in this book,
"Interestingly, Obama did not dedicate Dreams from My Father to his
mother or to his father, Barack Sr., or to his Indonesian stepfather," and
Media Matters,
the online organization, says in his book, he actually says on a -- on the last
page of the introduction, "It is to my family, though, my mother, my
grandparents, my siblings, stretched across oceans and continents that I owe
the deepest gratitude and to whom I dedicated this book." So if they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility? 

CORSI:
Let's discuss that one. If you'll read carefully what Media Matters said, they point
out there is no dedication page even in the second edition. 

BREWER:
But it says right in the introduction that it's dedicated to his family.

CORSI:
In the introduction that he wrote after, this was going with the second book. And
the original book had no dedication page and this is not the typical way that
you dedicate a book. So I'm making the distinction there is no dedication page
in the book at all, never has been.

BREWER:
Media Matters
has some eight, nine, 10 pages of factual errors. 

CORSI:
And I'd be happy to go through each one of them with you. 

BREWER:
And we're not going to do that. But I'm saying, if they are finding one, then
why do you get credibility for the book? 

CORSI:
Well, I've already objected to the one they found. I think Media Matters
is wrong, and I would argue with every one of them. 


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams:


DAN ABRAMS
(host): Yeah. I mean, look, you know, and again, among the accusations, Brad,
debunked from this book -- drug use in the U.S. Senate, that he didn't
dedicate his book to his family, he wanted to decrease the size of the
military. I mean, the list goes on of the things that were debunked from this
book.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Larry King Live:


LARRY
KING (host): Jerome, you write in your book that Senator Obama has, quote, "yet to answer whether he stopped using marijuana
and cocaine completely in college or whether his drug usage extended to his law
school days or beyond."

CORSI: Yes.

KING:
But Obama wrote in his memoir Dreams from My Father -- which you repeatedly cite in your
book -- that when he moved to New
  York in the early '80s, quote, "I stopped
getting high. I ran three miles a day and I fasted on Sunday." So
are you saying he's lying?

CORSI: What I'm saying in the
book is that people who admit that they've used drugs -- and Obama -- Obama said he used drugs through Occidental. And it was a lot
of drugs. He said it was -- it had become virtually habitual with marijuana and
cocaine. My argument is that the self-reporting of people who use drugs
as to when they quit is not reliable. That's the argument I was
making.


From an August 15 post to Commentary magazine's Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, titled "The Obama Smears":


As for the
book: it seems to be riddled with factual errors-some relatively minor
(like asserting that Obama does not mention the birth of his half-sister, Maya
Soetoro-Ng, in Dreams
from My Father; Obama does mention her), and some
significant (suggesting that Obama favors withdrawing troops from Afghanistan;
he wants to do the opposite). But more problematic, I think, is Corsi's
claim that Obama has "extensive connections to Islam" and his
suggestion that Obama is a recent drug user. Those claims are, from everything
I can tell, unsubstantiated. (When challenged to produce the evidence, Corsi
counters with the "prove you're not beating your wife"
defense.)

For
example, Obama, who in his book admitted using drugs in his youth, says he
hasn't used any since he was 20 years old. Corsi, in an interview, said
Obama's words can't be trusted because "self-reporting, by
people who have used drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently
unreliable." And Corsi's effort to tie Obama to the Muslim
faith-claims based on questionable sources, reaching back to
Obama's youth in Indonesia-is especially troubling, since the
subtext here is attaching Obama to militant Islam and suggesting that
he's somehow alien to America and its values (when in fact his candidacy
is a confirmation of the viability of those values).

Corsi's
approach to politics is both destructive and self-destructive. If Senator Obama
loses, he should lose on the merits: his record in public life and his
political philosophy. And while it's legitimate to take into account
Obama's past associations with people like the Reverend Jeremiah
Wright-especially for someone like Obama, about whom relatively little is
known-it wrong and reckless to throw out unsubstantiated charges and
smears against Senator Obama.

Conservatism
has been an intellectual home to people like Burke and Buckley. The GOP is the
party that gave us Lincoln and Reagan. It seems to me that its leaders ought to
make it clear that they find what Dr. Corsi is doing to be both wrong and
repellent. To have their movement and their party associated with such a figure
would be a terrible thing and it will only help the cause of those who hold
both the GOP and the conservative movement in contempt.


From an August 12 Los Angeles Times article by Kate
Linthicum:


Right-wing
author Jerome Corsi hit it big in 2004 with a book attacking John F. Kerry.

"Unfit
for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" soared to
No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Now
Corsi has done it again -- taking aim at a different Democratic presidential
candidate.

Corsi's
latest, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," will top the Aug. 17 New York Times hard-cover nonfiction
bestseller list.

The
book lashes out at Barack Obama and alleges, among other things, that the
politician has a secret radical Islamic agenda.

But
being No. 1 doesn't necessarily mean being accurate. Obama is a
Christian.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Election Center:


CAMPBELL
BROWN (host): There's a new book out about Barack Obama. It's
number one right now on The New York Times
bestseller list. I can guarantee you, though, nobody in the Obama camp is happy
at all -- at all happy about that. And here's why.

It is
called Obama Nation:
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality. The author, Jerome Corsi, also co-wrote the book Unfit
for Command, which started the Swift Boating of John Kerry. Obama Nation is riddled with pretty much
every unsubstantiated rumor you ever heard about Obama. Jessica Yellin
found out for us that it's also turning into a major campaign headache. And, Jessica,
I know -- we know that some of the most damaging charges in this book just
aren't true. The author admits he's on a mission to take down Barack Obama. He's been slammed for books that he's written before. They're
also discredited. But it's still getting an awful lot of
traction.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Anderson Cooper 360:


JESSICA
YELLIN (CNN Capitol Hill correspondent): To prove his point, Corsi says the book is meticulously researched
and fact-checked. But when we checked his facts, we found he's wrong on
many points. Here are a few. The book claims Obama didn't
dedicate his first book, Dreams from My
Father, to his family members. He did. He dedicated it to his
mother, his grandmother, and his siblings. Corsi cites a report saying
Obama was in church when Reverend Jeremiah Wright made
comments about race on July 22. But Obama was out of state, a full time zone
away. And Corsi
writes Obama has yet to answer questions about whether he
ever stopped using drugs. But in his first book, Obama said he stopped getting
high during college.


From an August 12 New York Times article by Jim
Rutenberg and Julie Bosman:


In the
summer of 2004 the conservative gadfly Jerome R. Corsi shot to the top of the
best-seller lists as co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book
attacking Senator John Kerry's record on a Vietnam War Swift boat that
began the larger damaging campaign against Mr. Kerry's war credentials as
he sought the presidency.

Almost exactly four
years after that campaign began, Mr. Corsi has released a new attack book
painting Senator Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumed presidential
nominee, as a stealth radical liberal who has tried to cover up
"extensive connections to Islam" -- Mr. Obama is Christian -- and questioning
whether his admitted experimentation with drugs in high school and college ever
ceased.

Significant parts of the
book, whose subtitle is "Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," have already been challenged as misleading or false in the
days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance
on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday --
at No. 1.

[...]

Several of the book's accusations, in fact, are unsubstantiated, misleading or inaccurate.


From the August 14 edition of Fox
News' Hannity &amp; Colmes:


ALAN COLMES (co-host): The substance of the book --

[crosstalk]

COLMES: -- we have already seen in the book. He was wrong about a
sermon that Barack Obama attended. He got the date wrong. He was wrong about
the dedication in the book. He was wrong about Obama saying that he stopped
using drugs. He was not truthful about that. He was wrong about a number of
things in the book --

HUGH HEWITT (syndicated radio host): Actually, stop there, Alan.
That's not true --

COLMES: -- there have been a number of things in the book that have
been discredited.


From an August 14 Washington Post article by Eli
Saslow:


Corsi's
"The Obama Nation" lacks major revelations and has been dismissed by
Obama's campaign as a series of lies from a serial liar. Parts of the book have
also been disproved by the mainstream media. In 2004, Corsi co-wrote
"Unfit for Command," in which Swift boat veterans criticized Sen. John
F. Kerry's Vietnam War record. That book was also widely
disproved.


From an August 15 Washington Post editorial:


Unfortunately
but unsurprisingly, given his earlier hit job on the last Democratic nominee,
Mr. Corsi's latest is rife with inaccuracies and innuendo. If the fundamental
smear of "Unfit for Command" was that John F. Kerry was no war hero,
the insinuation of Mr. Corsi's latest is that Mr. Obama is a closet Muslim and
militant, black activist drug-user.

[...]

He gets
facts wrong, from the date of Mr. Obama's marriage to whether he dedicated his autobiography
to his family (he did) to whether he revealed that he took his future wife on
his second trip to Kenya (he did.) He makes offensive statements: "The
sexual attraction of his mother to her African husband jumps out from the
page." 

