<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://xml.world-of-newave.info/islam.atom.xsl" media="screen"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en-us">
<title>Islam - World-of-Newave.info</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://answers.world-of-newave.info/islam.htm"/>
<author>
<name>World-of-Newave.info</name>
<url>http://www.world-of-newave.info/</url>
</author>
<modified>2008-09-08T14:39:29Z</modified>
<tagline>Latest news and articles about Islam</tagline>
<copyright>Copyright (c)2004-2008.§/Newave SARL. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<entry>
<title>{AFRICA &gt; NEWS AND MEDIA} - Gaddafi son retires from politics</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/africa/news-and-media/gaddafi-son-retires-from-politics-20080836016.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">The son of Libya's leader, Sayf al-Islam Gaddafi, says he is retiring from political life though he is seen as a likely successor.</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/africa/news-and-media/gaddafi-son-retires-from-politics-20080836016.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-21T11:38:45Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-21T11:38:45Z</modified>
<author>
<name>News.Bbc.Co.Uk</name>
<url>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7574083.stm</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/africa/news-and-media/gaddafi-son-retires-from-politics-20080836016.htm"><b>Gaddafi son retires from politics</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/africa/news-and-media/gaddafi-son-retires-from-politics-20080836016.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">News.Bbc.Co.Uk</span> - The son of Libya's leader, Sayf al-Islam Gaddafi, says he is retiring from political life though he is seen as a likely successor.<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">BBC NEWS | Africa | Gaddafi son retires from politics {...} The son of Libya's leader, seen as a possible successor, says he is retiring from political life. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 21, 2008, 11:38 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 25, 2008, 8:35 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;51KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/">Regional</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/africa/">Africa</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/africa/news-and-media/"><b>News and Media</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{MARKETING AND ADVERTISING &gt; NEWS AND MEDIA} - UK's Channel 4 Explores Sunnier Side of Islam</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/advertising/news-and-media/uk-s-channel-4-explores-sunnier-side-of-islam-20080851622.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">

Channel 4 enlisted London-based doctor Farrah Jarral and filmmaker Masood Khan to discover what it calls "the sunnier side of Islam."</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/advertising/news-and-media/uk-s-channel-4-explores-sunnier-side-of-islam-20080851622.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-20T19:42:14Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-20T19:42:14Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Adrants.Com</name>
<url>http://www.adrants.com/2008/08/uks-channel-4-explores-sunnier-side-of.php</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/advertising/news-and-media/uk-s-channel-4-explores-sunnier-side-of-islam-20080851622.htm"><b>UK's Channel 4 Explores Sunnier Side of Islam</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/advertising/news-and-media/uk-s-channel-4-explores-sunnier-side-of-islam-20080851622.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Adrants.Com</span> - 

Channel 4 enlisted London-based doctor Farrah Jarral and filmmaker Masood Khan to discover what it calls "the sunnier side of Islam."<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">UK's Channel 4 Explores Sunnier Side of Islam » Adrants {...} Channel 4 enlisted London-based doctor Farrah Jarral and filmmaker Masood Khan to discover what it calls  {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 20, 2008, 7:42 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 22, 2008, 5:25 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;39KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/">Marketing and Advertising</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/advertising/">Advertising</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/business/marketing-and-advertising/advertising/news-and-media/"><b>News and Media</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Boehlert: Fox News and Jerome Corsi, living in the past</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">It sure felt like déjà vu all over again, didn't it? 

No election watcher could forget the summer of 2004, when
Fox News repeatedly invited Swift Boat author John O'Neill onto cable
prime time and allowed
him to air his scurrilous allegations about Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam War
record. Even before the partisan Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group unveiled
its infamous television ads, it was on Fox News where the controversy was
birthed. It was Fox News that allowed O'Neill a mostly unobstructed platform on August 10,
17, 19, and 24, 2004,
to libel Kerry and to gin up a controversy that eventually swamped the
Democratic candidate for most of that crucial summer month. 

Then, almost exactly four years later to the dates (on July
31, August 3, 12, and 14),
Fox News presented its White
House campaign sequel. It welcomed O'Neill's Swift Boat writing
partner, Jerome Corsi, to publicize his new attack
book, The Obama Nation. Laying out his fever-swamp allegations about Obama's drug
use and his supposed connections to Islam, Corsi enjoyed the type of national
exposure, courtesy of Fox News, that every author craves. 

It was an audience that helped propel The Obama
Nation to No. 1 on the bestsellers list, which then ignited wide-scale mainstream coverage
for Corsi and his book. 

In other words, everything was going according to plan. The
sequel had been set up -- had
been marketed -- just
like the Swift Boat predecessor, and now all conservatives had to do was sit
back and watch the fun, as the Obama campaign became engulfed in Corsi-led
controversy. 

Right?

It hasn't worked that way. The Obama Nation's allegations, as
slight and flimsy as they are, have taken a back seat to questions about
Corsi's own credibility. In fact, journalists have likely spent more time
dissecting the errors in Obama Nation
and highlighting Corsi's controversial path, including the hateful,
bigoted items he used to post in online forums, than they have focusing on the
allegations Corsi wanted to broadcast.

As the conservative National Review Online noted with
frustration, "The media narrative thus becomes 'Corsi refuted' rather than 'Obama embattled.' "

Add in the fact that some conservatives have stepped forward
to publically denounce Corsi and
his brand of slime, beseeching the
movement to divorce itself from Corsi's unsubstantiated attacks, and
suddenly the sequel is in real distress.

Oh sure, it's selling. (Thanks in part to bulk sales,
a right-wing marketing staple.) But in terms of affecting the race, in terms of
gumming up the works for the Obama campaign, the book has so far been a bust.

What happened? How did a sure-fire follow-up hit turn into
such a trouble-plagued production? And why isn't Fox News' Swift
Boat formula working? 

Simple. Both Corsi and the Fox
News team are living in the past and failed to realize how dramatically the
media landscape has shifted since the shady Swift Boat accusers were able to
deftly use the media to spread their lies. 

First and foremost, the progressive movement has spent the
last four years bulking up its infrastructure, and specifically readying itself
to respond
to media-driven attacks from the right; the way Media Matters for America immediately blanketed The Obama
Nation and documented its egregious errors (often floated on Fox
News) and also raised doubts about the author's veracity and integrity. And thanks
to the larger Netroots community, Corsi hasn't had any breathing room to
spread his misinformation.

But there were also key marketplace changes within the cable
news industry that affected the Corsi coverage, I think. Because remember that
in 2004, Fox News drove the Swift Boat saga; it was practically a co-sponsor of
the anti-Kerry crusade, devoting endless hours to promoting the Vietnam-era
allegations. By sheer force of repetition, Fox News, then the dominant player
in cable news, forced its competitors to not only acknowledge the Swift Boat
story, but to go all in as well. And soon all the cable news outlets were
treating the Swift Boat saga with Fox News-like breathlessness. (CNN aired
nearly 300 segments referencing
the topic.)

And just like Fox, they weren't asking the tough
questions. Instead, they gave the Swift Boat accusers the same free ride that
Fox News did. They became media enablers, too.

Not this time around. With Fox News no longer the dominant cable news king -- and with Fox News no longer driving the campaign
narratives -- its competitors opted for a
much different approach to covering Corsi. And I think the coverage from the
competitors sent a subtle, yet simple, message: We no longer take our cues from
Fox News' lead, because they no longer dictate campaign coverage.
Instead, we're going to exult
in our role as a counterbalance, as a fact-checker, to the Fox News-produced
Corsi attack campaign. In fact, we're gonna help pull the curtain back on
Corsi. 

Just look at how MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer greeted Corsi, as he
ventured for the first time beyond the friendly TV confines of Rupert World:


BREWER: You say it's a
comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers that are going
through this book page by page and picking apart what they see as factual
errors. ... If they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility?


CNN's Campbell Brown introduced
a prime-time report by
announcing, "Obama
Nation is riddled with pretty much every unsubstantiated
rumor you ever heard about Obama."

And on Larry King Live,
Corsi was forced to face off
against Media Matters Senior Fellow Paul Waldman, who refused to let the
author spread his misinformation uncontested.

All the above represented precisely what the press, and most especially the
cable outfits, should have done --
but mostly refused to do --
in 2004.

They refused to allow articulate, independent critics onto
the national stage to debunk the patently false Swift Boat charges. Instead,
the press most often treated the Swift Boat story as a political one, which
meant amplifying the partisan charges and then going to the Kerry campaign for
a quote, or inviting a Kerry campaign surrogate on the air to debate a Swift
Boat liar. 

Rather than forcefully labeling the Swift Boat attacks a
charade and IDing the attackers as pranksters, and instead of holding the Swift
Boat accusers accountable, the press played dumb
and abandoned its traditional campaign role. 

As Greg Mitchell at Editor
&amp; Publisher noted,
"The mainstream press gave the charges -- carried in ads, in books and articles, and
in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a respectful airing
mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting to shoot them down
as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false."

In the infamous words of former Washington Post executive editor Len Downie, upon being pressed about the paper's
Swift Boat coverage in August 2004:
"We are not judging the credibility of Kerry or the [Swift Boat] Veterans, we just print the facts."

Talk about abdicating your role as journalists. During the
Swift Boat hoax, Downie and his team at the Post
essentially walked off the field, refusing to officiate the smear
campaign. Wasn't judging the credibility of the previously unknown Swift Boat
accusers precisely what the Post and the rest of the press
should have been doing in August 2004? 

Thankfully, that kind of cowardice has been replaced by
actual journalism when dealing with the Corsi sequel. And on TV, I'd
suggest that about-face has been fueled by Fox News' fall from ratings
grace, as its competitors, flush with confidence, realize they no longer have
to follow. 

Instead, they can lead. 

Of course, the fact that Corsi won't admit or correct
obvious errors in his book has only emboldened the press to pose tough questions. His often loopy logic
has also not helped him, like suggesting we cannot believe Obama when he said
he stopped taking drugs in college because, according to the author, "self-reporting, by people who have used
drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently unreliable."

When Corsi stumbled down that twisted path on CNN's Larry King Live last week, Media Matters' Waldman was waiting
to pounce: 


WALDMAN: You put up on
right-wing websites a whole series of bigoted and hateful posts in 2002 and
2003 that you later had to admit to when you got found out -- all kinds of
really vile, malicious stuff.

