<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://xml.world-of-newave.info/g.-gordon-liddy.xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
	<title>G. Gordon Liddy - World-of-Newave.info</title>
	<link>http://answers.world-of-newave.info/g.-gordon-liddy.htm</link>
	<description>Latest news and articles about G. Gordon Liddy</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c)2004-2008.§/Newave SARL. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<webMaster>webmaster@world-of-newave.com (Webmaster)</webMaster>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:43:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Newave Lisa XML Engine v1.0 - http://www.world-of-newave.info/about.htm</generator>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Why is the NY Times continuing to ignore McCain's "own Bill Ayers"?</title>
		<link>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/why-is-the-ny-times-continuing-to-ignore-mccain-s-2008102399.htm</link>
		<guid>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/why-is-the-ny-times-continuing-to-ignore-mccain-s-2008102399.htm</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<description>

On October 4, The New
York Times published a 2,140-word front-page article about Sen.
Barack Obama's association with former Weather Underground member William
Ayers -- at least the 18th Times article
this year mentioning that association. But the Times
has yet to mention, let alone devote an entire article to, Sen. John
McCain's relationship with radio host and convicted Watergate burglar G.
Gordon Liddy. Indeed, in its October 4 article, the Times quoted Chicago
Tribune columnist Steve Chapman denouncing Obama's association
with Ayers but did not note that Chapman has described Liddy as
McCain's "own Bill Ayers" and has written that
"[i]f Obama needs to answer questions about Ayers, McCain has the same
obligation regarding Liddy." The Times,
moreover, quoted McCain criticizing Obama for his association with Ayers
without noting that Chapman has faulted McCain for what Chapman described as McCain's
"howling hypocrisy on the subject."

As Media Matters for
America has noted, Liddy
served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in
and the break-in at the office of
the psychiatrist of Daniel
Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers.
Liddy has acknowledged
preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in "if
necessary"; plotting
to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting
with a "gangland figure" to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from
cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and
plotting
to kidnap "leftist guerillas" at the 1972 Republican National
Convention -- a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology
borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder,
firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During
the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions
on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also
reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary
Clinton.

Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain's
campaigns since 1998, including $1,000
in February 2008. In
addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy's radio show during the
presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video
labeled "John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07" includes a
discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an "old
friend." During the segment, McCain praised Liddy's "adherence to the
principles and philosophies that keep our nation great," said he was
"proud" of Liddy, and said that "it's always a pleasure for me
to come on your program."

Additionally, in 1998, Liddy reportedly held a fundraiser at his home for
McCain. Liddy was reportedly scheduled to speak at another fundraiser for McCain in 2000. The Charlotte Observer reported on January 23, 2000, that McCain's
campaign vouched for Liddy's "character": 


His [McCain's] campaign
officials said Liddy's character will appeal to many voters because he was
following orders from President Nixon and kept silent afterward.

"His (Liddy's) judgment might
be in question, but I don't think his character is," said Ed Walker, the York County
chairman of McCain's campaign. "He was following orders just like any good
soldier, and he didn't tell on anybody. He felt like he was on a mission and
kept his silence." 


Liddy's 2000 speech was reportedly
canceled due to bad weather.

Media Matters has documented that as of September
19, the Times had published 15
news articles and four opinion pieces referencing Obama's ties to Ayers. Since then, in
addition to the October 4 article, the Times
has published two more articles mentioning
the association.

But despite having apparently judged Chapman's
opinions on the candidates' controversial associations as being
newsworthy, the Times has ignored
entirely McCain's relationship with Liddy, according to a search of the Nexis database from January 1
through October 4*.

In his May 4 Tribune column, Chapman
wrote: 


What McCain didn't mention is that
he has his own Bill Ayers -- in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative
radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in
the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and
proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far
from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.

How close are McCain and Liddy? At
least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy's home was the
site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four contributions
totaling $5,000 to the senator's campaigns -- including $1,000 this year.

Last November, McCain went on his
radio show. Liddy greeted him as "an old friend," and McCain sounded
like one. "I'm proud of you, I'm proud of your family," he gushed.
"It's always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and
congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and
philosophies that keep our nation great."

Which principles would those be? The
ones that told Liddy it was fine to break into the office of the Democratic
National Committee to plant bugs and photograph documents? The ones that made
him propose to kidnap anti-war activists so they couldn't disrupt the 1972
Republican National Convention? The ones that inspired him to plan the murder
(never carried out) of an unfriendly newspaper columnist?

Liddy was in the thick of the
biggest political scandal in American history -- and one of the greatest
threats to the rule of law. He has said he has no regrets about what he did,
insisting that he went to jail as "a prisoner of war."

All this may sound like ancient
history. But it's from the same era as the bombings Ayers helped carry out as a
member of the Weather Underground. And Liddy's penchant for extreme solutions
has not abated.

[...]

Given Liddy's record, it's hard to
see why McCain would touch him with a 10-foot pole. On the contrary, he should
be returning his donations and shunning his show. Yet the senator shows no
qualms about associating with Liddy -- or celebrating his service to their
common cause.

How does McCain explain his howling
hypocrisy on the subject? He doesn't. I made repeated inquiries to his campaign
aides, which they refused to acknowledge, much less answer. On this topic, the
pilot of the Straight Talk Express would rather stay parked in the garage. 

That's
an odd policy for someone who is so forthright about his rival's
responsibility. McCain thinks Obama should apologize for associating with a
criminal extremist. To which Obama might reply: After you.


And in an August 22 blog post about an
anti-Obama ad highlighting Obama's association with Ayers, Chapman wrote:



But conservatives may not want to
draw attention to the issue of ties to violent radicals -- since
John McCain is longtime pals with convicted Watergate burglar Gordon Liddy,
who once plotted a journalist's murder (which was never carried out) and has
advocated the shooting of federal law enforcement agents.

If Obama needs to answer questions
about Ayers, McCain has the same obligation regarding Liddy. How about they
both get started? 


From The New York Times'
October 4 article "Obama and '60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed
Paths": 


Their relationship has become a
touchstone for opponents of Mr. Obama, the Democratic senator, in his bid for the
presidency. Video clips on YouTube, including a new advertisement that was
broadcast on Friday, juxtapose Mr. Obama's face with the young Mr. Ayers
or grainy shots of the bombings.

In a televised interview last
spring, Senator John McCain, Mr. Obama's Republican rival, asked,
"How can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings that could
have or did kill innocent people?"

[...]

Since earning a doctorate in
education at Columbia in 1987, Mr. Ayers has
been a professor of education at the University
 of Illinois at Chicago,
the author or editor of 15 books, and an advocate of school reform.

"He's done a lot of good
in this city and nationally," Mayor Richard M. Daley said in an interview
this week, explaining that he has long consulted Mr. Ayers on school issues.
Mr. Daley, whose father was Chicago's mayor during the street violence
accompanying the 1968 Democratic National Convention and the so-called Days of
Rage the following year, said he saw the bombings of that time in the context
of a polarized and turbulent era.

"This is 2008," Mr.
Daley said. "People make mistakes. You judge a person by his whole
life."

That attitude is widely shared in Chicago, but it is not
universal. Steve Chapman, a columnist for The Chicago Tribune, defended Mr. Obama's
relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., his longtime pastor, whose
black liberation theology and "God damn America" sermon became
notorious last spring. But he denounced Mr. Obama for associating with Mr.
Ayers, whom he said the University
 of Illinois should never
have hired.

"I don't think
there's a statute of limitations on terrorist bombings," Mr.
Chapman said in an interview, speaking not of the law but of political and
moral implications.

"If you're in public
life, you ought to say, 'I don't want to be associated with this
guy,' " Mr. Chapman said. "If John McCain had a long
association with a guy who'd bombed abortion clinics, I don't think
people would say, 'That's ancient history.' "

</description>
		<source url="http://mediamatters.org/items/200810040004">Mediamatters.Org</source>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/why-is-the-ny-times-continuing-to-ignore-mccain-s-2008102399.htm"><b>Why is the NY Times continuing to ignore McCain's "own Bill Ayers"?</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/why-is-the-ny-times-continuing-to-ignore-mccain-s-2008102399.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - 

On October 4, The New
York Times published a 2,140-word front-page article about Sen.
Barack Obama's association with former Weather Underground member William
Ayers -- at least the 18th Times article
this year mentioning that association. But the Times
has yet to mention, let alone devote an entire article to, Sen. John
McCain's relationship with radio host and convicted Watergate burglar G.
Gordon Liddy. Indeed, in its October 4 article, the Times quoted Chicago
Tribune columnist Steve Chapman denouncing Obama's association
with Ayers but did not note that Chapman has described Liddy as
McCain's "own Bill Ayers" and has written that
"[i]f Obama needs to answer questions about Ayers, McCain has the same
obligation regarding Liddy." The Times,
moreover, quoted McCain criticizing Obama for his association with Ayers
without noting that Chapman has faulted McCain for what Chapman described as McCain's
"howling hypocrisy on the subject."

As Media Matters for
America has noted, Liddy
served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in
and the break-in at the office of
the psychiatrist of Daniel
Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers.
Liddy has acknowledged
preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in "if
necessary"; plotting
to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting
with a "gangland figure" to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from
cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and
plotting
to kidnap "leftist guerillas" at the 1972 Republican National
Convention -- a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology
borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder,
firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During
the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions
on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also
reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary
Clinton.

Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain's
campaigns since 1998, including $1,000
in February 2008. In
addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy's radio show during the
presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video
labeled "John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07" includes a
discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an "old
friend." During the segment, McCain praised Liddy's "adherence to the
principles and philosophies that keep our nation great," said he was
"proud" of Liddy, and said that "it's always a pleasure for me
to come on your program."

Additionally, in 1998, Liddy reportedly held a fundraiser at his home for
McCain. Liddy was reportedly scheduled to speak at another fundraiser for McCain in 2000. The Charlotte Observer reported on January 23, 2000, that McCain's
campaign vouched for Liddy's "character": 


His [McCain's] campaign
officials said Liddy's character will appeal to many voters because he was
following orders from President Nixon and kept silent afterward.

"His (Liddy's) judgment might
be in question, but I don't think his character is," said Ed Walker, the York County
chairman of McCain's campaign. "He was following orders just like any good
soldier, and he didn't tell on anybody. He felt like he was on a mission and
kept his silence." 


Liddy's 2000 speech was reportedly
canceled due to bad weather.

Media Matters has documented that as of September
19, the Times had published 15
news articles and four opinion pieces referencing Obama's ties to Ayers. Since then, in
addition to the October 4 article, the Times
has published two more articles mentioning
the association.

But despite having apparently judged Chapman's
opinions on the candidates' controversial associations as being
newsworthy, the Times has ignored
entirely McCain's relationship with Liddy, according to a search of the Nexis database from January 1
through October 4*.

In his May 4 Tribune column, Chapman
wrote: 


What McCain didn't mention is that
he has his own Bill Ayers -- in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative
radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in
the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and
proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far
from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.

How close are McCain and Liddy? At
least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy's home was the
site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four contributions
totaling $5,000 to the senator's campaigns -- including $1,000 this year.

Last November, McCain went on his
radio show. Liddy greeted him as "an old friend," and McCain sounded
like one. "I'm proud of you, I'm proud of your family," he gushed.
"It's always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and
congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and
philosophies that keep our nation great."

Which principles would those be? The
ones that told Liddy it was fine to break into the office of the Democratic
National Committee to plant bugs and photograph documents? The ones that made
him propose to kidnap anti-war activists so they couldn't disrupt the 1972
Republican National Convention? The ones that inspired him to plan the murder
(never carried out) of an unfriendly newspaper columnist?

Liddy was in the thick of the
biggest political scandal in American history -- and one of the greatest
threats to the rule of law. He has said he has no regrets about what he did,
insisting that he went to jail as "a prisoner of war."

All this may sound like ancient
history. But it's from the same era as the bombings Ayers helped carry out as a
member of the Weather Underground. And Liddy's penchant for extreme solutions
has not abated.

[...]

Given Liddy's record, it's hard to
see why McCain would touch him with a 10-foot pole. On the contrary, he should
be returning his donations and shunning his show. Yet the senator shows no
qualms about associating with Liddy -- or celebrating his service to their
common cause.

How does McCain explain his howling
hypocrisy on the subject? He doesn't. I made repeated inquiries to his campaign
aides, which they refused to acknowledge, much less answer. On this topic, the
pilot of the Straight Talk Express would rather stay parked in the garage. 

That's
an odd policy for someone who is so forthright about his rival's
responsibility. McCain thinks Obama should apologize for associating with a
criminal extremist. To which Obama might reply: After you.


And in an August 22 blog post about an
anti-Obama ad highlighting Obama's association with Ayers, Chapman wrote:



But conservatives may not want to
draw attention to the issue of ties to violent radicals -- since
John McCain is longtime pals with convicted Watergate burglar Gordon Liddy,
who once plotted a journalist's murder (which was never carried out) and has
advocated the shooting of federal law enforcement agents.

If Obama needs to answer questions
about Ayers, McCain has the same obligation regarding Liddy. How about they
both get started? 