When
facts are lacking, Mr. Corsi makes his point by suggestive questions. Noting
that Life magazine could find no record of an article that Mr. Obama remembered
reading as a child about a black man who tried to lighten his skin, Mr. Corsi
asks, "How much more imagining, hypothetical lying, or just plain lying is
Obama capable of doing?" When facts are present, he twists them to make
Mr. Obama bad.


From an August 14 Associated Press article by Nedra
Pickler:


Jerome
Corsi's anti-Obama book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult
of Personality," claims the Illinois
senator is a dangerous, radical candidate for president. The book is a
compilation of all the innuendo and false rumors against Obama -- that he was
raised a Muslim, attended a radical, black church and secretly has a
"black rage" hidden beneath the surface.

In
fact, Obama is a Christian who attended Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

[...]

Corsi
suggests, without a shred of proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama
has acknowledged using marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit
when he went to college and hasn't used drugs since.

Corsi
makes an issue of the fact that, before he quit smoking cigarettes, Obama
didn't want it widely known that he smoked. "If Obama takes pains to hide
his smoking from us, what else does he take pains to hide?" Corsi asks in
the book.

Corsi
also dwells on Obama's mother marrying Obama's African father and later
marrying someone from Indonesia
-- whom Corsi describes as "a second man of color to be her mate."
The Obama campaign says the description is one of many examples of Corsi's
"offensive language" in the book.

He
claims Obama received extensive Islamic religious education as a boy in Indonesia,
education that was only offered to the truly faithful. Actually, Obama is a
Christian and as a boy he attended both Catholic school and Indonesian public
schools where some basic study of the Koran was offered.

He
accuses Obama of wanting to weaken the military even though Obama's campaign
calls for adding 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.


From an August 13 post by Joe Klein on Time magazine's Swampland
blog:


I heard
about Jerome Corsi's book a few weeks ago from my mother, who said that her
great fear--that Barack Obama has covert Islamic associations--had been
confirmed by a new book. I told her not to worry, that many reputable people
had looked into the matter and Obama was more likely to be spotted in Whole
Foods than praying in a mosque. (Since my mother has never been to Whole Foods,
so she didn't quite get my wry allusion.) "I hope so," she said,
dubiously. 

So we
know the market for trash is there, and not so far from home. And we know, that
Mary Matalin, who appears regularly on mainstream media programs like Meet the Press
called the Corsi book in the New York Times today:

"a
piece of scholarship, and a good one at that."

But
hey, Mary stands to make big bucks off this scholarship, which I'm sure was
submitted for peer review and otherwise held to the highest editorial
standards--and I'm sure her reputation and mediagenicity won't be damaged by
this poisonous crap, and we're all friends here, aren't we? And, yknow, they
say politics ain't beanbag...and it's all in the game to tell innocent, well-intentioned
people that Barack Obama is a secret Muslim or that John Kerry wasn't really a
hero in Vietnam.
Or, as George W. Bush, once told a rightly outraged John McCain--whose wife and
daughter Bush's minions had smeared--"It's just politics."


An August 13 post on Jonathan
Martin's blog at Politico.com:


The
power of Fox News and talk radio: Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation "is to
make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction
hardcovers this Sunday -- at No. 1.," according to a front-page story by Jim Rutenberg
and Julie Bosman in the Times today that will only help sell more books.

As
Rutenberg and Bosman note, the book has its share of errors. 

But
Corsi delved into the drug-and-Muslim fever swamps, which, regardless of
accuracy, is what many on the right want to believe about Obama.

The
best part of the piece, though, is this: "He said he was planning to
aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr.
Obama this fall, though he would not name them."

A
third-party anti-Obama effort still may form, but methinks there is a reason
here why Corsi "would not name them."

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-16T03:00:37Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-16T03:00:37Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150015</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm"><b>Media denounce Corsi's anti-Obama book</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - While the recent anti-Obama book by Jerome Corsi, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold
Editions), will debut atop the New York
Times bestseller list, many in the media are challenging the book,
noting its numerous falsehoods as well as its author's track record,
which includes a slew of bigoted posts on the
conservative website Free
Republic and co-authorship of a discredited book
attacking Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign. The
media's reaction to The Obama Nation stands
in stark contrast to coverage of that 2004 book, Unfit for Command. As Media Matters for America
has noted, the media were sharply criticized
for taking too long to challenge Unfit's
numerous smears and falsehoods.

In an August 15 article in Editor & Publisher, Greg Mitchell noted the contrast in the
media's reaction to the two books:


Four
years ago this month, with E&P's Joe Strupp, I explored in a number
of articles the belated or conflicted media response to the
"swiftboating" of Sen. John Kerry, then the Democratic nominee for
president. The mainstream press gave the charges-- carried in ads, in books and
articles, and in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a
respectful airing mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting
to shoot them down as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false. This delay, along
with Kerry's own reluctance to face the matter squarely, quite possibly
cost the Democrat the White House. 

Now,
this month, a bestselling anti-Obama book -- by a co-author of the most
prominent "swiftboat" anti-Kerry book in 2004 -- has predictably
been published (by Mary Matalin's imprint) and has gained immediate and wide
attention in the mainstream. But this time, in many cases, the media response
has been a "swift" kick to its credibility.


Below are numerous examples of the
media responding with "a 'swift' kick" to The Obama Nation's credibility:

From an August 15 Washington Post column by Eugene
Robinson:


The
"author," and I use the term loosely, whose vicious lies damaged John
Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign has crawled back out from under his rock to spew
vicious lies about Barack Obama. Right-wing radio talk-show hosts are dutifully
transmitting this concocted venom. This presidential campaign has officially
gotten ugly. 



The
"author" I'm talking about is a man named Jerome Corsi. In a book
published last year, "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico
and Canada," Corsi claimed that George W. Bush was at the heart of a
secret conspiracy to subsume the United States into a post-national,
one-worldish North American Union. Corsi's writings on far-right blogs have
been even more paranoid and delusional. He has written that pedophilia, for
which he used a more graphic term, "is OK with the Pope as long as it
isn't reported by the liberal press." He has referred to Muslims as
"ragheads."

Corsi
would be known as just another visitor from the outer fringe if he had not been
the co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book that slimed Kerry's
exemplary record as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam. The allegations in that
book were discredited, but not before they had been amplified by the right-wing
echo chamber to the point where they raised questions in some voters' minds --
perhaps enough to swing the election.


From an August 13 Politico article by Kenneth P.
Vogel:


The
folks behind "The Obama Nation," the wildly successful but
factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched
work. 

But its
author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called
into question his credibility.

Jerome
Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite
resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments
through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian
and Muslims worship Satan.


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:



RACHEL
MADDOW (guest host): You may remember Corsi for his
sober allegations that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian, that John Kerry is both a
Jew and a Communist, and his allegations that Muslims actually worship Satan.
You may remember Jerome Corsi for his recent book
attacking the liberal myth that oil is a finite resource, since he, Jerome Corsi, has learned how to make new oil. You may remember Corsi for his scholarly rebuke of George W. Bush's
secret plan to merge the United States
into Mexico.

OK,
honestly, you probably don't remember Jerome Corsi
at all, because why would you pay attention to someone with a record like that?
But Corsi's new anti-Obama book will be number one on
that bestseller list for at least two weeks running, despite fact checking by
news organizations, including The New York
Times, showing it to be rife with errors and inaccuracies.

And the
Obama camp is now firing back, issuing a 40-page rebuttal
titled "Unfit for Publication," soon appearing at Obama's Fight
the Smears website. The campaign promising to forcefully respond with all means
at their disposal. Nonetheless, the book is selling well, due, essentially, to
hundreds of right wing talk show interviews, and large volume bulk sales to
right-wing organizations, a tactic to be discussed now with my next guest.


From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the August 5 edition of MSNBC Live:


BREWER:
You say it's a comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers
that are going through this book page by page and picking apart what they see
as factual errors. Let me give you an example. You say in this book,
"Interestingly, Obama did not dedicate Dreams from My Father to his
mother or to his father, Barack Sr., or to his Indonesian stepfather," and
Media Matters,
the online organization, says in his book, he actually says on a -- on the last
page of the introduction, "It is to my family, though, my mother, my
grandparents, my siblings, stretched across oceans and continents that I owe
the deepest gratitude and to whom I dedicated this book." So if they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility? 

CORSI:
Let's discuss that one. If you'll read carefully what Media Matters said, they point
out there is no dedication page even in the second edition. 

BREWER:
But it says right in the introduction that it's dedicated to his family.

CORSI:
In the introduction that he wrote after, this was going with the second book. And
the original book had no dedication page and this is not the typical way that
you dedicate a book. So I'm making the distinction there is no dedication page
in the book at all, never has been.

BREWER:
Media Matters
has some eight, nine, 10 pages of factual errors. 

CORSI:
And I'd be happy to go through each one of them with you. 

BREWER:
And we're not going to do that. But I'm saying, if they are finding one, then
why do you get credibility for the book? 

CORSI:
Well, I've already objected to the one they found. I think Media Matters
is wrong, and I would argue with every one of them. 


