<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://xml.world-of-newave.info/birth-plan.atom.xsl" media="screen"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xml:lang="en-us">
<title>Birth Plan - World-of-Newave.info</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://answers.world-of-newave.info/birth-plan.htm"/>
<author>
<name>World-of-Newave.info</name>
<url>http://www.world-of-newave.info/</url>
</author>
<modified>2008-10-07T18:13:31Z</modified>
<tagline>Latest news and articles about Birth Plan</tagline>
<copyright>Copyright (c)2004-2008.§/Newave SARL. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<entry>
<title>{HEALTH &gt; NEWS AND MEDIA} - Gallery: Retired Drugs -- Failed Blockbusters, Homicidal Tampering, Fatal Oversights</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/health/news-and-media/gallery-retired-drugs-failed-blockbusters-homicidal-2008102801.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">: Photo: Associated PressThe history of medicine is rife with missteps. Even with today's standards in biochemical sciences and well-funded clinical trials, bad drugs can get into consumers' hands. 

We smirk that the words mercury and curative were once lumped together. Or that heroin was part of a physician-sanctioned regimen. But who knows what problems our present ignorance will cause in the future.

In an effort to know the past in order to avoid repeating it, let's take a look at some drug recalls from recent history and the stories that led to the drugs' demise.

Left: Thalidomide

From the late '50s to the early '60s, a German manufacturer sold thalidomide under 40 different brand names in 50 countries. Designed to relieve morning sickness and let pregnant mothers rest, the popular drug soon turned into a nightmare.

Children all over Europe and Africa were born with catastrophic birth defects because of the drug. No one knows exactly how many cases were linked to thalidomide, but one estimate of birth defects put the number at more than 10,000 children.

The United States was spared, however, thanks to the Food and Drug Administration. Frances Oldham Kelsey received a request from a company to bring the drug to the United States, but she had reservations about its safety. Despite pressure from the company, and the fact that dozens of other countries had approved the drug, Kelsey persisted in asking for further studies. Her fears were soon confirmed when studies began linking the drug to birth defects. Kelsey was instrumental in shaping legislation regarding the FDA's oversight of pharmaceuticals. She received national recognition from John F. Kennedy for her role in averting the threat.
: Blockbuster Drugs Gone Bad: Redux

The cover story of a September 1996 issue of Time magazine asked, "The New Miracle Pill?" Doctors sure thought so, scribbling out 85,000 prescriptions a week and driving $300 million in sales that year. 

Redux was part of the popular "fen-phen" diet plan, which stands for fenfluramine and phentermine. Taken alone, Redux (which was dexfenfluramine, a derivative of fenfluramine) produced drowsiness and mood swings. But when patients accompanied Redux with phentermine, they felt better, stayed on the pill and dropped the pounds. Trouble was, the combination also led to heart valve disease. A 1997 Mayo Clinic article reported 24 patients with abnormal heart valves. Other studies followed and, by September of that year, the FDA asked the company to pull the miracle from shelves. In all, the drug was linked to 100 deaths and cost American Home Products (now Wyeth) billions in settlements.
: Blockbuster Drugs Gone Bad: Vioxx

Vioxx was one of the most-successful product launches in history. Approved by the FDA in 1999, it was the most heavily marketed drug in the world by 2000. Doctors wrote 92.8 million prescriptions in the United States alone, and the medication's worldwide sales garnered Merck $2.5 billion a year. 

A member of the COX-2 inhibitor family of drugs, along with Bextra and Celebrex, Vioxx offered potent pain relief for arthritis sufferers. But studies and lawsuits soon cast a pall over the drug's success, claiming it increased the risks of heart attack and stroke. Merck retired the drug in 2004. Subsequent reports by the FDA suggest the drug was responsible for more than 27,000 deaths. 

: Photo: Kai Pfaffenbach/ReutersDoesn't Play Nice With Others: Seldane

In 1985, Seldane became the first non-drowsy antihistamine. But a few years later, this "breakthrough" drug was traced to cases of fatal heart-rhythm irregularities.  It turned out that when combined with drugs and even some foods (like grapefruit juice), toxic levels of the drug could build up in the body. 

The FDA launched a broad effort to warn physicians and patients of these unsafe combinations, but in 1997 Allegra hit the market, offering non-drowsiness without life-threatening side effects. Seldane was soon retired, but not before making its mark on drug safety. It led the FDA to require more rigorous testing on interactions -- get this -- before drugs go to market.

At left, Juergen Ruettgers, Germany's research and technology minister, visits the chemicals and drugs company Hoecht Marion Roussel -- makers of both Seldane and Allegra -- in Frankfurt in 1998. The minister is standing in the human insulin plant.
: Image: Computer IllustrationsDoesn't Play Nice With Others: Posicor (Mibefradil)

When the heart medication Posicor was approved in 1997, its label warned users of dangerous interactions with three other drugs. Posicor itself was harmless, but had the unenviable ability to greatly increase the blood levels of other drugs. 

Unfortunately, the warning list didn't stay at three. By 1998, Posicor was known to be toxic in combination with 25 different drugs. Concern grew that doctors and patients wouldn't be able to keep up with the "don't take if you're using" directions. Since Posicor offered no real advantage over other drugs in its class, the FDA recommended it be voluntarily removed. 
: Image: Courtesy CNNPassed Despite Resistance: Rezulin

The diabetes medication Rezulin stumbled out of the gate in January 1997 already under intense scrutiny. From there, things just got more sinister. 

Dr. John Gueriguian, the medical officer appointed to assess the drug, voiced his disapproval due to high liver toxicity. Walter-Lambert, the drug's maker, didn't want to see its "potential blockbuster" get busted. They complained, and the FDA stripped Gueriguian of his post and discarded his report. 

Soon after hitting the market, though, Rezulin was linked to sudden liver failures. Other FDA scientists sounded the alarm. After downplaying risks of the drug for three years, the FDA was forced to admit it had made a mistake. In March of 2000, Rezulin was pulled, a leading suspect in 391 deaths.
: Photo: Mike Derer/APPassed Despite Resistance: Duract

Duract was another case of the FDA ignoring its own advice. Medical officers warned repeatedly of the drug's liver toxicity, but the FDA assured them that a warning label could offset those risks. 

However, patients are notorious for not following directions. Too many people were staying on the painkiller far longer than the 10 recommended days. Stronger warnings were issued, but by the time the Wyeth-Ayerst company released its voluntary reports, Duract was implicated in 68 patient deaths. The company agreed to shelve the drug less than a year after its release.
: Photo: CorbisI Wish That I Knew Then What I Know Now:
Baycol (Lipobay in Germany)

Some drugs show little toxicity in the small sample sizes of FDA studies, but when tens of thousands of patients start popping pills, different trends can emerge. This was the case with Baycol. Along with other cholesterol-lowering "statins," (like Lipitor), Baycol had been tied to rare cases of a breakdown of muscle cells, called rhabdomyolysis, which led to kidney failure. However, the FDA felt Baycol's lifesaving effect of unclogging arteries outweighed that risk and approved it in 1997.

With a small slice of market share, few problems were reported. As doctors got the drug to more patients, it became clear that Baycol was more dangerous than initially believed. Announcing that it had been linked to 100 deaths, Bayer voluntarily retired the drug in 2001. 
: I Wish That I Knew Then What I Know Now:
Zelnorm

You might remember the weird commercials with women of different ages, sizes and races standing around with writing scrawled on their bare bellies. Zelnorm used a gigantic direct-to-consumer advertising campaign. The drug worked well for women afflicted with irritable bowel syndrome and, a few years later, was even approved for men. 

The drug's company, Novartis, had a great find on its hands, until it released the results of a study March 2007 that caused the FDA to sit up in alarm. Citing the report, which found increased risk of heart attacks and stroke in Zelnorm users, the FDA asked Novartis to pull the plug on the drug -- and those weird commercials.
: Photo: CorbisP.R. Nightmares: Tylenol

While a recall usually spells the end for a drug, Tylenol's 1982 recall of its popular pain med may have saved both lives and the product. In late September 1982, seven people in the Chicago area died after taking Tylenol capsules that had been tainted with potassium cyanide:  Someone was going into drugstores and tampering with pills.