CORSI: OK. If you --

WALDMAN: Now, you say that you've stopped that. You say that you've
stopped that and you don't put up those kinds of vile, bigoted, malicious,
hateful posts on right-wing websites. But all we have is your word. I mean, do -- can we really
trust you? People who do that kind of thing, well, you know, they're not really
very trustworthy.

CORSI: We have --

WALDMAN: So can we trust you? Are you still doing that?

CORSI: You have more than my word. You've got the record of everything
I've written since then.

WALDMAN: Can you prove that you're not doing it anonymously? Can you
prove it? 


I'm hard-pressed to recall the last time I saw an
author get so thoroughly discredited on
national television the way Corsi was at the hands of Waldman. (The encounter
simply confirmed why conservatives often refuse to go head-to-head with reps
from Media Matters in public settings.)

That undressing proved infectious within the mainstream media,
as it began to spell out, fairly and accurately, what Corsi and his book were
about. The Associated
Press' Nedra Pickler reported, "Corsi suggests, without a shred of
proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama has acknowledged using
marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit when he went to college
and hasn't used drugs since."

The New York Times' political
blog, The Caucus, set aside space to detail Corsi's
touting of radical 9-11
theories that suggest explosives detonated inside the Twin Towers
were also responsible for the destruction, not just the terrorist-piloted jumbo
jets. And Politico noted how Corsi had
"left a trail of wild
theories, vitriol and dogma that have called into question his
credibility." 

Is it some sort of collective penance journalists are
serving for the media's Swift Boat failures of 2004? Who knows? But it's exactly what
journalists ought to be doing when mischief-makers like Corsi climb onto the
national stage (ladder, courtesy
of Simon &amp; Schuster), and start making unsubstantiated charges about
presidential contenders. 

Conservatives now whine about the press taking sides, that
it's teaming up on Corsi. In fact, the press is simply doing exactly what
it should have done in 2004, and
that's vet the accuser. Period. 

The game has changed. But somebody forgot to tell Corsi and
his friends at Fox News. 
    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-19T16:00:57Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-19T16:00:57Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/columns/200808190001</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm"><b>Boehlert: Fox News and Jerome Corsi, living in the past</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/boehlert-fox-news-and-jerome-corsi-living-in-the-20080837517.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - It sure felt like déjà vu all over again, didn't it? 

No election watcher could forget the summer of 2004, when
Fox News repeatedly invited Swift Boat author John O'Neill onto cable
prime time and allowed
him to air his scurrilous allegations about Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam War
record. Even before the partisan Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group unveiled
its infamous television ads, it was on Fox News where the controversy was
birthed. It was Fox News that allowed O'Neill a mostly unobstructed platform on August 10,
17, 19, and 24, 2004,
to libel Kerry and to gin up a controversy that eventually swamped the
Democratic candidate for most of that crucial summer month. 

Then, almost exactly four years later to the dates (on July
31, August 3, 12, and 14),
Fox News presented its White
House campaign sequel. It welcomed O'Neill's Swift Boat writing
partner, Jerome Corsi, to publicize his new attack
book, The Obama Nation. Laying out his fever-swamp allegations about Obama's drug
use and his supposed connections to Islam, Corsi enjoyed the type of national
exposure, courtesy of Fox News, that every author craves. 

It was an audience that helped propel The Obama
Nation to No. 1 on the bestsellers list, which then ignited wide-scale mainstream coverage
for Corsi and his book. 

In other words, everything was going according to plan. The
sequel had been set up -- had
been marketed -- just
like the Swift Boat predecessor, and now all conservatives had to do was sit
back and watch the fun, as the Obama campaign became engulfed in Corsi-led
controversy. 

Right?

It hasn't worked that way. The Obama Nation's allegations, as
slight and flimsy as they are, have taken a back seat to questions about
Corsi's own credibility. In fact, journalists have likely spent more time
dissecting the errors in Obama Nation
and highlighting Corsi's controversial path, including the hateful,
bigoted items he used to post in online forums, than they have focusing on the
allegations Corsi wanted to broadcast.

As the conservative National Review Online noted with
frustration, "The media narrative thus becomes 'Corsi refuted' rather than 'Obama embattled.' "

Add in the fact that some conservatives have stepped forward
to publically denounce Corsi and
his brand of slime, beseeching the
movement to divorce itself from Corsi's unsubstantiated attacks, and
suddenly the sequel is in real distress.

Oh sure, it's selling. (Thanks in part to bulk sales,
a right-wing marketing staple.) But in terms of affecting the race, in terms of
gumming up the works for the Obama campaign, the book has so far been a bust.

What happened? How did a sure-fire follow-up hit turn into
such a trouble-plagued production? And why isn't Fox News' Swift
Boat formula working? 

Simple. Both Corsi and the Fox
News team are living in the past and failed to realize how dramatically the
media landscape has shifted since the shady Swift Boat accusers were able to
deftly use the media to spread their lies. 

First and foremost, the progressive movement has spent the
last four years bulking up its infrastructure, and specifically readying itself
to respond
to media-driven attacks from the right; the way Media Matters for America immediately blanketed The Obama
Nation and documented its egregious errors (often floated on Fox
News) and also raised doubts about the author's veracity and integrity. And thanks
to the larger Netroots community, Corsi hasn't had any breathing room to
spread his misinformation.

But there were also key marketplace changes within the cable
news industry that affected the Corsi coverage, I think. Because remember that
in 2004, Fox News drove the Swift Boat saga; it was practically a co-sponsor of
the anti-Kerry crusade, devoting endless hours to promoting the Vietnam-era
allegations. By sheer force of repetition, Fox News, then the dominant player
in cable news, forced its competitors to not only acknowledge the Swift Boat
story, but to go all in as well. And soon all the cable news outlets were
treating the Swift Boat saga with Fox News-like breathlessness. (CNN aired
nearly 300 segments referencing
the topic.)

And just like Fox, they weren't asking the tough
questions. Instead, they gave the Swift Boat accusers the same free ride that
Fox News did. They became media enablers, too.

Not this time around. With Fox News no longer the dominant cable news king -- and with Fox News no longer driving the campaign
narratives -- its competitors opted for a
much different approach to covering Corsi. And I think the coverage from the
competitors sent a subtle, yet simple, message: We no longer take our cues from
Fox News' lead, because they no longer dictate campaign coverage.
Instead, we're going to exult
in our role as a counterbalance, as a fact-checker, to the Fox News-produced
Corsi attack campaign. In fact, we're gonna help pull the curtain back on
Corsi. 

Just look at how MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer greeted Corsi, as he
ventured for the first time beyond the friendly TV confines of Rupert World:


BREWER: You say it's a
comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers that are going
through this book page by page and picking apart what they see as factual
errors. ... If they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility?


CNN's Campbell Brown introduced
a prime-time report by
announcing, "Obama
Nation is riddled with pretty much every unsubstantiated
rumor you ever heard about Obama."

And on Larry King Live,
Corsi was forced to face off
against Media Matters Senior Fellow Paul Waldman, who refused to let the
author spread his misinformation uncontested.

All the above represented precisely what the press, and most especially the
cable outfits, should have done --
but mostly refused to do --
in 2004.

They refused to allow articulate, independent critics onto
the national stage to debunk the patently false Swift Boat charges. Instead,
the press most often treated the Swift Boat story as a political one, which
meant amplifying the partisan charges and then going to the Kerry campaign for
a quote, or inviting a Kerry campaign surrogate on the air to debate a Swift
Boat liar. 

Rather than forcefully labeling the Swift Boat attacks a
charade and IDing the attackers as pranksters, and instead of holding the Swift
Boat accusers accountable, the press played dumb
and abandoned its traditional campaign role. 

As Greg Mitchell at Editor
& Publisher noted,
"The mainstream press gave the charges -- carried in ads, in books and articles, and
in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a respectful airing
mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting to shoot them down
as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false."

In the infamous words of former Washington Post executive editor Len Downie, upon being pressed about the paper's
Swift Boat coverage in August 2004:
"We are not judging the credibility of Kerry or the [Swift Boat] Veterans, we just print the facts."

Talk about abdicating your role as journalists. During the
Swift Boat hoax, Downie and his team at the Post
essentially walked off the field, refusing to officiate the smear
campaign. Wasn't judging the credibility of the previously unknown Swift Boat
accusers precisely what the Post and the rest of the press
should have been doing in August 2004? 

Thankfully, that kind of cowardice has been replaced by
actual journalism when dealing with the Corsi sequel. And on TV, I'd
suggest that about-face has been fueled by Fox News' fall from ratings
grace, as its competitors, flush with confidence, realize they no longer have
to follow. 

Instead, they can lead. 

Of course, the fact that Corsi won't admit or correct
obvious errors in his book has only emboldened the press to pose tough questions. His often loopy logic
has also not helped him, like suggesting we cannot believe Obama when he said
he stopped taking drugs in college because, according to the author, "self-reporting, by people who have used
drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently unreliable."

When Corsi stumbled down that twisted path on CNN's Larry King Live last week, Media Matters' Waldman was waiting
to pounce: 


WALDMAN: You put up on
right-wing websites a whole series of bigoted and hateful posts in 2002 and
2003 that you later had to admit to when you got found out -- all kinds of
really vile, malicious stuff.

CORSI: OK. If you --

WALDMAN: Now, you say that you've stopped that. You say that you've
stopped that and you don't put up those kinds of vile, bigoted, malicious,
hateful posts on right-wing websites. But all we have is your word. I mean, do -- can we really
trust you? People who do that kind of thing, well, you know, they're not really
very trustworthy.

CORSI: We have --

WALDMAN: So can we trust you? Are you still doing that?

CORSI: You have more than my word. You've got the record of everything
I've written since then.

WALDMAN: Can you prove that you're not doing it anonymously? Can you
prove it? 


I'm hard-pressed to recall the last time I saw an
author get so thoroughly discredited on
national television the way Corsi was at the hands of Waldman. (The encounter
simply confirmed why conservatives often refuse to go head-to-head with reps
from Media Matters in public settings.)