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams:


DAN ABRAMS
(host): Yeah. I mean, look, you know, and again, among the accusations, Brad,
debunked from this book -- drug use in the U.S. Senate, that he didn't
dedicate his book to his family, he wanted to decrease the size of the
military. I mean, the list goes on of the things that were debunked from this
book.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Larry King Live:


LARRY
KING (host): Jerome, you write in your book that Senator Obama has, quote, "yet to answer whether he stopped using marijuana
and cocaine completely in college or whether his drug usage extended to his law
school days or beyond."

CORSI: Yes.

KING:
But Obama wrote in his memoir Dreams from My Father -- which you repeatedly cite in your
book -- that when he moved to New
  York in the early '80s, quote, "I stopped
getting high. I ran three miles a day and I fasted on Sunday." So
are you saying he's lying?

CORSI: What I'm saying in the
book is that people who admit that they've used drugs -- and Obama -- Obama said he used drugs through Occidental. And it was a lot
of drugs. He said it was -- it had become virtually habitual with marijuana and
cocaine. My argument is that the self-reporting of people who use drugs
as to when they quit is not reliable. That's the argument I was
making.


From an August 15 post to Commentary magazine's Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, titled "The Obama Smears":


As for the
book: it seems to be riddled with factual errors-some relatively minor
(like asserting that Obama does not mention the birth of his half-sister, Maya
Soetoro-Ng, in Dreams
from My Father; Obama does mention her), and some
significant (suggesting that Obama favors withdrawing troops from Afghanistan;
he wants to do the opposite). But more problematic, I think, is Corsi's
claim that Obama has "extensive connections to Islam" and his
suggestion that Obama is a recent drug user. Those claims are, from everything
I can tell, unsubstantiated. (When challenged to produce the evidence, Corsi
counters with the "prove you're not beating your wife"
defense.)

For
example, Obama, who in his book admitted using drugs in his youth, says he
hasn't used any since he was 20 years old. Corsi, in an interview, said
Obama's words can't be trusted because "self-reporting, by
people who have used drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently
unreliable." And Corsi's effort to tie Obama to the Muslim
faith-claims based on questionable sources, reaching back to
Obama's youth in Indonesia-is especially troubling, since the
subtext here is attaching Obama to militant Islam and suggesting that
he's somehow alien to America and its values (when in fact his candidacy
is a confirmation of the viability of those values).

Corsi's
approach to politics is both destructive and self-destructive. If Senator Obama
loses, he should lose on the merits: his record in public life and his
political philosophy. And while it's legitimate to take into account
Obama's past associations with people like the Reverend Jeremiah
Wright-especially for someone like Obama, about whom relatively little is
known-it wrong and reckless to throw out unsubstantiated charges and
smears against Senator Obama.

Conservatism
has been an intellectual home to people like Burke and Buckley. The GOP is the
party that gave us Lincoln and Reagan. It seems to me that its leaders ought to
make it clear that they find what Dr. Corsi is doing to be both wrong and
repellent. To have their movement and their party associated with such a figure
would be a terrible thing and it will only help the cause of those who hold
both the GOP and the conservative movement in contempt.


From an August 12 Los Angeles Times article by Kate
Linthicum:


Right-wing
author Jerome Corsi hit it big in 2004 with a book attacking John F. Kerry.

"Unfit
for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" soared to
No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Now
Corsi has done it again -- taking aim at a different Democratic presidential
candidate.

Corsi's
latest, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," will top the Aug. 17 New York Times hard-cover nonfiction
bestseller list.

The
book lashes out at Barack Obama and alleges, among other things, that the
politician has a secret radical Islamic agenda.

But
being No. 1 doesn't necessarily mean being accurate. Obama is a
Christian.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Election Center:


CAMPBELL
BROWN (host): There's a new book out about Barack Obama. It's
number one right now on The New York Times
bestseller list. I can guarantee you, though, nobody in the Obama camp is happy
at all -- at all happy about that. And here's why.

It is
called Obama Nation:
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality. The author, Jerome Corsi, also co-wrote the book Unfit
for Command, which started the Swift Boating of John Kerry. Obama Nation is riddled with pretty much
every unsubstantiated rumor you ever heard about Obama. Jessica Yellin
found out for us that it's also turning into a major campaign headache. And, Jessica,
I know -- we know that some of the most damaging charges in this book just
aren't true. The author admits he's on a mission to take down Barack Obama. He's been slammed for books that he's written before. They're
also discredited. But it's still getting an awful lot of
traction.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Anderson Cooper 360:


JESSICA
YELLIN (CNN Capitol Hill correspondent): To prove his point, Corsi says the book is meticulously researched
and fact-checked. But when we checked his facts, we found he's wrong on
many points. Here are a few. The book claims Obama didn't
dedicate his first book, Dreams from My
Father, to his family members. He did. He dedicated it to his
mother, his grandmother, and his siblings. Corsi cites a report saying
Obama was in church when Reverend Jeremiah Wright made
comments about race on July 22. But Obama was out of state, a full time zone
away. And Corsi
writes Obama has yet to answer questions about whether he
ever stopped using drugs. But in his first book, Obama said he stopped getting
high during college.


From an August 12 New York Times article by Jim
Rutenberg and Julie Bosman:


In the
summer of 2004 the conservative gadfly Jerome R. Corsi shot to the top of the
best-seller lists as co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book
attacking Senator John Kerry's record on a Vietnam War Swift boat that
began the larger damaging campaign against Mr. Kerry's war credentials as
he sought the presidency.

Almost exactly four
years after that campaign began, Mr. Corsi has released a new attack book
painting Senator Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumed presidential
nominee, as a stealth radical liberal who has tried to cover up
"extensive connections to Islam" -- Mr. Obama is Christian -- and questioning
whether his admitted experimentation with drugs in high school and college ever
ceased.

Significant parts of the
book, whose subtitle is "Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," have already been challenged as misleading or false in the
days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance
on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday --
at No. 1.

[...]

Several of the book's accusations, in fact, are unsubstantiated, misleading or inaccurate.


From the August 14 edition of Fox
News' Hannity & Colmes:


ALAN COLMES (co-host): The substance of the book --

[crosstalk]

COLMES: -- we have already seen in the book. He was wrong about a
sermon that Barack Obama attended. He got the date wrong. He was wrong about
the dedication in the book. He was wrong about Obama saying that he stopped
using drugs. He was not truthful about that. He was wrong about a number of
things in the book --

HUGH HEWITT (syndicated radio host): Actually, stop there, Alan.
That's not true --

COLMES: -- there have been a number of things in the book that have
been discredited.


From an August 14 Washington Post article by Eli
Saslow:


Corsi's
"The Obama Nation" lacks major revelations and has been dismissed by
Obama's campaign as a series of lies from a serial liar. Parts of the book have
also been disproved by the mainstream media. In 2004, Corsi co-wrote
"Unfit for Command," in which Swift boat veterans criticized Sen. John
F. Kerry's Vietnam War record. That book was also widely
disproved.


From an August 15 Washington Post editorial:


Unfortunately
but unsurprisingly, given his earlier hit job on the last Democratic nominee,
Mr. Corsi's latest is rife with inaccuracies and innuendo. If the fundamental
smear of "Unfit for Command" was that John F. Kerry was no war hero,
the insinuation of Mr. Corsi's latest is that Mr. Obama is a closet Muslim and
militant, black activist drug-user.

[...]

He gets
facts wrong, from the date of Mr. Obama's marriage to whether he dedicated his autobiography
to his family (he did) to whether he revealed that he took his future wife on
his second trip to Kenya (he did.) He makes offensive statements: "The
sexual attraction of his mother to her African husband jumps out from the
page." 

When
facts are lacking, Mr. Corsi makes his point by suggestive questions. Noting
that Life magazine could find no record of an article that Mr. Obama remembered
reading as a child about a black man who tried to lighten his skin, Mr. Corsi
asks, "How much more imagining, hypothetical lying, or just plain lying is
Obama capable of doing?" When facts are present, he twists them to make
Mr. Obama bad.


From an August 14 Associated Press article by Nedra
Pickler:


Jerome
Corsi's anti-Obama book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult
of Personality," claims the Illinois
senator is a dangerous, radical candidate for president. The book is a
compilation of all the innuendo and false rumors against Obama -- that he was
raised a Muslim, attended a radical, black church and secretly has a
"black rage" hidden beneath the surface.

In
fact, Obama is a Christian who attended Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

[...]

Corsi
suggests, without a shred of proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama
has acknowledged using marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit
when he went to college and hasn't used drugs since.

Corsi
makes an issue of the fact that, before he quit smoking cigarettes, Obama
didn't want it widely known that he smoked. "If Obama takes pains to hide
his smoking from us, what else does he take pains to hide?" Corsi asks in
the book.

Corsi
also dwells on Obama's mother marrying Obama's African father and later
marrying someone from Indonesia
-- whom Corsi describes as "a second man of color to be her mate."
The Obama campaign says the description is one of many examples of Corsi's
"offensive language" in the book.