Johnson &amp; Johnson, the parent company of Tylenol's distributor, ceased production and implemented a nationwide recall of all Tylenol products. Though consumer confidence was shaken and authorities never found the killer, analysts say Tylenol's quick response reassured customers and saved the brand. Two months later, it was back on shelves in "triple-sealed" packaging to alleviate consumer fears. 

The photo compares a sample of extra-strength Tylenol (left) with a cyanide-laced capsule (right), in the Cook County Medical Examiners' office in Chicago on Oct. 2, 1982. The cyanide makes the contents grayish and lumpy instead of smooth and powdery white.
: Image: matmo1/YouTubeP.R. Nightmares: Encaprin

To be fair, Encaprin may have been doomed from the start. Tylenol was a giant in the painkiller market, and the recent release of both Advil and Nuprin made Proctor &amp; Gamble's pill a tough sell. But Encaprin's demise was sealed in 1986 when an anonymous caller told company headquarters that he had tampered with bottles at Chicago- and Detroit-area Walgreens and Kroger stores. 

Both stores pulled the product off their shelves, and P&G issued a recall. Even though the scare was eventually revealed as a hoax, Encaprin never recovered and was quietly retired. On the plus side, the scare helped lead to the current requirements for tamper-proof packaging.

  

   
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/health/news-and-media/gallery-retired-drugs-failed-blockbusters-homicidal-2008102801.htm</id>
<issued>2008-10-01T05:00:00Z</issued>
<modified>2008-10-01T05:00:00Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Wired.Com</name>
<url>http://www.wired.com/medtech/drugs/multimedia/2008/10/gallery_retired_drugs</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/health/news-and-media/gallery-retired-drugs-failed-blockbusters-homicidal-2008102801.htm"><b>Gallery: Retired Drugs -- Failed Blockbusters, Homicidal Tampering, Fatal Oversights</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/health/news-and-media/gallery-retired-drugs-failed-blockbusters-homicidal-2008102801.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Wired.Com</span> - : Photo: Associated PressThe history of medicine is rife with missteps. Even with today's standards in biochemical sciences and well-funded clinical trials, bad drugs can get into consumers' hands. 

We smirk that the words mercury and curative were once lumped together. Or that heroin was part of a physician-sanctioned regimen. But who knows what problems our present ignorance will cause in the future.

In an effort to know the past in order to avoid repeating it, let's take a look at some drug recalls from recent history and the stories that led to the drugs' demise.

Left: Thalidomide

From the late '50s to the early '60s, a German manufacturer sold thalidomide under 40 different brand names in 50 countries. Designed to relieve morning sickness and let pregnant mothers rest, the popular drug soon turned into a nightmare.

Children all over Europe and Africa were born with catastrophic birth defects because of the drug. No one knows exactly how many cases were linked to thalidomide, but one estimate of birth defects put the number at more than 10,000 children.

The United States was spared, however, thanks to the Food and Drug Administration. Frances Oldham Kelsey received a request from a company to bring the drug to the United States, but she had reservations about its safety. Despite pressure from the company, and the fact that dozens of other countries had approved the drug, Kelsey persisted in asking for further studies. Her fears were soon confirmed when studies began linking the drug to birth defects. Kelsey was instrumental in shaping legislation regarding the FDA's oversight of pharmaceuticals. She received national recognition from John F. Kennedy for her role in averting the threat.
: Blockbuster Drugs Gone Bad: Redux

The cover story of a September 1996 issue of Time magazine asked, "The New Miracle Pill?" Doctors sure thought so, scribbling out 85,000 prescriptions a week and driving $300 million in sales that year. 

Redux was part of the popular "fen-phen" diet plan, which stands for fenfluramine and phentermine. Taken alone, Redux (which was dexfenfluramine, a derivative of fenfluramine) produced drowsiness and mood swings. But when patients accompanied Redux with phentermine, they felt better, stayed on the pill and dropped the pounds. Trouble was, the combination also led to heart valve disease. A 1997 Mayo Clinic article reported 24 patients with abnormal heart valves. Other studies followed and, by September of that year, the FDA asked the company to pull the miracle from shelves. In all, the drug was linked to 100 deaths and cost American Home Products (now Wyeth) billions in settlements.
: Blockbuster Drugs Gone Bad: Vioxx

Vioxx was one of the most-successful product launches in history. Approved by the FDA in 1999, it was the most heavily marketed drug in the world by 2000. Doctors wrote 92.8 million prescriptions in the United States alone, and the medication's worldwide sales garnered Merck $2.5 billion a year. 

A member of the COX-2 inhibitor family of drugs, along with Bextra and Celebrex, Vioxx offered potent pain relief for arthritis sufferers. But studies and lawsuits soon cast a pall over the drug's success, claiming it increased the risks of heart attack and stroke. Merck retired the drug in 2004. Subsequent reports by the FDA suggest the drug was responsible for more than 27,000 deaths. 

: Photo: Kai Pfaffenbach/ReutersDoesn't Play Nice With Others: Seldane

In 1985, Seldane became the first non-drowsy antihistamine. But a few years later, this "breakthrough" drug was traced to cases of fatal heart-rhythm irregularities.  It turned out that when combined with drugs and even some foods (like grapefruit juice), toxic levels of the drug could build up in the body. 

The FDA launched a broad effort to warn physicians and patients of these unsafe combinations, but in 1997 Allegra hit the market, offering non-drowsiness without life-threatening side effects. Seldane was soon retired, but not before making its mark on drug safety. It led the FDA to require more rigorous testing on interactions -- get this -- before drugs go to market.

At left, Juergen Ruettgers, Germany's research and technology minister, visits the chemicals and drugs company Hoecht Marion Roussel -- makers of both Seldane and Allegra -- in Frankfurt in 1998. The minister is standing in the human insulin plant.
: Image: Computer IllustrationsDoesn't Play Nice With Others: Posicor (Mibefradil)

When the heart medication Posicor was approved in 1997, its label warned users of dangerous interactions with three other drugs. Posicor itself was harmless, but had the unenviable ability to greatly increase the blood levels of other drugs. 

Unfortunately, the warning list didn't stay at three. By 1998, Posicor was known to be toxic in combination with 25 different drugs. Concern grew that doctors and patients wouldn't be able to keep up with the "don't take if you're using" directions. Since Posicor offered no real advantage over other drugs in its class, the FDA recommended it be voluntarily removed. 
: Image: Courtesy CNNPassed Despite Resistance: Rezulin

The diabetes medication Rezulin stumbled out of the gate in January 1997 already under intense scrutiny. From there, things just got more sinister. 

Dr. John Gueriguian, the medical officer appointed to assess the drug, voiced his disapproval due to high liver toxicity. Walter-Lambert, the drug's maker, didn't want to see its "potential blockbuster" get busted. They complained, and the FDA stripped Gueriguian of his post and discarded his report. 

Soon after hitting the market, though, Rezulin was linked to sudden liver failures. Other FDA scientists sounded the alarm. After downplaying risks of the drug for three years, the FDA was forced to admit it had made a mistake. In March of 2000, Rezulin was pulled, a leading suspect in 391 deaths.
: Photo: Mike Derer/APPassed Despite Resistance: Duract

Duract was another case of the FDA ignoring its own advice. Medical officers warned repeatedly of the drug's liver toxicity, but the FDA assured them that a warning label could offset those risks. 

However, patients are notorious for not following directions. Too many people were staying on the painkiller far longer than the 10 recommended days. Stronger warnings were issued, but by the time the Wyeth-Ayerst company released its voluntary reports, Duract was implicated in 68 patient deaths. The company agreed to shelve the drug less than a year after its release.
: Photo: CorbisI Wish That I Knew Then What I Know Now:
Baycol (Lipobay in Germany)

Some drugs show little toxicity in the small sample sizes of FDA studies, but when tens of thousands of patients start popping pills, different trends can emerge. This was the case with Baycol. Along with other cholesterol-lowering "statins," (like Lipitor), Baycol had been tied to rare cases of a breakdown of muscle cells, called rhabdomyolysis, which led to kidney failure. However, the FDA felt Baycol's lifesaving effect of unclogging arteries outweighed that risk and approved it in 1997.

