Clean And Lean - World-of-Newave.info http://answers.world-of-newave.info/clean-and-lean.htm Latest news and articles about Clean And Lean en-us Copyright (c)2004-2008.§/Newave SARL. All rights reserved. webmaster@world-of-newave.com (Webmaster) Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:57:14 GMT Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:57:14 GMT Newave Lisa XML Engine v1.0 - http://www.world-of-newave.info/about.htm 60 http://www.world-of-newave.info/images/wi8831.gif World-of-Newave.info - Knowledge and Informational Database http://www.world-of-newave.info/ 88 31 {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Another Great room in the excelsior (excelsior / outer mission) $650 http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/another-great-room-in-the-excelsior-excelsior-outer-20080839823.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/another-great-room-in-the-excelsior-excelsior-outer-20080839823.htm Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:59:55 GMT This is a rather nice room I am trying to rent in a small but very nice house. The only immediate qualifications I have is that the prospective roommie be a producing student-artist.. and that they are LBGT/GQ friendly or fall somewhere inside the rainbow themselves. The household is communal, open, and mixed, (very). Your roommies, currently are Oscar and myself: Me: Rachel... A photographer (well student), 25 (er.. 32) and am a student at CCSF where I maintain a very high GPA in the pursuit of a photography degree. My interests are indie movies, occasional excercise, art in any form and of course photography. (obviously.) I have a darkroom in the house which you would be welcome to use, or annex off of.. preferably setting up your own dry space, with available extra equipment. Currently, I am into exploring different avenues of self-expression, which means I'll try anything I feel will inspire my work (which tends to lean towards fine art.) I'm taking an acting class, interested in performance art, costuming, and other odd things. Oscar is a student at one of the art schools, studying illustration. He is new in the house having only been here about 2 months, and likes bicycling, reading, records, and sleeping. He's a cool guy with a knack for character voices and making people laugh - a lot. I have only known him a few months but he seems to have it together, at least as much as any other 20 year old I've met. that's us! now on to the room... The room is 12'x12' with a 4' closet, it has desert-brown trim and a rather nice view of the mission/twin peaks/bernal heights. The window faces south and gets good evening light, and breeze. The room and closet are small.. but I've dressed it up a bit with the trim and added a nice mirror, bookshelf, and computer desk. You're welcome to keep or lose the furniture, but you'll need to bring a bed with you. The rest of the house is similar, the recently remodeled bathroom has a tub and seperate shower, the toilet has it's own little room (thank god) and the bathroom floor doubles as the wet side of the darkroom. While I have my busy times in the darkroom/bathroom, I make it a point to be respectful about not taking it over and will vacate quickly if someone needs the bath. When finished & in between projects I do keep the bathroom *spotless*. The house is really cute, but small.. We (and you?) share the entire upstairs flat. There is a very small octagon shaped dining area with built in cabinets that has been repainted recently and outfitted with a dining set. Every wall in the entire house has been repainted within this past year, and I do try to maintain the house the best I can. The colors and decor are a bit eccentric, as I've done them myself, but it's very SF. I'm tired of doing all the decorating and stuff and I'm hoping whoever moves in will bring their own flavor to the house. :) keep going (: Now our wish list for a new roommie: It would be really cool if you were (1) not a recluse (2) not a drug dealer or addict (3) someone who brougth an element of character to the household (4) employed (5) clean and ok with pro-actively doing chores We are one drama-free-tranny, and one boy, and for the sake of having a nice well-rounded household, we'd love a girl to move in.. a girl in her mid twenties would be wonderful... but neither are requirements. smoking of any kind is done outside :) music and guests must be respectful of school and work schedules. deposit = 1 months rent, deposit + first month (can be prorated) to move in. Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Another Great room in the excelsior (excelsior / outer mission) $650 {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - This is a rather nice room I am trying to rent in a small but very nice house. The only immediate qualifications I have is that the prospective roommie be a producing student-artist.. and that they are LBGT/GQ friendly or fall somewhere inside the rainbow themselves. The household is communal, open, and mixed, (very). Your roommies, currently are Oscar and myself: Me: Rachel... A photographer (well student), 25 (er.. 32) and am a student at CCSF where I maintain a very high GPA in the pursuit of a photography degree. My interests are indie movies, occasional excercise, art in any form and of course photography. (obviously.) I have a darkroom in the house which you would be welcome to use, or annex off of.. preferably setting up your own dry space, with available extra equipment. Currently, I am into exploring different avenues of self-expression, which means I'll try anything I feel will inspire my work (which tends to lean towards fine art.) I'm taking an acting class, interested in performance art, costuming, and other odd things. Oscar is a student at one of the art schools, studying illustration. He is new in the house having only been here about 2 months, and likes bicycling, reading, records, and sleeping. He's a cool guy with a knack for character voices and making people laugh - a lot. I have only known him a few months but he seems to have it together, at least as much as any other 20 year old I've met. that's us! now on to the room... The room is 12'x12' with a 4' closet, it has desert-brown trim and a rather nice view of the mission/twin peaks/bernal heights. The window faces south and gets good evening light, and breeze. The room and closet are small.. but I've dressed it up a bit with the trim and added a nice mirror, bookshelf, and computer desk. You're welcome to keep or lose the furniture, but you'll need to bring a bed with you. The rest of the house is similar, the recently remodeled bathroom has a tub and seperate shower, the toilet has it's own little room (thank god) and the bathroom floor doubles as the wet side of the darkroom. While I have my busy times in the darkroom/bathroom, I make it a point to be respectful about not taking it over and will vacate quickly if someone needs the bath. When finished & in between projects I do keep the bathroom *spotless*. The house is really cute, but small.. We (and you?) share the entire upstairs flat. There is a very small octagon shaped dining area with built in cabinets that has been repainted recently and outfitted with a dining set. Every wall in the entire house has been repainted within this past year, and I do try to maintain the house the best I can. The colors and decor are a bit eccentric, as I've done them myself, but it's very SF. I'm tired of doing all the decorating and stuff and I'm hoping whoever moves in will bring their own flavor to the house. :) keep going (: Now our wish list for a new roommie: It would be really cool if you were (1) not a recluse (2) not a drug dealer or addict (3) someone who brougth an element of character to the household (4) employed (5) clean and ok with pro-actively doing chores We are one drama-free-tranny, and one boy, and for the sake of having a nice well-rounded household, we'd love a girl to move in.. a girl in her mid twenties would be wonderful... but neither are requirements. smoking of any kind is done outside :) music and guests must be respectful of school and work schedules. deposit = 1 months rent, deposit + first month (can be prorated) to move in.