He
claims Obama received extensive Islamic religious education as a boy in Indonesia,
education that was only offered to the truly faithful. Actually, Obama is a
Christian and as a boy he attended both Catholic school and Indonesian public
schools where some basic study of the Koran was offered.

He
accuses Obama of wanting to weaken the military even though Obama's campaign
calls for adding 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.


From an August 13 post by Joe Klein on Time magazine's Swampland
blog:


I heard
about Jerome Corsi's book a few weeks ago from my mother, who said that her
great fear--that Barack Obama has covert Islamic associations--had been
confirmed by a new book. I told her not to worry, that many reputable people
had looked into the matter and Obama was more likely to be spotted in Whole
Foods than praying in a mosque. (Since my mother has never been to Whole Foods,
so she didn't quite get my wry allusion.) "I hope so," she said,
dubiously. 

So we
know the market for trash is there, and not so far from home. And we know, that
Mary Matalin, who appears regularly on mainstream media programs like Meet the Press
called the Corsi book in the New York Times today:

"a
piece of scholarship, and a good one at that."

But
hey, Mary stands to make big bucks off this scholarship, which I'm sure was
submitted for peer review and otherwise held to the highest editorial
standards--and I'm sure her reputation and mediagenicity won't be damaged by
this poisonous crap, and we're all friends here, aren't we? And, yknow, they
say politics ain't beanbag...and it's all in the game to tell innocent, well-intentioned
people that Barack Obama is a secret Muslim or that John Kerry wasn't really a
hero in Vietnam.
Or, as George W. Bush, once told a rightly outraged John McCain--whose wife and
daughter Bush's minions had smeared--"It's just politics."


An August 13 post on Jonathan
Martin's blog at Politico.com:


The
power of Fox News and talk radio: Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation "is to
make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction
hardcovers this Sunday -- at No. 1.," according to a front-page story by Jim Rutenberg
and Julie Bosman in the Times today that will only help sell more books.

As
Rutenberg and Bosman note, the book has its share of errors. 

But
Corsi delved into the drug-and-Muslim fever swamps, which, regardless of
accuracy, is what many on the right want to believe about Obama.

The
best part of the piece, though, is this: "He said he was planning to
aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr.
Obama this fall, though he would not name them."

A
third-party anti-Obama effort still may form, but methinks there is a reason
here why Corsi "would not name them."

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Media denounce Corsi&#39;s anti-Obama book {...} Many in the media are challenging Jerome Corsi&#39;s The Obama Nation , noting its numerous falsehoods and its author&#39;s track record. Their reaction stands in stark contrast to coverage of Corsi&#39;s 2004 book, Unfit for Command . The media were sharply criticized for taking too long to challenge that book&#39;s numerous smears and falsehoods. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 16, 2008, 3:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 16, 2008, 12:22 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;39KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - "[P]ro-White" radio host Edwards asks of Media Matters' funders: "[W]hat do you want to bet that a lot of those 'wealthy liberals' have funny last names?"</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/p-ro-white-radio-host-edwards-asks-of-media-matters-20080880817.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">In an August 15 blog post, James Edwards, co-host of
the "pro-White" Political
Cesspool Radio Show, responded to a Media
Matters for America item noting that Jerome Corsi,
author of The Obama
Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, appeared on the July 20 edition of
the show and is reportedly scheduled to appear in its August 17 broadcast. In his post, headlined "Gays, liberals attack Jerome
Corsi," Edwards wrote that Media
Matters was "founded and is run by homosexual David
Brock." After asserting that Media
Matters is funded by "a bunch of 'wealthy
liberals,' " Edwards said: "And what do you want to bet that a lot of those
'wealthy liberals' have funny last names?"

Edwards also wrote: "And notice
that no one ever refutes anything I've written. They can't. But
they hate the fact that I'm telling the truth on my blog and on the radio
show, so, because they can't refute me, they simply resort to name
calling." In fact, Media Matters highlighted some of Edwards'
comments. Edwards has asserted on his blog that
"[i]nterracial sex is white genocide" and called British historian David
Irving -- who was, according to BBC News, "jailed by an
Austrian court after pleading guilty to denying that the Holocaust took
place" -- a "real hero" and "a survivor of the Jewish
Holocaust against free speech." As
Media Matters noted, his radio show has on its
website a "Statement of Principles"
saying that the show "represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White"
and which "heartily endorse[s] and accept[s] as our own, the founding
tenets of the Council of Conservative Citizens
[CCC]."

In a second August 15 post
responding to how his "blog has been getting a ton of traffic over the
past two days thanks to the liberal/homosexual assault being waged against
Jerome Corsi on behalf of the Barack Obama campaign," Edwards said of
himself and his Political Cesspool
co-hosts, "We are not rooting for either candidate. We're rooting
for white people." Edwards further asserted: "Between McCain and
Obama, we couldn't care less who wins. In fact, we think an Obama victory
would be fitting. The only countries in the world that have black heads of state
are third world countries, and as massive demographic changes in this country
will soon make much of America a third world country, a black president would
be entirely appropriate." Edwards' post also referred to "the
left wing homosexuals over at Media Matters."

From Edwards' first August 15 post, headlined "Gays, liberals attack Jerome Corsi": 


Jerome
Corsi, author of the #1 bestseller The Obama Nation, is scheduled
to appear on The
Political Cesspool this Sunday. Yesterday the liberal
hate machine went into high gear in a massive, coordinated attack campaign
against Mr. Corsi, which is no doubt being managed and directed by the Obama
campaign. They remember how devastatingly effective his book Unfit For Command
was in keeping John Kerry out of the White House, and they're going to do
their darndest to try to keep him from repeating his success with Obama.

And what's their latest
angle of attack? They're trumpeting the fact that he's going to
talk about his book on The Cesspool. The first big story came yesterday from
the far left wing Media Matters, which was founded and is run by homosexual David Brock. You can read it here.

Summary: Despite stating
that he had apologized for what was described as a "series of bigoted and
hateful posts," Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation, is scheduled to
appear with host James Edwards on the August 17 edition of The Political
Cesspool Radio Show, which, according to its "Statement of
Principles," "represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White."
In a blog post, Edwards has stated that "[i]nterracial sex is white
genocide."

Then the equally far
left wing Huffington Post came after Corsi and The Cesspool. You can read their
diatribe here.

[...]

And notice that no one
ever refutes anything I've written. They can't. But they hate the
fact that I'm telling the truth on my blog and on the radio show, so,
because they can't refute me, they simply resort to name calling. And then
they attack Dr. Corsi for appearing on my show, as if every guest on every
radio show endorses every opinion and action of the host of that show. Which is
insane. There are lots of things I've written that Dr. Corsi
doesn't agree with, and there are lots of things he's written that
I don't agree with. Appearing on a show to promote your book in no way
implies anything, let alone that you agree with the radio host 100%. Corsi
appeared on Larry King Live the other night, but no one ever accuses guests of
Larry King of endorsing being married 7 times, not to mention King's criminal background,
which includes charges of bribery, corruption, grand larceny, and passing 14 bad
checks.

Besides, what
conservative wouldn't be proud to be attacked by these freaks? Like David Brock, the former "conservative"
writer for The American
Spectator, who's now openly homosexual and a
flaming liberal, who wrote in one of his books
about arranging a dinner/interview with Matt Drudge. But Drudge misunderstood
-- he thought it was a date, and brought a dozen roses for Brock, and took him
gay bar hopping. Drudge later wrote to Brock that some were saying that Drudge
and Brock were gay lovers and "I should only be so lucky." Brock,
the former "conservative", then went on to found Media Matters
which exists to expose "the lies of the right wing media." And
guess who's funding this little venture? The notorious Moveon.org, for one, and a
bunch of "wealthy liberals." And what do you want
to bet that a lot of those "wealthy liberals" have funny last
names?


From Edwards'
second post, headlined "Note for our newer readers": 


My blog has been getting
a ton of traffic over the past two days thanks to the liberal/homosexual assault
being waged against Jerome Corsi on behalf of the Barack Obama campaign. Most
of the liberal bloggers/websites that have mentioned us do nothing but call us
names, lifting passages directly from a hate piece by the Southern Poverty Law
Center. Many of them give the impression that we're McCain supporters.
Some make outrageously false accusations that we "malign" Jews and
non-whites. These are both lies.

I am the furthest thing
possible from a McCain supporter. The same is true of all my co-hosts on The
Political Cesspool radio program. We've never been McCain supporters, nor
Bush supporters. We are NOT Republicans. We are pro-white, and seek
what's best for white people. (We are not "white
supremacists" as all these gay/liberal liars are saying.) We believe the
interests of white people come first, and we want what's best for our
people. A McCain victory would not be in the interests of white people by any
stretch of the imagination. Between McCain and Obama, we couldn't care
less who wins. In fact, we think an Obama victory would be fitting. The only
countries in the world that have black heads of state are third world
countries, and as massive demographic changes in this country will soon make
much of America a third world country, a black president would be entirely
appropriate. 