With a small slice of market share, few problems were reported. As doctors got the drug to more patients, it became clear that Baycol was more dangerous than initially believed. Announcing that it had been linked to 100 deaths, Bayer voluntarily retired the drug in 2001. 
: I Wish That I Knew Then What I Know Now:
Zelnorm

You might remember the weird commercials with women of different ages, sizes and races standing around with writing scrawled on their bare bellies. Zelnorm used a gigantic direct-to-consumer advertising campaign. The drug worked well for women afflicted with irritable bowel syndrome and, a few years later, was even approved for men. 

The drug's company, Novartis, had a great find on its hands, until it released the results of a study March 2007 that caused the FDA to sit up in alarm. Citing the report, which found increased risk of heart attacks and stroke in Zelnorm users, the FDA asked Novartis to pull the plug on the drug -- and those weird commercials.
: Photo: CorbisP.R. Nightmares: Tylenol

While a recall usually spells the end for a drug, Tylenol's 1982 recall of its popular pain med may have saved both lives and the product. In late September 1982, seven people in the Chicago area died after taking Tylenol capsules that had been tainted with potassium cyanide:  Someone was going into drugstores and tampering with pills.

Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of Tylenol's distributor, ceased production and implemented a nationwide recall of all Tylenol products. Though consumer confidence was shaken and authorities never found the killer, analysts say Tylenol's quick response reassured customers and saved the brand. Two months later, it was back on shelves in "triple-sealed" packaging to alleviate consumer fears. 

The photo compares a sample of extra-strength Tylenol (left) with a cyanide-laced capsule (right), in the Cook County Medical Examiners' office in Chicago on Oct. 2, 1982. The cyanide makes the contents grayish and lumpy instead of smooth and powdery white.
: Image: matmo1/YouTubeP.R. Nightmares: Encaprin

To be fair, Encaprin may have been doomed from the start. Tylenol was a giant in the painkiller market, and the recent release of both Advil and Nuprin made Proctor & Gamble's pill a tough sell. But Encaprin's demise was sealed in 1986 when an anonymous caller told company headquarters that he had tampered with bottles at Chicago- and Detroit-area Walgreens and Kroger stores. 

Both stores pulled the product off their shelves, and P&G issued a recall. Even though the scare was eventually revealed as a hoax, Encaprin never recovered and was quietly retired. On the plus side, the scare helped lead to the current requirements for tamper-proof packaging.

  

   
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">See the latest multimedia and applications including videos, animations, podcasts, photos, and slideshows on Wired.com {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> October 1, 2008, 5:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> October 2, 2008, 2:39 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;35KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/health/">Health</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/health/news-and-media/"><b>News and Media</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{NORTH AMERICA &gt; NEWS AND MEDIA} - Voter Database Glitches Could Disenfranchise Thousands</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/politics/news-and-media/voter-database-glitches-could-disenfranchise-20080914624.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">
Electronic voting machines have been the focus of much controversy the last few years. But another election technology has received little scrutiny yet could create numerous problems and disenfranchise thousands of voters in November, election experts say.


This year marks the first time that new, statewide, centralized voter-registration databases will be used in a federal election in a number of states.



The databases were mandated in the 2002 Help America Vote Act, which required all election districts in a state or U.S. territory to consolidate their lists into a single database electronically accessible to every election office in the state or territory.



But the databases, some created by the same companies that make electronic voting machines, aren't federally tested or certified and some have been plagued by missed deadlines, rushed production schedules, cost overruns, security problems, and design and reliability issues.



Last year, in Larimer County, Colorado, election workers got an error message when they tried to access the state's database to process absentee ballots, and had to log off for 20 minutes. In a mock election four months ago, clerks in other counties had trouble accessing the database from polling locations. Those who could connect said the system was sluggish. 



Election officials in several counties said they didn't trust the system, and planned to load the database to county computers and use printed poll books on Election Day rather than access the central database in real time.



"The voter-registration databases are an underlying part of the voting technology revolution that has taken place in this country that has been the least noticed," says Kim Alexander, president and founder of the California Voter Foundation. "We don't know how much of a problem (they've) been across the country. My guess is that there have been technical problems with statewide databases all across the country that have gone unreported."



This year, during primaries in several states, longtime voters phoned a national voter hotline complaining their party affiliation had changed from Democrat or Republican to unaffiliated, preventing some from casting ballots in states without open primaries. Others complained they weren't on the voter roll, though they'd lived and voted at the same location for years. One Maryland woman said the birth date in her voter record was several decades off her real age. Others were listed as "inactive," although they'd voted in the previous federal election. And one woman who said she voted in 2006 was told she wasn't registered and couldn't cast a ballot. Election officials told her the voter ID number she had belonged to a man.



But election experts say the real concern is how states are conducting database matches of new voters under HAVA.





The law requires each voter to have a unique identifier. Since 2004, new registration applicants have had to provide a driver's license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number to register (voters who don't have them are assigned a unique number by the state). States are required to try to authenticate the numbers with motor vehicle records and the Social Security Administration database.



But databases are prone to errors such as misspellings and transposed numbers, and applicants are prone to make mistakes or write illegibly on applications. The Social Security Administration has acknowledged that matches between its database and voter-registration records have yielded a 28.5 percent error rate.



States vary in how they treat applicants whose records don't match, and experts say rules in some states could prevent thousands of eligible voters from casting ballots or having their votes counted in November. Those who don't match in Oregon, for example, can cast a ballot, but their vote for president or any other federal race on a ballot won't be counted. There are currently about 9,500 voters in Oregon who fall into this category, but a state spokesman says matching issues will be resolved with most of them before November so they can vote in federal races. Fewer than 500 voters were affected by this during the state's primary.



"One of the big problems is that states just haven't been very transparent about how they're operating their new database," says Dan Tokaji, law professor at the Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. "So it's really hard to tell how this is going to play out. A few states have implemented overly stringent matching rules, the consequence of which could be that some citizens' votes don't get counted."



In the 2000 election, about 1.3 million registered voters said they didn't vote due to trouble with their registration, according to a U.S. Census Bureau survey, which didn't elaborate on the nature of the troubles. In an election when record numbers of new voters are expected to participate, experts say the number of voters who find they can't cast a ballot this year could be higher.



Voter registration databases are central to the democratic process in every state except North Dakota -- which doesn't require registration. Everywhere else, the registration roll is the gatekeeper determining eligibility to vote in an election. Voter lists aren't used just for elections, however. Shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, before statewide databases were mandated, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft reportedly ordered that voter registration lists be checked for links to terrorists.



Until HAVA, each county or election district in most states maintained its own voter list, which often resulted in duplicate registrations when voters moved and re-registered -- creating opportunities for fraud. States were supposed to consolidate their lists by Jan. 1, 2004, but most got an extension to 2006. Creating a statewide system that interfaces with multiple county registration databases built by different companies proved to be difficult. About a dozen states missed the 2006 deadline, and four were sued by the Justice Department. 



There have also been a number of issues involving companies that make the systems. Some states built databases in-house; others outsourced to companies like Election Systems &amp; Software (which also makes voting machines), and the Bermuda-based Accenture. Accenture was hired by several states, but lost contracts in all but one for missed deadlines and other issues. 



Colorado -- a crucial swing state -- completed its $13 million database this year after firing Accenture in 2005. A little-known Oregon company named Saber, which has created databases for 11 states, replaced it. Accenture retained its contract in Pennsylvania, though problems occurred there as well. In 2005, one state official called the $20 million system "seriously if not fatally flawed."



HAVA requires databases to have "adequate technological security" but doesn't specify details, such as encryption. And although the databases interface with every county election office, access controls haven't been developed in some states.



A 2006 audit of Florida's registration system found that the state hadn't established adequate access levels for various users and had no process for maintaining or monitoring audit logs, making records vulnerable to theft and manipulation. A June 2008 follow-up found some of the same problems. One former election office employee, for example, still had access to the database three months after leaving his job.

In 2006 in Denver, electronic poll books made by Sequoia Voting Systems crashed extensively, causing long lines that resulted in an estimated 20,000 voters leaving polls without voting.  During Georgia's primary this year problems with e-poll books made by Diebold Election Systems led to voting delays up to three hours long.


Despite various issues, Kay Stimson, spokeswoman for the National Association of Secretaries of State, says the registration databases are ready, and states are confident they'll perform well for the election. She acknowledges, however, that issues over HAVA matches are still a concern.