Another Great room in the excelsior {...}
Published: August 25, 2008, 5:59 pm - Indexed: August 25, 2008, 6:29 pm - Page Size: 7KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Share house in North Berkeley (berkeley north / hills) $615 http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/share-house-in-north-berkeley-berkeley-north-hills-20080899819.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/share-house-in-north-berkeley-berkeley-north-hills-20080899819.htm Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:05:25 GMT North Berkeley house to share with 4 housemates. The house is near everything that makes life pleasant: shops, restaurants, parks, UCB and easy transportation. The room is medium sized with southern exposure and a private bathroom. We are a teacher, graduate student, alternative health care practitioner, and environmental activist, ages 24-65 who all lean left. Although our schedules vary widely, we share what we can and conversations in the kitchen can be fun and sociable. You should be friendly, responsible, clean, and non-smoking. The room is available after August 3. $615 rent includes utilities and room is set up for cable TV, computer and phone. Please email and tell us something about yourself and leave your phone number. Rose St. at Milvia St. Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Share house in North Berkeley (berkeley north / hills) $615 {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - North Berkeley house to share with 4 housemates. The house is near everything that makes life pleasant: shops, restaurants, parks, UCB and easy transportation. The room is medium sized with southern exposure and a private bathroom. We are a teacher, graduate student, alternative health care practitioner, and environmental activist, ages 24-65 who all lean left. Although our schedules vary widely, we share what we can and conversations in the kitchen can be fun and sociable. You should be friendly, responsible, clean, and non-smoking. The room is available after August 3. $615 rent includes utilities and room is set up for cable TV, computer and phone. Please email and tell us something about yourself and leave your phone number. Rose St. at Milvia St.
Share house in North Berkeley {...}
Published: August 20, 2008, 5:05 am - Indexed: August 20, 2008, 9:33 am - Page Size: 5KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Room for professional Female ,Fully Furnished Independent room availa (san jose south) $695 http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/room-for-professional-female-fully-furnished-independent-20080745434.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/room-for-professional-female-fully-furnished-independent-20080745434.htm Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:11:58 GMT Room for professional Female ,Fully Furnished Independent room available in apartment - including high speed Internet, Cable TV ,pool, Laundry I am a single professional female and have an Independent room available in my 2 bedroom apartment for rent in the desirable San Jose area .The room is a 12*12 room in a nice clean environment with all the below amenties included .This room is for a single person only . • Fully furnished room Including bed ,lamp etc • High speed Internet ( Comcast ) • Comcast Cable TV • Plenty of Closet Space for storage • Pool on Premises • Water ,Garbage all included • Laundry on premises • Living Room/Dining Room With full size Wide screen TV • Full Kitchen facilities with all modern appliances • Minutes from freeways ( 85,87 and 101 ) • Close to the commercial hub of San Jose (Cisco ,Juniper ,Microsoft) • No Smokers Please Rent is $695 per month + 1/2 of PGE( Roughly $15 ) + $250 Refundable Security deposit . Please contact Mani @408-440-8670 between 2.00pm to 7.00pm You can see the room @ 5544 Lean Ave ,San Jose CA But with previous appointment only . Contact Mani @408-440-8670 between 2.00pm to 7.00pm Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Room for professional Female ,Fully Furnished Independent room availa (san jose south) $695 {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - Room for professional Female ,Fully Furnished Independent room available in apartment - including high speed Internet, Cable TV ,pool, Laundry I am a single professional female and have an Independent room available in my 2 bedroom apartment for rent in the desirable San Jose area .The room is a 12*12 room in a nice clean environment with all the below amenties included .This room is for a single person only . • Fully furnished room Including bed ,lamp etc • High speed Internet ( Comcast ) • Comcast Cable TV • Plenty of Closet Space for storage • Pool on Premises • Water ,Garbage all included • Laundry on premises • Living Room/Dining Room With full size Wide screen TV • Full Kitchen facilities with all modern appliances • Minutes from freeways ( 85,87 and 101 ) • Close to the commercial hub of San Jose (Cisco ,Juniper ,Microsoft) • No Smokers Please Rent is $695 per month + 1/2 of PGE( Roughly $15 ) + $250 Refundable Security deposit . Please contact Mani @408-440-8670 between 2.00pm to 7.00pm You can see the room @ 5544 Lean Ave ,San Jose CA But with previous appointment only . Contact Mani @408-440-8670 between 2.00pm to 7.00pm
Room for professional Female ,Fully Furnished Independent room availa {...}
Published: July 30, 2008, 3:11 pm - Indexed: July 30, 2008, 3:15 pm - Page Size: 6KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Great Room for A Great Person! (ingleside / SFSU / CCSF) $700 http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/great-room-for-a-great-person-ingleside-sfsu-ccsf-20080748224.