We are not rooting for
either candidate. We're rooting for white people.


Nor do we malign any
racial group. We tell the truth about racial differences, and unlike the
mainstream media, we don't cover up the racial angles of important news
stories. Unlike some people, we don't consider pointing out that a Jew is
a Jew to be "anti-semitic", any more than pointing out that Obama
is black is "anti-black." And the very people attacking us as racists,
the left wing homosexuals over at Media Matters, have no compunctions at all
about highlighting people's race when it suits their purposes. Of course,
when they do it, it's not "racism", it's just
"honest reporting", etc. 

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/p-ro-white-radio-host-edwards-asks-of-media-matters-20080880817.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-16T01:01:44Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-16T01:01:44Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150012</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/p-ro-white-radio-host-edwards-asks-of-media-matters-20080880817.htm"><b>"[P]ro-White" radio host Edwards asks of Media Matters' funders: "[W]hat do you want to bet that a lot of those 'wealthy liberals' have funny last names?"</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/p-ro-white-radio-host-edwards-asks-of-media-matters-20080880817.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - In an August 15 blog post, James Edwards, co-host of
the "pro-White" Political
Cesspool Radio Show, responded to a Media
Matters for America item noting that Jerome Corsi,
author of The Obama
Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, appeared on the July 20 edition of
the show and is reportedly scheduled to appear in its August 17 broadcast. In his post, headlined "Gays, liberals attack Jerome
Corsi," Edwards wrote that Media
Matters was "founded and is run by homosexual David
Brock." After asserting that Media
Matters is funded by "a bunch of 'wealthy
liberals,' " Edwards said: "And what do you want to bet that a lot of those
'wealthy liberals' have funny last names?"

Edwards also wrote: "And notice
that no one ever refutes anything I've written. They can't. But
they hate the fact that I'm telling the truth on my blog and on the radio
show, so, because they can't refute me, they simply resort to name
calling." In fact, Media Matters highlighted some of Edwards'
comments. Edwards has asserted on his blog that
"[i]nterracial sex is white genocide" and called British historian David
Irving -- who was, according to BBC News, "jailed by an
Austrian court after pleading guilty to denying that the Holocaust took
place" -- a "real hero" and "a survivor of the Jewish
Holocaust against free speech." As
Media Matters noted, his radio show has on its
website a "Statement of Principles"
saying that the show "represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White"
and which "heartily endorse[s] and accept[s] as our own, the founding
tenets of the Council of Conservative Citizens
[CCC]."

In a second August 15 post
responding to how his "blog has been getting a ton of traffic over the
past two days thanks to the liberal/homosexual assault being waged against
Jerome Corsi on behalf of the Barack Obama campaign," Edwards said of
himself and his Political Cesspool
co-hosts, "We are not rooting for either candidate. We're rooting
for white people." Edwards further asserted: "Between McCain and
Obama, we couldn't care less who wins. In fact, we think an Obama victory
would be fitting. The only countries in the world that have black heads of state
are third world countries, and as massive demographic changes in this country
will soon make much of America a third world country, a black president would
be entirely appropriate." Edwards' post also referred to "the
left wing homosexuals over at Media Matters."

From Edwards' first August 15 post, headlined "Gays, liberals attack Jerome Corsi": 


Jerome
Corsi, author of the #1 bestseller The Obama Nation, is scheduled
to appear on The
Political Cesspool this Sunday. Yesterday the liberal
hate machine went into high gear in a massive, coordinated attack campaign
against Mr. Corsi, which is no doubt being managed and directed by the Obama
campaign. They remember how devastatingly effective his book Unfit For Command
was in keeping John Kerry out of the White House, and they're going to do
their darndest to try to keep him from repeating his success with Obama.

And what's their latest
angle of attack? They're trumpeting the fact that he's going to
talk about his book on The Cesspool. The first big story came yesterday from
the far left wing Media Matters, which was founded and is run by homosexual David Brock. You can read it here.

Summary: Despite stating
that he had apologized for what was described as a "series of bigoted and
hateful posts," Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation, is scheduled to
appear with host James Edwards on the August 17 edition of The Political
Cesspool Radio Show, which, according to its "Statement of
Principles," "represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White."
In a blog post, Edwards has stated that "[i]nterracial sex is white
genocide."

Then the equally far
left wing Huffington Post came after Corsi and The Cesspool. You can read their
diatribe here.

[...]

And notice that no one
ever refutes anything I've written. They can't. But they hate the
fact that I'm telling the truth on my blog and on the radio show, so,
because they can't refute me, they simply resort to name calling. And then
they attack Dr. Corsi for appearing on my show, as if every guest on every
radio show endorses every opinion and action of the host of that show. Which is
insane. There are lots of things I've written that Dr. Corsi
doesn't agree with, and there are lots of things he's written that
I don't agree with. Appearing on a show to promote your book in no way
implies anything, let alone that you agree with the radio host 100%. Corsi
appeared on Larry King Live the other night, but no one ever accuses guests of
Larry King of endorsing being married 7 times, not to mention King's criminal background,
which includes charges of bribery, corruption, grand larceny, and passing 14 bad
checks.

Besides, what
conservative wouldn't be proud to be attacked by these freaks? Like David Brock, the former "conservative"
writer for The American
Spectator, who's now openly homosexual and a
flaming liberal, who wrote in one of his books
about arranging a dinner/interview with Matt Drudge. But Drudge misunderstood
-- he thought it was a date, and brought a dozen roses for Brock, and took him
gay bar hopping. Drudge later wrote to Brock that some were saying that Drudge
and Brock were gay lovers and "I should only be so lucky." Brock,
the former "conservative", then went on to found Media Matters
which exists to expose "the lies of the right wing media." And
guess who's funding this little venture? The notorious Moveon.org, for one, and a
bunch of "wealthy liberals." And what do you want
to bet that a lot of those "wealthy liberals" have funny last
names?


From Edwards'
second post, headlined "Note for our newer readers": 


My blog has been getting
a ton of traffic over the past two days thanks to the liberal/homosexual assault
being waged against Jerome Corsi on behalf of the Barack Obama campaign. Most
of the liberal bloggers/websites that have mentioned us do nothing but call us
names, lifting passages directly from a hate piece by the Southern Poverty Law
Center. Many of them give the impression that we're McCain supporters.
Some make outrageously false accusations that we "malign" Jews and
non-whites. These are both lies.

I am the furthest thing
possible from a McCain supporter. The same is true of all my co-hosts on The
Political Cesspool radio program. We've never been McCain supporters, nor
Bush supporters. We are NOT Republicans. We are pro-white, and seek
what's best for white people. (We are not "white
supremacists" as all these gay/liberal liars are saying.) We believe the
interests of white people come first, and we want what's best for our
people. A McCain victory would not be in the interests of white people by any
stretch of the imagination. Between McCain and Obama, we couldn't care
less who wins. In fact, we think an Obama victory would be fitting. The only
countries in the world that have black heads of state are third world
countries, and as massive demographic changes in this country will soon make
much of America a third world country, a black president would be entirely
appropriate. 

We are not rooting for
either candidate. We're rooting for white people.


Nor do we malign any
racial group. We tell the truth about racial differences, and unlike the
mainstream media, we don't cover up the racial angles of important news
stories. Unlike some people, we don't consider pointing out that a Jew is
a Jew to be "anti-semitic", any more than pointing out that Obama
is black is "anti-black." And the very people attacking us as racists,
the left wing homosexuals over at Media Matters, have no compunctions at all
about highlighting people's race when it suits their purposes. Of course,
when they do it, it's not "racism", it's just
"honest reporting", etc. 

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - "[P]ro-White" radio host Edwards asks of Media Matters&#39; funders: "[W]hat do you want to bet that a lot of those &#39;wealthy liberals&#39; have funny last names?" {...} Responding to a Media Matters item, James Edwards, co-host of the "pro-White" Political Cesspool Radio Show , asserted that Media Matters is funded by "a bunch of &#39;wealthy liberals,&#39; " and said: "And what do you want to bet that a lot of those &#39;wealthy liberals&#39; have funny last names?" Edwards also said of himself and his Political Cesspool co-hosts, "We are not rooting for either candidate. We&#39;re rooting for white people." {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 16, 2008, 1:01 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 16, 2008, 12:22 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;25KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - CNN's Amy Holmes falsely accused Hillary Clinton of fostering doubt about Obama's religion</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/cnn-s-amy-holmes-falsely-accused-hillary-clinton-2008088029.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">On the August 13 edition of
CNN's Larry King Live, CNN
political contributor and Republican strategist Amy Holmes accused Sen. Hillary
Clinton of fostering doubt about Sen.
Barack Obama's religion. Holmes mischaracterized Clinton's response during a March 2 60 Minutes interview to the question of
whether Clinton
"believe[d] that Senator Obama is a Muslim," falsely asserting that "Hillary Clinton herself said
she wasn't -- she thought he was Christian, as far as she knew." As Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, contrary to
Holmes' claim, Clinton's first three words in response to the
question were, "Of course not." Indeed, during the interview with
CBS correspondent Steve Kroft, Clinton
equated the false rumors about Obama's religion to false rumors about
her: "Look, I have
been the target of so many ridiculous rumors. I have a great deal of sympathy
for anybody who gets, you know, smeared with the kind of rumors that go on all
the time."