"Generally speaking, the uncertainty that hangs over the process, including uncertainty that results from election challenges and litigation introduced shortly before Election Day, creates a greater likelihood for problems or confusion at the polls," she said. 



HAVA leaves it to states to decide how to conduct matches. Some states require an exact match with the Social Security Administration database and only a substantial match with motor records. Others require an exact match for a voter's Social Security number, first and last name, and month and year of birth. 



Exact matching, however, could mean that a woman who recently married and changed her name would fail to match government records containing her maiden name. Voters who have double last names or unusually spelled names might also fail. Everything depends on how a state's matching algorithm is designed.



Last month Wisconsin, whose database just became operational, conducted a test of 20,000 voter names against motor vehicle records and found 20 percent with mismatches, due mainly to typos and transposed numbers. Among those who failed to match were four members of the state's Government Accountability Board (.pdf), which conducted the test. Thomas Cane, the board's chairman and a retired judge, failed because he was listed by his full name, R. Thomas Cane, in his driver's record.



A recent report from the Academies of Sciences noted that "many (if not most) of the matching procedures used by the states have been developed on the basis of intuitive reasoning without further systematic validation or mathematically rigorous analysis, do not reflect the state of the art in matching techniques, and have not been validated in the market, scientifically, or otherwise."



Herbert Lin, one of the authors of the report, told Wired.com that the method states use to develop their procedures often involves "a bunch of guys sitting around a table saying 'Let's try this' and 'Yeah that seems reasonable.'"



The federal Election Assistance Commission advises states not to leave final matching decisions to algorithms, and to have humans examine records that fail and contact voters to resolve discrepancies.



HAVA doesn't say what to do with applicants when matching issues can't be resolved. It says only that first-time voters who register by mail, rather than in person, and whose records can't be matched, must show ID at the poll.



Most states will register applicants who fail a match and let them cast a regular ballot after showing ID at the polls. But three states -- Iowa, Louisiana and South Dakota -- won't register applicants who fail. Iowa does, however, permit Election Day registration, which may allow a rejected applicant to reapply for registration at the poll and cast a regular ballot. Louisiana and South Dakota let the rejected applicants vote after showing ID at the poll but only on a provisional ballot, which may or may not be counted, depending on circumstances and state law. A survey of the 2004 general election showed that states varied in the percentage of provisional ballots that were cast and counted. Most states fell in the 30-70 percent range.



"Provisional ballots are really problem ballots; we don't want people to use them if there's a way not to," says Michael Slater, executive director of Project Vote, a voting integrity group.



Last week Florida, a battleground state, announced a new policy that voting groups say will likely disenfranchise numerous voters. A state law passed in 2005 initially prohibited applicants whose records didn't match from either being registered or voting. But after some 13,000 voters were blocked for bad matches in 2006, and more were blocked in 2007, the state was sued by several groups, forcing it to change its plan. 





Beginning Sept. 8, new registration applicants who fail a HAVA match must mail a copy or bring a hard copy of their ID to an election office before Nov. 4 to show that the ID number on their registration application is correct. Officials plan to send a letter to such voters explaining what to do. Voters who forget or never receive instructions can cast a provisional ballot on Election Day, but it will be counted only if they bring or send a copy of their ID to an election office within 48 hours. ID presented at the poll will not be accepted, which could create confusion since Florida law already requires everyone to show ID at the polls.



Election experts say the policy places an unfair burden on voters who may fail a match through no fault of their own, especially since most states get huge spikes in registration applications just before registration deadlines, increasing the likelihood that harried clerks will make data-entry errors.



"Allowing voters to return within 48 hours is worrisome because, the truth is, a lot of them won't," says Tokaji. "Maybe, if it comes down to Florida deciding the presidency, God help them, they will return. But ? the more complicated you make things, the more votes won't be counted."



Critics of the policy predict it will affect 10 to 20 percent of new registration applicants. 



"That's tens of thousands of people in a state that decided a presidential contest by a few hundred votes (in 2000)," says Slater, whose group was one of the parties that sued Florida.



Florida's voter-registration list isn't new to controversy, of course. In 2000 a contractor hired to weed out convicted felons used broad criteria to match voter names against correctional records and swept up thousands of the wrong people. The same problem occurred in 2004.



Slater cites another troubling trend emerging with the implementation of statewide databases.



Several states have begun comparing databases for duplicate records of existing voters, then purging voters they believe have moved and registered in another state. The problem, Slater says, is the methods used can yield false positives, and officials are deleting voters without contacting them to verify that they've moved, or waiting for two federal election cycles to pass, which are requirements under the National Voter Rights Acts of 1993.



In 2006, Kentucky's attorney general successfully sued his state's board of elections after officials compared their list to ones from South Carolina and Tennessee and purged about 8,000 voters who appeared to have registered in those states at a later date than their registration in Kentucky and were presumed to have moved. 



Project Vote is investigating Kansas, Louisiana and South Dakota for similar activity. Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri and Nebraska have also been comparing lists.



"That is a trend that will accelerate, but there are inadequate safeguards, and I think it's very, very dangerous," Slater says.



To address some of the issues that may arise at polls in November, voting groups are advising voters to double-check their registration status before their state's registration deadline (.pdf), to bring ID to the polls in case questions arise about their eligibility, and call 866.MYVOTE1 to report problems.

    
    
    
    
      
  
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/politics/news-and-media/voter-database-glitches-could-disenfranchise-20080914624.htm</id>
<issued>2008-09-17T02:00:00Z</issued>
<modified>2008-09-17T02:00:00Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Wired.Com</name>
<url>http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2008/09/voter_registration</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/politics/news-and-media/voter-database-glitches-could-disenfranchise-20080914624.htm"><b>Voter Database Glitches Could Disenfranchise Thousands</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/politics/news-and-media/voter-database-glitches-could-disenfranchise-20080914624.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Wired.Com</span> - 
Electronic voting machines have been the focus of much controversy the last few years. But another election technology has received little scrutiny yet could create numerous problems and disenfranchise thousands of voters in November, election experts say.


This year marks the first time that new, statewide, centralized voter-registration databases will be used in a federal election in a number of states.



The databases were mandated in the 2002 Help America Vote Act, which required all election districts in a state or U.S. territory to consolidate their lists into a single database electronically accessible to every election office in the state or territory.



But the databases, some created by the same companies that make electronic voting machines, aren't federally tested or certified and some have been plagued by missed deadlines, rushed production schedules, cost overruns, security problems, and design and reliability issues.



Last year, in Larimer County, Colorado, election workers got an error message when they tried to access the state's database to process absentee ballots, and had to log off for 20 minutes. In a mock election four months ago, clerks in other counties had trouble accessing the database from polling locations. Those who could connect said the system was sluggish. 



Election officials in several counties said they didn't trust the system, and planned to load the database to county computers and use printed poll books on Election Day rather than access the central database in real time.



"The voter-registration databases are an underlying part of the voting technology revolution that has taken place in this country that has been the least noticed," says Kim Alexander, president and founder of the California Voter Foundation. "We don't know how much of a problem (they've) been across the country. My guess is that there have been technical problems with statewide databases all across the country that have gone unreported."



This year, during primaries in several states, longtime voters phoned a national voter hotline complaining their party affiliation had changed from Democrat or Republican to unaffiliated, preventing some from casting ballots in states without open primaries. Others complained they weren't on the voter roll, though they'd lived and voted at the same location for years. One Maryland woman said the birth date in her voter record was several decades off her real age. Others were listed as "inactive," although they'd voted in the previous federal election. And one woman who said she voted in 2006 was told she wasn't registered and couldn't cast a ballot. Election officials told her the voter ID number she had belonged to a man.



But election experts say the real concern is how states are conducting database matches of new voters under HAVA.





The law requires each voter to have a unique identifier. Since 2004, new registration applicants have had to provide a driver's license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number to register (voters who don't have them are assigned a unique number by the state). States are required to try to authenticate the numbers with motor vehicle records and the Social Security Administration database.



But databases are prone to errors such as misspellings and transposed numbers, and applicants are prone to make mistakes or write illegibly on applications. The Social Security Administration has acknowledged that matches between its database and voter-registration records have yielded a 28.5 percent error rate.