From The New York Times'
October 4 article "Obama and '60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed
Paths": 


Their relationship has become a
touchstone for opponents of Mr. Obama, the Democratic senator, in his bid for the
presidency. Video clips on YouTube, including a new advertisement that was
broadcast on Friday, juxtapose Mr. Obama's face with the young Mr. Ayers
or grainy shots of the bombings.

In a televised interview last
spring, Senator John McCain, Mr. Obama's Republican rival, asked,
"How can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings that could
have or did kill innocent people?"

[...]

Since earning a doctorate in
education at Columbia in 1987, Mr. Ayers has
been a professor of education at the University
 of Illinois at Chicago,
the author or editor of 15 books, and an advocate of school reform.

"He's done a lot of good
in this city and nationally," Mayor Richard M. Daley said in an interview
this week, explaining that he has long consulted Mr. Ayers on school issues.
Mr. Daley, whose father was Chicago's mayor during the street violence
accompanying the 1968 Democratic National Convention and the so-called Days of
Rage the following year, said he saw the bombings of that time in the context
of a polarized and turbulent era.

"This is 2008," Mr.
Daley said. "People make mistakes. You judge a person by his whole
life."

That attitude is widely shared in Chicago, but it is not
universal. Steve Chapman, a columnist for The Chicago Tribune, defended Mr. Obama's
relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., his longtime pastor, whose
black liberation theology and "God damn America" sermon became
notorious last spring. But he denounced Mr. Obama for associating with Mr.
Ayers, whom he said the University
 of Illinois should never
have hired.

"I don't think
there's a statute of limitations on terrorist bombings," Mr.
Chapman said in an interview, speaking not of the law but of political and
moral implications.

"If you're in public
life, you ought to say, 'I don't want to be associated with this
guy,' " Mr. Chapman said. "If John McCain had a long
association with a guy who'd bombed abortion clinics, I don't think
people would say, 'That's ancient history.' "

<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Why is the NY Times continuing to ignore McCain&#39;s "own Bill Ayers"? {...} On October 4, The New York Times published a front-page article about Sen. Barack Obama&#39;s association with William Ayers -- at least the 18th Times article this year mentioning that association. But the Times has yet to mention Sen. John McCain&#39;s relationship with G. Gordon Liddy. The October 4 article quoted Chicago Tribune columnist Steve Chapman denouncing Obama&#39;s association with Ayers but did not note that Chapman has described Liddy as McCain&#39;s "own Bill Ayers" and written that "[i]f Obama needs to answer questions about Ayers, McCain has the same obligation regarding Liddy."   {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> October 4, 2008, 10:23 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> October 5, 2008, 11:50 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;26KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content:encoded>
		<category>Society > Issues > Business > Media > Bias and Balance</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Despite attacks on media by McCain campaign, case studies show disparate coverage in McCain's favor</title>
		<link>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-attacks-on-media-by-mccain-campaign-case-20080939225.htm</link>
		<guid>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-attacks-on-media-by-mccain-campaign-case-20080939225.htm</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
		<description>The media have for months reported complaints by Sen. John
McCain's campaign that they have favored his opponent in their coverage
of the presidential race, while making little attempt to assess accuracy of those complaints or to confirm or refute them. Media Matters for
America has undertaken a review of the media's coverage of two
stories negatively affecting or reflecting on Sen. Barack Obama and two stories
negatively affecting or reflecting on McCain and compared the extent of media
attention to each. Specifically, Media Matters
compared the media's coverage of Obama's association with Chicago developer Antoin
Rezko
to the media's coverage of McCain's associations with donors for
whom McCain reportedly facilitated land
deals. Media Matters
also compared coverage of Obama's association with former Weather
Underground member Bill Ayers to coverage of McCain's association with G.
Gordon Liddy, whom Chicago Tribune
columnist Steve Chapman has described as McCain's "own Bill
Ayers." 

Media Matters found that
while the five major newspapers -- the Los
Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The
Wall Street Journal, and
The Washington Post -- and the three evening network news broadcasts
have frequently mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers and Rezko, they have rarely mentioned
McCain's dealings with donors whom he reportedly benefited and have
completely ignored McCain's association with Liddy. Indeed, since The New
York Times first reported on April 22 that McCain facilitated land
deals that benefited major donors, these media outlets have mentioned those
deals in only six additional reports, but news reports and editorial and opinion pieces by or in those media outlets have mentioned Obama's
ties to Rezko -- who was convicted in June in a case in which Obama was never
accused of any wrongdoing -- 44 times
during that same time period. Moreover, while these same media outlets have
frequently mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers -- 69 mentions so far in 2008
-- they have yet to mention
McCain's connections to Liddy, whom McCain has praised and repeatedly
associated with in public and in campaign settings. In addition to serving more
than four years in prison for his role in the Watergate break-in and the Daniel
Ellsberg case, Liddy also admitted that he plotted
to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotted to murder fellow Republican
operative E. Howard Hunt; and plotted
to firebomb the Brookings Institution.
Liddy also
reportedly gave
advice on how to shoot agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and reportedly admitted to naming
shooting targets after the Clintons. 

Media Matters previously
conducted a review of coverage of the
Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. versus coverage of televangelist James Hagee in The Washington Post and The New York Times and found
that, from February 27,
the date Hagee endorsed McCain for president, to April 30, the two papers
combined published more than 12 times as many articles mentioning Wright and
Obama as they did mentioning Hagee and McCain. Media
Matters also documented (here,
here,
here,
here,
and here) other examples of
the disparity between the media's extensive coverage of controversial comments
made by Wright and other supporters of Obama and their coverage of
controversial comments
by Hagee and other supporters of McCain.

McCain and land deals vs. Obama and Rezko

McCain has reportedly facilitated several land deals that
benefited wealthy developers who were major McCain donors. But while several
major newspapers published initial articles concerning those deals, the media
have devoted far less attention to McCain's land deals than they have
paid to Obama's ties to Rezko. According to a Media Matters search of the Nexis and Factiva databases,
since The
New York Times' initial
April 22 article, the land deals have been mentioned in only six additional news articles, editorials, or
opinion pieces in the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, or The
Washington Post, and have yet to be mentioned on any evening network
news program. By contrast, during
the same time period, 39 news articles, editorials, or opinion
pieces in those papers have collectively mentioned Obama and Rezko; and the
evening news broadcasts have collectively mentioned Obama and Rezko in five
reports. 

Specifically:

The Los Angeles Times has published one news article that
     mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, compared to five news articles mentioning Obama
     and Rezko. 


The New York Times has published its original April 22 news
     article and one editorial that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals,
     compared to seven news articles and one opinion piece mentioning Obama and
     Rezko. 


USA Today published one news article
     that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, compared to two news
     articles mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


The Wall Street Journal has yet to publish a news
     article, editorial, or opinion piece that mentioned McCain-facilitated
     land deals, but it has published six news articles and four editorials or
     opinion pieces mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


The Washington Post has published three news
     articles that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, compared to 12 news
     articles and two editorials or opinion pieces mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


ABC's World News has yet to air a report
     that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, but has aired three reports
     mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


The CBS Evening News has yet to air a report that mentioned
     McCain-facilitated land deals, but has aired one report mentioning Obama
     and Rezko. 


NBC's Nightly News has yet to air a report
     that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, but has aired one report
     mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


In its April 22 article, headlined "A Developer, His Deals and His Ties to McCain,"
The New York Times
examined McCain's relationship with Arizona developer Donald R. Diamond. The Times reported:


In Arizona, Mr. McCain has helped Mr. Diamond
with matters as small as forwarding a complaint in a regulatory skirmish over
the endangered pygmy owl, and as large as introducing legislation remapping
public lands. In 1991 and 1994, Mr. McCain sponsored two laws sought by Mr.
Diamond that resulted in providing him millions of dollars and thousands of
acres in exchange for adding some of his properties to national parks. The Arizona senator
co-sponsored a third similar bill now before the Senate.


The article described Diamond as "one of the elite
fund-raisers Mr. McCain's current presidential campaign calls Innovators,
having raised more than $250,000 so far."

In a May 9 article headlined "McCain Pushed Land Swap That Benefits Backer,"
The Washington Post
reported that McCain "championed legislation that will let an Arizona
rancher trade remote grassland and ponderosa pine forest here for acres of
valuable federally owned property that is ready for development, a land swap
that now stands to directly benefit one of his top presidential campaign
fundraisers." The Post
continued:


Initially reluctant to support the
swap, the Arizona Republican became a key figure in pushing the deal through
Congress after the rancher and his partners hired lobbyists that included
McCain's 1992 Senate campaign manager, two of his former Senate staff members
(one of whom has returned as his chief of staff), and an Arizona insider who
was a major McCain donor and is now bundling campaign checks.

When McCain's legislation passed in
November 2005, the ranch owner gave the job of building as many as 12,000 homes
to SunCor Development, a firm in Tempe,
 Ariz., run by Steven A. Betts, a
longtime McCain supporter who has raised more than $100,000 for the presumptive
Republican nominee. Betts said he and McCain never discussed the
deal.


In the article, the Post also reported that
"opponents were baffled by the senator's [McCain] seemingly
contradictory positions" on the legislation and quoted Janine Blaeloch,
founder and director of the Western Lands Project, asserting, "The bizarre
thing to me regarding McCain is, we spent a lot of time with his staff, and we
all seemed to be on the same page about the problems with this swap. But
somehow, John McCain kept pushing it forward."

Additionally, the Post stated:


Betts is among a string of donors
who have benefited from McCain-engineered land swaps. In 1994, the senator
helped a lobbyist for land developer Del Webb Corp. pursue an exchange in the Las Vegas area, according
to the Center for Public Integrity. McCain sponsored two bills, in 1991 and
1994, sought by donor Donald R. Diamond that yielded the developer thousands of
acres in trade for national parkland.


In a May 19 article,
USA Today reported on a third
McCain-facilitated land deal that benefited his political contributors,
writing:


McCain, who has made fighting
special-interest projects a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, inserted
$14.3 million in a 2003 defense bill to buy land around Luke Air Force Base in
a provision sought by SunCor Development, the largest of about 50 landowners
near the base. SunCor representatives, upset with a state law that restricted
development around Luke, met with McCain's staff to lobby for funding,
according to John Ogden, SunCor's president at the time.

The Air Force later paid SunCor $3
million for 122 acres near the base. It was the highest single land transaction
of the private lots purchased by the government -- three times the county's assessed value and
twice the military's estimated value. SunCor also donated another 122 acres.
Alan Bunnell, a spokesman for SunCor's parent company, Pinnacle West Capital,
said the donation was meant to minimize the company's tax bill and enhance the
value of adjacent property it owns.


USA Today further reported
that "McCain's campaigns have received $224,000 since 1998 from donors
connected to Pinnacle West, including $104,100 for his current presidential
run" and that Pinnacle West's CEO, vice president and lobbyist,
and former president, in addition to Betts, SunCor's president, are all
McCain fundraisers.

McCain and Liddy vs. Obama and Ayers 

According to a Media
Matters search of the Nexis and Factiva databases, between January 1 and September 17, none
of the five major newspapers or three evening network news broadcasts mentioned McCain's association
with Liddy. By contrast, during
the same time period, the five major newspapers, as
well as ABC's and NBC's evening news broadcasts, have collectively broadcast or published mentions of
Obama's relationship with Ayers in 69 reports, editorials, and opinion pieces. 

The Tribune's Chapman wrote in his May 4
column, "[B]ack in the 1970s, [Liddy] extolled
violence and committed crimes in the name of a radical ideology." Writing
that "Liddy's penchant for extreme solutions has not abated,"
Chapman went on to note that, in 1994, Liddy "gave some advice to his
listeners" on how to shoot and ATF officials. Chapman further wrote that "[f]ar
from repudiating him [Liddy], McCain has embraced him":


What McCain didn't mention is that
he has his own Bill Ayers -- in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative
radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in
the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and
proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far
from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.

How close are McCain and Liddy? At
least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy's home was the
site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four
contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator's campaigns -- including $1,000
this year.

Last November, McCain went on his
radio show. Liddy greeted him as "an old friend," and McCain sounded
like one. "I'm proud of you, I'm proud of your family," he gushed.
"It's always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and
congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and
philosophies that keep our nation great."


Incidents in Liddy's past include:

Felony convictions. As The Washington Post wrote in its online section about the Watergate
     break-in scandal, "Liddy was convicted for his role in the Watergate
     break-in, for conspiracy in the Daniel Ellsberg case and for contempt of
     court, spending about four and a half years in prison. In 1986, a federal
     appeals court found Liddy liable for $20,499 in back taxes on Watergate
     slush-fund money, rejecting his claim that his benefits did not exceed
     $45,000. As one of the White House 'plumbers,' Liddy spent
     about $300,000 engineering political dirty tricks and the Watergate
     break-in." 


Liddy plotted to murder journalist Jack Anderson. In a 2004 article in the British newspaper The
     Independent, Liddy was quoted discussing his never-implemented
     plans to kill Anderson:




He [Liddy] is famous in the US as the most
fiercely loyal of Richard Nixon's "plumbers", one of the agents sent to
illegally burgle, drug and libel the President's internal opponents. "The
war in Vietnam was fought on
the streets of America
too," he says. "It was lost here at home, by people who didn't have
the Will to win. We had to get the people who wanted America to lose." Including
killing columnists? "If they were traitors as Jack Andersen [sic] was,
directly helping the enemy, then yes."