That undressing proved infectious within the mainstream media,
as it began to spell out, fairly and accurately, what Corsi and his book were
about. The Associated
Press' Nedra Pickler reported, "Corsi suggests, without a shred of
proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama has acknowledged using
marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit when he went to college
and hasn't used drugs since."

The New York Times' political
blog, The Caucus, set aside space to detail Corsi's
touting of radical 9-11
theories that suggest explosives detonated inside the Twin Towers
were also responsible for the destruction, not just the terrorist-piloted jumbo
jets. And Politico noted how Corsi had
"left a trail of wild
theories, vitriol and dogma that have called into question his
credibility." 

Is it some sort of collective penance journalists are
serving for the media's Swift Boat failures of 2004? Who knows? But it's exactly what
journalists ought to be doing when mischief-makers like Corsi climb onto the
national stage (ladder, courtesy
of Simon & Schuster), and start making unsubstantiated charges about
presidential contenders. 

Conservatives now whine about the press taking sides, that
it's teaming up on Corsi. In fact, the press is simply doing exactly what
it should have done in 2004, and
that's vet the accuser. Period. 

The game has changed. But somebody forgot to tell Corsi and
his friends at Fox News. 
    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Fox News and Jerome Corsi, living in the past {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 19, 2008, 4:00 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 20, 2008, 11:12 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;25KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Wash. Post ignored McCain flip-flop on Falwell as an "agent of intolerance," McCain's pastor problems</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/wash-post-ignored-mccain-flip-flop-on-falwell-as-20080870319.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">In an August 17 Washington Post article
reporting on the August 16 appearances by Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain at
Saddleback Church
in
Lake Forest, Calif., Shailagh
Murray and Perry Bacon Jr. wrote,
"[Sen. John] McCain and his campaign advisers have been eager to put
their struggles with Christian conservatives behind them. Some conservatives
remain angry over his role in a 2005 compromise that allowed Democrats to block
some conservative judges Bush was attempting to appoint; others still recall
his criticisms of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as 'agents of
intolerance' during the 2000 Republican primaries." But the Post did not note that, in April 2006,
McCain said he no longer believed Falwell was an "agent of intolerance," and delivered the
commencement address at Falwell's Liberty
 University a month later,
as Media Matters for America documented.

Moreover, while claiming that Sen. Barack
Obama "endured a storm of controversy over comments made by the former
pastor of the Chicago church he attended until recently," and noting
"the high-profile controversy stirred up by Obama's former pastor at
Trinity United Church of Christ, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr." the Post article ignored the controversy over comments by religious figures
who endorsed McCain. Indeed, while Murray and Bacon noted that the McCain
campaign was "eager" to put its "struggles with Christian
conservatives behind them," they did not mention that McCain actively sought the
endorsement of controversial pastor John Hagee, despite Hagee's numerous controversial
comments about gays, the Catholic Church, Islam, and women. Nor did Murray
and Bacon note that even after Hagee's controversial comments came to
light, McCain still said, "I'm glad
to have his endorsement," before eventually rejecting it. Murray and Bacon
also did not mention McCain's connection to Rod Parsley, a senior pastor of the
World Harvest Church in Columbus, Ohio, whom McCain had reportedly called "one of the
truly great leaders in America, a moral compass, a spiritual guide," and
who had been widely criticized for comments
about Islam before he endorsed McCain. McCain
accepted Parsley's
endorsement on February 26, but then rejected it on May 22.

From the August 17 Washington Post article:


Barack
Obama and John McCain made their first joint appearance of the general election
Saturday night, breaking away from the debates over national security and the
economy that have dominated the campaign in recent weeks to court evangelical
voters at an Orange County megachurch.

The
forum at Saddleback
 Church presented a rare
opportunity for Christian voters to contrast candidates who do not conform
neatly to party stereotypes. While Obama has spoken often about his faith --
and endured a storm of controversy over comments made by the former pastor of
the Chicago
church he attended until recently -- McCain has largely avoided public
discussions of faith and values during his career, which has contributed to a
sometimes rocky relationship with evangelical leaders.

The
event was hosted by Rick Warren, the author of the best-selling "The Purpose
Driven Life" and one of the country's most prominent evangelical
preachers. Warren, a Southern Baptist, referred to both McCain and Obama as
friends in his introductions. "They both care deeply about America," Warren said. "They're both
patriots."

Each
candidate was interviewed individually by Warren
for an hour. The two met only briefly, embracing on the stage midway through
the event as Obama exited and McCain entered.

[...]

Christian
conservatives gave Bush 78 percent of their votes in 2004, and they remain a
vital part of the Republican Party's electoral strategy. But although Democrat
Obama has taken stances on issues such as abortion and gay rights that many
Christians disagree with, his campaign hopes that he can cut into that showing
by keeping his faith in the spotlight and by discussing topics such as poverty
and global warming.

McCain
and his campaign advisers have been eager to put their struggles with Christian
conservatives behind them. Some conservatives remain angry over his role in a
2005 compromise that allowed Democrats to block some conservative judges Bush
was attempting to appoint; others still recall his criticisms of Pat Robertson
and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance" during the 2000
Republican primaries.

Many of
these activists pointedly refused to back McCain during the GOP primaries,
favoring former Massachusetts governor Mitt
Romney or former Arkansas
governor Mike Huckabee. Tony Perkins, head of the socially conservative Family
Research Council, criticized McCain this summer for making faith and values
less of a priority on his Web site and in other campaign materials than Obama
had.

McCain
has publicly suggested in recent days that even though he opposes abortion, he
might select a running mate who supports abortion rights. That drew warnings
from Perkins and other religious conservatives that they might not show up at
the polls in November if McCain picked an abortion-rights supporter such as
former governor Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania.

But McCain's
campaign has also sought to highlight stances such as his opposition to
same-sex marriage and civil unions. The Republican nominee also has spoken
about his faith more often in recent months, frequently focusing on how it
sustained him as a prisoner of war after he was shot down over Vietnam.

Saturday
night, he cited the role of faith in his decision to stay in a Vietnamese
prison camp after he was offered release because his father was a high-ranking
naval officer. He said it was the toughest choice he had ever made, adding that
"it took a lot of prayer, it took a lot of prayer."

The
Obama campaign made an aggressive sales pitch at the event, distributing a
12-page booklet to the 2,200 people who streamed through Saddleback's doors
that chronicled the candidate's "Christian journey" and his long
relationship with Warren.

The
campaign also announced Saturday that the upcoming Democratic National
Convention would have a strong religious flavor, with "faith caucus
meetings" to discuss religious voters' concerns and daily invocations and
benedictions from national faith leaders. The list includes Joel Hunter, a
prominent Republican pastor from an evangelical Florida
church; a Greek Orthodox archbishop; a Roman Catholic nun from Cleveland; and a
Colorado
couple who are both Methodist ministers.

Topics
of the faith caucus meetings include "How an Obama Administration Will
Engage People of Faith"; "Moral Values Issues Abroad"; and
"Getting Out the Faith Vote."

For
Obama, the Saddleback event allowed him to reinforce that he is a Christian
before an audience that doubtless included many familiar with Internet and
talk-radio-driven rumors that he is a Muslim. That particular falsehood has
proven maddeningly difficult to dispel for Obama's campaign, continuing to dog
his candidacy even after the high-profile controversy stirred up by Obama's
former pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright
Jr.

On
Saturday night, Obama's appearance was his second at Saddleback. In December 2006,
he and conservative Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) addressed Warren's annual conference on HIV-AIDS.

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/wash-post-ignored-mccain-flip-flop-on-falwell-as-20080870319.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-17T23:03:35Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-17T23:03:35Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808170001</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/wash-post-ignored-mccain-flip-flop-on-falwell-as-20080870319.htm"><b>Wash. Post ignored McCain flip-flop on Falwell as an "agent of intolerance," McCain's pastor problems</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/wash-post-ignored-mccain-flip-flop-on-falwell-as-20080870319.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - In an August 17 Washington Post article
reporting on the August 16 appearances by Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain at
Saddleback Church
in
Lake Forest, Calif., Shailagh
Murray and Perry Bacon Jr. wrote,
"[Sen. John] McCain and his campaign advisers have been eager to put
their struggles with Christian conservatives behind them. Some conservatives
remain angry over his role in a 2005 compromise that allowed Democrats to block
some conservative judges Bush was attempting to appoint; others still recall
his criticisms of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as 'agents of
intolerance' during the 2000 Republican primaries." But the Post did not note that, in April 2006,
McCain said he no longer believed Falwell was an "agent of intolerance," and delivered the
commencement address at Falwell's Liberty
 University a month later,
as Media Matters for America documented.

Moreover, while claiming that Sen. Barack
Obama "endured a storm of controversy over comments made by the former
pastor of the Chicago church he attended until recently," and noting
"the high-profile controversy stirred up by Obama's former pastor at
Trinity United Church of Christ, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr." the Post article ignored the controversy over comments by religious figures
who endorsed McCain. Indeed, while Murray and Bacon noted that the McCain
campaign was "eager" to put its "struggles with Christian
conservatives behind them," they did not mention that McCain actively sought the
endorsement of controversial pastor John Hagee, despite Hagee's numerous controversial
comments about gays, the Catholic Church, Islam, and women. Nor did Murray
and Bacon note that even after Hagee's controversial comments came to
light, McCain still said, "I'm glad
to have his endorsement," before eventually rejecting it. Murray and Bacon
also did not mention McCain's connection to Rod Parsley, a senior pastor of the
World Harvest Church in Columbus, Ohio, whom McCain had reportedly called "one of the
truly great leaders in America, a moral compass, a spiritual guide," and
who had been widely criticized for comments
about Islam before he endorsed McCain. McCain
accepted Parsley's
endorsement on February 26, but then rejected it on May 22.

From the August 17 Washington Post article:


Barack
Obama and John McCain made their first joint appearance of the general election
Saturday night, breaking away from the debates over national security and the
economy that have dominated the campaign in recent weeks to court evangelical
voters at an Orange County megachurch.

The
forum at Saddleback
 Church presented a rare
opportunity for Christian voters to contrast candidates who do not conform
neatly to party stereotypes. While Obama has spoken often about his faith --
and endured a storm of controversy over comments made by the former pastor of
the Chicago
church he attended until recently -- McCain has largely avoided public
discussions of faith and values during his career, which has contributed to a
sometimes rocky relationship with evangelical leaders.