States vary in how they treat applicants whose records don't match, and experts say rules in some states could prevent thousands of eligible voters from casting ballots or having their votes counted in November. Those who don't match in Oregon, for example, can cast a ballot, but their vote for president or any other federal race on a ballot won't be counted. There are currently about 9,500 voters in Oregon who fall into this category, but a state spokesman says matching issues will be resolved with most of them before November so they can vote in federal races. Fewer than 500 voters were affected by this during the state's primary.



"One of the big problems is that states just haven't been very transparent about how they're operating their new database," says Dan Tokaji, law professor at the Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. "So it's really hard to tell how this is going to play out. A few states have implemented overly stringent matching rules, the consequence of which could be that some citizens' votes don't get counted."



In the 2000 election, about 1.3 million registered voters said they didn't vote due to trouble with their registration, according to a U.S. Census Bureau survey, which didn't elaborate on the nature of the troubles. In an election when record numbers of new voters are expected to participate, experts say the number of voters who find they can't cast a ballot this year could be higher.



Voter registration databases are central to the democratic process in every state except North Dakota -- which doesn't require registration. Everywhere else, the registration roll is the gatekeeper determining eligibility to vote in an election. Voter lists aren't used just for elections, however. Shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, before statewide databases were mandated, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft reportedly ordered that voter registration lists be checked for links to terrorists.



Until HAVA, each county or election district in most states maintained its own voter list, which often resulted in duplicate registrations when voters moved and re-registered -- creating opportunities for fraud. States were supposed to consolidate their lists by Jan. 1, 2004, but most got an extension to 2006. Creating a statewide system that interfaces with multiple county registration databases built by different companies proved to be difficult. About a dozen states missed the 2006 deadline, and four were sued by the Justice Department. 



There have also been a number of issues involving companies that make the systems. Some states built databases in-house; others outsourced to companies like Election Systems & Software (which also makes voting machines), and the Bermuda-based Accenture. Accenture was hired by several states, but lost contracts in all but one for missed deadlines and other issues. 



Colorado -- a crucial swing state -- completed its $13 million database this year after firing Accenture in 2005. A little-known Oregon company named Saber, which has created databases for 11 states, replaced it. Accenture retained its contract in Pennsylvania, though problems occurred there as well. In 2005, one state official called the $20 million system "seriously if not fatally flawed."



HAVA requires databases to have "adequate technological security" but doesn't specify details, such as encryption. And although the databases interface with every county election office, access controls haven't been developed in some states.



A 2006 audit of Florida's registration system found that the state hadn't established adequate access levels for various users and had no process for maintaining or monitoring audit logs, making records vulnerable to theft and manipulation. A June 2008 follow-up found some of the same problems. One former election office employee, for example, still had access to the database three months after leaving his job.

In 2006 in Denver, electronic poll books made by Sequoia Voting Systems crashed extensively, causing long lines that resulted in an estimated 20,000 voters leaving polls without voting.  During Georgia's primary this year problems with e-poll books made by Diebold Election Systems led to voting delays up to three hours long.


Despite various issues, Kay Stimson, spokeswoman for the National Association of Secretaries of State, says the registration databases are ready, and states are confident they'll perform well for the election. She acknowledges, however, that issues over HAVA matches are still a concern.





"Generally speaking, the uncertainty that hangs over the process, including uncertainty that results from election challenges and litigation introduced shortly before Election Day, creates a greater likelihood for problems or confusion at the polls," she said. 



HAVA leaves it to states to decide how to conduct matches. Some states require an exact match with the Social Security Administration database and only a substantial match with motor records. Others require an exact match for a voter's Social Security number, first and last name, and month and year of birth. 



Exact matching, however, could mean that a woman who recently married and changed her name would fail to match government records containing her maiden name. Voters who have double last names or unusually spelled names might also fail. Everything depends on how a state's matching algorithm is designed.



Last month Wisconsin, whose database just became operational, conducted a test of 20,000 voter names against motor vehicle records and found 20 percent with mismatches, due mainly to typos and transposed numbers. Among those who failed to match were four members of the state's Government Accountability Board (.pdf), which conducted the test. Thomas Cane, the board's chairman and a retired judge, failed because he was listed by his full name, R. Thomas Cane, in his driver's record.



A recent report from the Academies of Sciences noted that "many (if not most) of the matching procedures used by the states have been developed on the basis of intuitive reasoning without further systematic validation or mathematically rigorous analysis, do not reflect the state of the art in matching techniques, and have not been validated in the market, scientifically, or otherwise."



Herbert Lin, one of the authors of the report, told Wired.com that the method states use to develop their procedures often involves "a bunch of guys sitting around a table saying 'Let's try this' and 'Yeah that seems reasonable.'"



The federal Election Assistance Commission advises states not to leave final matching decisions to algorithms, and to have humans examine records that fail and contact voters to resolve discrepancies.



HAVA doesn't say what to do with applicants when matching issues can't be resolved. It says only that first-time voters who register by mail, rather than in person, and whose records can't be matched, must show ID at the poll.



Most states will register applicants who fail a match and let them cast a regular ballot after showing ID at the polls. But three states -- Iowa, Louisiana and South Dakota -- won't register applicants who fail. Iowa does, however, permit Election Day registration, which may allow a rejected applicant to reapply for registration at the poll and cast a regular ballot. Louisiana and South Dakota let the rejected applicants vote after showing ID at the poll but only on a provisional ballot, which may or may not be counted, depending on circumstances and state law. A survey of the 2004 general election showed that states varied in the percentage of provisional ballots that were cast and counted. Most states fell in the 30-70 percent range.



"Provisional ballots are really problem ballots; we don't want people to use them if there's a way not to," says Michael Slater, executive director of Project Vote, a voting integrity group.



Last week Florida, a battleground state, announced a new policy that voting groups say will likely disenfranchise numerous voters. A state law passed in 2005 initially prohibited applicants whose records didn't match from either being registered or voting. But after some 13,000 voters were blocked for bad matches in 2006, and more were blocked in 2007, the state was sued by several groups, forcing it to change its plan. 





Beginning Sept. 8, new registration applicants who fail a HAVA match must mail a copy or bring a hard copy of their ID to an election office before Nov. 4 to show that the ID number on their registration application is correct. Officials plan to send a letter to such voters explaining what to do. Voters who forget or never receive instructions can cast a provisional ballot on Election Day, but it will be counted only if they bring or send a copy of their ID to an election office within 48 hours. ID presented at the poll will not be accepted, which could create confusion since Florida law already requires everyone to show ID at the polls.



Election experts say the policy places an unfair burden on voters who may fail a match through no fault of their own, especially since most states get huge spikes in registration applications just before registration deadlines, increasing the likelihood that harried clerks will make data-entry errors.



"Allowing voters to return within 48 hours is worrisome because, the truth is, a lot of them won't," says Tokaji. "Maybe, if it comes down to Florida deciding the presidency, God help them, they will return. But ? the more complicated you make things, the more votes won't be counted."



Critics of the policy predict it will affect 10 to 20 percent of new registration applicants. 



"That's tens of thousands of people in a state that decided a presidential contest by a few hundred votes (in 2000)," says Slater, whose group was one of the parties that sued Florida.



Florida's voter-registration list isn't new to controversy, of course. In 2000 a contractor hired to weed out convicted felons used broad criteria to match voter names against correctional records and swept up thousands of the wrong people. The same problem occurred in 2004.



Slater cites another troubling trend emerging with the implementation of statewide databases.



Several states have begun comparing databases for duplicate records of existing voters, then purging voters they believe have moved and registered in another state. The problem, Slater says, is the methods used can yield false positives, and officials are deleting voters without contacting them to verify that they've moved, or waiting for two federal election cycles to pass, which are requirements under the National Voter Rights Acts of 1993.



In 2006, Kentucky's attorney general successfully sued his state's board of elections after officials compared their list to ones from South Carolina and Tennessee and purged about 8,000 voters who appeared to have registered in those states at a later date than their registration in Kentucky and were presumed to have moved. 



Project Vote is investigating Kansas, Louisiana and South Dakota for similar activity. Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri and Nebraska have also been comparing lists.



"That is a trend that will accelerate, but there are inadequate safeguards, and I think it's very, very dangerous," Slater says.