In his 1980 autobiography, Will: The Autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy
(St. Martin's Press, November 1996), Liddy wrote that he and GOP
operative Hunt had become convinced that Anderson had compromised an overseas
intelligence source's safety and must be assassinated:




I took the position that, in a
hypothetical case in which the target had been the direct cause of the
identification and execution of one of our agents abroad, halfway measures were
not appropriate. How many of our people should we let him kill before we stop
him, I asked rhetorically, still not using Anderson's name. I urged as the logical
and just solution that the target be killed. Quickly. 

[...]

I submitted that the target should
just become a fatal victim of the notorious Washington street-crime rate. No
one argued against that recommendation and, at Hunt's suggestion, I gave
[then-CIA deputy director of Medical Services] Dr. [Edward] Gunn a
hundred-dollar bill, from Committee to Re-Elect the President intelligence
funds, as a fee for his services. I took this to be to protect Dr. Gunn's
image as "retired."

Afterward Hunt and I discussed the
recommendation further. It was decided to include the suggestion that the
assassination of Jack Anderson be carried out by Cubans already recruited for
the intelligence arm of the Committee to Re-Elect the President. [Pages 208-209]




According to Liddy, when Hunt
worried that his superiors would not trust those operatives to carry out the
assassination, Liddy said he would be willing to carry out the plot
himself:




I thought about the damage Anderson was doing to our
country's ability to conduct foreign policy. Most of all, I thought of that U.S. agent
abroad, dead or about to die after what I was sure would be interrogation by
torture. If Hunt's principal was worried, I had the answer. 

"Tell him," I said,
"if necessary, I'll do it." [Page 210]


Hunt confirms the murder plot in his
own book, American Spy: My
Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond (Wiley,
February 2007):




Liddy and I, feeling that Anderson had
done such harm to the country by exposing foreign-based CIA agents who might be
imprisoned and/or killed, spent a lot of time concocting ways to get rid of the
pesky journalist, even trying to cook up a way to get him to ingest LSD through
his skin from his steering wheel so that he would crash his car. A CIA
specialist, however, assured me that skin was an inadequate delivery system, so
the plan did not move forward. Still, Liddy was primed and ready to go it
alone, planning an assassination if [Attorney General John] Mitchell would just give the word.
Ultimately, the attorney general aborted the operation and the muckraker in
question outlived most of his adversaries, dying in December 2005 at the age of
eighty-three from Parkinson's disease. [Page 199]



Liddy participated in Ellsberg psychiatrist break-in, prepared to kill someone "if
     necessary." After
     military analyst Daniel
     Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers to The
     New York Times, Liddy and
     Hunt organized a break-in of Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office
     in an attempt to obtain files on Ellsberg. Liddy wrote in Will: 




I can run for miles, and there were
numerous deeply shadowed hiding places in the area from which I could pause to
warn the men inside with the transceiver. Only if there were no other recourse
would I have used the knife, but use it I would, if I'd had to; I had
given my men word that I would protect them.

For the period of the actual
breaking and entering, I posted myself in a narrow space between two buildings
concealed by more shrubbery, from which I could see clearly the area of the
break-in, all of the private, and much of the public parking lot. [Page 167]

[...]

I was completely candid with him [Egil
(Bud) Krogh] in my report, showing him everything: the suitcase, tools,
even the knife I had carried. He asked me, incredulous, "Would you really
have used it -- I mean, kill
somebody?"

"Only if there were absolutely
no other way. But yes, I would, if necessary to protect my men. I gave them my
word I'd cover them." [Page 169]




Liddy also wrote in Will that he and Hunt plotted to drug
Ellsberg:


According to Hunt, Daniel Ellsberg
was scheduled to speak at a fund-raising dinner to be held in Washington, and
[Nixon chief counsel] Chuck Colson thought it an opportunity to discredit him.
The dinner would be well attended by media opinion-shapers and the speech would
get wide coverage. Could
["[o]ur organization"] ODESSA drug Ellsberg
enough to befuddle him, make him appear a near burnt-out drug case? 

Hunt and I studied the matter and
developed a plan to infiltrate enough Cuban waiters into the group serving the
banquet to be able to ensure that one of our people would serve Ellsberg at the
dais. One of the earliest dishes on the menu was soup. A warm liquid is ideal for the rapid
absorption and wide dispersal of a drug, and the taste would mask its presence.
Hunt was certain that he could provide men from the Miami Cuban community
who'd worked at major Florida
hotels; the drug, a fast-acting psychedelic such as LSD 25, he said he could
get from the CIA together with a recommendation of the dose necessary to have
Ellsberg incoherent by the time he was to speak. [Page 170]


The drug plan was not carried out
because, according to Liddy, "our superiors had waited too long" to
approve it and "[t]here was no longer enough lead time." [Page 170]


Liddy plotted with "gangland figure" to murder Hunt, a
     government witness. While in prison, Liddy came to the
     conclusion that White House officials might want his partner, Hunt, killed rather than risk Hunt
     cooperating with the Watergate grand jury. Liddy wrote in Will that he made plans to carry out
     such an assassination order: 




By now I knew that the fee for a
killing in the D.C. jail was two "boxes." I'd be an immediate suspect were Hunt
to be killed, so it would have to be a contract sanction and I'd have to
arrange an airtight alibi. That would be easy; just have myself put back in
deadlock prior to the event. It wouldn't do, however, to go around
soliciting Hunt's execution. Prisons
are filled with informers. For
that reason I sought the advice of a gangland figure I knew and could trust. 

My friend was sharp and as soon as I
began to broach the subject, he nodded his understanding but jumped to the
conclusion I was referring to [James] McCord, now free on bond. He offered immediately to
have McCord shot. I had to explain that I appreciated his offer but had someone
else in mind. 

[...]

I explained carefully to my friend
that I had not yet received
orders to kill Hunt, and that under no circumstances was he to be harmed
without my specific authorization, which I would not give in the absence of
unequivocal orders from my superiors. [Page 309]


Liddy wrote that after Hunt cooperated
with investigators, he awaited an order to kill him, but "because the
message never came, Hunt lives" [Page 311].


Liddy plotted to "firebomb[]" Brookings Institution. Liddy
     and Hunt believed that because of Ellsberg's past association with
     the Brookings Institution, classified or sensitive documents might be
     stored in the organization's security vault. Their plan to retrieve
     these supposed materials involved firebombing the
     building: 




We devised a plan that entailed buying
a used but late-model fire engine of the kind used by the District of Columbia fire department and
marking it appropriately; uniforms for a squad of Cubans and their training so
their performance would be believable.
Thereafter, Brookings would be firebombed by use of a delay
mechanism timed to go off at night so as not to endanger lives needlessly. The Cubans in the
authentic-looking fire engine would "respond" minutes after the
timer went off, enter, get anybody in there out, hit the vault, and get themselves
out in the confusion of other fire apparatus arriving, calmly loading
"rescued" material into a van. The bogus engine would be abandoned at the
scene. The taking of
the material from the vault would be discovered and the fire engine traced to a
cut-out buyer. There
would be a lot of who-struck-John in the liberal press, but because nothing
could be proved the matter would lapse into the unsolved-mystery category.
[Page 171-72]


According to Liddy, the plan was not
approved by the White House because it was deemed "[t]oo expensive"
[Page 172].


Liddy borrowed terminology from Nazis in outlining plan to thwart "attack" by
     "leftist guerillas." Before the 1972 Republican
     National Convention in San Diego, Liddy met with a group of White House
     officials, including Attorney General John Mitchell, to discuss ways to
     thwart an "attack" on the convention by "leftist
     guerrillas": 




I proposed to emulate the Texas
Rangers by identifying the leaders through intelligence before the attack got under way, kidnap
them, drug them, and hold them in Mexico until after the convention was over,
then release them unharmed and still wondering what happened. Leaderless, the attack would be further disrupted
by faked assembly orders and messages, and if it ever did get off the ground it
would be much easier to repel. The
sudden disappearances, which I labeled on the chart in the original German, Nacht und Nebel ("Night and
Fog"), would strike fear into the hearts of the leftist guerrillas. The chart labeled the team
slated to carry out the night and fog plan as a "Special Action
Group" and, when John Mitchell asked, "What's that?"
and expressed doubt that it could perform as I had explained, I grew impatient.

[...]

With [then-Nixon deputy campaign director Jeb] Magruder
and [then-associate deputy attorney
general John] Dean out to lunch, I felt obliged to impress
Mitchell with my seriousness of purpose, that my people were the kind and I was
the kind who could and would do whatever was necessary to deal with organized
mass violence. Both
Magruder and Dean were too young to know what I was talking about, but I knew
that Mitchell, a naval officer in World War II, would get the message if I
translated the English "Special Action Group" into German. Given the history involved,
it was a gross exaggeration, but it made my point. "An Einsatzgruppe,
General," I said, inadvertently using a hard g for the word General and turning it, too, into German. "These men include professional killers
who have accounted between them for twenty-two dead so far, including two
hanged from a beam in a garage." [Page 197-98]




According to the United States Holocaust
Memorial Museum's
Holocaust Encyclopedia,
the Einsatzgruppen were mobile
killing units organized by the Nazis for, among other things, the purpose of
carrying out "the
murder of those perceived to be racial or political enemies found behind German
combat lines in the occupied Soviet Union." Their "victims
included Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and officials of the Soviet state and the Soviet
Communist party. The Einsatzgruppen also murdered thousands of residents of
institutions for the mentally and physically disabled." 

According to Yad Vashem,
"Nacht und Nebel" is
a "German term used in a secret order issued by Adolf Hitler on December
7, 1941. The order stated that any underground resistance activities against
the Reich carried out in Western Europe would
be punished in the most severe ways. The term 'Night and Fog'
referred to those underground activists from Western
 Europe who, as a result of this order, were to disappear into the
'fog of the night' without leaving a trace. ... According to the order, special military
courts could impose the death sentence without a unanimous decision. If not
sentenced to death, the defendants were to be deported to Germany, where
they would disappear without a trace into concentration camps or
prisons."

The judgment of the
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg described
the purpose and effects of the decree:


The territories occupied by Germany were
administered in violation of the laws of war. The evidence is quite
overwhelming of a systematic rule of violence, brutality and terror. On the 7th
December, 1941, Hitler issued the directive since known as the "Nacht und Nebel Erlass" (Night and Fog
Decree), under which persons who committed offences against the Reich or the
German forces in occupied territories, except where the death sentence was
certain, were to be taken secretly to Germany and handed over to the SIPO [German state security police] and
SD [intelligence division of the
German SS] for trial or punishment in Germany. This decree was
signed by the defendant [chief of the
High Command of the German Armed Forces Wilhelm] Keitel. After
these civilians arrived in Germany,
no word of them was permitted to reach the country from which they came, or
their relatives; even in cases when they died awaiting trial the families were
not informed, the purpose being to create anxiety in the minds of the family of
the arrested person. Hitler's purpose in issuing this decree was stated by the
defendant Keitel in a covering letter, dated 12th December, 1941, to be as
follows:


" Efficient and enduring
intimidation can only be achieved either by capital punishment or by measures
by which the relatives of the criminal and the population do not know the fate
of the criminal. This aim is achieved when the criminal is transferred to Germany."


Even persons who were only suspected
of opposing any of the policies of the German occupation authorities were
arrested, and on arrest were interrogated by the Gestapo and the SD in the most
shameful manner. On the 12th June 1942 the Chief of the SIPO and SD published,
through Mueller, the Gestapo Chief, an order authorising the use of "third
degree" methods of interrogation, where preliminary investigation had indicated
that the person could give information on important matters, such as subversive
activities, though not for the purpose of extorting confessions of the
prisoner's own crimes. This order provided:


" ... Third degree may, under
this supposition, only be employed against Communists, Marxists, Jehovah's
Witnesses, saboteurs, terrorists, members of resistance movements, parachute
agents, anti-social elements, Polish or Soviet Russian loafers or tramps; in
all other cases my permission must first be obtained ... Third degree can,
according to circumstances, consist amongst other methods of very simple diet
(bread and water), hard bunk, dark cell, deprivation of sleep, exhaustive
drilling, also in flogging (for more than twenty strokes a doctor must be
consulted)."


The brutal suppression of all
opposition to the German occupation was not confined to severe measures against
suspected members of resistance movements themselves, but was also extended to
their families. On the 19th July, 1944, the Commander of the SIPO and SD in the
district of Radom, in Poland, published an order, transmitted through the
Higher SS and Police leaders, to the effect that in all cases of assassination
or attempted assassination of Germans, or where saboteurs had destroyed vital
installations not only the guilty person, but also all his or her male
relatives should be shot, and female relatives over sixteen years of age put
into a concentration camp.


Liddy's proposed
"Special Action Group" for the kidnappings was, in the end, not
employed.


Liddy's advice for shooting ATF agents.
     According to an April 26, 1995, CBS News transcript (retrieved from
     Nexis), Liddy said on his August 26, 1994, radio show: 




LIDDY: Well, if the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms,
resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they're going to be wearing
bulletproof vests.