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/great-room-for-a-great-person-ingleside-sfsu-ccsf-20080748224.htm Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:30:14 GMT $700 Ikea’d, sunny, quiet, and clean Room Available. + no permit street parking The Digs! -Large One-Bedroom with Loft Space converted into a Two Bedroom. -Room Size is a visually spacious 11x10 w/ built in shelves and new window which receives eastern light. -Full Kitchen, minus the dishwasher. I’m considering installing a garbage disposal. -Full shared Bathroom with moderate cabinetry. Shower/Tub combo. -Lower apartment of 2-story flat. Private entrance, mini gate, unit built into a hill. The area! -Within walking / biking distance to both San Francisco State University and City College. -Walking distance to Muni Line K and M. (25 minutes downtown) -Bus 29 Stops right out front and takes you to Balboa Park Bart in 7 minutes. (15 minutes downtown) -Rite-Aid, Walgreens, 24 Hour Fitness, Laundry, and local business 4 blocks away. -Lucky, Safeway, Trader Joes all located nearby. -Easy non-permit street parking. -Lake Merced and the beach are within jogging distance. -Good area for biking, running, walking, fresh air! No bums! The reality! -$700 per month includes utilities + free wireless. -Security deposit is 950.00 - Credit check, and Reference check required, no shady losers! - Non-smokers ONLY. Not 420 friendly. -Sorry no furry pets. You! -Employed (no work from home) or Student (with parental support) - Best if between the ages 20-32 -Pays Rent on time, everytime. - Respectfully quiet, clean leaning towards anal, mellow. -gay friendly -active outside the home, however mi casa, es su casa and you can be here as often as you like. -Mellow, communicative, and positive a plus. ME! -A conceptually aboriginal San Franciscan. -25 GWM young professional. -Aries. I’m Head strong, social, humorous, theatrical, respectful and communicative. - Lean more toward anally clean -I’m a designer, a painter, a bad photographer, and a conceptualist. Please send me an email with any questions and introduce yourself. The better you describe yourself the easier it will be for me to make a decision. I would like to have someone in the room by August 1st. I can show every day as long as it is scheduled ahead. Please include your name and phone number. -Charles Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Great Room for A Great Person! (ingleside / SFSU / CCSF) $700 {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - $700 Ikea’d, sunny, quiet, and clean Room Available. + no permit street parking The Digs! -Large One-Bedroom with Loft Space converted into a Two Bedroom. -Room Size is a visually spacious 11x10 w/ built in shelves and new window which receives eastern light. -Full Kitchen, minus the dishwasher. I’m considering installing a garbage disposal. -Full shared Bathroom with moderate cabinetry. Shower/Tub combo. -Lower apartment of 2-story flat. Private entrance, mini gate, unit built into a hill. The area! -Within walking / biking distance to both San Francisco State University and City College. -Walking distance to Muni Line K and M. (25 minutes downtown) -Bus 29 Stops right out front and takes you to Balboa Park Bart in 7 minutes. (15 minutes downtown) -Rite-Aid, Walgreens, 24 Hour Fitness, Laundry, and local business 4 blocks away. -Lucky, Safeway, Trader Joes all located nearby. -Easy non-permit street parking. -Lake Merced and the beach are within jogging distance. -Good area for biking, running, walking, fresh air! No bums! The reality! -$700 per month includes utilities + free wireless. -Security deposit is 950.00 - Credit check, and Reference check required, no shady losers! - Non-smokers ONLY. Not 420 friendly. -Sorry no furry pets. You! -Employed (no work from home) or Student (with parental support) - Best if between the ages 20-32 -Pays Rent on time, everytime. - Respectfully quiet, clean leaning towards anal, mellow. -gay friendly -active outside the home, however mi casa, es su casa and you can be here as often as you like. -Mellow, communicative, and positive a plus. ME! -A conceptually aboriginal San Franciscan. -25 GWM young professional. -Aries. I’m Head strong, social, humorous, theatrical, respectful and communicative. - Lean more toward anally clean -I’m a designer, a painter, a bad photographer, and a conceptualist. Please send me an email with any questions and introduce yourself. The better you describe yourself the easier it will be for me to make a decision. I would like to have someone in the room by August 1st. I can show every day as long as it is scheduled ahead. Please include your name and phone number. -Charles
Great Room for A Great Person! {...}
Published: July 26, 2008, 9:30 am - Indexed: July 26, 2008, 11:49 am - Page Size: 6KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - room for rent furnished (san jose south) $550 http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/room-for-rent-furnished-san-jose-south-550-20080785934.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/room-for-rent-furnished-san-jose-south-550-20080785934.htm Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:47:04 GMT one bedroom 10x12 furnished $550.00 plus $300.00 for Deposit. The room will rent to a working female only with refrences Queen size bed and dresser with mirror. The washer and dryer are brand new LG. The use of kitchen is ok if you willing to clean after your self. The cross streets are Lean ave and Calero near Santa Teresa ave. The corner of blossom hill and Snell ave has a shopping center theres a Luckys. for more info call Luis@408-307-0694 Sfbay.Craigslist.Org room for rent furnished (san jose south) $550 {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - one bedroom 10x12 furnished $550.00 plus $300.00 for Deposit. The room will rent to a working female only with refrences Queen size bed and dresser with mirror. The washer and dryer are brand new LG. The use of kitchen is ok if you willing to clean after your self. The cross streets are Lean ave and Calero near Santa Teresa ave. The corner of blossom hill and Snell ave has a shopping center theres a Luckys. for more info call Luis@408-307-0694
room for rent furnished {...}
Published: July 25, 2008, 4:47 am - Indexed: July 25, 2008, 9:25 am - Page Size: 4KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Room Available for Rent - August 1st - Gay Household (san jose south) $550 http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/room-available-for-rent-august-1st-gay-household-2008071511.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/room-available-for-rent-august-1st-gay-household-2008071511.htm Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:44:29 GMT Seeking a Professionally employed Roommate to rent a room in my 3bd 2ba home. Kitchen privleges and parking in the driveway. Washer and Dryer available in the garage. I am a business professional, 59 and gay man, college graduate and diverse in my social activities. I work out of my home and enjoy entertaining outside etc. You must be gainfully employed and responsible, clean,trustworthy and have prior landlord references. You must be open to a credit check and filling out a rental application. You can be gay, bi or straight. No live in boyfriends, girlfriends or Pets allowed. My home is generally quiet in the evenings, I do enjoy listening to a variety of music and watch lots of movies. I entertain at home at times. I am located near Blossom Hill Rd. and Lean Ave. in south San Jose. The rent is $550./mo plus 1/3 of the utilities. The deposit is