From the March 2 edition of CBS' 60 Minutes: 


KROFT: You don't believe that
Senator Obama is a Muslim?

CLINTON: Of course not. I mean, that's --
you know, there is no basis for that. You know, I take him on the basis of what
he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that.

KROFT: And you said you'd take
Senator Obama at his word that he's not a Muslim.

CLINTON: Right. Right.

KROFT: You don't believe that he's a
Muslim --

CLINTON: No. No. Why would I? There's no --

KROFT: -- or implying, right?

CLINTON: No, there is nothing to base that
on, as far as I know.

KROFT: It's just scurrilous --

CLINTON: Look, I have been the target of so
many ridiculous rumors. I have a great deal of sympathy for anybody who gets,
you know, smeared with the kind of rumors that go on all the time.



From the August 13 edition of CNN's Larry King Live: 


HOLMES: I agree with Peter [Beinart,
Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow]. I don't think Barack Obama should
give this any more attention, any more oxygen. But I would like to say that so
much of this criticism in this book is being laid at the feet of the GOP, as if
this is a conservative -- concerted conservative smear machine, which it's not.
And let's remember, back in the Democratic primary, it was Bill Clinton
questioning Barack Obama's love of country, when he said that he thought if McCain
and Hillary ran that you would have two candidates who loved their country and
were devoted to their country. So I would like to, you know, kind of put this
out on the table, that a lot of this was coming from Democrats, long before
this [Jerome] Corsi put out this book. 

BEINART: Well, but Mary Matalin is
the head of this publishing house.

LARRY KING (host): Yeah. Mary
Matalin is. 

HOLMES: I understand that. I
understand that. But so much of the attacks on this is that this is only the
GOP and that it's somehow coordinated and concerted, when, in fact, in
the Democratic primary, we saw left-wing blogs attacking Barack Obama on
religion. Hillary Clinton herself said she wasn't -- she thought he was
Christian, as far as she knew. 

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/cnn-s-amy-holmes-falsely-accused-hillary-clinton-2008088029.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-15T00:24:18Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-15T00:24:18Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808140007</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/cnn-s-amy-holmes-falsely-accused-hillary-clinton-2008088029.htm"><b>CNN's Amy Holmes falsely accused Hillary Clinton of fostering doubt about Obama's religion</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/cnn-s-amy-holmes-falsely-accused-hillary-clinton-2008088029.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - On the August 13 edition of
CNN's Larry King Live, CNN
political contributor and Republican strategist Amy Holmes accused Sen. Hillary
Clinton of fostering doubt about Sen.
Barack Obama's religion. Holmes mischaracterized Clinton's response during a March 2 60 Minutes interview to the question of
whether Clinton
"believe[d] that Senator Obama is a Muslim," falsely asserting that "Hillary Clinton herself said
she wasn't -- she thought he was Christian, as far as she knew." As Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, contrary to
Holmes' claim, Clinton's first three words in response to the
question were, "Of course not." Indeed, during the interview with
CBS correspondent Steve Kroft, Clinton
equated the false rumors about Obama's religion to false rumors about
her: "Look, I have
been the target of so many ridiculous rumors. I have a great deal of sympathy
for anybody who gets, you know, smeared with the kind of rumors that go on all
the time."

From the March 2 edition of CBS' 60 Minutes: 


KROFT: You don't believe that
Senator Obama is a Muslim?

CLINTON: Of course not. I mean, that's --
you know, there is no basis for that. You know, I take him on the basis of what
he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that.

KROFT: And you said you'd take
Senator Obama at his word that he's not a Muslim.

CLINTON: Right. Right.

KROFT: You don't believe that he's a
Muslim --

CLINTON: No. No. Why would I? There's no --

KROFT: -- or implying, right?

CLINTON: No, there is nothing to base that
on, as far as I know.

KROFT: It's just scurrilous --

CLINTON: Look, I have been the target of so
many ridiculous rumors. I have a great deal of sympathy for anybody who gets,
you know, smeared with the kind of rumors that go on all the time.



From the August 13 edition of CNN's Larry King Live: 


HOLMES: I agree with Peter [Beinart,
Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow]. I don't think Barack Obama should
give this any more attention, any more oxygen. But I would like to say that so
much of this criticism in this book is being laid at the feet of the GOP, as if
this is a conservative -- concerted conservative smear machine, which it's not.
And let's remember, back in the Democratic primary, it was Bill Clinton
questioning Barack Obama's love of country, when he said that he thought if McCain
and Hillary ran that you would have two candidates who loved their country and
were devoted to their country. So I would like to, you know, kind of put this
out on the table, that a lot of this was coming from Democrats, long before
this [Jerome] Corsi put out this book. 

BEINART: Well, but Mary Matalin is
the head of this publishing house.

LARRY KING (host): Yeah. Mary
Matalin is. 

HOLMES: I understand that. I
understand that. But so much of the attacks on this is that this is only the
GOP and that it's somehow coordinated and concerted, when, in fact, in
the Democratic primary, we saw left-wing blogs attacking Barack Obama on
religion. Hillary Clinton herself said she wasn't -- she thought he was
Christian, as far as she knew. 

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - CNN&#39;s Amy Holmes falsely accused Hillary Clinton of fostering doubt about Obama&#39;s religion {...} On Larry King Live , Amy Holmes falsely asserted that "Hillary Clinton herself said she wasn&#39;t -- she thought he [Sen. Barack Obama] was Christian, as far as she knew." In fact, during the 60 Minutes interview to which Holmes was referring, when Clinton was asked whether she "believe[d] that Senator Obama is a Muslim," the first three words of her response were, "Of course not." {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 15, 2008, 12:24 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 15, 2008, 3:25 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;20KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Despite "all my apologies" for bigoted comments, Corsi reportedly scheduled to appear on "pro-White" radio show</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-all-my-apologies-for-bigoted-comments-corsi-20080878614.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">In an appearance on the August 13 edition of CNN's Larry King Live, after Media Matters for America Senior Fellow Paul Waldman noted that Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics
and the Cult of Personality, had
"put up on right-wing Web sites a whole series of bigoted and hateful
posts," Corsi replied that "you haven't mentioned all my apologies
for those statements." But
notwithstanding Corsi's apologies for his comments, Corsi is reportedly scheduled to appear with host James Edwards
on the August 17 edition of The Political Cesspool Radio Show, which, according to its "Statement of Principles,"
"represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White" and which
"heartily endorse[s] and accept[s] as our own, the founding tenets of the
Council of Conservative Citizens [CCC]." According to a Fall 2007 article in the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Report, " 'The Political
Cesspool' in the past two years has become the primary radio nexus of
hate in America."
Corsi previously appeared on the July 20
edition of the show, in which he promoted The
Obama Nation and criticized Sen. Barack Obama.

The show's statement also asserts
that "America would not be as prosperous, ruggedly individualistic, and a
land of opportunity if the founding stock were not Europeans" and that
"[w]e wish to revive the White birthrate above replacement level
fertility and beyond to grow the percentage of Whites in the world relative to
other races." It also states: "Secession is a right of all people
and individuals. It was successful in 1776 and this show honors those who tried
to make it successful in 1865." According to the statement, Political Cesspool is also "against
feminism" and "against homosexuality." 

An August 14 post on Edwards' blog,
titled "Hollywood promotes white genocide" and
highlighted on the front page of the show's website, states: "One of
the most popular movies right now is Sisterhood
of the Traveling Pants: 2, which is being marketed directly to
teenage girls. It's been out about a week and has already grossed almost
$25 million dollars. What's it about? White girls having sex with
non-whites. Which is white genocide." It later adds: "Interracial
sex is white genocide." An August 13 post to Edwards'
blog, headlined "Your chance to hear a real
Holocaust survivor," states: "If you're anywhere near Alabama, and you want
the chance to meet a real hero, mark August 26th on your calendar. That's
the day David Irving, a survivor of the Jewish Holocaust against free speech,
will be speaking at the Prattville Holiday Inn." In a February 20, 2006, article, BBC News reported that Irving, a
British historian, had been "jailed by an Austrian court after pleading
guilty to denying that the Holocaust took place." 