Reporting on Liddy's October
19, 1994, radio show, The Washington Post's
Howard Kurtz recounted in an
October 24, 1994, article:


Ursula from Millerton, Pa.,
tells Liddy she's afraid the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is coming
after her gun-owning friend. Liddy calls the bureau "bottom-dwelling slugs
... a pack of nitwits out to make war on those Americans who take seriously the
Second Amendment." Liddy allows that calls to "hunt down and
kill" such agents is "going too far." But, he says,
"shooting back is reasonable...
. I have counseled shooting them in the head."


According to Fairness &amp; Accuracy
in Reporting, on September 15, 1994, Liddy
stated:


If the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms insists upon a firefight, give them a firefight. Just
remember, they're wearing flak jackets and you're better off shooting for the
head.


According to FAIR, Liddy said to a caller later in the show:


When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms thugs come to kill your wife and children, to try to disarm you
and they open fire on you. When they come at the point of a gun, force and
violence, when you're going to defend yourself, use that Gerand [sic] [M-1 rifle]. That thing
is 30-06, and it'll take 'em right out.


According to an April 25, 1995,
Associated Press article:


Talk show host G. Gordon Liddy said
Tuesday he gave listeners bad advice when he told them to shoot for the head if
attacked by federal agents. Instead, he said, go twice for the body and then
the groin.

[...]

Last August, Liddy counseled
"head shots" to respond to an encounter with agents of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, because, "They've got a vest
underneath."

On Tuesday, he told a news
conference held as part of his WJFK program that people should cooperate if
authorities come to their homes with search warrants. But they should shoot
back if agents shoot their way in, he said.

He said experts have told him
shooting for the head was a bad idea because heads are hard to hit.

"So you shoot twice to the
body, center of mass, and if that does not work, then shoot to the groin
area," he said.

"They cannot move their hips
fast enough and you'll probably get a femoral artery and you'll knock them down
at any rate."


Asked
about his ATF comments by right-wing blogger John Hawkins in December 2003,
Liddy argued they had been misinterpreted:


LIDDY: [A]s usual, people remember
part of what I said, but not all of what I said. What I did was restate the
law. I was talking about a situation in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms comes smashing into a house, doesn't say who they are, and their
guns are out, they're shooting, and they're in the wrong place. This has
happened time and time again. The ATF has gone in and gotten the wrong guy in
the wrong place. The law is that if somebody is shooting at you, using deadly
force, the mere fact that they are a law enforcement officer, if they are in
the wrong, does not mean you are obliged to allow yourself to be killed so your
kinfolk can have a wrongful death action. You are legally entitled to defend
yourself and I was speaking of exactly those kind of situations. If you're
going to do that, you should know that they're wearing body armor so you should
use a head shot. Now all I'm doing is stating the law, but all the nuances in
there got left out when the story got repeated.



Liddy acknowledged naming shooting targets after Clintons. According to the April
     25, 1995, edition of NPR's All
     Things Considered (retrieved from Nexis), during a press
     conference, Liddy admitted that he named shooting targets after
     then-President Bill Clinton and first lady Hillary Clinton. From the press
     conference, as aired by NPR: 




LIDDY: I did relate that on the 4th
of July of last year, when I and my family and some friends were out firing
away at a properly-constructed rifle range and we ran out of targets, and so we -- I drew some stick figure targets and I
thought we ought to give them names. So I named them Bill and Hillary, thought
it might improve my aim. It didn't. My aim is good anyway. Now, having said
that, I accept no responsibility for somebody shooting up the White
House.


Nonetheless, the five
major papers and the network evening newscasts have ignored McCain's
association with -- and praise of -- Liddy. For instance:


Fundraising. In a March 9, 1998, article (retrieved
     from Nexis), The Washington Post's Al Kamen reported that Liddy
     hosted a fundraiser for McCain's 1998 Senate re-election campaign. Kamen wrote: 




Here's one we wished we hadn't
missed. "G. Gordon Liddy and family cordially invite you to a fundraiser
reception" at their home in Scottsdale,
 Ariz., "in support of Sen.
John McCain's 1998 re-election campaign."

So McCain (R), a bona fide American
hero, is having G. Gordon Liddy, a bona fide American felon and, worse yet,
talk show host, do a fund-raiser for him? What is this all about?

Liddy has a home there and "he
called and said he wanted to invite some friends over," McCain said,
"and I said okay. I was surprised when he made the offer. I hardly know
him." As for the old conviction, McCain noted, "He's a successful
talk show host."

The affair, which took place over
the weekend, was $ 125 per person, but those who ponied up $ 250 a person got
to go to the early "VIP reception." There you could have your picture
taken with McCain and Liddy.




According to a January 23, 2000, Charlotte Observer article (retrieved from
Nexis), Liddy was also scheduled to speak at a fundraiser for McCain's
2000 presidential campaign. Discussing the event, McCain's campaign
reportedly vouched for Liddy's "character":


A presidential candidate who has
made character a central issue of his campaign is bringing a Watergate felon to
a Rock Hill
rally this week.

G. Gordon Liddy will speak at a
Wednesday fund-raiser to benefit Arizona Sen. John McCain. Liddy served more
than four years in prison for his role in the Watergate break-in and later
became host of a popular conservative radio talk show.

McCain is not scheduled to appear.

His campaign officials said Liddy's
character will appeal to many voters because he was following orders from
President Nixon and kept silent afterward.

"His (Liddy's) judgment might
be in question, but I don't think his character is," said Ed Walker, the York County
chairman of McCain's campaign. "He was following orders just like any good
soldier, and he didn't tell on anybody. He felt like he was on a mission and
kept his silence." 


The Herald of Rock Hill, South
  Carolina, reported on January 26, 2000 (retrieved
from Nexis), "Today's fund raiser for Sen. John McCain's
Republican presidential bid has fallen victim to the weather. Keynote speaker G. Gordon Liddy, radio
talk-show host and a figure from the Watergate era, can't get out of Washington, D.C." 


Campaign donations. According to a search of the Federal
     Election Commission's database, McCain has accepted $5,000 in
     campaign contributions from Liddy, including $1,000 this year for his
     presidential campaign. Liddy
     has donated to several of McCain's campaigns: 




2/11/2008: Liddy contributed
$1,000 to McCain

9/9/2003: Liddy contributed
$2,000 to McCain

3/23/1999: Liddy contributed
$1,000 to McCain

3/7/1998: Liddy contributed $1,000 to McCain



Radio America's The G. Gordon Liddy Show. McCain has made
     appearances on Liddy's radio show, including as recently as May of
     this year. An online video labeled "John McCain On The G.
     Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07" includes a discussion between Liddy and
     McCain, whom Liddy described as an "old friend." During the segment,
     McCain praised Liddy's "adherence to the principles and
     philosophies that keep our nation great," said he was
     "proud" of Liddy, and said that "it's always a
     pleasure for me to come on your program." From the program: 




LIDDY: Your experience in the Hanoi
Hilton is remarkable. I mean, I put in five years in a prison, but it was here in
the United States,
and they didn't torture -- the only torture that I had was being forced
to listen to rap music from time to time.

McCAIN: Well, you know, I'm proud of you.
I'm proud of your family. I'm proud to know your son, Tom,
who's a great and wonderful guy. And it's always a pleasure for me
to come on your program, Gordon. And congratulations on your continued success
and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.

LIDDY: Senator, congratulations on
your surge -- I guess we can call it that. You're coming back with a
vengeance. And thank you so much for sharing time with us. Really appreciate
it.

McCAIN: Thank you. Thanks Gordon,
great to be with you.

LIDDY: Good to be with you,
Senator.



Rezko coverage

From April 22 to September 18, 44 combined network evening news broadcasts and news,
editorials, or opinion pieces covered or mentioned Obama's ties to Rezko: 

Los
  Angeles Times (5)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.
  





Hiding
  Sarah Palin behind 'deference'



9/9/08



N





Barack
  Obama: Search for identity



8/28/08



N





Obama
  pounces on McCain's gaffe about his homes



8/22/08



N





Rezko closing arguments begin 



5/13/08



N





Antoin Rezko
  won't take the stand in his fraud trial



5/6/08



N





The New York Times (8)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Obama
  and McCain Seek a Common Touch



8/21/08



N





UNIONS
  UNITED; Hitting McCain Where He Lives



8/19/08



N





Ex-Obama
  Fund-Raiser Is Convicted Of Fraud



6/5/08



N





Corruption Case
  Taints Rising Political Star



5/12/08



N





Pragmatic
  Politics, Forged on the South Side



5/11/08



N





Republicans
  Focus on Obama as Fall Opponent



5/8/08



N





How McCain Lost
  in Pennsylvania



4/27/08



E





Ex-Official
  in Illinois Admits Lying About Job for Donation



4/23/08



N





USA Today (2)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





McCain
  ad: Clinton's 'truth hurt'



8/25/08



N





Obama
  slams McCain's inability to count family residences



8/21/08



N





The Wall Street Journal (10)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Obama
  Should Come Clean on Ayers, Rezko and the Iraqi Billionaire



8/30/08



E





House
  Party: Obama Homes In on McCain



8/22/08



N





Obama
  Played by Chicago Rules



8/20/08



E





Friends
  of Barack



6/11/08



E





Campaign '08:
  GOP Starts Recycling Primary Clips Attacking Obama



6/7/08



N





Obama Heads
  to Election With Some Weaknesses



6/5/08



N





Rezko
  Convicted of Wire Fraud, Money Laundering



6/5/08



N





Our Collectivist Candidates



5/28/08



E





For Obama,
  Advice Straight Up



5/12/08



N





From Their
  House to the White House



5/9/08



N





The Washington
Post (14)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





McCain
  Strategist Blasts Media 



9/3/08



N





Romney
  Leads a Denver Counteroffensive



8/27/08



N





Obama
  Calls His Pick, Biden, Both a Statesman and Fighter



8/24/08



N





Extreme
  Campaign Makeover



8/23/08



E





Obama's
  Judgment Is Questioned



8/22/08



N





Houses
  Add Up to A Snag for McCain



8/22/08



N





Can
  McCain Use Advice Clinton Got on Obama?



8/13/08



N





In
  Obama's Circle, Chicago Remains The Tie That Binds



7/14/08



N





Obama
  Got Discount on Home Loan



7/2/08



N





Former
  Obama Fundraiser Convicted of Corruption



6/5/08



N





For
  Clinton, A Following Of 'Marshans'



6/4/08



N





Obama
  as You've Never Known Him!



5/23/08



N





Rezko's
  Defense Rests Without Calling Witness



5/6/08



N





Obama's
  'Distractions'?



4/25/08



E





ABC evening news broadcasts (3)





Show



Date





World News Sunday



8/24/08





World News with Charles Gibson



8/21/08





World News with Charles Gibson



6/4/08





CBS evening
news broadcast (1) 





Show



Date





CBS Evening News with Katie Couric



6/4/08





NBC evening
news broadcast (1) 





Show



Date





Nightly News with Brian Williams



6/4/08





Land deals coverage

From April 22 to September 18, seven news, editorials, or opinion pieces mentioned that
McCain reportedly facilitated land deals that benefited wealthy developers who
were major McCain donors: 

The Washington Post (3) 





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Top
  McCain Adviser Has Found Success Mixing Money,
  Politics



6/26/08



N





John
  McCain's
  Rapid-Fire Responders



5/20/08



N





McCain
  Pushed Land Swap That Benefits
  Backer



5/9/08



N





The New York Times (2)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





The Trouble With
  Not Being Earnest



4/25/08



E





A
  Developer, His Deals and His Ties to McCain



4/22/08



N





Los Angeles Times (1)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





McCain land
  deal benefits donor



5/9/08



N





USA Today (1)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Price
  of power: McCain action helped Arizona land developer



5/19/08



N





The Wall Street
Journal: No coverage. 

ABC evening news
broadcast: No
coverage. 

NBC evening news
broadcast: No
coverage. 

CBS evening news
broadcast: No
coverage

Ayers coverage

From January 1 to September 18,
69 combined network evening news broadcasts and news,
editorials or opinion pieces mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers: 

The New York Times (19)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Interest Groups
  Step Up Efforts in a Tight Race



9/15/08



N





On the Web,
  a Nonpartisan Look at Those Partisan Campaign Ads



9/12/08



N





Obama Looks
  to Lessons From Chicago in His National Education Plan



9/10/08



N





Obama Steps
  Into O'Reilly's 'No Spin Zone'



9/5/08



N





Obama
  Campaign Wages Fight Against Conservative Group's Ads



8/27/08



N





A
  Billionaire Finances Ads Hitting Obama



8/22/08



N





Group
  Plans Ad Criticizing Obama's Ties To Ex-Radical



8/21/08



N





Late-Period
  Limbaugh



7/6/08



N





Pragmatic
  Politics, Forged on the South Side



5/11/08



N





Republicans
  Focus on Obama as Fall Opponent



5/8/08



N





A
  Backlash?