The
event was hosted by Rick Warren, the author of the best-selling "The Purpose
Driven Life" and one of the country's most prominent evangelical
preachers. Warren, a Southern Baptist, referred to both McCain and Obama as
friends in his introductions. "They both care deeply about America," Warren said. "They're both
patriots."

Each
candidate was interviewed individually by Warren
for an hour. The two met only briefly, embracing on the stage midway through
the event as Obama exited and McCain entered.

[...]

Christian
conservatives gave Bush 78 percent of their votes in 2004, and they remain a
vital part of the Republican Party's electoral strategy. But although Democrat
Obama has taken stances on issues such as abortion and gay rights that many
Christians disagree with, his campaign hopes that he can cut into that showing
by keeping his faith in the spotlight and by discussing topics such as poverty
and global warming.

McCain
and his campaign advisers have been eager to put their struggles with Christian
conservatives behind them. Some conservatives remain angry over his role in a
2005 compromise that allowed Democrats to block some conservative judges Bush
was attempting to appoint; others still recall his criticisms of Pat Robertson
and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance" during the 2000
Republican primaries.

Many of
these activists pointedly refused to back McCain during the GOP primaries,
favoring former Massachusetts governor Mitt
Romney or former Arkansas
governor Mike Huckabee. Tony Perkins, head of the socially conservative Family
Research Council, criticized McCain this summer for making faith and values
less of a priority on his Web site and in other campaign materials than Obama
had.

McCain
has publicly suggested in recent days that even though he opposes abortion, he
might select a running mate who supports abortion rights. That drew warnings
from Perkins and other religious conservatives that they might not show up at
the polls in November if McCain picked an abortion-rights supporter such as
former governor Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania.

But McCain's
campaign has also sought to highlight stances such as his opposition to
same-sex marriage and civil unions. The Republican nominee also has spoken
about his faith more often in recent months, frequently focusing on how it
sustained him as a prisoner of war after he was shot down over Vietnam.

Saturday
night, he cited the role of faith in his decision to stay in a Vietnamese
prison camp after he was offered release because his father was a high-ranking
naval officer. He said it was the toughest choice he had ever made, adding that
"it took a lot of prayer, it took a lot of prayer."

The
Obama campaign made an aggressive sales pitch at the event, distributing a
12-page booklet to the 2,200 people who streamed through Saddleback's doors
that chronicled the candidate's "Christian journey" and his long
relationship with Warren.

The
campaign also announced Saturday that the upcoming Democratic National
Convention would have a strong religious flavor, with "faith caucus
meetings" to discuss religious voters' concerns and daily invocations and
benedictions from national faith leaders. The list includes Joel Hunter, a
prominent Republican pastor from an evangelical Florida
church; a Greek Orthodox archbishop; a Roman Catholic nun from Cleveland; and a
Colorado
couple who are both Methodist ministers.

Topics
of the faith caucus meetings include "How an Obama Administration Will
Engage People of Faith"; "Moral Values Issues Abroad"; and
"Getting Out the Faith Vote."

For
Obama, the Saddleback event allowed him to reinforce that he is a Christian
before an audience that doubtless included many familiar with Internet and
talk-radio-driven rumors that he is a Muslim. That particular falsehood has
proven maddeningly difficult to dispel for Obama's campaign, continuing to dog
his candidacy even after the high-profile controversy stirred up by Obama's
former pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright
Jr.

On
Saturday night, Obama's appearance was his second at Saddleback. In December 2006,
he and conservative Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) addressed Warren's annual conference on HIV-AIDS.

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Wash. Post ignored McCain flip-flop on Falwell as an "agent of intolerance," McCain&#39;s pastor problems {...} A Washington Post article noted Sen. John McCain&#39;s "criticisms of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as &#39;agents of intolerance&#39; during the 2000 Republican primaries" without also noting that McCain has since said he no longer believed Falwell was an "agent of intolerance." The article also referred to "the high-profile controversy stirred up by Obama&#39;s former pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr." without mentioning controversies involving two pastors who endorsed McCain. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 17, 2008, 11:03 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 18, 2008, 10:20 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;24KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Media denounce Corsi's anti-Obama book</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">While the recent anti-Obama book by Jerome Corsi, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold
Editions), will debut atop the New York
Times bestseller list, many in the media are challenging the book,
noting its numerous falsehoods as well as its author's track record,
which includes a slew of bigoted posts on the
conservative website Free
Republic and co-authorship of a discredited book
attacking Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign. The
media's reaction to The Obama Nation stands
in stark contrast to coverage of that 2004 book, Unfit for Command. As Media Matters for America
has noted, the media were sharply criticized
for taking too long to challenge Unfit's
numerous smears and falsehoods.

In an August 15 article in Editor &amp; Publisher, Greg Mitchell noted the contrast in the
media's reaction to the two books:


Four
years ago this month, with E&P's Joe Strupp, I explored in a number
of articles the belated or conflicted media response to the
"swiftboating" of Sen. John Kerry, then the Democratic nominee for
president. The mainstream press gave the charges-- carried in ads, in books and
articles, and in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a
respectful airing mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting
to shoot them down as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false. This delay, along
with Kerry's own reluctance to face the matter squarely, quite possibly
cost the Democrat the White House. 

Now,
this month, a bestselling anti-Obama book -- by a co-author of the most
prominent "swiftboat" anti-Kerry book in 2004 -- has predictably
been published (by Mary Matalin's imprint) and has gained immediate and wide
attention in the mainstream. But this time, in many cases, the media response
has been a "swift" kick to its credibility.


Below are numerous examples of the
media responding with "a 'swift' kick" to The Obama Nation's credibility:

From an August 15 Washington Post column by Eugene
Robinson:


The
"author," and I use the term loosely, whose vicious lies damaged John
Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign has crawled back out from under his rock to spew
vicious lies about Barack Obama. Right-wing radio talk-show hosts are dutifully
transmitting this concocted venom. This presidential campaign has officially
gotten ugly. 



The
"author" I'm talking about is a man named Jerome Corsi. In a book
published last year, "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico
and Canada," Corsi claimed that George W. Bush was at the heart of a
secret conspiracy to subsume the United States into a post-national,
one-worldish North American Union. Corsi's writings on far-right blogs have
been even more paranoid and delusional. He has written that pedophilia, for
which he used a more graphic term, "is OK with the Pope as long as it
isn't reported by the liberal press." He has referred to Muslims as
"ragheads."

Corsi
would be known as just another visitor from the outer fringe if he had not been
the co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book that slimed Kerry's
exemplary record as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam. The allegations in that
book were discredited, but not before they had been amplified by the right-wing
echo chamber to the point where they raised questions in some voters' minds --
perhaps enough to swing the election.


From an August 13 Politico article by Kenneth P.
Vogel:


The
folks behind "The Obama Nation," the wildly successful but
factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched
work. 

But its
author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called
into question his credibility.

Jerome
Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite
resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments
through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian
and Muslims worship Satan.


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:



RACHEL
MADDOW (guest host): You may remember Corsi for his
sober allegations that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian, that John Kerry is both a
Jew and a Communist, and his allegations that Muslims actually worship Satan.
You may remember Jerome Corsi for his recent book
attacking the liberal myth that oil is a finite resource, since he, Jerome Corsi, has learned how to make new oil. You may remember Corsi for his scholarly rebuke of George W. Bush's
secret plan to merge the United States
into Mexico.

OK,
honestly, you probably don't remember Jerome Corsi
at all, because why would you pay attention to someone with a record like that?
But Corsi's new anti-Obama book will be number one on
that bestseller list for at least two weeks running, despite fact checking by
news organizations, including The New York
Times, showing it to be rife with errors and inaccuracies.

And the
Obama camp is now firing back, issuing a 40-page rebuttal
titled "Unfit for Publication," soon appearing at Obama's Fight
the Smears website. The campaign promising to forcefully respond with all means
at their disposal. Nonetheless, the book is selling well, due, essentially, to
hundreds of right wing talk show interviews, and large volume bulk sales to
right-wing organizations, a tactic to be discussed now with my next guest.


From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the August 5 edition of MSNBC Live:


BREWER:
You say it's a comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers
that are going through this book page by page and picking apart what they see
as factual errors. Let me give you an example. You say in this book,
"Interestingly, Obama did not dedicate Dreams from My Father to his
mother or to his father, Barack Sr., or to his Indonesian stepfather," and
Media Matters,
the online organization, says in his book, he actually says on a -- on the last
page of the introduction, "It is to my family, though, my mother, my
grandparents, my siblings, stretched across oceans and continents that I owe
the deepest gratitude and to whom I dedicated this book." So if they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility? 

CORSI:
Let's discuss that one. If you'll read carefully what Media Matters said, they point
out there is no dedication page even in the second edition. 

BREWER:
But it says right in the introduction that it's dedicated to his family.

CORSI:
In the introduction that he wrote after, this was going with the second book. And
the original book had no dedication page and this is not the typical way that
you dedicate a book. So I'm making the distinction there is no dedication page
in the book at all, never has been.

BREWER:
Media Matters
has some eight, nine, 10 pages of factual errors. 

CORSI:
And I'd be happy to go through each one of them with you. 

BREWER:
And we're not going to do that. But I'm saying, if they are finding one, then
why do you get credibility for the book? 

CORSI:
Well, I've already objected to the one they found. I think Media Matters
is wrong, and I would argue with every one of them. 


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams:


DAN ABRAMS
(host): Yeah. I mean, look, you know, and again, among the accusations, Brad,
debunked from this book -- drug use in the U.S. Senate, that he didn't
dedicate his book to his family, he wanted to decrease the size of the
military. I mean, the list goes on of the things that were debunked from this
book.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Larry King Live:


LARRY
KING (host): Jerome, you write in your book that Senator Obama has, quote, "yet to answer whether he stopped using marijuana
and cocaine completely in college or whether his drug usage extended to his law
school days or beyond."

CORSI: Yes.

KING:
But Obama wrote in his memoir Dreams from My Father -- which you repeatedly cite in your
book -- that when he moved to New
  York in the early '80s, quote, "I stopped
getting high. I ran three miles a day and I fasted on Sunday." So
are you saying he's lying?