In addition, responding to a June 6 report by the Anti-Defamation League
(ADL) about Political Cesspool's
return to the airwaves following a four-month hiatus, in a June 9 blog post, Edwards
referred to the ADL as "America's
most powerful hate group." Purporting to provide "a handy
ADL-to-English dictionary" for his supporters to use while reading the
ADL's article, Edwards wrote: 


White
supremacist -- anybody who doesn't hate white people
Anti-semite -- 1. any non Jewish white person; 2. everyone who's ever met
[ADL chairman] Abe Foxman
Extremist -- normal American
Holocaust denier -- someone who asks questions about WW II the ADL
doesn't want asked
Neo-Nazi -- any white person who openly disagrees with a Jew
Racist -- a white person 


Other statements found on Edwards'
blog:


In an August 11 post, Edwards wrote:
"For blacks in the Americas,
slavery is the greatest thing that ever happened to them. Unfortunately,
it's the worst thing that ever happened to white Americans."

In an August 6 post headlined
"Jewish media reaches new heights," discussing a Slate.com article by "Jew Timothy
Noah," Edwards wrote that the piece would "make sense once you
understand that Jews are the ones who are always speaking in code; when they
use words like 'racists', 'bigots', 'anti-semites',
they simply mean white people." Similarly, in a July 9 post headlined
"Great moments in Jewish journalism," Edwards referred to a column by The Washington Post's David S.
Broder about former Sen. Jesse Helms as "another hatefilled Jewish attack
piece."
 
In a July 30 post, Edwards asked:
"If the WNBA [Women's National Basketball Association] is so hell
bent on diversity, why don't they hire a couple of heterosexual players
or coaches?"

In a June 6 post headlined
"Does she hate Whitey?" Edwards wrote: "Michelle Obama, that
is. Uh, yeah, I'm pretty sure she does. Just like her husband. Just like
about 90% of blacks."


CCC's principles, as printed on Political Cesspool''s website,
are: 


1. We believe the United
       States is a Christian country. 
2. The     United States     is a sovereign and independent nation. 
3. We     believe the United       States is a European country and that
     Americans are part of the European people. 
4. The     United States     is a constitutional republic. 
5. We     believe in States' Rights, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Bill
     of Rights. 
6. The     traditional family is the basic unit of human society. 
7. Private     property and free enterprise are the foundations of our economy. 
8. We     must have cultural, national, and racial integrity. 
9. A     strong national defense is imperative. 
10. Our     nation needs an "America First" Foreign Policy. 
11. Our     nation needs "America First" Trade Policies. 
12. Traditional     education should remain under local control. 
13. We     advocate strong and just law enforcement. 
14. English     is the official language to be used in public discourse in America.
 
15. We     believe in the protection of our environmental and natural heritage.


For its part, the CCC says next to the "principle[]" quoted by Political Cesspool about the United States
being a "European Country": "We
also oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind, to promote non-white races
over the European-American people through so-called 'affirmative action' and
similar measures, to destroy or denigrate the European-American heritage,
including the heritage of the Southern people, and to force the integration of
the races." Edwards spoke at the CCC 2008 national convention.
    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-all-my-apologies-for-bigoted-comments-corsi-20080878614.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-13T20:26:39Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-13T20:26:39Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808140003</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-all-my-apologies-for-bigoted-comments-corsi-20080878614.htm"><b>Despite "all my apologies" for bigoted comments, Corsi reportedly scheduled to appear on "pro-White" radio show</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-all-my-apologies-for-bigoted-comments-corsi-20080878614.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - In an appearance on the August 13 edition of CNN's Larry King Live, after Media Matters for America Senior Fellow Paul Waldman noted that Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics
and the Cult of Personality, had
"put up on right-wing Web sites a whole series of bigoted and hateful
posts," Corsi replied that "you haven't mentioned all my apologies
for those statements." But
notwithstanding Corsi's apologies for his comments, Corsi is reportedly scheduled to appear with host James Edwards
on the August 17 edition of The Political Cesspool Radio Show, which, according to its "Statement of Principles,"
"represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White" and which
"heartily endorse[s] and accept[s] as our own, the founding tenets of the
Council of Conservative Citizens [CCC]." According to a Fall 2007 article in the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Report, " 'The Political
Cesspool' in the past two years has become the primary radio nexus of
hate in America."
Corsi previously appeared on the July 20
edition of the show, in which he promoted The
Obama Nation and criticized Sen. Barack Obama.

The show's statement also asserts
that "America would not be as prosperous, ruggedly individualistic, and a
land of opportunity if the founding stock were not Europeans" and that
"[w]e wish to revive the White birthrate above replacement level
fertility and beyond to grow the percentage of Whites in the world relative to
other races." It also states: "Secession is a right of all people
and individuals. It was successful in 1776 and this show honors those who tried
to make it successful in 1865." According to the statement, Political Cesspool is also "against
feminism" and "against homosexuality." 

An August 14 post on Edwards' blog,
titled "Hollywood promotes white genocide" and
highlighted on the front page of the show's website, states: "One of
the most popular movies right now is Sisterhood
of the Traveling Pants: 2, which is being marketed directly to
teenage girls. It's been out about a week and has already grossed almost
$25 million dollars. What's it about? White girls having sex with
non-whites. Which is white genocide." It later adds: "Interracial
sex is white genocide." An August 13 post to Edwards'
blog, headlined "Your chance to hear a real
Holocaust survivor," states: "If you're anywhere near Alabama, and you want
the chance to meet a real hero, mark August 26th on your calendar. That's
the day David Irving, a survivor of the Jewish Holocaust against free speech,
will be speaking at the Prattville Holiday Inn." In a February 20, 2006, article, BBC News reported that Irving, a
British historian, had been "jailed by an Austrian court after pleading
guilty to denying that the Holocaust took place." 

In addition, responding to a June 6 report by the Anti-Defamation League
(ADL) about Political Cesspool's
return to the airwaves following a four-month hiatus, in a June 9 blog post, Edwards
referred to the ADL as "America's
most powerful hate group." Purporting to provide "a handy
ADL-to-English dictionary" for his supporters to use while reading the
ADL's article, Edwards wrote: 


White
supremacist -- anybody who doesn't hate white people
Anti-semite -- 1. any non Jewish white person; 2. everyone who's ever met
[ADL chairman] Abe Foxman
Extremist -- normal American
Holocaust denier -- someone who asks questions about WW II the ADL
doesn't want asked
Neo-Nazi -- any white person who openly disagrees with a Jew
Racist -- a white person 


Other statements found on Edwards'
blog:


In an August 11 post, Edwards wrote:
"For blacks in the Americas,
slavery is the greatest thing that ever happened to them. Unfortunately,
it's the worst thing that ever happened to white Americans."

In an August 6 post headlined
"Jewish media reaches new heights," discussing a Slate.com article by "Jew Timothy
Noah," Edwards wrote that the piece would "make sense once you
understand that Jews are the ones who are always speaking in code; when they
use words like 'racists', 'bigots', 'anti-semites',
they simply mean white people." Similarly, in a July 9 post headlined
"Great moments in Jewish journalism," Edwards referred to a column by The Washington Post's David S.
Broder about former Sen. Jesse Helms as "another hatefilled Jewish attack
piece."
 
In a July 30 post, Edwards asked:
"If the WNBA [Women's National Basketball Association] is so hell
bent on diversity, why don't they hire a couple of heterosexual players
or coaches?"

In a June 6 post headlined
"Does she hate Whitey?" Edwards wrote: "Michelle Obama, that
is. Uh, yeah, I'm pretty sure she does. Just like her husband. Just like
about 90% of blacks."


CCC's principles, as printed on Political Cesspool''s website,
are: 


1. We believe the United
       States is a Christian country. 
2. The     United States     is a sovereign and independent nation. 
3. We     believe the United       States is a European country and that
     Americans are part of the European people. 
4. The     United States     is a constitutional republic. 
5. We     believe in States' Rights, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Bill
     of Rights. 
6. The     traditional family is the basic unit of human society. 
7. Private     property and free enterprise are the foundations of our economy. 
8. We     must have cultural, national, and racial integrity. 
9. A     strong national defense is imperative. 
10. Our     nation needs an "America First" Foreign Policy. 
11. Our     nation needs "America First" Trade Policies. 
12. Traditional     education should remain under local control. 
13. We     advocate strong and just law enforcement. 
14. English     is the official language to be used in public discourse in America.
 
15. We     believe in the protection of our environmental and natural heritage.


For its part, the CCC says next to the "principle[]" quoted by Political Cesspool about the United States
being a "European Country": "We
also oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind, to promote non-white races
over the European-American people through so-called 'affirmative action' and
similar measures, to destroy or denigrate the European-American heritage,
including the heritage of the Southern people, and to force the integration of
the races." Edwards spoke at the CCC 2008 national convention.
    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Despite "all my apologies" for bigoted comments, Corsi reportedly scheduled to appear on "pro-White" radio show {...} Despite stating that he had apologized for what was described as a "series of bigoted and hateful posts," Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation , is scheduled to appear with host James Edwards on the August 17 edition of The Political Cesspool Radio Show , which, according to its " Statement of Principles," "represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White." In a blog post, Edwards has stated that "[i]nterracial sex is white genocide." {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 13, 2008, 8:26 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 14, 2008, 9:00 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;26KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{NORTH AMERICA &gt; LODGING} - Royal Islander - October 18-25 (Cancun, Mexico) $1000 2bd</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/royal-islander-october-18-25-cancun-mexico-1000-2008082558.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">Royal Islander 2 bedroom/2 bath villa during October 18-25. Suite includes master bedroom (king), living room with two pull-down twin beds and full sized kitchen. Lock-off includes two double beds, bathroom &amp; mini refrigerator. There is a large outside terrace with table &amp; chairs. Free activities include bicycles, volleyball, sailboats, kayaks, tennis, and snorkel gear. 