5/3/08



E





McCain
  Criticizes Clergyman's Remarks



4/28/08



N





How McCain lost
  in Pennsylvania



4/27/08



E





Brush
  it Off



4/20/08



E





Clinton
  Impugns Obama's Toughness



4/19/08



N





'60s
  Radicals Become Issue in Campaign of 2008



4/17/08



N





Former
  Friends Weigh Into Debate, and the Former Amity Drains Out



4/17/08



N





Clinton Uses
  Sharp Attacks in Tense Debate



4/17/08



N





Battle of
  the Baggage



4/17/08



E





The Washington
Post (19)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Group With
  Swift Boat Alumni Readies Ads Attacking Obama



9/14/08



N





Obama
  Met With Fox News Executives



9/3/08



N





The
  Perfect Stranger



8/29/08



E





Obama's
  Response Ad Reflects Lessons of 2004



8/27/08



N





Romney
  Leads a Denver Counteroffensive



8/27/08



N





'She
  Could Accept Losing. She Could Not Accept Quitting.'



6/5/08



N





Obama
  as You've Never Known Him!



5/23/08



N





Candidates
  Vie to Be The Anti-Lobbyist



5/20/08



N





Clinton
  Quiet About Own Radical Ties



5/19/08



N





Obama
  Has the Upper Hand. But McCain Can Still Take Him



5/18/08



E





The
  Race's Real Winner



5/11/08



E





Too Late to the
  Duck Hunt



5/9/08



E





Obama's
  'Distractions'?



4/25/08



E





McCain
  Questions Obama Remark Comparing '60s Radical, Lawmaker



4/21/08



N





Obama Looks
  To Turn Debate Into a Victory



4/18/08



N





Performance
  By ABC's Moderators Is a Matter Of Debate 



4/18/08



N





Former
  '60s Radical
  Is Now Considered Mainstream in Chicago



4/18/08



N





Obama
  Pressed in Pa. Debate



4/17/08



N





'Soft'
  Press Sharpens Its Focus on Obama



3/3/08



N





Los
  Angeles Times (18) 





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Barack Obama
  raises the funding roof 



9/15/08



N





Some
  Obama links will mislead



8/30/08



N





Barack
  Obama: Search for identity



8/28/08



N





Biden's
  jokes about his wife Jill? OK with Pelosi



8/24/08



N





Billionaire
  behind Swift Boat ads funded anti-Obama spot



8/23/08



N





Ad
  attacks Obama's ties to leftist leader



8/22/08



N





John
  McCain puts the focus on economy



7/19/08



N





The Obama-McCain age gap that matters



6/1/08



E





Obama
  pounds away at McCain



5/19/08



N





Steeling
  Obama



5/15/08



E





GOP makes a target of Obama



4/25/08



N





Ex-radical
  William Ayers keeps low profile



4/24/08



N





What
  to look for in Pennsylvania



4/22/08



N





Heating
  up in Pennsylvania



4/21/08



N





Moderators' 'gotcha' tone inspires angry new debate



4/18/08



N





Obama
  and the former radicals



4/18/08



N





The
  influence test



4/18/08



E





Debate dwells on Obama's past



4/17/08



N





USA Today (2)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Groups
  play up Obama link to '60s radical



8/26/08



N





Damage
  control, take 2



4/30/08



E





The Wall Street Journal (9)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Obama
  Should Come Clean on Ayers, Rezko and the Iraqi Billionaire



8/30/08



E





Legal
  Controversy Erupts Over TV Ads Linking Obama to '60s Radical



8/29/08



N





Ex-Friends
  of Barack



6/12/08



E





Why Hillary Goes Nuclear



5/29/08



E





The
  Clinton Divorce



5/9/08



E





Obama's
  Other Radical Friends



5/2/08



E





Democratic Fight Has Its Upsides



4/23/08



E





Woods Fund Could Become Obama's 'Swift Boat'



4/18/08



N





Democrats
  Meet in Feisty Debate



4/17/08



N





ABC evening news broadcast (1)





Show



Date





World News Sunday



4/20/08





NBC evening news broadcast (1)





Show



Date





Nightly News



4/17/08





CBS evening news
broadcast: No
coverage

Liddy coverage


Media Matters did not
find any coverage from January 1 to September 18 of McCain's ties to Liddy in the Los Angeles Times, The New
York Times, USA Today,
The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, or the evening news programs of ABC, CBS, or NBC. A
February 8 Washington Post column by Dana
Milbank and an August 13 New
York Times article both mentioned Liddy and McCain
but did not report or note any ties between the two.

    
</description>
		<source url="http://mediamatters.org/items/200809190012">Mediamatters.Org</source>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-attacks-on-media-by-mccain-campaign-case-20080939225.htm"><b>Despite attacks on media by McCain campaign, case studies show disparate coverage in McCain's favor</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/despite-attacks-on-media-by-mccain-campaign-case-20080939225.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - The media have for months reported complaints by Sen. John
McCain's campaign that they have favored his opponent in their coverage
of the presidential race, while making little attempt to assess accuracy of those complaints or to confirm or refute them. Media Matters for
America has undertaken a review of the media's coverage of two
stories negatively affecting or reflecting on Sen. Barack Obama and two stories
negatively affecting or reflecting on McCain and compared the extent of media
attention to each. Specifically, Media Matters
compared the media's coverage of Obama's association with Chicago developer Antoin
Rezko
to the media's coverage of McCain's associations with donors for
whom McCain reportedly facilitated land
deals. Media Matters
also compared coverage of Obama's association with former Weather
Underground member Bill Ayers to coverage of McCain's association with G.
Gordon Liddy, whom Chicago Tribune
columnist Steve Chapman has described as McCain's "own Bill
Ayers." 

Media Matters found that
while the five major newspapers -- the Los
Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The
Wall Street Journal, and
The Washington Post -- and the three evening network news broadcasts
have frequently mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers and Rezko, they have rarely mentioned
McCain's dealings with donors whom he reportedly benefited and have
completely ignored McCain's association with Liddy. Indeed, since The New
York Times first reported on April 22 that McCain facilitated land
deals that benefited major donors, these media outlets have mentioned those
deals in only six additional reports, but news reports and editorial and opinion pieces by or in those media outlets have mentioned Obama's
ties to Rezko -- who was convicted in June in a case in which Obama was never
accused of any wrongdoing -- 44 times
during that same time period. Moreover, while these same media outlets have
frequently mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers -- 69 mentions so far in 2008
-- they have yet to mention
McCain's connections to Liddy, whom McCain has praised and repeatedly
associated with in public and in campaign settings. In addition to serving more
than four years in prison for his role in the Watergate break-in and the Daniel
Ellsberg case, Liddy also admitted that he plotted
to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotted to murder fellow Republican
operative E. Howard Hunt; and plotted
to firebomb the Brookings Institution.
Liddy also
reportedly gave
advice on how to shoot agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and reportedly admitted to naming
shooting targets after the Clintons. 

Media Matters previously
conducted a review of coverage of the
Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. versus coverage of televangelist James Hagee in The Washington Post and The New York Times and found
that, from February 27,
the date Hagee endorsed McCain for president, to April 30, the two papers
combined published more than 12 times as many articles mentioning Wright and
Obama as they did mentioning Hagee and McCain. Media
Matters also documented (here,
here,
here,
here,
and here) other examples of
the disparity between the media's extensive coverage of controversial comments
made by Wright and other supporters of Obama and their coverage of
controversial comments
by Hagee and other supporters of McCain.

McCain and land deals vs. Obama and Rezko

McCain has reportedly facilitated several land deals that
benefited wealthy developers who were major McCain donors. But while several
major newspapers published initial articles concerning those deals, the media
have devoted far less attention to McCain's land deals than they have
paid to Obama's ties to Rezko. According to a Media Matters search of the Nexis and Factiva databases,
since The
New York Times' initial
April 22 article, the land deals have been mentioned in only six additional news articles, editorials, or
opinion pieces in the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, or The
Washington Post, and have yet to be mentioned on any evening network
news program. By contrast, during
the same time period, 39 news articles, editorials, or opinion
pieces in those papers have collectively mentioned Obama and Rezko; and the
evening news broadcasts have collectively mentioned Obama and Rezko in five
reports. 

Specifically:

The Los Angeles Times has published one news article that
     mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, compared to five news articles mentioning Obama
     and Rezko. 


The New York Times has published its original April 22 news
     article and one editorial that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals,
     compared to seven news articles and one opinion piece mentioning Obama and
     Rezko. 


USA Today published one news article
     that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, compared to two news
     articles mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


The Wall Street Journal has yet to publish a news
     article, editorial, or opinion piece that mentioned McCain-facilitated
     land deals, but it has published six news articles and four editorials or
     opinion pieces mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


The Washington Post has published three news
     articles that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, compared to 12 news
     articles and two editorials or opinion pieces mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


ABC's World News has yet to air a report
     that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, but has aired three reports
     mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


The CBS Evening News has yet to air a report that mentioned
     McCain-facilitated land deals, but has aired one report mentioning Obama
     and Rezko. 


NBC's Nightly News has yet to air a report
     that mentioned McCain-facilitated land deals, but has aired one report
     mentioning Obama and Rezko. 


In its April 22 article, headlined "A Developer, His Deals and His Ties to McCain,"
The New York Times
examined McCain's relationship with Arizona developer Donald R. Diamond. The Times reported:


In Arizona, Mr. McCain has helped Mr. Diamond
with matters as small as forwarding a complaint in a regulatory skirmish over
the endangered pygmy owl, and as large as introducing legislation remapping
public lands. In 1991 and 1994, Mr. McCain sponsored two laws sought by Mr.
Diamond that resulted in providing him millions of dollars and thousands of
acres in exchange for adding some of his properties to national parks. The Arizona senator
co-sponsored a third similar bill now before the Senate.


The article described Diamond as "one of the elite
fund-raisers Mr. McCain's current presidential campaign calls Innovators,
having raised more than $250,000 so far."

In a May 9 article headlined "McCain Pushed Land Swap That Benefits Backer,"
The Washington Post
reported that McCain "championed legislation that will let an Arizona
rancher trade remote grassland and ponderosa pine forest here for acres of
valuable federally owned property that is ready for development, a land swap
that now stands to directly benefit one of his top presidential campaign
fundraisers." The Post
continued:


Initially reluctant to support the
swap, the Arizona Republican became a key figure in pushing the deal through
Congress after the rancher and his partners hired lobbyists that included
McCain's 1992 Senate campaign manager, two of his former Senate staff members
(one of whom has returned as his chief of staff), and an Arizona insider who
was a major McCain donor and is now bundling campaign checks.

When McCain's legislation passed in
November 2005, the ranch owner gave the job of building as many as 12,000 homes
to SunCor Development, a firm in Tempe,
 Ariz., run by Steven A. Betts, a
longtime McCain supporter who has raised more than $100,000 for the presumptive
Republican nominee. Betts said he and McCain never discussed the
deal.


In the article, the Post also reported that
"opponents were baffled by the senator's [McCain] seemingly
contradictory positions" on the legislation and quoted Janine Blaeloch,
founder and director of the Western Lands Project, asserting, "The bizarre
thing to me regarding McCain is, we spent a lot of time with his staff, and we
all seemed to be on the same page about the problems with this swap. But
somehow, John McCain kept pushing it forward."

Additionally, the Post stated:


Betts is among a string of donors
who have benefited from McCain-engineered land swaps. In 1994, the senator
helped a lobbyist for land developer Del Webb Corp. pursue an exchange in the Las Vegas area, according
to the Center for Public Integrity. McCain sponsored two bills, in 1991 and
1994, sought by donor Donald R. Diamond that yielded the developer thousands of
acres in trade for national parkland.


In a May 19 article,
USA Today reported on a third
McCain-facilitated land deal that benefited his political contributors,
writing:


McCain, who has made fighting
special-interest projects a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, inserted
$14.3 million in a 2003 defense bill to buy land around Luke Air Force Base in
a provision sought by SunCor Development, the largest of about 50 landowners
near the base. SunCor representatives, upset with a state law that restricted
development around Luke, met with McCain's staff to lobby for funding,
according to John Ogden, SunCor's president at the time.

The Air Force later paid SunCor $3
million for 122 acres near the base. It was the highest single land transaction
of the private lots purchased by the government -- three times the county's assessed value and
twice the military's estimated value. SunCor also donated another 122 acres.
Alan Bunnell, a spokesman for SunCor's parent company, Pinnacle West Capital,
said the donation was meant to minimize the company's tax bill and enhance the
value of adjacent property it owns.


USA Today further reported
that "McCain's campaigns have received $224,000 since 1998 from donors
connected to Pinnacle West, including $104,100 for his current presidential
run" and that Pinnacle West's CEO, vice president and lobbyist,
and former president, in addition to Betts, SunCor's president, are all
McCain fundraisers.

McCain and Liddy vs. Obama and Ayers 

According to a Media
Matters search of the Nexis and Factiva databases, between January 1 and September 17, none
of the five major newspapers or three evening network news broadcasts mentioned McCain's association
with Liddy. By contrast, during
the same time period, the five major newspapers, as
well as ABC's and NBC's evening news broadcasts, have collectively broadcast or published mentions of
Obama's relationship with Ayers in 69 reports, editorials, and opinion pieces. 