CORSI: What I'm saying in the
book is that people who admit that they've used drugs -- and Obama -- Obama said he used drugs through Occidental. And it was a lot
of drugs. He said it was -- it had become virtually habitual with marijuana and
cocaine. My argument is that the self-reporting of people who use drugs
as to when they quit is not reliable. That's the argument I was
making.


From an August 15 post to Commentary magazine's Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, titled "The Obama Smears":


As for the
book: it seems to be riddled with factual errors-some relatively minor
(like asserting that Obama does not mention the birth of his half-sister, Maya
Soetoro-Ng, in Dreams
from My Father; Obama does mention her), and some
significant (suggesting that Obama favors withdrawing troops from Afghanistan;
he wants to do the opposite). But more problematic, I think, is Corsi's
claim that Obama has "extensive connections to Islam" and his
suggestion that Obama is a recent drug user. Those claims are, from everything
I can tell, unsubstantiated. (When challenged to produce the evidence, Corsi
counters with the "prove you're not beating your wife"
defense.)

For
example, Obama, who in his book admitted using drugs in his youth, says he
hasn't used any since he was 20 years old. Corsi, in an interview, said
Obama's words can't be trusted because "self-reporting, by
people who have used drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently
unreliable." And Corsi's effort to tie Obama to the Muslim
faith-claims based on questionable sources, reaching back to
Obama's youth in Indonesia-is especially troubling, since the
subtext here is attaching Obama to militant Islam and suggesting that
he's somehow alien to America and its values (when in fact his candidacy
is a confirmation of the viability of those values).

Corsi's
approach to politics is both destructive and self-destructive. If Senator Obama
loses, he should lose on the merits: his record in public life and his
political philosophy. And while it's legitimate to take into account
Obama's past associations with people like the Reverend Jeremiah
Wright-especially for someone like Obama, about whom relatively little is
known-it wrong and reckless to throw out unsubstantiated charges and
smears against Senator Obama.

Conservatism
has been an intellectual home to people like Burke and Buckley. The GOP is the
party that gave us Lincoln and Reagan. It seems to me that its leaders ought to
make it clear that they find what Dr. Corsi is doing to be both wrong and
repellent. To have their movement and their party associated with such a figure
would be a terrible thing and it will only help the cause of those who hold
both the GOP and the conservative movement in contempt.


From an August 12 Los Angeles Times article by Kate
Linthicum:


Right-wing
author Jerome Corsi hit it big in 2004 with a book attacking John F. Kerry.

"Unfit
for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" soared to
No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Now
Corsi has done it again -- taking aim at a different Democratic presidential
candidate.

Corsi's
latest, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," will top the Aug. 17 New York Times hard-cover nonfiction
bestseller list.

The
book lashes out at Barack Obama and alleges, among other things, that the
politician has a secret radical Islamic agenda.

But
being No. 1 doesn't necessarily mean being accurate. Obama is a
Christian.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Election Center:


CAMPBELL
BROWN (host): There's a new book out about Barack Obama. It's
number one right now on The New York Times
bestseller list. I can guarantee you, though, nobody in the Obama camp is happy
at all -- at all happy about that. And here's why.

It is
called Obama Nation:
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality. The author, Jerome Corsi, also co-wrote the book Unfit
for Command, which started the Swift Boating of John Kerry. Obama Nation is riddled with pretty much
every unsubstantiated rumor you ever heard about Obama. Jessica Yellin
found out for us that it's also turning into a major campaign headache. And, Jessica,
I know -- we know that some of the most damaging charges in this book just
aren't true. The author admits he's on a mission to take down Barack Obama. He's been slammed for books that he's written before. They're
also discredited. But it's still getting an awful lot of
traction.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Anderson Cooper 360:


JESSICA
YELLIN (CNN Capitol Hill correspondent): To prove his point, Corsi says the book is meticulously researched
and fact-checked. But when we checked his facts, we found he's wrong on
many points. Here are a few. The book claims Obama didn't
dedicate his first book, Dreams from My
Father, to his family members. He did. He dedicated it to his
mother, his grandmother, and his siblings. Corsi cites a report saying
Obama was in church when Reverend Jeremiah Wright made
comments about race on July 22. But Obama was out of state, a full time zone
away. And Corsi
writes Obama has yet to answer questions about whether he
ever stopped using drugs. But in his first book, Obama said he stopped getting
high during college.


From an August 12 New York Times article by Jim
Rutenberg and Julie Bosman:


In the
summer of 2004 the conservative gadfly Jerome R. Corsi shot to the top of the
best-seller lists as co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book
attacking Senator John Kerry's record on a Vietnam War Swift boat that
began the larger damaging campaign against Mr. Kerry's war credentials as
he sought the presidency.

Almost exactly four
years after that campaign began, Mr. Corsi has released a new attack book
painting Senator Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumed presidential
nominee, as a stealth radical liberal who has tried to cover up
"extensive connections to Islam" -- Mr. Obama is Christian -- and questioning
whether his admitted experimentation with drugs in high school and college ever
ceased.

Significant parts of the
book, whose subtitle is "Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," have already been challenged as misleading or false in the
days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance
on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday --
at No. 1.

[...]

Several of the book's accusations, in fact, are unsubstantiated, misleading or inaccurate.


From the August 14 edition of Fox
News' Hannity &amp; Colmes:


ALAN COLMES (co-host): The substance of the book --

[crosstalk]

COLMES: -- we have already seen in the book. He was wrong about a
sermon that Barack Obama attended. He got the date wrong. He was wrong about
the dedication in the book. He was wrong about Obama saying that he stopped
using drugs. He was not truthful about that. He was wrong about a number of
things in the book --

HUGH HEWITT (syndicated radio host): Actually, stop there, Alan.
That's not true --

COLMES: -- there have been a number of things in the book that have
been discredited.


From an August 14 Washington Post article by Eli
Saslow:


Corsi's
"The Obama Nation" lacks major revelations and has been dismissed by
Obama's campaign as a series of lies from a serial liar. Parts of the book have
also been disproved by the mainstream media. In 2004, Corsi co-wrote
"Unfit for Command," in which Swift boat veterans criticized Sen. John
F. Kerry's Vietnam War record. That book was also widely
disproved.


From an August 15 Washington Post editorial:


Unfortunately
but unsurprisingly, given his earlier hit job on the last Democratic nominee,
Mr. Corsi's latest is rife with inaccuracies and innuendo. If the fundamental
smear of "Unfit for Command" was that John F. Kerry was no war hero,
the insinuation of Mr. Corsi's latest is that Mr. Obama is a closet Muslim and
militant, black activist drug-user.

[...]

He gets
facts wrong, from the date of Mr. Obama's marriage to whether he dedicated his autobiography
to his family (he did) to whether he revealed that he took his future wife on
his second trip to Kenya (he did.) He makes offensive statements: "The
sexual attraction of his mother to her African husband jumps out from the
page." 

When
facts are lacking, Mr. Corsi makes his point by suggestive questions. Noting
that Life magazine could find no record of an article that Mr. Obama remembered
reading as a child about a black man who tried to lighten his skin, Mr. Corsi
asks, "How much more imagining, hypothetical lying, or just plain lying is
Obama capable of doing?" When facts are present, he twists them to make
Mr. Obama bad.


From an August 14 Associated Press article by Nedra
Pickler:


Jerome
Corsi's anti-Obama book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult
of Personality," claims the Illinois
senator is a dangerous, radical candidate for president. The book is a
compilation of all the innuendo and false rumors against Obama -- that he was
raised a Muslim, attended a radical, black church and secretly has a
"black rage" hidden beneath the surface.

In
fact, Obama is a Christian who attended Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

[...]

Corsi
suggests, without a shred of proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama
has acknowledged using marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit
when he went to college and hasn't used drugs since.

Corsi
makes an issue of the fact that, before he quit smoking cigarettes, Obama
didn't want it widely known that he smoked. "If Obama takes pains to hide
his smoking from us, what else does he take pains to hide?" Corsi asks in
the book.

Corsi
also dwells on Obama's mother marrying Obama's African father and later
marrying someone from Indonesia
-- whom Corsi describes as "a second man of color to be her mate."
The Obama campaign says the description is one of many examples of Corsi's
"offensive language" in the book.

He
claims Obama received extensive Islamic religious education as a boy in Indonesia,
education that was only offered to the truly faithful. Actually, Obama is a
Christian and as a boy he attended both Catholic school and Indonesian public
schools where some basic study of the Koran was offered.

He
accuses Obama of wanting to weaken the military even though Obama's campaign
calls for adding 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.


From an August 13 post by Joe Klein on Time magazine's Swampland
blog:


I heard
about Jerome Corsi's book a few weeks ago from my mother, who said that her
great fear--that Barack Obama has covert Islamic associations--had been
confirmed by a new book. I told her not to worry, that many reputable people
had looked into the matter and Obama was more likely to be spotted in Whole
Foods than praying in a mosque. (Since my mother has never been to Whole Foods,
so she didn't quite get my wry allusion.) "I hope so," she said,
dubiously. 

So we
know the market for trash is there, and not so far from home. And we know, that
Mary Matalin, who appears regularly on mainstream media programs like Meet the Press
called the Corsi book in the New York Times today:

"a
piece of scholarship, and a good one at that."

But
hey, Mary stands to make big bucks off this scholarship, which I'm sure was
submitted for peer review and otherwise held to the highest editorial
standards--and I'm sure her reputation and mediagenicity won't be damaged by
this poisonous crap, and we're all friends here, aren't we? And, yknow, they
say politics ain't beanbag...and it's all in the game to tell innocent, well-intentioned
people that Barack Obama is a secret Muslim or that John Kerry wasn't really a
hero in Vietnam.
Or, as George W. Bush, once told a rightly outraged John McCain--whose wife and
daughter Bush's minions had smeared--"It's just politics."


An August 13 post on Jonathan
Martin's blog at Politico.com:


The
power of Fox News and talk radio: Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation "is to
make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction
hardcovers this Sunday -- at No. 1.," according to a front-page story by Jim Rutenberg
and Julie Bosman in the Times today that will only help sell more books.

As
Rutenberg and Bosman note, the book has its share of errors. 