I have the following week available: 



Week 42 - October 18-25 - Royal Islander - Unit 4431 Ocean View 



Check out the Royal Islander website at: 



http://www.royalresorts.com/villas-royal-islander.asp 



Contact Larry or Paula at 925-200-7808 or reply to this ad.</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/royal-islander-october-18-25-cancun-mexico-1000-2008082558.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-10T07:17:37Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-10T07:17:37Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Sfbay.Craigslist.Org</name>
<url>http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/vac/790522293.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/royal-islander-october-18-25-cancun-mexico-1000-2008082558.htm"><b>Royal Islander - October 18-25 (Cancun, Mexico) $1000 2bd</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/royal-islander-october-18-25-cancun-mexico-1000-2008082558.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Sfbay.Craigslist.Org</span> - Royal Islander 2 bedroom/2 bath villa during October 18-25. Suite includes master bedroom (king), living room with two pull-down twin beds and full sized kitchen. Lock-off includes two double beds, bathroom & mini refrigerator. There is a large outside terrace with table & chairs. Free activities include bicycles, volleyball, sailboats, kayaks, tennis, and snorkel gear. 



I have the following week available: 



Week 42 - October 18-25 - Royal Islander - Unit 4431 Ocean View 



Check out the Royal Islander website at: 



http://www.royalresorts.com/villas-royal-islander.asp 



Contact Larry or Paula at 925-200-7808 or reply to this ad.<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Royal Islander - October 18-25 {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 10, 2008, 7:17 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 10, 2008, 1:17 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;4KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/">Regional</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/">North America</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/">United States</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/">California</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/">Metro Areas</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/">San Francisco Bay Area</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/">Travel and Tourism</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/"><b>Lodging</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ENTERTAINMENT &gt; PUBLICATIONS AND MEDIA} - Hollywood Has Finally Figured Out How to Make Web Video Pay</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/entertainment/publications-and-media/hollywood-has-finally-figured-out-how-to-make-web-20080737334.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">


It's a quintessential Hollywood moment: a star on a soundstage, the focal point of every person and every piece of equipment in the room. The star on this particular January day is Rosario Dawson, the 29-year-old actress who earned her cred as an Uzi-wielding prostitute in Sin City. She's being filmed against a greenscreen in extreme close-up, highlighting her sculpted cheekbones and olive skin. "We've got this joke in vice," she murmurs in a voice that's uncommonly sultry for a police detective. "Love costs 10 bucks. True love costs 20."

In her studded black tunic and high-heeled boots, Dawson is apparently Tinseltown's idea of how to clean up the streets. "She looks like she can kick some ass," observes Brent Friedman, the chief screenwriter, who's watching on a nearby monitor. But even though we're in a Hollywood zip code, this is no film or television shoot. The rented space looks more like an oversize garage than a studio soundstage. Instead of the usual army of grips and gaffers, the production is staffed by a skeleton crew. And the parking lot outside? Barely big enough for 20 cars.






All of which can mean only one thing: another Web production. Two years after the success of Lonelygirl15 &mdash; the groundbreaking YouTube serial that turned out to be not the DIY diary of a 16-year-old girl but the work of three wannabe auteurs in Beverly Hills &mdash; Web video has finally captured Hollywood's imagination. Last year, former Disney chief Michael Eisner launched Prom Queen, a daily 90-second teen drama; Judd Apatow has joined Will Ferrell on Funny or Die, a sort of YouTube for comedy; producers Ed Zwick and Marshall Herskovitz had a modest success with Quarterlife, a Web show about self-obsessed twentysomethings, only to see it flop on TV. But Gemini Division, the sci-fi serial Dawson is shooting today, will be the first Web series to feature a bona fide Hollywood star.

Sure, the YouTube explosion was fueled by amateurs, but it will be showbiz professionals who cash in on Web video. That's because most big corporate advertisers want a safe, predictable environment &mdash; not the latest YouTube one-off, no matter how viral. Once the major brands get on board, millions of ad dollars will follow. Which is why when the writers' strike idled most of Hollywood last winter, talent agents fielded calls from clients eager to try their hand. At the same time, the fact that a three-minute clip can be shot for as little as $2,000 means Web video will be more open to ambitious neophytes than television ever was &mdash; witness the guys behind Lonelygirl15, who now have a second hit Web series called KateModern and a deal to develop more for CBS.

So far, however, this is a gold rush without any gold. Nobody knows how the business is supposed to work &mdash; what kind of stories to tell, whether to tell them in 90 seconds or 20 minutes, whether to build a destination site or distribute episodes across the Net, how to generate revenue, how to do it all on a shoestring. The Gemini team is betting they can figure it out. "People ask, 'What's your business model?'" says the director, Stan Rogow, during a lull in the shoot. "And I say, 'This morning's or this afternoon's?' It's only partly a joke."

A wiry figure who wears his long silver hair brushed straight back, Rogow is dressed in softly faded jeans and an extravagantly collared white shirt open halfway to the waist, a set of aviator glasses tucked neatly into the V. In an earlier life he was "the king of tweens," the producer who made Lizzie McGuire for Disney and turned Hilary Duff into a star. Gemini Division is the first of eight Web serials he has in the works at Electric Farm Entertainment, the production company he's formed with Friedman, the writer, and Jeff Sagansky, a former copresident of Sony Pictures Entertainment and head of CBS Entertainment before that.

Right now they need a distributor, and they've been talking with everyone from NBC Universal to MySpace about putting Gemini Division on their sites. Whoever they partner with would sell advertising and maybe even help fund the production. MySpace isn't offering money up front, but it does sell ads and split the revenue with producers. Eisner partnered with MySpace on Prom Queen, as did Herskovitz with Quarterlife, but Rogow is hoping for a more lucrative arrangement &mdash; which is why he has spent half the afternoon squiring around a pair of suits from NBC. The deal he's discussing would put Electric Farm well on its way to recouping the $1.75 million or so it will cost to make the 50 three-minute episodes Rogow plans to shoot. But the deal's not done yet.

Meanwhile, Rogow has been talking with Cisco and a handful of other companies about another way to make money: product placement. As a Buck Rogers-style serial set "five minutes in the future," the show presents many possibilities for tech companies. Dawson's smartphone, for instance, is the aperture through which we see the entire series. She talks urgently into the device throughout each episode, sending the feed to someone &mdash; we don't know whom &mdash; and occasionally holding it up to capture what's going on around her. It's a prominent branding opportunity for any handset maker willing to plunk down the money.

Like Prom Queen and Lonelygirl15, Gemini Division is essentially a female first-person confessional &mdash; in this case, a confessional about biotech run wild. Dawson plays Anna Diaz, a New York City detective having a crazy fling with a guy who's tall, blond, and ripped. By episode 4, the one they're shooting now, he has spirited her off to Paris for a romantic getaway, but she realizes something isn't right. Like, what's with the orange ring he left around the bathtub? "I really do love Nick," Dawson confides to the camera. "But being a cop, you get cynical. And you learn to trust your gut."

For the next scene, two crew members wheel a queen-size bed into place. Justin Hartley, the 6'3" Smallville actor who plays Nick, is lolling on the bed in his boxer shorts, sporting six-pack abs and a bright orange belly button. The script calls for Anna to come out in a sexy black negligee and climb into bed with him. The sound man cues up Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On." Everybody laughs.




	
		
		Dawson as detective Anna Diaz Screenshot: Courtesy Electric Farm
	


For Anna, romance has given way to suspicion: first the orange tub ring and now, as she settles reluctantly into Nick's arms, his orange navel. If the camera were to pan a little wider, it would also catch two grips crouching behind the headboard to keep the bed from sliding across the set. Rogow smiles ruefully at the amateurishness of it all. "I think we should keep those guys in the background," he quips. "It's a nice touch."

Two years ago,when Lonelygirl15 first showed that a scripted Web-only serial could attract a sizable audience, most people in show business thought of the Web as a promotional vehicle &mdash; if they thought of it at all. Then a couple of major players caught the bug. Michael Eisner was one; another was Jeff Sagansky, who was investing in small production companies like the one that makes The Tudors for Showtime. Web video was uncharted territory: no rules, limitless potential. "We're at the vanguard of something that can explode," Sagansky declares a few weeks after the January shoot. A trim 56-year-old, he's seated in his elegantly appointed town house on Manhattan's Upper East Side. "You know TV; it's been around in its present form since Hill Street B