equal to one months rent. The room will be available on August 1st. Please send me an e mail if you are interested in learning more about the room, and my home. Thanks Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Room Available for Rent - August 1st - Gay Household (san jose south) $550 {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - Seeking a Professionally employed Roommate to rent a room in my 3bd 2ba home. Kitchen privleges and parking in the driveway. Washer and Dryer available in the garage. I am a business professional, 59 and gay man, college graduate and diverse in my social activities. I work out of my home and enjoy entertaining outside etc. You must be gainfully employed and responsible, clean,trustworthy and have prior landlord references. You must be open to a credit check and filling out a rental application. You can be gay, bi or straight. No live in boyfriends, girlfriends or Pets allowed. My home is generally quiet in the evenings, I do enjoy listening to a variety of music and watch lots of movies. I entertain at home at times. I am located near Blossom Hill Rd. and Lean Ave. in south San Jose. The rent is $550./mo plus 1/3 of the utilities. The deposit is equal to one months rent. The room will be available on August 1st. Please send me an e mail if you are interested in learning more about the room, and my home. Thanks
Room Available for Rent - August 1st - Gay Household {...}
Published: July 2, 2008, 6:44 am - Indexed: July 2, 2008, 3:11 pm - Page Size: 5KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Pet Friendly Oakland/E'ville 2Bd/1Bth House w/Sun Drenched Yard! (emeryville) $1795 2bd http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/pet-friendly-oakland-e-ville-2bd-1bth-house-w-sun-2008098019.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/pet-friendly-oakland-e-ville-2bd-1bth-house-w-sun-2008098019.htm Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:13:36 GMT Jay Lean - President/CEO | Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. | 510.684.8369 986 37th Street , Oakland, CA Oakland/Emeryville PET FRIENDLY 2Bd/1Bth HOUSE with fully fenced sun drenched yard! 2BR/1BA Single Family House $1,795/month Bedrooms 2 Bathrooms 1 full, 0 partial Sq Footage Unspecified Parking 1 dedicated Pet Policy Cats, Dogs (any) Deposit $1,500 DESCRIPTION PET FRIENDLY! 2Bd/1Bth House w/Fully Fenced Sun Drenched Yard! Located a half block from Emeryville and close to Pixar, IKEA, E'ville City Hall, Trader Joe's, Home Depot, Rudy's Can't Fail Cafe, Arizmendi Bakery, New OAKWALK Project and more! Wood Floors, Washer/Dryer, Large grassy yard for pets, Offstreet Parking for 2 cars. Tons of new lofts, retail and restaurants in this thriving neighborhood! *CALL JAY 510.684.8369 FOR APPOINTMENT TO SEE ANYTIME! see additional photos below RENTAL FEATURES Hardwood floor Refrigerator Stove/Oven Washer Dryer Yard LEASE TERMS 1 Year Lease, $1,795 per month, $1,500 deposit. Pets: YES! WE LUV EM'! ADDITIONAL PHOTOS Renter contact info: Jay Lean - President/CEO Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. 510.684.8369 Equal Opportunity Housing Posted: Sep 5, 2008, 11:10pm PDT Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Pet Friendly Oakland/E'ville 2Bd/1Bth House w/Sun Drenched Yard! (emeryville) $1795 2bd {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - Jay Lean - President/CEO | Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. | 510.684.8369 986 37th Street , Oakland, CA Oakland/Emeryville PET FRIENDLY 2Bd/1Bth HOUSE with fully fenced sun drenched yard! 2BR/1BA Single Family House $1,795/month Bedrooms 2 Bathrooms 1 full, 0 partial Sq Footage Unspecified Parking 1 dedicated Pet Policy Cats, Dogs (any) Deposit $1,500 DESCRIPTION PET FRIENDLY! 2Bd/1Bth House w/Fully Fenced Sun Drenched Yard! Located a half block from Emeryville and close to Pixar, IKEA, E'ville City Hall, Trader Joe's, Home Depot, Rudy's Can't Fail Cafe, Arizmendi Bakery, New OAKWALK Project and more! Wood Floors, Washer/Dryer, Large grassy yard for pets, Offstreet Parking for 2 cars. Tons of new lofts, retail and restaurants in this thriving neighborhood! *CALL JAY 510.684.8369 FOR APPOINTMENT TO SEE ANYTIME! see additional photos below RENTAL FEATURES Hardwood floor Refrigerator Stove/Oven Washer Dryer Yard LEASE TERMS 1 Year Lease, $1,795 per month, $1,500 deposit. Pets: YES! WE LUV EM'! ADDITIONAL PHOTOS Renter contact info: Jay Lean - President/CEO Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. 510.684.8369 Equal Opportunity Housing Posted: Sep 5, 2008, 11:10pm PDT
Pet Friendly Oakland/E'ville 2Bd/1Bth House w/Sun Drenched Yard! {...}
Published: September 6, 2008, 9:13 am - Indexed: September 6, 2008, 10:01 am - Page Size: 15KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {NORTH AMERICA > RENTALS} - Pet Friendly, Furnished, Short-Term, Montclair 2Bd/1Bth House (oakland piedmont / montclair) $3495 2bd http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/pet-friendly-furnished-short-term-montclair-2bd-2008097026.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/business-and-economy/real-estate/rentals/pet-friendly-furnished-short-term-montclair-2bd-2008097026.htm Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:13:24 GMT Jay Lean - President/CEO | Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. | jay@jaylean.com | 510.684.8369 1954 Magellan Drive, (montclair) Oakland, CA PET FRIENDLY! FRUNISHED! SHORT-TERM! 2Bd/1Bth Montclair House! w/Hot Tub! Located just 1 block above the Village! 2BR/1BA Single Family House $3,495/month Bedrooms 2 Bathrooms 1 full, 0 partial Sq Footage Unspecified Parking 2 dedicated Pet Policy Cats, Dogs (any) Deposit $3,000 DESCRIPTION Pet Friendly! Level, Fenced backyard w/ Hot Tub, Oversized Garage for storage, Dog Run, Utilities Included, Cable, Wireless Internet, Local Phone, Water & PG&E, Washer/Dryer, Plasma TV's. FULLY FURNISHED/SHORT-TERM - 3 Month Min. Lease see additional photos below RENTAL FEATURES Central heat Fireplace Walk-in closet Hardwood floor Tile floor Living room Dishwasher Refrigerator Stove/Oven Stainless steel appliances Washer Dryer Laundry area - inside Yard Cable-ready High-speed internet COMMUNITY FEATURES Garage parking Laundry on-site Sauna/Spa LEASE TERMS Short-Term Furnished: $3,495 a month w/3 month min Lease. PETS OK! ADDITIONAL PHOTOS Renter contact info: Jay Lean - President/CEO Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. jay@jaylean.com 510.684.8369 Equal Opportunity Housing Posted: Sep 5, 2008, 11:06pm PDT Sfbay.Craigslist.Org Pet Friendly, Furnished, Short-Term, Montclair 2Bd/1Bth House (oakland piedmont / montclair) $3495 2bd {new window}   Sfbay.Craigslist.Org - Jay Lean - President/CEO | Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. | jay@jaylean.com | 510.684.8369 1954 Magellan Drive, (montclair) Oakland, CA PET FRIENDLY! FRUNISHED! SHORT-TERM! 2Bd/1Bth Montclair House! w/Hot Tub! Located just 1 block above the Village! 