The Tribune's Chapman wrote in his May 4
column, "[B]ack in the 1970s, [Liddy] extolled
violence and committed crimes in the name of a radical ideology." Writing
that "Liddy's penchant for extreme solutions has not abated,"
Chapman went on to note that, in 1994, Liddy "gave some advice to his
listeners" on how to shoot and ATF officials. Chapman further wrote that "[f]ar
from repudiating him [Liddy], McCain has embraced him":


What McCain didn't mention is that
he has his own Bill Ayers -- in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative
radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in
the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and
proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far
from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.

How close are McCain and Liddy? At
least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy's home was the
site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four
contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator's campaigns -- including $1,000
this year.

Last November, McCain went on his
radio show. Liddy greeted him as "an old friend," and McCain sounded
like one. "I'm proud of you, I'm proud of your family," he gushed.
"It's always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and
congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and
philosophies that keep our nation great."


Incidents in Liddy's past include:

Felony convictions. As The Washington Post wrote in its online section about the Watergate
     break-in scandal, "Liddy was convicted for his role in the Watergate
     break-in, for conspiracy in the Daniel Ellsberg case and for contempt of
     court, spending about four and a half years in prison. In 1986, a federal
     appeals court found Liddy liable for $20,499 in back taxes on Watergate
     slush-fund money, rejecting his claim that his benefits did not exceed
     $45,000. As one of the White House 'plumbers,' Liddy spent
     about $300,000 engineering political dirty tricks and the Watergate
     break-in." 


Liddy plotted to murder journalist Jack Anderson. In a 2004 article in the British newspaper The
     Independent, Liddy was quoted discussing his never-implemented
     plans to kill Anderson:




He [Liddy] is famous in the US as the most
fiercely loyal of Richard Nixon's "plumbers", one of the agents sent to
illegally burgle, drug and libel the President's internal opponents. "The
war in Vietnam was fought on
the streets of America
too," he says. "It was lost here at home, by people who didn't have
the Will to win. We had to get the people who wanted America to lose." Including
killing columnists? "If they were traitors as Jack Andersen [sic] was,
directly helping the enemy, then yes."


In his 1980 autobiography, Will: The Autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy
(St. Martin's Press, November 1996), Liddy wrote that he and GOP
operative Hunt had become convinced that Anderson had compromised an overseas
intelligence source's safety and must be assassinated:




I took the position that, in a
hypothetical case in which the target had been the direct cause of the
identification and execution of one of our agents abroad, halfway measures were
not appropriate. How many of our people should we let him kill before we stop
him, I asked rhetorically, still not using Anderson's name. I urged as the logical
and just solution that the target be killed. Quickly. 

[...]

I submitted that the target should
just become a fatal victim of the notorious Washington street-crime rate. No
one argued against that recommendation and, at Hunt's suggestion, I gave
[then-CIA deputy director of Medical Services] Dr. [Edward] Gunn a
hundred-dollar bill, from Committee to Re-Elect the President intelligence
funds, as a fee for his services. I took this to be to protect Dr. Gunn's
image as "retired."

Afterward Hunt and I discussed the
recommendation further. It was decided to include the suggestion that the
assassination of Jack Anderson be carried out by Cubans already recruited for
the intelligence arm of the Committee to Re-Elect the President. [Pages 208-209]




According to Liddy, when Hunt
worried that his superiors would not trust those operatives to carry out the
assassination, Liddy said he would be willing to carry out the plot
himself:




I thought about the damage Anderson was doing to our
country's ability to conduct foreign policy. Most of all, I thought of that U.S. agent
abroad, dead or about to die after what I was sure would be interrogation by
torture. If Hunt's principal was worried, I had the answer. 

"Tell him," I said,
"if necessary, I'll do it." [Page 210]


Hunt confirms the murder plot in his
own book, American Spy: My
Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond (Wiley,
February 2007):




Liddy and I, feeling that Anderson had
done such harm to the country by exposing foreign-based CIA agents who might be
imprisoned and/or killed, spent a lot of time concocting ways to get rid of the
pesky journalist, even trying to cook up a way to get him to ingest LSD through
his skin from his steering wheel so that he would crash his car. A CIA
specialist, however, assured me that skin was an inadequate delivery system, so
the plan did not move forward. Still, Liddy was primed and ready to go it
alone, planning an assassination if [Attorney General John] Mitchell would just give the word.
Ultimately, the attorney general aborted the operation and the muckraker in
question outlived most of his adversaries, dying in December 2005 at the age of
eighty-three from Parkinson's disease. [Page 199]



Liddy participated in Ellsberg psychiatrist break-in, prepared to kill someone "if
     necessary." After
     military analyst Daniel
     Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers to The
     New York Times, Liddy and
     Hunt organized a break-in of Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office
     in an attempt to obtain files on Ellsberg. Liddy wrote in Will: 




I can run for miles, and there were
numerous deeply shadowed hiding places in the area from which I could pause to
warn the men inside with the transceiver. Only if there were no other recourse
would I have used the knife, but use it I would, if I'd had to; I had
given my men word that I would protect them.

For the period of the actual
breaking and entering, I posted myself in a narrow space between two buildings
concealed by more shrubbery, from which I could see clearly the area of the
break-in, all of the private, and much of the public parking lot. [Page 167]

[...]

I was completely candid with him [Egil
(Bud) Krogh] in my report, showing him everything: the suitcase, tools,
even the knife I had carried. He asked me, incredulous, "Would you really
have used it -- I mean, kill
somebody?"

"Only if there were absolutely
no other way. But yes, I would, if necessary to protect my men. I gave them my
word I'd cover them." [Page 169]




Liddy also wrote in Will that he and Hunt plotted to drug
Ellsberg:


According to Hunt, Daniel Ellsberg
was scheduled to speak at a fund-raising dinner to be held in Washington, and
[Nixon chief counsel] Chuck Colson thought it an opportunity to discredit him.
The dinner would be well attended by media opinion-shapers and the speech would
get wide coverage. Could
["[o]ur organization"] ODESSA drug Ellsberg
enough to befuddle him, make him appear a near burnt-out drug case? 

Hunt and I studied the matter and
developed a plan to infiltrate enough Cuban waiters into the group serving the
banquet to be able to ensure that one of our people would serve Ellsberg at the
dais. One of the earliest dishes on the menu was soup. A warm liquid is ideal for the rapid
absorption and wide dispersal of a drug, and the taste would mask its presence.
Hunt was certain that he could provide men from the Miami Cuban community
who'd worked at major Florida
hotels; the drug, a fast-acting psychedelic such as LSD 25, he said he could
get from the CIA together with a recommendation of the dose necessary to have
Ellsberg incoherent by the time he was to speak. [Page 170]


The drug plan was not carried out
because, according to Liddy, "our superiors had waited too long" to
approve it and "[t]here was no longer enough lead time." [Page 170]


Liddy plotted with "gangland figure" to murder Hunt, a
     government witness. While in prison, Liddy came to the
     conclusion that White House officials might want his partner, Hunt, killed rather than risk Hunt
     cooperating with the Watergate grand jury. Liddy wrote in Will that he made plans to carry out
     such an assassination order: 




By now I knew that the fee for a
killing in the D.C. jail was two "boxes." I'd be an immediate suspect were Hunt
to be killed, so it would have to be a contract sanction and I'd have to
arrange an airtight alibi. That would be easy; just have myself put back in
deadlock prior to the event. It wouldn't do, however, to go around
soliciting Hunt's execution. Prisons
are filled with informers. For
that reason I sought the advice of a gangland figure I knew and could trust. 

My friend was sharp and as soon as I
began to broach the subject, he nodded his understanding but jumped to the
conclusion I was referring to [James] McCord, now free on bond. He offered immediately to
have McCord shot. I had to explain that I appreciated his offer but had someone
else in mind. 

[...]

I explained carefully to my friend
that I had not yet received
orders to kill Hunt, and that under no circumstances was he to be harmed
without my specific authorization, which I would not give in the absence of
unequivocal orders from my superiors. [Page 309]


Liddy wrote that after Hunt cooperated
with investigators, he awaited an order to kill him, but "because the
message never came, Hunt lives" [Page 311].


Liddy plotted to "firebomb[]" Brookings Institution. Liddy
     and Hunt believed that because of Ellsberg's past association with
     the Brookings Institution, classified or sensitive documents might be
     stored in the organization's security vault. Their plan to retrieve
     these supposed materials involved firebombing the
     building: 




We devised a plan that entailed buying
a used but late-model fire engine of the kind used by the District of Columbia fire department and
marking it appropriately; uniforms for a squad of Cubans and their training so
their performance would be believable.
Thereafter, Brookings would be firebombed by use of a delay
mechanism timed to go off at night so as not to endanger lives needlessly. The Cubans in the
authentic-looking fire engine would "respond" minutes after the
timer went off, enter, get anybody in there out, hit the vault, and get themselves
out in the confusion of other fire apparatus arriving, calmly loading
"rescued" material into a van. The bogus engine would be abandoned at the
scene. The taking of
the material from the vault would be discovered and the fire engine traced to a
cut-out buyer. There
would be a lot of who-struck-John in the liberal press, but because nothing
could be proved the matter would lapse into the unsolved-mystery category.
[Page 171-72]


According to Liddy, the plan was not
approved by the White House because it was deemed "[t]oo expensive"
[Page 172].


Liddy borrowed terminology from Nazis in outlining plan to thwart "attack" by
     "leftist guerillas." Before the 1972 Republican
     National Convention in San Diego, Liddy met with a group of White House
     officials, including Attorney General John Mitchell, to discuss ways to
     thwart an "attack" on the convention by "leftist
     guerrillas": 




I proposed to emulate the Texas
Rangers by identifying the leaders through intelligence before the attack got under way, kidnap
them, drug them, and hold them in Mexico until after the convention was over,
then release them unharmed and still wondering what happened. Leaderless, the attack would be further disrupted
by faked assembly orders and messages, and if it ever did get off the ground it
would be much easier to repel. The
sudden disappearances, which I labeled on the chart in the original German, Nacht und Nebel ("Night and
Fog"), would strike fear into the hearts of the leftist guerrillas. The chart labeled the team
slated to carry out the night and fog plan as a "Special Action
Group" and, when John Mitchell asked, "What's that?"
and expressed doubt that it could perform as I had explained, I grew impatient.

[...]

With [then-Nixon deputy campaign director Jeb] Magruder
and [then-associate deputy attorney
general John] Dean out to lunch, I felt obliged to impress
Mitchell with my seriousness of purpose, that my people were the kind and I was
the kind who could and would do whatever was necessary to deal with organized
mass violence. Both
Magruder and Dean were too young to know what I was talking about, but I knew
that Mitchell, a naval officer in World War II, would get the message if I
translated the English "Special Action Group" into German. Given the history involved,
it was a gross exaggeration, but it made my point. "An Einsatzgruppe,
General," I said, inadvertently using a hard g for the word General and turning it, too, into German. "These men include professional killers
who have accounted between them for twenty-two dead so far, including two
hanged from a beam in a garage." [Page 197-98]




According to the United States Holocaust
Memorial Museum's
Holocaust Encyclopedia,
the Einsatzgruppen were mobile
killing units organized by the Nazis for, among other things, the purpose of
carrying out "the
murder of those perceived to be racial or political enemies found behind German
combat lines in the occupied Soviet Union." Their "victims
included Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and officials of the Soviet state and the Soviet
Communist party. The Einsatzgruppen also murdered thousands of residents of
institutions for the mentally and physically disabled." 

According to Yad Vashem,
"Nacht und Nebel" is
a "German term used in a secret order issued by Adolf Hitler on December
7, 1941. The order stated that any underground resistance activities against
the Reich carried out in Western Europe would
be punished in the most severe ways. The term 'Night and Fog'
referred to those underground activists from Western
 Europe who, as a result of this order, were to disappear into the
'fog of the night' without leaving a trace. ... According to the order, special military
courts could impose the death sentence without a unanimous decision. If not
sentenced to death, the defendants were to be deported to Germany, where
they would disappear without a trace into concentration camps or
prisons."

The judgment of the
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg described
the purpose and effects of the decree:


The territories occupied by Germany were
administered in violation of the laws of war. The evidence is quite
overwhelming of a systematic rule of violence, brutality and terror. On the 7th
December, 1941, Hitler issued the directive since known as the "Nacht und Nebel Erlass" (Night and Fog
Decree), under which persons who committed offences against the Reich or the
German forces in occupied territories, except where the death sentence was
certain, were to be taken secretly to Germany and handed over to the SIPO [German state security police] and
SD [intelligence division of the
German SS] for trial or punishment in Germany. This decree was
signed by the defendant [chief of the
High Command of the German Armed Forces Wilhelm] Keitel. After
these civilians arrived in Germany,
no word of them was permitted to reach the country from which they came, or
their relatives; even in cases when they died awaiting trial the families were
not informed, the purpose being to create anxiety in the minds of the family of
the arrested person. Hitler's purpose in issuing this decree was stated by the
defendant Keitel in a covering letter, dated 12th December, 1941, to be as
follows:


" Efficient and enduring
intimidation can only be achieved either by capital punishment or by measures
by which the relatives of the criminal and the population do not know the fate
of the criminal. This aim is achieved when the criminal is transferred to Germany."