But
Corsi delved into the drug-and-Muslim fever swamps, which, regardless of
accuracy, is what many on the right want to believe about Obama.

The
best part of the piece, though, is this: "He said he was planning to
aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr.
Obama this fall, though he would not name them."

A
third-party anti-Obama effort still may form, but methinks there is a reason
here why Corsi "would not name them."

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-16T03:00:37Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-16T03:00:37Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150015</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm"><b>Media denounce Corsi's anti-Obama book</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - While the recent anti-Obama book by Jerome Corsi, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold
Editions), will debut atop the New York
Times bestseller list, many in the media are challenging the book,
noting its numerous falsehoods as well as its author's track record,
which includes a slew of bigoted posts on the
conservative website Free
Republic and co-authorship of a discredited book
attacking Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign. The
media's reaction to The Obama Nation stands
in stark contrast to coverage of that 2004 book, Unfit for Command. As Media Matters for America
has noted, the media were sharply criticized
for taking too long to challenge Unfit's
numerous smears and falsehoods.

In an August 15 article in Editor & Publisher, Greg Mitchell noted the contrast in the
media's reaction to the two books:


Four
years ago this month, with E&P's Joe Strupp, I explored in a number
of articles the belated or conflicted media response to the
"swiftboating" of Sen. John Kerry, then the Democratic nominee for
president. The mainstream press gave the charges-- carried in ads, in books and
articles, and in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a
respectful airing mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting
to shoot them down as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false. This delay, along
with Kerry's own reluctance to face the matter squarely, quite possibly
cost the Democrat the White House. 

Now,
this month, a bestselling anti-Obama book -- by a co-author of the most
prominent "swiftboat" anti-Kerry book in 2004 -- has predictably
been published (by Mary Matalin's imprint) and has gained immediate and wide
attention in the mainstream. But this time, in many cases, the media response
has been a "swift" kick to its credibility.


Below are numerous examples of the
media responding with "a 'swift' kick" to The Obama Nation's credibility:

From an August 15 Washington Post column by Eugene
Robinson:


The
"author," and I use the term loosely, whose vicious lies damaged John
Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign has crawled back out from under his rock to spew
vicious lies about Barack Obama. Right-wing radio talk-show hosts are dutifully
transmitting this concocted venom. This presidential campaign has officially
gotten ugly. 



The
"author" I'm talking about is a man named Jerome Corsi. In a book
published last year, "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico
and Canada," Corsi claimed that George W. Bush was at the heart of a
secret conspiracy to subsume the United States into a post-national,
one-worldish North American Union. Corsi's writings on far-right blogs have
been even more paranoid and delusional. He has written that pedophilia, for
which he used a more graphic term, "is OK with the Pope as long as it
isn't reported by the liberal press." He has referred to Muslims as
"ragheads."

Corsi
would be known as just another visitor from the outer fringe if he had not been
the co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book that slimed Kerry's
exemplary record as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam. The allegations in that
book were discredited, but not before they had been amplified by the right-wing
echo chamber to the point where they raised questions in some voters' minds --
perhaps enough to swing the election.


From an August 13 Politico article by Kenneth P.
Vogel:


The
folks behind "The Obama Nation," the wildly successful but
factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched
work. 

But its
author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called
into question his credibility.

Jerome
Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite
resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments
through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian
and Muslims worship Satan.


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:



RACHEL
MADDOW (guest host): You may remember Corsi for his
sober allegations that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian, that John Kerry is both a
Jew and a Communist, and his allegations that Muslims actually worship Satan.
You may remember Jerome Corsi for his recent book
attacking the liberal myth that oil is a finite resource, since he, Jerome Corsi, has learned how to make new oil. You may remember Corsi for his scholarly rebuke of George W. Bush's
secret plan to merge the United States
into Mexico.

OK,
honestly, you probably don't remember Jerome Corsi
at all, because why would you pay attention to someone with a record like that?
But Corsi's new anti-Obama book will be number one on
that bestseller list for at least two weeks running, despite fact checking by
news organizations, including The New York
Times, showing it to be rife with errors and inaccuracies.

And the
Obama camp is now firing back, issuing a 40-page rebuttal
titled "Unfit for Publication," soon appearing at Obama's Fight
the Smears website. The campaign promising to forcefully respond with all means
at their disposal. Nonetheless, the book is selling well, due, essentially, to
hundreds of right wing talk show interviews, and large volume bulk sales to
right-wing organizations, a tactic to be discussed now with my next guest.


From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the August 5 edition of MSNBC Live:


BREWER:
You say it's a comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers
that are going through this book page by page and picking apart what they see
as factual errors. Let me give you an example. You say in this book,
"Interestingly, Obama did not dedicate Dreams from My Father to his
mother or to his father, Barack Sr., or to his Indonesian stepfather," and
Media Matters,
the online organization, says in his book, he actually says on a -- on the last
page of the introduction, "It is to my family, though, my mother, my
grandparents, my siblings, stretched across oceans and continents that I owe
the deepest gratitude and to whom I dedicated this book." So if they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility? 

CORSI:
Let's discuss that one. If you'll read carefully what Media Matters said, they point
out there is no dedication page even in the second edition. 

BREWER:
But it says right in the introduction that it's dedicated to his family.

CORSI:
In the introduction that he wrote after, this was going with the second book. And
the original book had no dedication page and this is not the typical way that
you dedicate a book. So I'm making the distinction there is no dedication page
in the book at all, never has been.

BREWER:
Media Matters
has some eight, nine, 10 pages of factual errors. 

CORSI:
And I'd be happy to go through each one of them with you. 

BREWER:
And we're not going to do that. But I'm saying, if they are finding one, then
why do you get credibility for the book? 

CORSI:
Well, I've already objected to the one they found. I think Media Matters
is wrong, and I would argue with every one of them. 


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams:


DAN ABRAMS
(host): Yeah. I mean, look, you know, and again, among the accusations, Brad,
debunked from this book -- drug use in the U.S. Senate, that he didn't
dedicate his book to his family, he wanted to decrease the size of the
military. I mean, the list goes on of the things that were debunked from this
book.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Larry King Live:


LARRY
KING (host): Jerome, you write in your book that Senator Obama has, quote, "yet to answer whether he stopped using marijuana
and cocaine completely in college or whether his drug usage extended to his law
school days or beyond."

CORSI: Yes.

KING:
But Obama wrote in his memoir Dreams from My Father -- which you repeatedly cite in your
book -- that when he moved to New
  York in the early '80s, quote, "I stopped
getting high. I ran three miles a day and I fasted on Sunday." So
are you saying he's lying?

CORSI: What I'm saying in the
book is that people who admit that they've used drugs -- and Obama -- Obama said he used drugs through Occidental. And it was a lot
of drugs. He said it was -- it had become virtually habitual with marijuana and
cocaine. My argument is that the self-reporting of people who use drugs
as to when they quit is not reliable. That's the argument I was
making.


From an August 15 post to Commentary magazine's Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, titled "The Obama Smears":


As for the
book: it seems to be riddled with factual errors-some relatively minor
(like asserting that Obama does not mention the birth of his half-sister, Maya
Soetoro-Ng, in Dreams
from My Father; Obama does mention her), and some
significant (suggesting that Obama favors withdrawing troops from Afghanistan;
he wants to do the opposite). But more problematic, I think, is Corsi's
claim that Obama has "extensive connections to Islam" and his
suggestion that Obama is a recent drug user. Those claims are, from everything
I can tell, unsubstantiated. (When challenged to produce the evidence, Corsi
counters with the "prove you're not beating your wife"
defense.)

For
example, Obama, who in his book admitted using drugs in his youth, says he
hasn't used any since he was 20 years old. Corsi, in an interview, said
Obama's words can't be trusted because "self-reporting, by
people who have used drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently
unreliable." And Corsi's effort to tie Obama to the Muslim
faith-claims based on questionable sources, reaching back to
Obama's youth in Indonesia-is especially troubling, since the
subtext here is attaching Obama to militant Islam and suggesting that
he's somehow alien to America and its values (when in fact his candidacy
is a confirmation of the viability of those values).

Corsi's
approach to politics is both destructive and self-destructive. If Senator Obama
loses, he should lose on the merits: his record in public life and his
political philosophy. And while it's legitimate to take into account
Obama's past associations with people like the Reverend Jeremiah
Wright-especially for someone like Obama, about whom relatively little is
known-it wrong and reckless to throw out unsubstantiated charges and
smears against Senator Obama.

Conservatism
has been an intellectual home to people like Burke and Buckley. The GOP is the
party that gave us Lincoln and Reagan. It seems to me that its leaders ought to
make it clear that they find what Dr. Corsi is doing to be both wrong and
repellent. To have their movement and their party associated with such a figure
would be a terrible thing and it will only help the cause of those who hold
both the GOP and the conservative movement in contempt.


From an August 12 Los Angeles Times article by Kate
Linthicum:


Right-wing
author Jerome Corsi hit it big in 2004 with a book attacking John F. Kerry.

"Unfit
for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" soared to
No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Now
Corsi has done it again -- taking aim at a different Democratic presidential
candidate.

Corsi's
latest, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," will top the Aug. 17 New York Times hard-cover nonfiction
bestseller list.

The
book lashes out at Barack Obama and alleges, among other things, that the
politician has a secret radical Islamic agenda.

But
being No. 1 doesn't necessarily mean being accurate. Obama is a
Christian.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Election Center:


CAMPBELL
BROWN (host): There's a new book out about Barack Obama. It's
number one right now on The New York Times
bestseller list. I can guarantee you, though, nobody in the Obama camp is happy
at all -- at all happy about that. And here's why.

It is
called Obama Nation:
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality. The author, Jerome Corsi, also co-wrote the book Unfit
for Command, which started the Swift Boating of John Kerry. Obama Nation is riddled with pretty much
every unsubstantiated rumor you ever heard about Obama. Jessica Yellin
found out for us that it's also turning into a major campaign headache. And, Jessica,
I know -- we know that some of the most damaging charges in this book just
aren't true. The author admits he's on a mission to take down Barack Obama. He's been slammed for books that he's written before. They're
also discredited. But it's still getting an awful lot of
traction.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Anderson Cooper 360:


JESSICA
YELLIN (CNN Capitol Hill correspondent): To prove his point, Corsi says the book is meticulously researched
and fact-checked. But when we checked his facts, we found he's wrong on
many points. Here are a few. The book claims Obama didn't
dedicate his first book, Dreams from My
Father, to his family members. He did. He dedicated it to his
mother, his grandmother, and his siblings. Corsi cites a report saying
Obama was in church when Reverend Jeremiah Wright made
comments about race on July 22. But Obama was out of state, a full time zone
away. And Corsi
writes Obama has yet to answer questions about whether he
ever stopped using drugs. But in his first book, Obama said he stopped getting
high during college.