2BR/1BA Single Family House $3,495/month Bedrooms 2 Bathrooms 1 full, 0 partial Sq Footage Unspecified Parking 2 dedicated Pet Policy Cats, Dogs (any) Deposit $3,000 DESCRIPTION Pet Friendly! Level, Fenced backyard w/ Hot Tub, Oversized Garage for storage, Dog Run, Utilities Included, Cable, Wireless Internet, Local Phone, Water & PG&E, Washer/Dryer, Plasma TV's. FULLY FURNISHED/SHORT-TERM - 3 Month Min. Lease see additional photos below RENTAL FEATURES Central heat Fireplace Walk-in closet Hardwood floor Tile floor Living room Dishwasher Refrigerator Stove/Oven Stainless steel appliances Washer Dryer Laundry area - inside Yard Cable-ready High-speed internet COMMUNITY FEATURES Garage parking Laundry on-site Sauna/Spa LEASE TERMS Short-Term Furnished: $3,495 a month w/3 month min Lease. PETS OK! ADDITIONAL PHOTOS Renter contact info: Jay Lean - President/CEO Jay Lean Real Estate, Inc. jay@jaylean.com 510.684.8369 Equal Opportunity Housing Posted: Sep 5, 2008, 11:06pm PDT
Pet Friendly, Furnished, Short-Term, Montclair 2Bd/1Bth House {...}
Published: September 6, 2008, 9:13 am - Indexed: September 6, 2008, 10:01 am - Page Size: 17KB
Category: Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals

]]> Regional > North America > United States > California > Metro Areas > San Francisco Bay Area > Business and Economy > Real Estate > Rentals {ISSUES > BIAS AND BALANCE} - "Media Matters"; by Jamison Foser http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-matters-by-jamison-foser-2008096566.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-matters-by-jamison-foser-2008096566.htm Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:32:32 GMT A test for the media On MSNBC on Thursday, Time's Jay Carney offered an assessment of the McCain campaign's most recent assault on the media: "Clearly, the campaign has decided that one way to win is to attack the media. Now, that could work. It does not have a great history of working. 'Annoy the Media: Re-Elect George Bush,' 1992 -- Bush got, I think, 39 percent of the vote or 37 percent of the vote." Carney didn't explicitly say it, but he seems to be under the impression that the point of the McCain campaign's attacks on the media is to win support from voters who dislike the media. And he seems to think the Republicans only occasionally wage a war on his profession. In fact, it is a constant war, the point of which is not to merely win a few votes from people who dislike the media. The point is to make voters distrust the media, to make them believe the media are out to get conservatives and thus cause them to discount news reports that are unfavorable to conservatives, and to cow the media themselves into running fewer such reports. (It serves another purpose, too: It helps a nominee whose heiress wife shows up at the convention in an outfit estimated to cost $300,000 pretend to be a man of the people raging against the "elites." But that's a story better told elsewhere.) And it does indeed have a great history of working. No, it has a spectacularly successful history of working -- of helping conservatives win both short-term and long-term victories. Don't take my word for it: Longtime Washington Post reporter Tom Edsall, now of The Huffington Post, has explained: The conservative movement has been very effective attacking the media (broadcast and print) for its liberal biases. The refusal of the media to disclose and discuss the ideological leanings of reporters and editors, and the broader claim of objectivity, has made the press overly anxious, and inclined to lean over backwards not to offend critics from the right. In many respects, the campaign against the media has been more than a victory: it has turned the press into an unwilling, and often unknowing, ally of the right. Take one example of right-wing media bashing contributing to short-term electoral success: Under fire from the White House and conservative activists, CBS News spiked a report questioning the Bush administration's case for the Iraq war that was supposed to air shortly before the 2004 election. During that year's presidential debates, Bush told Americans, "I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations" -- a direct assault on the media from the president of the United States in the biggest forum he had. But that was only a small drop in the steady stream of media criticism that came from Bush and his allies during the 2004 election. If Jay Carney is going to point to election results to assess the success of the GOP's assault on the media, he can't simply cherry-pick the elections the Republicans lost; they've been doing this every election cycle for 40 years. But the conservatives' attacks on the media aren't simply about the next election. They recognize that each such criticism makes voters and the media more likely to believe the next -- so even if the 2004 attacks hadn't worked, they still would have been successful. And there would be nothing wrong with any of that -- if the Republicans' complaints had significant merit. But they frequently do not -- and they often don't even pretend that they do. A few weeks ago, for example, there was a frenzy of conservative whining that Barack Obama had gotten more media coverage than John McCain. Now, the amount of coverage each candidate has gotten, by itself, tells us virtually nothing. What was the content of the coverage? Was it positive? Negative? True? False? Fair? Balanced? The conservative complainers made no attempt to assess this -- they just yelled that Obama was getting more coverage. Well, O.J. Simpson got considerably more coverage than Mother Teresa in 1994 -- anyone want to argue he got more favorable coverage? Anyone want to argue that, by covering Simpson too much, the media were demonstrating that they were in the tank for him? Still, despite glaring flaws with the Republicans' criticism, the media took them seriously, and many journalists adopted the complaints as their own. The past week provides a useful case study of how the Republicans' assault on the media works. Last Friday, John McCain announced that he had chosen Sarah Palin to be his running mate. The media had a few questions -- basically, who is she, and is she ready to be president? So the McCain campaign threw a tantrum, insisting the media were being unfair. As usual, the