Even persons who were only suspected
of opposing any of the policies of the German occupation authorities were
arrested, and on arrest were interrogated by the Gestapo and the SD in the most
shameful manner. On the 12th June 1942 the Chief of the SIPO and SD published,
through Mueller, the Gestapo Chief, an order authorising the use of "third
degree" methods of interrogation, where preliminary investigation had indicated
that the person could give information on important matters, such as subversive
activities, though not for the purpose of extorting confessions of the
prisoner's own crimes. This order provided:


" ... Third degree may, under
this supposition, only be employed against Communists, Marxists, Jehovah's
Witnesses, saboteurs, terrorists, members of resistance movements, parachute
agents, anti-social elements, Polish or Soviet Russian loafers or tramps; in
all other cases my permission must first be obtained ... Third degree can,
according to circumstances, consist amongst other methods of very simple diet
(bread and water), hard bunk, dark cell, deprivation of sleep, exhaustive
drilling, also in flogging (for more than twenty strokes a doctor must be
consulted)."


The brutal suppression of all
opposition to the German occupation was not confined to severe measures against
suspected members of resistance movements themselves, but was also extended to
their families. On the 19th July, 1944, the Commander of the SIPO and SD in the
district of Radom, in Poland, published an order, transmitted through the
Higher SS and Police leaders, to the effect that in all cases of assassination
or attempted assassination of Germans, or where saboteurs had destroyed vital
installations not only the guilty person, but also all his or her male
relatives should be shot, and female relatives over sixteen years of age put
into a concentration camp.


Liddy's proposed
"Special Action Group" for the kidnappings was, in the end, not
employed.


Liddy's advice for shooting ATF agents.
     According to an April 26, 1995, CBS News transcript (retrieved from
     Nexis), Liddy said on his August 26, 1994, radio show: 




LIDDY: Well, if the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms,
resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they're going to be wearing
bulletproof vests.


Reporting on Liddy's October
19, 1994, radio show, The Washington Post's
Howard Kurtz recounted in an
October 24, 1994, article:


Ursula from Millerton, Pa.,
tells Liddy she's afraid the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is coming
after her gun-owning friend. Liddy calls the bureau "bottom-dwelling slugs
... a pack of nitwits out to make war on those Americans who take seriously the
Second Amendment." Liddy allows that calls to "hunt down and
kill" such agents is "going too far." But, he says,
"shooting back is reasonable...
. I have counseled shooting them in the head."


According to Fairness & Accuracy
in Reporting, on September 15, 1994, Liddy
stated:


If the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms insists upon a firefight, give them a firefight. Just
remember, they're wearing flak jackets and you're better off shooting for the
head.


According to FAIR, Liddy said to a caller later in the show:


When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms thugs come to kill your wife and children, to try to disarm you
and they open fire on you. When they come at the point of a gun, force and
violence, when you're going to defend yourself, use that Gerand [sic] [M-1 rifle]. That thing
is 30-06, and it'll take 'em right out.


According to an April 25, 1995,
Associated Press article:


Talk show host G. Gordon Liddy said
Tuesday he gave listeners bad advice when he told them to shoot for the head if
attacked by federal agents. Instead, he said, go twice for the body and then
the groin.

[...]

Last August, Liddy counseled
"head shots" to respond to an encounter with agents of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, because, "They've got a vest
underneath."

On Tuesday, he told a news
conference held as part of his WJFK program that people should cooperate if
authorities come to their homes with search warrants. But they should shoot
back if agents shoot their way in, he said.

He said experts have told him
shooting for the head was a bad idea because heads are hard to hit.

"So you shoot twice to the
body, center of mass, and if that does not work, then shoot to the groin
area," he said.

"They cannot move their hips
fast enough and you'll probably get a femoral artery and you'll knock them down
at any rate."


Asked
about his ATF comments by right-wing blogger John Hawkins in December 2003,
Liddy argued they had been misinterpreted:


LIDDY: [A]s usual, people remember
part of what I said, but not all of what I said. What I did was restate the
law. I was talking about a situation in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms comes smashing into a house, doesn't say who they are, and their
guns are out, they're shooting, and they're in the wrong place. This has
happened time and time again. The ATF has gone in and gotten the wrong guy in
the wrong place. The law is that if somebody is shooting at you, using deadly
force, the mere fact that they are a law enforcement officer, if they are in
the wrong, does not mean you are obliged to allow yourself to be killed so your
kinfolk can have a wrongful death action. You are legally entitled to defend
yourself and I was speaking of exactly those kind of situations. If you're
going to do that, you should know that they're wearing body armor so you should
use a head shot. Now all I'm doing is stating the law, but all the nuances in
there got left out when the story got repeated.



Liddy acknowledged naming shooting targets after Clintons. According to the April
     25, 1995, edition of NPR's All
     Things Considered (retrieved from Nexis), during a press
     conference, Liddy admitted that he named shooting targets after
     then-President Bill Clinton and first lady Hillary Clinton. From the press
     conference, as aired by NPR: 




LIDDY: I did relate that on the 4th
of July of last year, when I and my family and some friends were out firing
away at a properly-constructed rifle range and we ran out of targets, and so we -- I drew some stick figure targets and I
thought we ought to give them names. So I named them Bill and Hillary, thought
it might improve my aim. It didn't. My aim is good anyway. Now, having said
that, I accept no responsibility for somebody shooting up the White
House.


Nonetheless, the five
major papers and the network evening newscasts have ignored McCain's
association with -- and praise of -- Liddy. For instance:


Fundraising. In a March 9, 1998, article (retrieved
     from Nexis), The Washington Post's Al Kamen reported that Liddy
     hosted a fundraiser for McCain's 1998 Senate re-election campaign. Kamen wrote: 




Here's one we wished we hadn't
missed. "G. Gordon Liddy and family cordially invite you to a fundraiser
reception" at their home in Scottsdale,
 Ariz., "in support of Sen.
John McCain's 1998 re-election campaign."

So McCain (R), a bona fide American
hero, is having G. Gordon Liddy, a bona fide American felon and, worse yet,
talk show host, do a fund-raiser for him? What is this all about?

Liddy has a home there and "he
called and said he wanted to invite some friends over," McCain said,
"and I said okay. I was surprised when he made the offer. I hardly know
him." As for the old conviction, McCain noted, "He's a successful
talk show host."

The affair, which took place over
the weekend, was $ 125 per person, but those who ponied up $ 250 a person got
to go to the early "VIP reception." There you could have your picture
taken with McCain and Liddy.




According to a January 23, 2000, Charlotte Observer article (retrieved from
Nexis), Liddy was also scheduled to speak at a fundraiser for McCain's
2000 presidential campaign. Discussing the event, McCain's campaign
reportedly vouched for Liddy's "character":


A presidential candidate who has
made character a central issue of his campaign is bringing a Watergate felon to
a Rock Hill
rally this week.

G. Gordon Liddy will speak at a
Wednesday fund-raiser to benefit Arizona Sen. John McCain. Liddy served more
than four years in prison for his role in the Watergate break-in and later
became host of a popular conservative radio talk show.

McCain is not scheduled to appear.

His campaign officials said Liddy's
character will appeal to many voters because he was following orders from
President Nixon and kept silent afterward.

"His (Liddy's) judgment might
be in question, but I don't think his character is," said Ed Walker, the York County
chairman of McCain's campaign. "He was following orders just like any good
soldier, and he didn't tell on anybody. He felt like he was on a mission and
kept his silence." 


The Herald of Rock Hill, South
  Carolina, reported on January 26, 2000 (retrieved
from Nexis), "Today's fund raiser for Sen. John McCain's
Republican presidential bid has fallen victim to the weather. Keynote speaker G. Gordon Liddy, radio
talk-show host and a figure from the Watergate era, can't get out of Washington, D.C." 


Campaign donations. According to a search of the Federal
     Election Commission's database, McCain has accepted $5,000 in
     campaign contributions from Liddy, including $1,000 this year for his
     presidential campaign. Liddy
     has donated to several of McCain's campaigns: 




2/11/2008: Liddy contributed
$1,000 to McCain

9/9/2003: Liddy contributed
$2,000 to McCain

3/23/1999: Liddy contributed
$1,000 to McCain

3/7/1998: Liddy contributed $1,000 to McCain



Radio America's The G. Gordon Liddy Show. McCain has made
     appearances on Liddy's radio show, including as recently as May of
     this year. An online video labeled "John McCain On The G.
     Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07" includes a discussion between Liddy and
     McCain, whom Liddy described as an "old friend." During the segment,
     McCain praised Liddy's "adherence to the principles and
     philosophies that keep our nation great," said he was
     "proud" of Liddy, and said that "it's always a
     pleasure for me to come on your program." From the program: 




LIDDY: Your experience in the Hanoi
Hilton is remarkable. I mean, I put in five years in a prison, but it was here in
the United States,
and they didn't torture -- the only torture that I had was being forced
to listen to rap music from time to time.

McCAIN: Well, you know, I'm proud of you.
I'm proud of your family. I'm proud to know your son, Tom,
who's a great and wonderful guy. And it's always a pleasure for me
to come on your program, Gordon. And congratulations on your continued success
and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.

LIDDY: Senator, congratulations on
your surge -- I guess we can call it that. You're coming back with a
vengeance. And thank you so much for sharing time with us. Really appreciate
it.

McCAIN: Thank you. Thanks Gordon,
great to be with you.

LIDDY: Good to be with you,
Senator.



Rezko coverage

From April 22 to September 18, 44 combined network evening news broadcasts and news,
editorials, or opinion pieces covered or mentioned Obama's ties to Rezko: 

Los
  Angeles Times (5)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.
  





Hiding
  Sarah Palin behind 'deference'



9/9/08



N





Barack
  Obama: Search for identity



8/28/08



N





Obama
  pounces on McCain's gaffe about his homes



8/22/08



N





Rezko closing arguments begin 



5/13/08



N





Antoin Rezko
  won't take the stand in his fraud trial



5/6/08



N





The New York Times (8)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Obama
  and McCain Seek a Common Touch



8/21/08



N





UNIONS
  UNITED; Hitting McCain Where He Lives



8/19/08



N





Ex-Obama
  Fund-Raiser Is Convicted Of Fraud



6/5/08



N





Corruption Case
  Taints Rising Political Star



5/12/08



N





Pragmatic
  Politics, Forged on the South Side



5/11/08



N





Republicans
  Focus on Obama as Fall Opponent



5/8/08



N





How McCain Lost
  in Pennsylvania



4/27/08



E





Ex-Official
  in Illinois Admits Lying About Job for Donation



4/23/08



N





USA Today (2)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





McCain
  ad: Clinton's 'truth hurt'



8/25/08



N





Obama
  slams McCain's inability to count family residences



8/21/08



N





The Wall Street Journal (10)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Obama
  Should Come Clean on Ayers, Rezko and the Iraqi Billionaire



8/30/08



E





House
  Party: Obama Homes In on McCain



8/22/08



N





Obama
  Played by Chicago Rules



8/20/08



E





Friends
  of Barack



6/11/08



E





Campaign '08:
  GOP Starts Recycling Primary Clips Attacking Obama



6/7/08



N





Obama Heads
  to Election With Some Weaknesses



6/5/08



N





Rezko
  Convicted of Wire Fraud, Money Laundering



6/5/08



N





Our Collectivist Candidates



5/28/08



E





For Obama,
  Advice Straight Up



5/12/08



N





From Their
  House to the White House



5/9/08



N





The Washington
Post (14)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





McCain
  Strategist Blasts Media 



9/3/08



N





Romney
  Leads a Denver Counteroffensive



8/27/08



N





Obama
  Calls His Pick, Biden, Both a Statesman and Fighter



8/24/08



N





Extreme
  Campaign Makeover



8/23/08



E





Obama's
  Judgment Is Questioned



8/22/08



N





Houses
  Add Up to A Snag for McCain



8/22/08



N





Can
  McCain Use Advice Clinton Got on Obama?



8/13/08



N





In
  Obama's Circle, Chicago Remains The Tie That Binds



7/14/08



N





Obama
  Got Discount on Home Loan



7/2/08



N





Former
  Obama Fundraiser Convicted of Corruption



6/5/08



N





For
  Clinton, A Following Of 'Marshans'



6/4/08



N





Obama
  as You've Never Known Him!



5/23/08



N





Rezko's
  Defense Rests Without Calling Witness



5/6/08



N





Obama's
  'Distractions'?



4/25/08



E





ABC evening news broadcasts (3)





Show



Date





World News Sunday



8/24/08





World News with Charles Gibson



8/21/08





World News with Charles Gibson



6/4/08





CBS evening
news broadcast (1) 





Show



Date





CBS Evening News with Katie Couric



6/4/08





NBC evening
news broadcast (1) 





Show



Date





Nightly News with Brian Williams



6/4/08





Land deals coverage

From April 22 to September 18, seven news, editorials, or opinion pieces mentioned that
McCain reportedly facilitated land deals that benefited wealthy developers who
were major McCain donors: 

The Washington Post (3) 





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Top
  McCain Adviser Has Found Success Mixing Money,
  Politics



6/26/08



N





John
  McCain's
  Rapid-Fire Responders



5/20/08



N





McCain
  Pushed Land Swap That Benefits
  Backer



5/9/08



N





The New York Times (2)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





The Trouble With
  Not Being Earnest



4/25/08



E





A
  Developer, His Deals and His Ties to McCain



4/22/08



N





Los Angeles Times (1)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





McCain land
  deal benefits donor



5/9/08



N





USA Today (1)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Price
  of power: McCain action helped Arizona land developer



5/19/08



N





The Wall Street
Journal: No coverage. 