To address some of the issues that may arise at polls in November, voting groups are advising voters to double-check their registration status before their state's registration deadline (.pdf), to bring ID to the polls in case questions arise about their eligibility, and call 866.MYVOTE1 to report problems.

    
    
    
    
      
  
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Around the country bugs are surfacing in the new, centralized voter registration databases used to determine a citizen's eligibility to vote.  In some cases, problems in making matches could mean votes in the presidential race will be silently discarded. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> September 17, 2008, 2:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> September 18, 2008, 12:49 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;48KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/">Regional</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/">North America</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/">United States</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/">Society and Culture</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/politics/">Politics</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/society-and-culture/politics/news-and-media/"><b>News and Media</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Media denounce Corsi's anti-Obama book</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">While the recent anti-Obama book by Jerome Corsi, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold
Editions), will debut atop the New York
Times bestseller list, many in the media are challenging the book,
noting its numerous falsehoods as well as its author's track record,
which includes a slew of bigoted posts on the
conservative website Free
Republic and co-authorship of a discredited book
attacking Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign. The
media's reaction to The Obama Nation stands
in stark contrast to coverage of that 2004 book, Unfit for Command. As Media Matters for America
has noted, the media were sharply criticized
for taking too long to challenge Unfit's
numerous smears and falsehoods.

In an August 15 article in Editor &amp; Publisher, Greg Mitchell noted the contrast in the
media's reaction to the two books:


Four
years ago this month, with E&P's Joe Strupp, I explored in a number
of articles the belated or conflicted media response to the
"swiftboating" of Sen. John Kerry, then the Democratic nominee for
president. The mainstream press gave the charges-- carried in ads, in books and
articles, and in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a
respectful airing mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting
to shoot them down as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false. This delay, along
with Kerry's own reluctance to face the matter squarely, quite possibly
cost the Democrat the White House. 

Now,
this month, a bestselling anti-Obama book -- by a co-author of the most
prominent "swiftboat" anti-Kerry book in 2004 -- has predictably
been published (by Mary Matalin's imprint) and has gained immediate and wide
attention in the mainstream. But this time, in many cases, the media response
has been a "swift" kick to its credibility.


Below are numerous examples of the
media responding with "a 'swift' kick" to The Obama Nation's credibility:

From an August 15 Washington Post column by Eugene
Robinson:


The
"author," and I use the term loosely, whose vicious lies damaged John
Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign has crawled back out from under his rock to spew
vicious lies about Barack Obama. Right-wing radio talk-show hosts are dutifully
transmitting this concocted venom. This presidential campaign has officially
gotten ugly. 



The
"author" I'm talking about is a man named Jerome Corsi. In a book
published last year, "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico
and Canada," Corsi claimed that George W. Bush was at the heart of a
secret conspiracy to subsume the United States into a post-national,
one-worldish North American Union. Corsi's writings on far-right blogs have
been even more paranoid and delusional. He has written that pedophilia, for
which he used a more graphic term, "is OK with the Pope as long as it
isn't reported by the liberal press." He has referred to Muslims as
"ragheads."

Corsi
would be known as just another visitor from the outer fringe if he had not been
the co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book that slimed Kerry's
exemplary record as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam. The allegations in that
book were discredited, but not before they had been amplified by the right-wing
echo chamber to the point where they raised questions in some voters' minds --
perhaps enough to swing the election.


From an August 13 Politico article by Kenneth P.
Vogel:


The
folks behind "The Obama Nation," the wildly successful but
factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched
work. 

But its
author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called
into question his credibility.

Jerome
Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite
resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments
through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian
and Muslims worship Satan.


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:



RACHEL
MADDOW (guest host): You may remember Corsi for his
sober allegations that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian, that John Kerry is both a
Jew and a Communist, and his allegations that Muslims actually worship Satan.
You may remember Jerome Corsi for his recent book
attacking the liberal myth that oil is a finite resource, since he, Jerome Corsi, has learned how to make new oil. You may remember Corsi for his scholarly rebuke of George W. Bush's
secret plan to merge the United States
into Mexico.

OK,
honestly, you probably don't remember Jerome Corsi
at all, because why would you pay attention to someone with a record like that?
But Corsi's new anti-Obama book will be number one on
that bestseller list for at least two weeks running, despite fact checking by
news organizations, including The New York
Times, showing it to be rife with errors and inaccuracies.

And the
Obama camp is now firing back, issuing a 40-page rebuttal
titled "Unfit for Publication," soon appearing at Obama's Fight
the Smears website. The campaign promising to forcefully respond with all means
at their disposal. Nonetheless, the book is selling well, due, essentially, to
hundreds of right wing talk show interviews, and large volume bulk sales to
right-wing organizations, a tactic to be discussed now with my next guest.


From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the August 5 edition of MSNBC Live:


BREWER:
You say it's a comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers
that are going through this book page by page and picking apart what they see
as factual errors. Let me give you an example. You say in this book,
"Interestingly, Obama did not dedicate Dreams from My Father to his
mother or to his father, Barack Sr., or to his Indonesian stepfather," and
Media Matters,
the online organization, says in his book, he actually says on a -- on the last
page of the introduction, "It is to my family, though, my mother, my
grandparents, my siblings, stretched across oceans and continents that I owe
the deepest gratitude and to whom I dedicated this book." So if they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility? 

CORSI:
Let's discuss that one. If you'll read carefully what Media Matters said, they point
out there is no dedication page even in the second edition. 

BREWER:
But it says right in the introduction that it's dedicated to his family.

CORSI:
In the introduction that he wrote after, this was going with the second book. And
the original book had no dedication page and this is not the typical way that
you dedicate a book. So I'm making the distinction there is no dedication page
in the book at all, never has been.

BREWER:
Media Matters
has some eight, nine, 10 pages of factual errors. 

CORSI:
And I'd be happy to go through each one of them with you. 

BREWER:
And we're not going to do that. But I'm saying, if they are finding one, then
why do you get credibility for the book? 

CORSI:
Well, I've already objected to the one they found. I think Media Matters
is wrong, and I would argue with every one of them. 


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams:


DAN ABRAMS
(host): Yeah. I mean, look, you know, and again, among the accusations, Brad,
debunked from this book -- drug use in the U.S. Senate, that he didn't
dedicate his book to his family, he wanted to decrease the size of the
military. I mean, the list goes on of the things that were debunked from this
book.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Larry King Live:


LARRY
KING (host): Jerome, you write in your book that Senator Obama has, quote, "yet to answer whether he stopped using marijuana
and cocaine completely in college or whether his drug usage extended to his law
school days or beyond."

CORSI: Yes.

KING:
But Obama wrote in his memoir Dreams from My Father -- which you repeatedly cite in your
book -- that when he moved to New
  York in the early '80s, quote, "I stopped
getting high. I ran three miles a day and I fasted on Sunday." So
are you saying he's lying?

CORSI: What I'm saying in the
book is that people who admit that they've used drugs -- and Obama -- Obama said he used drugs through Occidental. And it was a lot
of drugs. He said it was -- it had become virtually habitual with marijuana and
cocaine. My argument is that the self-reporting of people who use drugs
as to when they quit is not reliable. That's the argument I was
making.


From an August 15 post to Commentary magazine's Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, titled "The Obama Smears":


As for the
book: it seems to be riddled with factual errors-some relatively minor
(like asserting that Obama does not mention the birth of his half-sister, Maya
Soetoro-Ng, in Dreams
from My Father; Obama does mention her), and some
significant (suggesting that Obama favors withdrawing troops from Afghanistan;
he wants to do the opposite). But more problematic, I think, is Corsi's
claim that Obama has "extensive connections to Islam" and his
suggestion that Obama is a recent drug user. Those claims are, from everything
I can tell, unsubstantiated. (When challenged to produce the evidence, Corsi
counters with the "prove you're not beating your wife"
defense.)

For
example, Obama, who in his book admitted using drugs in his youth, says he
hasn't used any since he was 20 years old. Corsi, in an interview, said
Obama's words can't be trusted because "self-reporting, by
people who have used drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently
unreliable." And Corsi's effort to tie Obama to the Muslim
faith-claims based on questionable sources, reaching back to
Obama's youth in Indonesia-is especially troubling, since the
subtext here is attaching Obama to militant Islam and suggesting that
he's somehow alien to America and its values (when in fact his candidacy
is a confirmation of the viability of those values).