complaints were short on details and merit -- but the media still took the complaints seriously, treating them as one of the most important topics of the past few week. Perhaps the best example of how phony the GOP's complaints were: the McCain campaign's cancellation of an appearance by McCain on Larry King Live because, they said, CNN anchor Campbell Brown had behaved improperly in interviewing campaign spokesperson Tucker Bounds the night before. They didn't really say what Brown had done wrong -- probably because all she had done was ask simple questions that Bounds couldn't answer. After Bounds said that as governor of Alaska, Palin leads the state's National Guard, Brown asked him for an example of a decision she had made in that capacity. He didn't answer. So she asked him again. That isn't inappropriate; that's exactly what she should have done -- that's journalism. And that drove the McCain campaign crazy. So, did all the complaints work? Consider this: Wednesday night, Sarah Palin falsely claimed she had told Congress she did not want funding for the "bridge to nowhere." She didn't; that was a lie. Congress had said a year before Palin became governor that Alaska need not spend the federal funds on the bridge. And Palin had initially supported the bridge, not opposed it. And once she became governor, Palin kept the money. Palin's false claims Wednesday night were not new: She had said the same thing in previous campaign appearances since McCain picked her -- and several media outlets, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times had debunked the boast. But when Palin told the lie during her convention speech -- after days of McCain complaints that the media had been too hard on Palin -- those newspapers ignored the lie. That wasn't the only false claim in Palin's speech that went un-debunked by the media. She falsely attacked Barack Obama's legislative record -- and media uncritically quoted the false claims. She lied about Obama's tax plans -- she said he "wants to raise" them, even though John McCain's own economic adviser has admitted that is false -- and, again, the media repeated her claim without debunking it. Instead, much of the media gushed over her speech. If you watched MSNBC yesterday, you would have seen reporter after reporter talk about the McCain complaints that the media were too hard on Palin. And you would have seen reporter after reporter lavish praise on Palin's speech. But you wouldn't have seen them say much about the actual content of Palin's speech -- certainly not about whether she told the truth in it. At one point, Andrea Mitchell declared that "what came through" in Palin's address was "the authenticity." Nonsense. "Authenticity" doesn't consist of doing a good job of delivering a speech -- not if the speech is riddled with falsehoods. But most of the media didn't tell you about the falsehoods, they just fell all over themselves praising the speech -- even praising the "authenticity" of someone who stood before the nation and repeated lies she had already been caught telling. So, did the McCain attacks on the media work? They certainly didn't hurt. And this isn't the first time a McCain assault on the media has appeared to pay off. He and his campaign have spent much of the year attacking the press. And it seems to have worked: McCain still hasn't faced the media scrutiny reporters kept insisting would come eventually. The media have told us a lot about Barack Obama and Tony Rezko, for example -- but kept key details about John McCain's relationship with Charles Keating a secret. Did you know that Cindy McCain was business partners with Keating around the time John McCain was meeting with regulators on Keating's behalf? Probably not: The Washington Post hasn't told readers that fact during this campaign; The New York Times has made only brief mention of it. ABC, CBS, NBC -- nothing. Or how about the fact that John and Cindy McCain would save nearly $400,000 a year under John McCain's tax plan -- a tax plan that includes the extension of Bush tax cuts McCain once bashed as unfairly skewed towards the wealthy? Have you seen any media mention to that lately? It wasn't long ago that news organizations thought John Edwards' wealth was important to keep in mind in assessing his policy proposals -- but that apparently doesn't apply to John McCain. The McCain campaign's war against the media shouldn't be surprising; this is what conservatives do. The only real question is what reporters are going to do about it. Are they going to fall for the absurd argument that John McCain -- arguably the national politician who has received the most favorable media coverage over the past decade, if not longer -- is being unfairly treated by reporters who still haven't given him any serious scrutiny? Are they going to cower in the face of right-wing bullying as they have so many times in the past? It's hard to imagine that they won't. But there have been some encouraging signs this week. Time's Carney seems legitimately irritated that the Republican vice-presidential nominee refuses to face reporters. And colleague Joe Klein -- who has, in the past, been awfully kind to McCain -- urged fellow reporters not to back down in the face of the barrage of criticism from the right: There is a tendency in the media to kick ourselves, cringe and withdraw, when we are criticized. But I hope my colleagues stand strong in this case: it is important for the public to know that Palin raised taxes as governor, supported the Bridge to Nowhere before she opposed it, pursued pork-barrel projects as mayor, tried to ban books at the local library and thinks the war in Iraq is "a task from God." The attempts by the McCain campaign to bully us into not reporting such things are not only stupidly aggressive, but unprofessional in the extreme. The next two months will constitute a test for reporters: If they fall for the idea that they're treating unfairly a candidate who has long referred to them as his "base," what won't they fall for? If they won't stand up to these attacks, what will they stand up to? Mediamatters.Org "Media Matters"; by Jamison Foser {new window}   Mediamatters.Org - A test for the media On MSNBC on Thursday, Time's Jay Carney offered an assessment of the McCain campaign's most recent assault on the media: "Clearly, the campaign has decided that one way to win is to attack the media. Now, that could work. It does not have a great history of working. 