From an August 12 New York Times article by Jim
Rutenberg and Julie Bosman:


In the
summer of 2004 the conservative gadfly Jerome R. Corsi shot to the top of the
best-seller lists as co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book
attacking Senator John Kerry's record on a Vietnam War Swift boat that
began the larger damaging campaign against Mr. Kerry's war credentials as
he sought the presidency.

Almost exactly four
years after that campaign began, Mr. Corsi has released a new attack book
painting Senator Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumed presidential
nominee, as a stealth radical liberal who has tried to cover up
"extensive connections to Islam" -- Mr. Obama is Christian -- and questioning
whether his admitted experimentation with drugs in high school and college ever
ceased.

Significant parts of the
book, whose subtitle is "Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," have already been challenged as misleading or false in the
days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance
on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday --
at No. 1.

[...]

Several of the book's accusations, in fact, are unsubstantiated, misleading or inaccurate.


From the August 14 edition of Fox
News' Hannity & Colmes:


ALAN COLMES (co-host): The substance of the book --

[crosstalk]

COLMES: -- we have already seen in the book. He was wrong about a
sermon that Barack Obama attended. He got the date wrong. He was wrong about
the dedication in the book. He was wrong about Obama saying that he stopped
using drugs. He was not truthful about that. He was wrong about a number of
things in the book --

HUGH HEWITT (syndicated radio host): Actually, stop there, Alan.
That's not true --

COLMES: -- there have been a number of things in the book that have
been discredited.


From an August 14 Washington Post article by Eli
Saslow:


Corsi's
"The Obama Nation" lacks major revelations and has been dismissed by
Obama's campaign as a series of lies from a serial liar. Parts of the book have
also been disproved by the mainstream media. In 2004, Corsi co-wrote
"Unfit for Command," in which Swift boat veterans criticized Sen. John
F. Kerry's Vietnam War record. That book was also widely
disproved.


From an August 15 Washington Post editorial:


Unfortunately
but unsurprisingly, given his earlier hit job on the last Democratic nominee,
Mr. Corsi's latest is rife with inaccuracies and innuendo. If the fundamental
smear of "Unfit for Command" was that John F. Kerry was no war hero,
the insinuation of Mr. Corsi's latest is that Mr. Obama is a closet Muslim and
militant, black activist drug-user.

[...]

He gets
facts wrong, from the date of Mr. Obama's marriage to whether he dedicated his autobiography
to his family (he did) to whether he revealed that he took his future wife on
his second trip to Kenya (he did.) He makes offensive statements: "The
sexual attraction of his mother to her African husband jumps out from the
page." 

When
facts are lacking, Mr. Corsi makes his point by suggestive questions. Noting
that Life magazine could find no record of an article that Mr. Obama remembered
reading as a child about a black man who tried to lighten his skin, Mr. Corsi
asks, "How much more imagining, hypothetical lying, or just plain lying is
Obama capable of doing?" When facts are present, he twists them to make
Mr. Obama bad.


From an August 14 Associated Press article by Nedra
Pickler:


Jerome
Corsi's anti-Obama book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult
of Personality," claims the Illinois
senator is a dangerous, radical candidate for president. The book is a
compilation of all the innuendo and false rumors against Obama -- that he was
raised a Muslim, attended a radical, black church and secretly has a
"black rage" hidden beneath the surface.

In
fact, Obama is a Christian who attended Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

[...]

Corsi
suggests, without a shred of proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama
has acknowledged using marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit
when he went to college and hasn't used drugs since.

Corsi
makes an issue of the fact that, before he quit smoking cigarettes, Obama
didn't want it widely known that he smoked. "If Obama takes pains to hide
his smoking from us, what else does he take pains to hide?" Corsi asks in
the book.

Corsi
also dwells on Obama's mother marrying Obama's African father and later
marrying someone from Indonesia
-- whom Corsi describes as "a second man of color to be her mate."
The Obama campaign says the description is one of many examples of Corsi's
"offensive language" in the book.

He
claims Obama received extensive Islamic religious education as a boy in Indonesia,
education that was only offered to the truly faithful. Actually, Obama is a
Christian and as a boy he attended both Catholic school and Indonesian public
schools where some basic study of the Koran was offered.

He
accuses Obama of wanting to weaken the military even though Obama's campaign
calls for adding 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.


From an August 13 post by Joe Klein on Time magazine's Swampland
blog:


I heard
about Jerome Corsi's book a few weeks ago from my mother, who said that her
great fear--that Barack Obama has covert Islamic associations--had been
confirmed by a new book. I told her not to worry, that many reputable people
had looked into the matter and Obama was more likely to be spotted in Whole
Foods than praying in a mosque. (Since my mother has never been to Whole Foods,
so she didn't quite get my wry allusion.) "I hope so," she said,
dubiously. 

So we
know the market for trash is there, and not so far from home. And we know, that
Mary Matalin, who appears regularly on mainstream media programs like Meet the Press
called the Corsi book in the New York Times today:

"a
piece of scholarship, and a good one at that."

But
hey, Mary stands to make big bucks off this scholarship, which I'm sure was
submitted for peer review and otherwise held to the highest editorial
standards--and I'm sure her reputation and mediagenicity won't be damaged by
this poisonous crap, and we're all friends here, aren't we? And, yknow, they
say politics ain't beanbag...and it's all in the game to tell innocent, well-intentioned
people that Barack Obama is a secret Muslim or that John Kerry wasn't really a
hero in Vietnam.
Or, as George W. Bush, once told a rightly outraged John McCain--whose wife and
daughter Bush's minions had smeared--"It's just politics."


An August 13 post on Jonathan
Martin's blog at Politico.com:


The
power of Fox News and talk radio: Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation "is to
make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction
hardcovers this Sunday -- at No. 1.," according to a front-page story by Jim Rutenberg
and Julie Bosman in the Times today that will only help sell more books.

As
Rutenberg and Bosman note, the book has its share of errors. 

But
Corsi delved into the drug-and-Muslim fever swamps, which, regardless of
accuracy, is what many on the right want to believe about Obama.

The
best part of the piece, though, is this: "He said he was planning to
aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr.
Obama this fall, though he would not name them."

A
third-party anti-Obama effort still may form, but methinks there is a reason
here why Corsi "would not name them."

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Media denounce Corsi&#39;s anti-Obama book {...} Many in the media are challenging Jerome Corsi&#39;s The Obama Nation , noting its numerous falsehoods and its author&#39;s track record. Their reaction stands in stark contrast to coverage of Corsi&#39;s 2004 book, Unfit for Command . The media were sharply criticized for taking too long to challenge that book&#39;s numerous smears and falsehoods. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 16, 2008, 3:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 16, 2008, 12:22 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;39KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ARTS} - Graffiti artist gives talk</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/graffiti-artist-gives-talk-20080814420.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">GRAFFITI artist Mohammed Ali will discuss his work at Edinburgh's Central Mosque as part of the Islam Festival.
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/graffiti-artist-gives-talk-20080814420.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-14T01:00:00Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-14T01:00:00Z</modified>
<author>
<name>News.Scotsman.Com</name>
<url>http://news.scotsman.com/arts/Graffiti-artist-gives-talk.4389831.jp</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/graffiti-artist-gives-talk-20080814420.htm"><b>Graffiti artist gives talk</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/graffiti-artist-gives-talk-20080814420.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">News.Scotsman.Com</span> - GRAFFITI artist Mohammed Ali will discuss his work at Edinburgh's Central Mosque as part of the Islam Festival.
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">	Graffiti artist gives talk - Scotsman.com News {...} Graffiti artist gives talk - GRAFFITI artist Mohammed Ali will discuss his work at Edinburgh's Central Mosque as part of the Islam Festival.<br /> {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 14, 2008, 1:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 14, 2008, 7:57 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;44KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span>  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/"><b>Arts</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{EUROPE &gt; NEWSPAPERS} - Publisher Random House has pulled a novel about Islam over protest fears </title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/publisher-random-house-has-pulled-a-novel-about-2008089122.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">
Random House has withdrawn a novel about the Prophet Mohammed's child bride, 
  fearing it could "incite acts of violence". 

</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/publisher-random-house-has-pulled-a-novel-about-2008089122.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-08T09:31:28Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-08T09:31:28Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Telegraph.Co.Uk</name>
<url>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2521794/Publisher-Random-House-has-pulled-a-novel-about-Islam-over-protest-fears.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/publisher-random-house-has-pulled-a-novel-about-2008089122.htm"><b>Publisher Random House has pulled a novel about Islam over protest fears </b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/publisher-random-house-has-pulled-a-novel-about-2008089122.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Telegraph.Co.Uk</span> - 
Random House has withdrawn a novel about the Prophet Mohammed's child bride, 
  fearing it could "incite acts of violence". 

<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Publisher Random House has pulled a novel about Islam over protest fears  - Telegraph {...} random house,islam,jewel of medina,mohammed,sherry jones, UK News, uk news, breaking UK news, latest UK news, UK news latest breaking UK stories, current UK news, online UK news, todays UK news, UK politics news, the daily telegraph UK news, telegraph uk news, telegraph UK news, daily telegraph UK news, telegraph.co.uk, Britain, British News, UK News,News {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 8, 2008, 9:31 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 8, 2008, 10:49 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;36KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/">Regional</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/">Europe</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/">United Kingdom</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/">News and Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/"><b>Newspapers</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{AUTOS &gt; MAGAZINES AND E-ZINES} - EgyptAir Offers Muslim Prayer Before Flights; Some People Freak Out.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-2008087542.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">


Because we don't have enough to worry about in this country, a group calling itself Stop the ACLU has posted a silly rant on its Web site complaining about EgyptAir ending its preflight safety spiel with an Islamic prayer. The brilliant mind behind the post says no one has lodged a complaint against EgyptAir for this atrocious crime, because "complaining about all things Muslim is almost taboo."