Corsi's
approach to politics is both destructive and self-destructive. If Senator Obama
loses, he should lose on the merits: his record in public life and his
political philosophy. And while it's legitimate to take into account
Obama's past associations with people like the Reverend Jeremiah
Wright-especially for someone like Obama, about whom relatively little is
known-it wrong and reckless to throw out unsubstantiated charges and
smears against Senator Obama.

Conservatism
has been an intellectual home to people like Burke and Buckley. The GOP is the
party that gave us Lincoln and Reagan. It seems to me that its leaders ought to
make it clear that they find what Dr. Corsi is doing to be both wrong and
repellent. To have their movement and their party associated with such a figure
would be a terrible thing and it will only help the cause of those who hold
both the GOP and the conservative movement in contempt.


From an August 12 Los Angeles Times article by Kate
Linthicum:


Right-wing
author Jerome Corsi hit it big in 2004 with a book attacking John F. Kerry.

"Unfit
for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" soared to
No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Now
Corsi has done it again -- taking aim at a different Democratic presidential
candidate.

Corsi's
latest, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," will top the Aug. 17 New York Times hard-cover nonfiction
bestseller list.

The
book lashes out at Barack Obama and alleges, among other things, that the
politician has a secret radical Islamic agenda.

But
being No. 1 doesn't necessarily mean being accurate. Obama is a
Christian.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Election Center:


CAMPBELL
BROWN (host): There's a new book out about Barack Obama. It's
number one right now on The New York Times
bestseller list. I can guarantee you, though, nobody in the Obama camp is happy
at all -- at all happy about that. And here's why.

It is
called Obama Nation:
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality. The author, Jerome Corsi, also co-wrote the book Unfit
for Command, which started the Swift Boating of John Kerry. Obama Nation is riddled with pretty much
every unsubstantiated rumor you ever heard about Obama. Jessica Yellin
found out for us that it's also turning into a major campaign headache. And, Jessica,
I know -- we know that some of the most damaging charges in this book just
aren't true. The author admits he's on a mission to take down Barack Obama. He's been slammed for books that he's written before. They're
also discredited. But it's still getting an awful lot of
traction.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Anderson Cooper 360:


JESSICA
YELLIN (CNN Capitol Hill correspondent): To prove his point, Corsi says the book is meticulously researched
and fact-checked. But when we checked his facts, we found he's wrong on
many points. Here are a few. The book claims Obama didn't
dedicate his first book, Dreams from My
Father, to his family members. He did. He dedicated it to his
mother, his grandmother, and his siblings. Corsi cites a report saying
Obama was in church when Reverend Jeremiah Wright made
comments about race on July 22. But Obama was out of state, a full time zone
away. And Corsi
writes Obama has yet to answer questions about whether he
ever stopped using drugs. But in his first book, Obama said he stopped getting
high during college.


From an August 12 New York Times article by Jim
Rutenberg and Julie Bosman:


In the
summer of 2004 the conservative gadfly Jerome R. Corsi shot to the top of the
best-seller lists as co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book
attacking Senator John Kerry's record on a Vietnam War Swift boat that
began the larger damaging campaign against Mr. Kerry's war credentials as
he sought the presidency.

Almost exactly four
years after that campaign began, Mr. Corsi has released a new attack book
painting Senator Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumed presidential
nominee, as a stealth radical liberal who has tried to cover up
"extensive connections to Islam" -- Mr. Obama is Christian -- and questioning
whether his admitted experimentation with drugs in high school and college ever
ceased.

Significant parts of the
book, whose subtitle is "Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," have already been challenged as misleading or false in the
days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance
on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday --
at No. 1.

[...]

Several of the book's accusations, in fact, are unsubstantiated, misleading or inaccurate.


From the August 14 edition of Fox
News' Hannity &amp; Colmes:


ALAN COLMES (co-host): The substance of the book --

[crosstalk]

COLMES: -- we have already seen in the book. He was wrong about a
sermon that Barack Obama attended. He got the date wrong. He was wrong about
the dedication in the book. He was wrong about Obama saying that he stopped
using drugs. He was not truthful about that. He was wrong about a number of
things in the book --

HUGH HEWITT (syndicated radio host): Actually, stop there, Alan.
That's not true --

COLMES: -- there have been a number of things in the book that have
been discredited.


From an August 14 Washington Post article by Eli
Saslow:


Corsi's
"The Obama Nation" lacks major revelations and has been dismissed by
Obama's campaign as a series of lies from a serial liar. Parts of the book have
also been disproved by the mainstream media. In 2004, Corsi co-wrote
"Unfit for Command," in which Swift boat veterans criticized Sen. John
F. Kerry's Vietnam War record. That book was also widely
disproved.


From an August 15 Washington Post editorial:


Unfortunately
but unsurprisingly, given his earlier hit job on the last Democratic nominee,
Mr. Corsi's latest is rife with inaccuracies and innuendo. If the fundamental
smear of "Unfit for Command" was that John F. Kerry was no war hero,
the insinuation of Mr. Corsi's latest is that Mr. Obama is a closet Muslim and
militant, black activist drug-user.

[...]

He gets
facts wrong, from the date of Mr. Obama's marriage to whether he dedicated his autobiography
to his family (he did) to whether he revealed that he took his future wife on
his second trip to Kenya (he did.) He makes offensive statements: "The
sexual attraction of his mother to her African husband jumps out from the
page." 

When
facts are lacking, Mr. Corsi makes his point by suggestive questions. Noting
that Life magazine could find no record of an article that Mr. Obama remembered
reading as a child about a black man who tried to lighten his skin, Mr. Corsi
asks, "How much more imagining, hypothetical lying, or just plain lying is
Obama capable of doing?" When facts are present, he twists them to make
Mr. Obama bad.


From an August 14 Associated Press article by Nedra
Pickler:


Jerome
Corsi's anti-Obama book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult
of Personality," claims the Illinois
senator is a dangerous, radical candidate for president. The book is a
compilation of all the innuendo and false rumors against Obama -- that he was
raised a Muslim, attended a radical, black church and secretly has a
"black rage" hidden beneath the surface.

In
fact, Obama is a Christian who attended Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

[...]

Corsi
suggests, without a shred of proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama
has acknowledged using marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit
when he went to college and hasn't used drugs since.

Corsi
makes an issue of the fact that, before he quit smoking cigarettes, Obama
didn't want it widely known that he smoked. "If Obama takes pains to hide
his smoking from us, what else does he take pains to hide?" Corsi asks in
the book.

Corsi
also dwells on Obama's mother marrying Obama's African father and later
marrying someone from Indonesia
-- whom Corsi describes as "a second man of color to be her mate."
The Obama campaign says the description is one of many examples of Corsi's
"offensive language" in the book.

He
claims Obama received extensive Islamic religious education as a boy in Indonesia,
education that was only offered to the truly faithful. Actually, Obama is a
Christian and as a boy he attended both Catholic school and Indonesian public
schools where some basic study of the Koran was offered.

He
accuses Obama of wanting to weaken the military even though Obama's campaign
calls for adding 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.


From an August 13 post by Joe Klein on Time magazine's Swampland
blog:


I heard
about Jerome Corsi's book a few weeks ago from my mother, who said that her
great fear--that Barack Obama has covert Islamic associations--had been
confirmed by a new book. I told her not to worry, that many reputable people
had looked into the matter and Obama was more likely to be spotted in Whole
Foods than praying in a mosque. (Since my mother has never been to Whole Foods,
so she didn't quite get my wry allusion.) "I hope so," she said,
dubiously. 

So we
know the market for trash is there, and not so far from home. And we know, that
Mary Matalin, who appears regularly on mainstream media programs like Meet the Press
called the Corsi book in the New York Times today:

"a
piece of scholarship, and a good one at that."

But
hey, Mary stands to make big bucks off this scholarship, which I'm sure was
submitted for peer review and otherwise held to the highest editorial
standards--and I'm sure her reputation and mediagenicity won't be damaged by
this poisonous crap, and we're all friends here, aren't we? And, yknow, they
say politics ain't beanbag...and it's all in the game to tell innocent, well-intentioned
people that Barack Obama is a secret Muslim or that John Kerry wasn't really a
hero in Vietnam.
Or, as George W. Bush, once told a rightly outraged John McCain--whose wife and
daughter Bush's minions had smeared--"It's just politics."