ABC evening news
broadcast: No
coverage. 

NBC evening news
broadcast: No
coverage. 

CBS evening news
broadcast: No
coverage

Ayers coverage

From January 1 to September 18,
69 combined network evening news broadcasts and news,
editorials or opinion pieces mentioned Obama's ties to Ayers: 

The New York Times (19)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Interest Groups
  Step Up Efforts in a Tight Race



9/15/08



N





On the Web,
  a Nonpartisan Look at Those Partisan Campaign Ads



9/12/08



N





Obama Looks
  to Lessons From Chicago in His National Education Plan



9/10/08



N





Obama Steps
  Into O'Reilly's 'No Spin Zone'



9/5/08



N





Obama
  Campaign Wages Fight Against Conservative Group's Ads



8/27/08



N





A
  Billionaire Finances Ads Hitting Obama



8/22/08



N





Group
  Plans Ad Criticizing Obama's Ties To Ex-Radical



8/21/08



N





Late-Period
  Limbaugh



7/6/08



N





Pragmatic
  Politics, Forged on the South Side



5/11/08



N





Republicans
  Focus on Obama as Fall Opponent



5/8/08



N





A
  Backlash?



5/3/08



E





McCain
  Criticizes Clergyman's Remarks



4/28/08



N





How McCain lost
  in Pennsylvania



4/27/08



E





Brush
  it Off



4/20/08



E





Clinton
  Impugns Obama's Toughness



4/19/08



N





'60s
  Radicals Become Issue in Campaign of 2008



4/17/08



N





Former
  Friends Weigh Into Debate, and the Former Amity Drains Out



4/17/08



N





Clinton Uses
  Sharp Attacks in Tense Debate



4/17/08



N





Battle of
  the Baggage



4/17/08



E





The Washington
Post (19)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Group With
  Swift Boat Alumni Readies Ads Attacking Obama



9/14/08



N





Obama
  Met With Fox News Executives



9/3/08



N





The
  Perfect Stranger



8/29/08



E





Obama's
  Response Ad Reflects Lessons of 2004



8/27/08



N





Romney
  Leads a Denver Counteroffensive



8/27/08



N





'She
  Could Accept Losing. She Could Not Accept Quitting.'



6/5/08



N





Obama
  as You've Never Known Him!



5/23/08



N





Candidates
  Vie to Be The Anti-Lobbyist



5/20/08



N





Clinton
  Quiet About Own Radical Ties



5/19/08



N





Obama
  Has the Upper Hand. But McCain Can Still Take Him



5/18/08



E





The
  Race's Real Winner



5/11/08



E





Too Late to the
  Duck Hunt



5/9/08



E





Obama's
  'Distractions'?



4/25/08



E





McCain
  Questions Obama Remark Comparing '60s Radical, Lawmaker



4/21/08



N





Obama Looks
  To Turn Debate Into a Victory



4/18/08



N





Performance
  By ABC's Moderators Is a Matter Of Debate 



4/18/08



N





Former
  '60s Radical
  Is Now Considered Mainstream in Chicago



4/18/08



N





Obama
  Pressed in Pa. Debate



4/17/08



N





'Soft'
  Press Sharpens Its Focus on Obama



3/3/08



N





Los
  Angeles Times (18) 





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Barack Obama
  raises the funding roof 



9/15/08



N





Some
  Obama links will mislead



8/30/08



N





Barack
  Obama: Search for identity



8/28/08



N





Biden's
  jokes about his wife Jill? OK with Pelosi



8/24/08



N





Billionaire
  behind Swift Boat ads funded anti-Obama spot



8/23/08



N





Ad
  attacks Obama's ties to leftist leader



8/22/08



N





John
  McCain puts the focus on economy



7/19/08



N





The Obama-McCain age gap that matters



6/1/08



E





Obama
  pounds away at McCain



5/19/08



N





Steeling
  Obama



5/15/08



E





GOP makes a target of Obama



4/25/08



N





Ex-radical
  William Ayers keeps low profile



4/24/08



N





What
  to look for in Pennsylvania



4/22/08



N





Heating
  up in Pennsylvania



4/21/08



N





Moderators' 'gotcha' tone inspires angry new debate



4/18/08



N





Obama
  and the former radicals



4/18/08



N





The
  influence test



4/18/08



E





Debate dwells on Obama's past



4/17/08



N





USA Today (2)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Groups
  play up Obama link to '60s radical



8/26/08



N





Damage
  control, take 2



4/30/08



E





The Wall Street Journal (9)





Headline



Date



News or Editorial/Op.





Obama
  Should Come Clean on Ayers, Rezko and the Iraqi Billionaire



8/30/08



E





Legal
  Controversy Erupts Over TV Ads Linking Obama to '60s Radical



8/29/08



N





Ex-Friends
  of Barack



6/12/08



E





Why Hillary Goes Nuclear



5/29/08



E





The
  Clinton Divorce



5/9/08



E





Obama's
  Other Radical Friends



5/2/08



E





Democratic Fight Has Its Upsides



4/23/08



E





Woods Fund Could Become Obama's 'Swift Boat'



4/18/08



N





Democrats
  Meet in Feisty Debate



4/17/08



N





ABC evening news broadcast (1)





Show



Date





World News Sunday



4/20/08





NBC evening news broadcast (1)





Show



Date





Nightly News



4/17/08





CBS evening news
broadcast: No
coverage

Liddy coverage


Media Matters did not
find any coverage from January 1 to September 18 of McCain's ties to Liddy in the Los Angeles Times, The New
York Times, USA Today,
The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, or the evening news programs of ABC, CBS, or NBC. A
February 8 Washington Post column by Dana
Milbank and an August 13 New
York Times article both mentioned Liddy and McCain
but did not report or note any ties between the two.

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Despite attacks on media by McCain campaign, case studies show disparate coverage in McCain&#39;s favor {...} The media have for months reported complaints by the McCain campaign that they have favored his opponent in their coverage of the presidential race, while making little attempt to assess the accuracy of those complaints or to confirm or refute them. But in a review of the media&#39;s coverage of two stories negatively affecting or reflecting on Sen. Barack Obama and two stories negatively affecting or reflecting on Sen. John McCain -- specifically Obama&#39;s ties to Bill Ayers and Antoin Rezko, and McCain&#39;s dealings with donors whom he reportedly benefited and his association with G. Gordon Liddy -- Media Matters found that the five major newspapers and the three evening network news broadcasts have frequently mentioned Obama&#39;s ties to Ayers and Rezko, but have rarely mentioned McCain&#39;s dealings with donors and have ignored his association with Liddy. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> September 19, 2008, 7:07 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> September 21, 2008, 10:31 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;112KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content:encoded>
		<category>Society > Issues > Business > Media > Bias and Balance</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Liddy, Corsi again repeated discredited claim that Obama has not produced birth certificate establishing his U.S. citizenship</title>
		<link>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/liddy-corsi-again-repeated-discredited-claim-that-20080968330.htm</link>
		<guid>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/liddy-corsi-again-repeated-discredited-claim-that-20080968330.htm</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:14:31 GMT</pubDate>
		<description>On the September 17 edition of The G. Gordon Liddy Show, Liddy and Obama Nation author Jerome Corsi each
repeated the discredited claim that Sen. Barack Obama has not released an
authentic birth certificate establishing that he was born in the United States, and
therefore could be ineligible to run for president. In fact, in addition to
posting a copy of Obama's birth certificate on the campaign website, the Obama
campaign reportedly provided the original document to FactCheck.org, whose
staff reported in an August 21 article that they
"have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth
certificate" and concluded that it "meets all of the requirements
from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship." Indeed, even
WorldNetDaily.com, the right-wing website for which Corsi works as a staff
reporter, reported in an August 23 article that a
"WND investigation into Obama's birth certificate utilizing forgery
experts also found the document to be authentic," as Media Matters for America
has documented.

During the September 17 discussion, Liddy stated:
"Now, the Daily Kos, which is a blog, a leftist blog, published a
certificate of live birth -- purportedly from Hawaii. Giving a date but having the serial
number redacted, blocked out. And, from what we're told, heavily
Photoshopped. ... It's not a birth certificate. It's something
that is issued after there has been a birth -- and supposedly attests to the
fact that, well, yes, there was a birth in the past and it was on such and such
a day, but it's not a birth certificate such as you and I have."
Corsi agreed, stating: "It's a registry of birth. It's -- you
know, you come into the office afterwards, and you register the birth. The
birth certificate is issued by the hospital. It's not something you go in
and request." Corsi then said that a pending lawsuit alleging
that Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen "would seem to
be -- to have some credibility to it, because the Obama campaign refuses to
release the original birth certificate." Liddy and Corsi then agreed that
Obama should "release" his birth certificate to settle the matter.

Liddy and Corsi have each previously claimed that Obama has
not produced a birth certificate, as Media
Matters has documented. On his September 15 broadcast, Liddy said: "[T]here's others who say
[Obama] was born, you know, in Kenya.
And I don't have a birth certificate from Kenya
to show that he was, but neither does he have a birth certificate to show that
he was born in Hawaii,
either." Additionally, on the August 26 broadcast of his show, Liddy asserted: "[W]e still don't
have a birth certificate for Obama. There are claims that he was actually born
in Kenya."
In an August 15 appearance on Fox News' Fox
&amp; Friends, Corsi claimed: "The [Obama] campaign
has a false, fake birth certificate posted on their website. ... The original
birth certificate of Obama has never been released, and the campaign refuses to
release it."

From the September 17 broadcast of Radio America's
The G. Gordon Liddy Show:



LIDDY: I'd like to talk about
the, you know, the business of his birth. 

CORSI: Yes.

LIDDY: Now, the Daily Kos, which is
a blog, a leftist blog, published a certificate of live birth -- 

CORSI: Right.

LIDDY: -- purportedly from Hawaii.

CORSI: Right.

LIDDY: Giving a date but having the
serial number redacted, blocked out.

CORSI: Exactly.

LIDDY: And, from what we're
told, heavily Photoshopped. Can you go into that? It's not a birth
certificate. It's something that is issued after there has been a birth
-- 

CORSI: That's right.

LIDDY: -- and supposedly attests to
the fact that, well, yes, there was a birth in the past, and it was on such and
such a day, but it's not a birth certificate -- 

CORSI: Right.

LIDDY: -- such as you and I have.

CORSI: It's a registry of
birth. It's -- you know, you come into the office afterwards, and you
register the birth. The birth certificate is issued by the hospital. It's
not something you go in and request. And the -- this lawsuit that [Philip] Berg has
filed in, I believe, Pennsylvania
-- 

LIDDY: It is Pennsylvania, yes.

CORSI: -- is arguing that the
original, the birth certificate, is in Kenya, and Obama -- Obama's father
and mother went back to Kenya before Obama was born, and evidently the
pregnancy was so advanced that Ann Dunham was not allowed to return to the
United States, and Obama was born in Kenya. That's the argument. And it
would seem to be -- to have some credibility to it, because the Obama campaign
refuses to release the original birth certificate. And why would that -- a
birth certificate, you know, Mr. Liddy, should be a mundane document.

LIDDY: Yeah. It is. I mean,
I've got mine, you've got yours, and everybody I know -- and, you
know, Snopes and people like that are all saying, "Oh, no, no, no, he was
born in Hawaii."
Well, if he was, and they have the thing, why don't they --

CORSI: Just release it.

LIDDY: -- produce that? Release it.

CORSI: Release it. It would solve the
issue.

LIDDY: It would indeed.

CORSI: Like so many of these issues,
as I have pointed out continuously, Obama does not release important details
about his life. 

LIDDY: Same way John Kerry
wouldn't release his military records.


CORSI: He never signed a Standard
Form 180 for a full public disclosure. John Kerry, finally, after the election,
signed the Standard Form 180, but only for The
Boston Globe or one or two other favorable newspaper reporters.


    
</description>
		<source url="http://mediamatters.org/items/200809180017">Mediamatters.Org</source>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/liddy-corsi-again-repeated-discredited-claim-that-20080968330.htm"><b>Liddy, Corsi again repeated discredited claim that Obama has not produced birth certificate establishing his U.S. citizenship</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/liddy-corsi-again-repeated-discredited-claim-that-20080968330.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - On the September 17 edition of The G. Gordon Liddy Show, Liddy and Obama Nation author Jerome Corsi each
repeated the discredited claim that Sen. Barack Obama has not released an
authentic birth certificate establishing that he was born in the United States, and
therefore could be ineligible to run for president. In fact, in addition to
posting a copy of Obama's birth certificate on the campaign website, the Obama
campaign reportedly provided the original document to FactCheck.org, whose
staff reported in an