'Annoy the Media: Re-Elect George Bush,' 1992 -- Bush got, I think, 39 percent of the vote or 37 percent of the vote." Carney didn't explicitly say it, but he seems to be under the impression that the point of the McCain campaign's attacks on the media is to win support from voters who dislike the media. And he seems to think the Republicans only occasionally wage a war on his profession. In fact, it is a constant war, the point of which is not to merely win a few votes from people who dislike the media. The point is to make voters distrust the media, to make them believe the media are out to get conservatives and thus cause them to discount news reports that are unfavorable to conservatives, and to cow the media themselves into running fewer such reports. (It serves another purpose, too: It helps a nominee whose heiress wife shows up at the convention in an outfit estimated to cost $300,000 pretend to be a man of the people raging against the "elites." But that's a story better told elsewhere.) And it does indeed have a great history of working. No, it has a spectacularly successful history of working -- of helping conservatives win both short-term and long-term victories. Don't take my word for it: Longtime Washington Post reporter Tom Edsall, now of The Huffington Post, has explained: The conservative movement has been very effective attacking the media (broadcast and print) for its liberal biases. The refusal of the media to disclose and discuss the ideological leanings of reporters and editors, and the broader claim of objectivity, has made the press overly anxious, and inclined to lean over backwards not to offend critics from the right. In many respects, the campaign against the media has been more than a victory: it has turned the press into an unwilling, and often unknowing, ally of the right. Take one example of right-wing media bashing contributing to short-term electoral success: Under fire from the White House and conservative activists, CBS News spiked a report questioning the Bush administration's case for the Iraq war that was supposed to air shortly before the 2004 election. During that year's presidential debates, Bush told Americans, "I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations" -- a direct assault on the media from the president of the United States in the biggest forum he had. But that was only a small drop in the steady stream of media criticism that came from Bush and his allies during the 2004 election. If Jay Carney is going to point to election results to assess the success of the GOP's assault on the media, he can't simply cherry-pick the elections the Republicans lost; they've been doing this every election cycle for 40 years. But the conservatives' attacks on the media aren't simply about the next election. They recognize that each such criticism makes voters and the media more likely to believe the next -- so even if the 2004 attacks hadn't worked, they still would have been successful. And there would be nothing wrong with any of that -- if the Republicans' complaints had significant merit. But they frequently do not -- and they often don't even pretend that they do. A few weeks ago, for example, there was a frenzy of conservative whining that Barack Obama had gotten more media coverage than John McCain. Now, the amount of coverage each candidate has gotten, by itself, tells us virtually nothing. What was the content of the coverage? Was it positive? Negative? True? False? Fair? Balanced? The conservative complainers made no attempt to assess this -- they just yelled that Obama was getting more coverage. Well, O.J. Simpson got considerably more coverage than Mother Teresa in 1994 -- anyone want to argue he got more favorable coverage? Anyone want to argue that, by covering Simpson too much, the media were demonstrating that they were in the tank for him? Still, despite glaring flaws with the Republicans' criticism, the media took them seriously, and many journalists adopted the complaints as their own. The past week provides a useful case study of how the Republicans' assault on the media works. Last Friday, John McCain announced that he had chosen Sarah Palin to be his running mate. The media had a few questions -- basically, who is she, and is she ready to be president? So the McCain campaign threw a tantrum, insisting the media were being unfair. As usual, the complaints were short on details and merit -- but the media still took the complaints seriously, treating them as one of the most important topics of the past few week. Perhaps the best example of how phony the GOP's complaints were: the McCain campaign's cancellation of an appearance by McCain on Larry King Live because, they said, CNN anchor Campbell Brown had behaved improperly in interviewing campaign spokesperson Tucker Bounds the night before. They didn't really say what Brown had done wrong -- probably because all she had done was ask simple questions that Bounds couldn't answer. After Bounds said that as governor of Alaska, Palin leads the state's National Guard, Brown asked him for an example of a decision she had made in that capacity. He didn't answer. So she asked him again. That isn't inappropriate; that's exactly what she should have done -- that's journalism. And that drove the McCain campaign crazy. So, did all the complaints work? Consider this: Wednesday night, Sarah Palin falsely claimed she had told Congress she did not want funding for the "bridge to nowhere." She didn't; that was a lie. Congress had said a year before Palin became governor that Alaska need not spend the federal funds on the bridge. And Palin had initially supported the bridge, not opposed it. And once she became governor, Palin kept the money. Palin's false claims Wednesday night were not new: She had said the same thing in previous campaign appearances since McCain picked her -- and several media outlets, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times had debunked the boast. But when Palin told the lie during her convention speech -- after days of McCain complaints that the media had been too hard on Palin -- those newspapers ignored the lie. That wasn't the only false claim in Palin's speech that went un-debunked by the media. She falsely attacked Barack Obama's legislative record -- and media uncritically quoted the false claims. She lied about Obama's tax plans -- she said he "wants to raise" them, even though John McCain's own economic adviser has admitted that is false -- and, again, the media repeated her claim without debunking it. Instead, much of the media gushed over her speech. If you watched MSNBC yesterday, you would have seen reporter after reporter talk about the McCain complaints that the media were too hard on Palin. And you would have seen reporter after reporter lavish praise on Palin's speech. But you