What a load. Can anyone really listen to the last few seconds of the prayer posted at YouTube (and at the end of this post) and find it offensive? We'll admit wrapping up a safety briefing with a prayer and a shot of a mosque might be a little strange, but is it really that horrible? Here's a tip, folks. If you don't like the video, how about not watching it. We don't see a flight attendant standing over anyone's seat forcing them to tune in. If an Islamic prayer stresses you out that much, put on your noise-canceling headphones, dig into the latest issue of the Weekly Standard and ignore it.

Or better yet, if you're that hot and bothered, how about not flying EgyptAir? Lufthansa has a nice connecting flight into Cairo, though the crew would be speaking German, so that might not work for you either. Maybe Ann Coulter has a travel agent who can help you put together an itinerary. 

Stop the ACLU is making this nonissue into some sort of struggle between Christianity and Islam (and manages to get in a dig against Jews, to boot), and it's anything but. You know why EgyptAir flights feature prayers that appeal to Muslims? Because Egypt is 90 percent Muslim. It's the same reason that Air France flight attendants speak French and Qantas serves Australian wine. Airlines are in the business of making their most-important customers happy. If a U.S. airline thought it could rake in some cash with an inflight Hail Mary or two, you can bet they'd do it. 

So if you think EgyptAir is blatantly insensitive, take your business elsewhere. And if you're going to complain about an airline on your blog, how about focusing on something that matters? Like the fact that in five years most of us won't be able to afford to fly anyway. That would take care of your in-flight prayer problem, wouldn't it? 

Photo: caribb/Flickr.


  


   
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-2008087542.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-06T22:23:07Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-06T22:23:07Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Blog.Wired.Com</name>
<url>http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/07/egypt-air-rolls.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-2008087542.htm"><b>EgyptAir Offers Muslim Prayer Before Flights; Some People Freak Out.</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-2008087542.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Blog.Wired.Com</span> - 


Because we don't have enough to worry about in this country, a group calling itself Stop the ACLU has posted a silly rant on its Web site complaining about EgyptAir ending its preflight safety spiel with an Islamic prayer. The brilliant mind behind the post says no one has lodged a complaint against EgyptAir for this atrocious crime, because "complaining about all things Muslim is almost taboo."



What a load. Can anyone really listen to the last few seconds of the prayer posted at YouTube (and at the end of this post) and find it offensive? We'll admit wrapping up a safety briefing with a prayer and a shot of a mosque might be a little strange, but is it really that horrible? Here's a tip, folks. If you don't like the video, how about not watching it. We don't see a flight attendant standing over anyone's seat forcing them to tune in. If an Islamic prayer stresses you out that much, put on your noise-canceling headphones, dig into the latest issue of the Weekly Standard and ignore it.

Or better yet, if you're that hot and bothered, how about not flying EgyptAir? Lufthansa has a nice connecting flight into Cairo, though the crew would be speaking German, so that might not work for you either. Maybe Ann Coulter has a travel agent who can help you put together an itinerary. 

Stop the ACLU is making this nonissue into some sort of struggle between Christianity and Islam (and manages to get in a dig against Jews, to boot), and it's anything but. You know why EgyptAir flights feature prayers that appeal to Muslims? Because Egypt is 90 percent Muslim. It's the same reason that Air France flight attendants speak French and Qantas serves Australian wine. Airlines are in the business of making their most-important customers happy. If a U.S. airline thought it could rake in some cash with an inflight Hail Mary or two, you can bet they'd do it. 

So if you think EgyptAir is blatantly insensitive, take your business elsewhere. And if you're going to complain about an airline on your blog, how about focusing on something that matters? Like the fact that in five years most of us won't be able to afford to fly anyway. That would take care of your in-flight prayer problem, wouldn't it? 

Photo: caribb/Flickr.


  


   
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">EgyptAir Offers Muslim Prayer Before Flights; Some People Freak Out. | Autopia from Wired.com {...} Because we don't have enough to worry about in this country, a group calling itself Stop the ACLU has posted a silly rant on its Web site complaining about EgyptAir {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 6, 2008, 10:23 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;63KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/recreation/">Recreation</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/">Autos</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/"><b>Magazines and E-zines</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{AUTOS &gt; MAGAZINES AND E-ZINES} - EgyptAir Offers Muslim Prayer Before Flights; Some People Freak Out.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-20080725529.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">


Because we don't have enough to worry about in this country, a group calling itself Stop the ACLU has posted a silly rant on its Web site complaining about EgyptAir ending its preflight safety spiel with an Islamic prayer. The brilliant mind behind the post says no one has lodged a complaint against EgyptAir for this atrocious crime, because "complaining about all things Muslim is almost taboo."



What a load. Can anyone really listen to the last few seconds of the prayer posted at YouTube (and at the end of this post) and find it offensive? We'll admit wrapping up a safety briefing with a prayer and a shot of a mosque might be a little strange, but is it really that horrible? Here's a tip, folks. If you don't like the video, how about not watching it. We don't see a flight attendant standing over anyone's seat forcing them to tune in. If an Islamic prayer stresses you out that much, put on your noise-canceling headphones, dig into the latest issue of the Weekly Standard and ignore it.

Or better yet, if you're that hot and bothered, how about not flying EgyptAir? Lufthansa has a nice connecting flight into Cairo, though the crew would be speaking German, so that might not work for you either. Maybe Ann Coulter has a travel agent who can help you put together an itinerary. 

Stop the ACLU is making this nonissue into some sort of struggle between Christianity and Islam (and manages to get in a dig against Jews, to boot), and it's anything but. You know why EgyptAir flights feature prayers that appeal to Muslims? Because Egypt is 90 percent Muslim. It's the same reason that Air France flight attendants speak French and Qantas serves Australian wine. Airlines are in the business of making their most-important customers happy. If a U.S. airline thought it could rake in some cash with an inflight Hail Mary or two, you can bet they'd do it. 

So if you think EgyptAir is blatantly insensitive, take your business elsewhere. And if you're going to complain about an airline on your blog, how about focusing on something that matters? Like the fact that in five years most of us won't be able to afford to fly anyway. That would take care of your in-flight prayer problem, wouldn't it? 

Photo: caribb/Flickr.


  


   
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-20080725529.htm</id>
<issued>2008-07-30T23:56:36Z</issued>
<modified>2008-07-30T23:56:36Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Blog.Wired.Com</name>
<url>http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/07/egypt-air-rolls.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-20080725529.htm"><b>EgyptAir Offers Muslim Prayer Before Flights; Some People Freak Out.</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/egyptair-offers-muslim-prayer-before-flights-some-20080725529.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Blog.Wired.Com</span> - 


Because we don't have enough to worry about in this country, a group calling itself Stop the ACLU has posted a silly rant on its Web site complaining about EgyptAir ending its preflight safety spiel with an Islamic prayer. The brilliant mind behind the post says no one has lodged a complaint against EgyptAir for this atrocious crime, because "complaining about all things Muslim is almost taboo."



What a load. Can anyone really listen to the last few seconds of the prayer posted at YouTube (and at the end of this post) and find it offensive? We'll admit wrapping up a safety briefing with a prayer and a shot of a mosque might be a little strange, but is it really that horrible? Here's a tip, folks. If you don't like the video, how about not watching it. We don't see a flight attendant standing over anyone's seat forcing them to tune in. If an Islamic prayer stresses you out that much, put on your noise-canceling headphones, dig into the latest issue of the Weekly Standard and ignore it.

Or better yet, if you're that hot and bothered, how about not flying EgyptAir? Lufthansa has a nice connecting flight into Cairo, though the crew would be speaking German, so that might not work for you either. Maybe Ann Coulter has a travel agent who can help you put together an itinerary. 

Stop the ACLU is making this nonissue into some sort of struggle between Christianity and Islam (and manages to get in a dig against Jews, to boot), and it's anything but. You know why EgyptAir flights feature prayers that appeal to Muslims? Because Egypt is 90 percent Muslim. It's the same reason that Air France flight attendants speak French and Qantas serves Australian wine. Airlines are in the business of making their most-important customers happy. If a U.S. airline thought it could rake in some cash with an inflight Hail Mary or two, you can bet they'd do it. 

So if you think EgyptAir is blatantly insensitive, take your business elsewhere. And if you're going to complain about an airline on your blog, how about focusing on something that matters? Like the fact that in five years most of us won't be able to afford to fly anyway. That would take care of your in-flight prayer problem, wouldn't it? 

Photo: caribb/Flickr.


  


   
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">EgyptAir Offers Muslim Prayer Before Flights; Some People Freak Out. | Autopia from Wired.com {...} Because we don't have enough to worry about in this country, a group calling itself Stop the ACLU has posted a silly rant on its Web site complaining about EgyptAir {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> July 30, 2008, 11:56 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;58KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/recreation/">Recreation</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/">Autos</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/recreation/autos/magazines-and-e_zines/"><b>Magazines and E-zines</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{EUROPE &gt; NEWSPAPERS} - Muslim students back killing in the name of Islam </title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/muslim-students-back-killing-in-the-name-of-islam-20080777730.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">A third of Muslim university students believe killing in the name of religion can be justified, a survey has revealed. </summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/muslim-students-back-killing-in-the-name-of-islam-20080777730.htm</id>
<issued>2008-07-27T09:11:12Z</issued>
<modified>2008-07-27T09:11:12Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Telegraph.Co.Uk</name>
<url>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2462911/Muslim-students-back-killing-in-the-name-of-Islam.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/muslim-students-back-killing-in-the-name-of-islam-20080777730.htm"><b>Muslim students back killing in the name of Islam </b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/muslim-students-back-killing-in-the-name-of-islam-20080777730.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Telegraph.Co.Uk</span> - A third of Muslim university students believe killing in the name of religion can be justified, a survey has revealed. <blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Muslim students back killing in the name of Islam  - Telegraph {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> July 27, 2008, 9:11 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> July 27, 2008, 9:49 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;37KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/">Regional</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/">Europe</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/">United Kingdom</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/">News and Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/europe/united-kingdom/news-and-media/newspapers/"><b>Newspapers</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>