wouldn't have seen them say much about the actual content of Palin's speech -- certainly not about whether she told the truth in it. At one point, Andrea Mitchell declared that "what came through" in Palin's address was "the authenticity." Nonsense. "Authenticity" doesn't consist of doing a good job of delivering a speech -- not if the speech is riddled with falsehoods. But most of the media didn't tell you about the falsehoods, they just fell all over themselves praising the speech -- even praising the "authenticity" of someone who stood before the nation and repeated lies she had already been caught telling. So, did the McCain attacks on the media work? They certainly didn't hurt. And this isn't the first time a McCain assault on the media has appeared to pay off. He and his campaign have spent much of the year attacking the press. And it seems to have worked: McCain still hasn't faced the media scrutiny reporters kept insisting would come eventually. The media have told us a lot about Barack Obama and Tony Rezko, for example -- but kept key details about John McCain's relationship with Charles Keating a secret. Did you know that Cindy McCain was business partners with Keating around the time John McCain was meeting with regulators on Keating's behalf? Probably not: The Washington Post hasn't told readers that fact during this campaign; The New York Times has made only brief mention of it. ABC, CBS, NBC -- nothing. Or how about the fact that John and Cindy McCain would save nearly $400,000 a year under John McCain's tax plan -- a tax plan that includes the extension of Bush tax cuts McCain once bashed as unfairly skewed towards the wealthy? Have you seen any media mention to that lately? It wasn't long ago that news organizations thought John Edwards' wealth was important to keep in mind in assessing his policy proposals -- but that apparently doesn't apply to John McCain. The McCain campaign's war against the media shouldn't be surprising; this is what conservatives do. The only real question is what reporters are going to do about it. Are they going to fall for the absurd argument that John McCain -- arguably the national politician who has received the most favorable media coverage over the past decade, if not longer -- is being unfairly treated by reporters who still haven't given him any serious scrutiny? Are they going to cower in the face of right-wing bullying as they have so many times in the past? It's hard to imagine that they won't. But there have been some encouraging signs this week. Time's Carney seems legitimately irritated that the Republican vice-presidential nominee refuses to face reporters. And colleague Joe Klein -- who has, in the past, been awfully kind to McCain -- urged fellow reporters not to back down in the face of the barrage of criticism from the right: There is a tendency in the media to kick ourselves, cringe and withdraw, when we are criticized. But I hope my colleagues stand strong in this case: it is important for the public to know that Palin raised taxes as governor, supported the Bridge to Nowhere before she opposed it, pursued pork-barrel projects as mayor, tried to ban books at the local library and thinks the war in Iraq is "a task from God." The attempts by the McCain campaign to bully us into not reporting such things are not only stupidly aggressive, but unprofessional in the extreme. The next two months will constitute a test for reporters: If they fall for the idea that they're treating unfairly a candidate who has long referred to them as his "base," what won't they fall for? If they won't stand up to these attacks, what will they stand up to?
Media Matters - "Media Matters"; by Jamison Foser {...}
Published: September 6, 2008, 1:32 am - Indexed: September 6, 2008, 11:16 am - Page Size: 23KB
Category: Society > Issues > Business > Media > Bias and Balance

]]> Society > Issues > Business > Media > Bias and Balance {LITERATURE > CYBERPUNK} - Mythbusters host: credit-card companies DIDN'T kill segment on RFID vulnerabiliies http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/mythbusters-host-credit-card-companies-didn-t-kill-2008095428.htm http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/mythbusters-host-credit-card-companies-didn-t-kill-2008095428.htm Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:38:26 GMT Mythbusters' Adam Savage now says that credit-card companies and Texas Instruments didn't lean on him to kill a story about vulnerabilities in RFID cards: "There's been a lot of talk about this RFID thing, and I have to admit that I got some of my facts wrong, as I wasn't on that story, and as I said on the video, I wasn't actually in on the call," Savage said in the statement. "Texas Instruments' account of their call with Grant and our producer is factually correct. If I went into the detail of exactly why this story didn't get filmed, it's so bizarre and convoluted that no one would believe me, but suffice to say...the decision not to continue on with the RFID story was made by our production company, Beyond Productions, and had nothing to do with Discovery, or their ad sales department." 'MythBusters' co-host backpedals on RFID kerfuffle See also: Credit-card companies killed Mythbusters segment on RFID vulnerabilities... Boingboing.Net Mythbusters host: credit-card companies DIDN'T kill segment on RFID vulnerabiliies {new window}   Www.Boingboing.Net - Mythbusters' Adam Savage now says that credit-card companies and Texas Instruments didn't lean on him to kill a story about vulnerabilities in RFID cards: "There's been a lot of talk about this RFID thing, and I have to admit that I got some of my facts wrong, as I wasn't on that story, and as I said on the video, I wasn't actually in on the call," Savage said in the statement. "Texas Instruments' account of their call with Grant and our producer is factually correct. If I went into the detail of exactly why this story didn't get filmed, it's so bizarre and convoluted that no one would believe me, but suffice to say...the decision not to continue on with the RFID story was made by our production company, Beyond Productions, and had nothing to do with Discovery, or their ad sales department." 'MythBusters' co-host backpedals on RFID kerfuffle See also: Credit-card companies killed Mythbusters segment on RFID vulnerabilities...
Mythbusters host: credit-card companies DIDN'T kill segment on RFID vulnerabiliies - Boing Boing {...}
Published: September 5, 2008, 7:38 am - Indexed: September 6, 2008, 10:13 am - Page Size: 61KB
Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Cyberpunk

]]> Arts > Literature > Genres > Cyberpunk