An August 13 post on Jonathan
Martin's blog at Politico.com:


The
power of Fox News and talk radio: Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation "is to
make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction
hardcovers this Sunday -- at No. 1.," according to a front-page story by Jim Rutenberg
and Julie Bosman in the Times today that will only help sell more books.

As
Rutenberg and Bosman note, the book has its share of errors. 

But
Corsi delved into the drug-and-Muslim fever swamps, which, regardless of
accuracy, is what many on the right want to believe about Obama.

The
best part of the piece, though, is this: "He said he was planning to
aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr.
Obama this fall, though he would not name them."

A
third-party anti-Obama effort still may form, but methinks there is a reason
here why Corsi "would not name them."

    
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm</id>
<issued>2008-08-16T03:00:37Z</issued>
<modified>2008-08-16T03:00:37Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Mediamatters.Org</name>
<url>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150015</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm"><b>Media denounce Corsi's anti-Obama book</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/media-denounce-corsi-s-anti-obama-book-20080853313.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Mediamatters.Org</span> - While the recent anti-Obama book by Jerome Corsi, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality (Threshold
Editions), will debut atop the New York
Times bestseller list, many in the media are challenging the book,
noting its numerous falsehoods as well as its author's track record,
which includes a slew of bigoted posts on the
conservative website Free
Republic and co-authorship of a discredited book
attacking Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign. The
media's reaction to The Obama Nation stands
in stark contrast to coverage of that 2004 book, Unfit for Command. As Media Matters for America
has noted, the media were sharply criticized
for taking too long to challenge Unfit's
numerous smears and falsehoods.

In an August 15 article in Editor & Publisher, Greg Mitchell noted the contrast in the
media's reaction to the two books:


Four
years ago this month, with E&P's Joe Strupp, I explored in a number
of articles the belated or conflicted media response to the
"swiftboating" of Sen. John Kerry, then the Democratic nominee for
president. The mainstream press gave the charges-- carried in ads, in books and
articles, and in major TV appearances -- a free ride for a spell, then a
respectful airing mixed with critique, before in many cases finally attempting
to shoot them down as overwhelmingly exaggerated or false. This delay, along
with Kerry's own reluctance to face the matter squarely, quite possibly
cost the Democrat the White House. 

Now,
this month, a bestselling anti-Obama book -- by a co-author of the most
prominent "swiftboat" anti-Kerry book in 2004 -- has predictably
been published (by Mary Matalin's imprint) and has gained immediate and wide
attention in the mainstream. But this time, in many cases, the media response
has been a "swift" kick to its credibility.


Below are numerous examples of the
media responding with "a 'swift' kick" to The Obama Nation's credibility:

From an August 15 Washington Post column by Eugene
Robinson:


The
"author," and I use the term loosely, whose vicious lies damaged John
Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign has crawled back out from under his rock to spew
vicious lies about Barack Obama. Right-wing radio talk-show hosts are dutifully
transmitting this concocted venom. This presidential campaign has officially
gotten ugly. 



The
"author" I'm talking about is a man named Jerome Corsi. In a book
published last year, "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico
and Canada," Corsi claimed that George W. Bush was at the heart of a
secret conspiracy to subsume the United States into a post-national,
one-worldish North American Union. Corsi's writings on far-right blogs have
been even more paranoid and delusional. He has written that pedophilia, for
which he used a more graphic term, "is OK with the Pope as long as it
isn't reported by the liberal press." He has referred to Muslims as
"ragheads."

Corsi
would be known as just another visitor from the outer fringe if he had not been
the co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book that slimed Kerry's
exemplary record as a Swift boat commander in Vietnam. The allegations in that
book were discredited, but not before they had been amplified by the right-wing
echo chamber to the point where they raised questions in some voters' minds --
perhaps enough to swing the election.


From an August 13 Politico article by Kenneth P.
Vogel:


The
folks behind "The Obama Nation," the wildly successful but
factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched
work. 

But its
author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called
into question his credibility.

Jerome
Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite
resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments
through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian
and Muslims worship Satan.


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:



RACHEL
MADDOW (guest host): You may remember Corsi for his
sober allegations that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian, that John Kerry is both a
Jew and a Communist, and his allegations that Muslims actually worship Satan.
You may remember Jerome Corsi for his recent book
attacking the liberal myth that oil is a finite resource, since he, Jerome Corsi, has learned how to make new oil. You may remember Corsi for his scholarly rebuke of George W. Bush's
secret plan to merge the United States
into Mexico.

OK,
honestly, you probably don't remember Jerome Corsi
at all, because why would you pay attention to someone with a record like that?
But Corsi's new anti-Obama book will be number one on
that bestseller list for at least two weeks running, despite fact checking by
news organizations, including The New York
Times, showing it to be rife with errors and inaccuracies.

And the
Obama camp is now firing back, issuing a 40-page rebuttal
titled "Unfit for Publication," soon appearing at Obama's Fight
the Smears website. The campaign promising to forcefully respond with all means
at their disposal. Nonetheless, the book is selling well, due, essentially, to
hundreds of right wing talk show interviews, and large volume bulk sales to
right-wing organizations, a tactic to be discussed now with my next guest.


From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the August 5 edition of MSNBC Live:


BREWER:
You say it's a comprehensive look, and yet there are already online bloggers
that are going through this book page by page and picking apart what they see
as factual errors. Let me give you an example. You say in this book,
"Interestingly, Obama did not dedicate Dreams from My Father to his
mother or to his father, Barack Sr., or to his Indonesian stepfather," and
Media Matters,
the online organization, says in his book, he actually says on a -- on the last
page of the introduction, "It is to my family, though, my mother, my
grandparents, my siblings, stretched across oceans and continents that I owe
the deepest gratitude and to whom I dedicated this book." So if they're
going through, and they're finding all of these factual errors in your book,
why should we give you the credibility? 

CORSI:
Let's discuss that one. If you'll read carefully what Media Matters said, they point
out there is no dedication page even in the second edition. 

BREWER:
But it says right in the introduction that it's dedicated to his family.

CORSI:
In the introduction that he wrote after, this was going with the second book. And
the original book had no dedication page and this is not the typical way that
you dedicate a book. So I'm making the distinction there is no dedication page
in the book at all, never has been.

BREWER:
Media Matters
has some eight, nine, 10 pages of factual errors. 

CORSI:
And I'd be happy to go through each one of them with you. 

BREWER:
And we're not going to do that. But I'm saying, if they are finding one, then
why do you get credibility for the book? 

CORSI:
Well, I've already objected to the one they found. I think Media Matters
is wrong, and I would argue with every one of them. 


From the August 13 edition of
MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams:


DAN ABRAMS
(host): Yeah. I mean, look, you know, and again, among the accusations, Brad,
debunked from this book -- drug use in the U.S. Senate, that he didn't
dedicate his book to his family, he wanted to decrease the size of the
military. I mean, the list goes on of the things that were debunked from this
book.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Larry King Live:


LARRY
KING (host): Jerome, you write in your book that Senator Obama has, quote, "yet to answer whether he stopped using marijuana
and cocaine completely in college or whether his drug usage extended to his law
school days or beyond."

CORSI: Yes.

KING:
But Obama wrote in his memoir Dreams from My Father -- which you repeatedly cite in your
book -- that when he moved to New
  York in the early '80s, quote, "I stopped
getting high. I ran three miles a day and I fasted on Sunday." So
are you saying he's lying?

CORSI: What I'm saying in the
book is that people who admit that they've used drugs -- and Obama -- Obama said he used drugs through Occidental. And it was a lot
of drugs. He said it was -- it had become virtually habitual with marijuana and
cocaine. My argument is that the self-reporting of people who use drugs
as to when they quit is not reliable. That's the argument I was
making.


From an August 15 post to Commentary magazine's Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, titled "The Obama Smears":


As for the
book: it seems to be riddled with factual errors-some relatively minor
(like asserting that Obama does not mention the birth of his half-sister, Maya
Soetoro-Ng, in Dreams
from My Father; Obama does mention her), and some
significant (suggesting that Obama favors withdrawing troops from Afghanistan;
he wants to do the opposite). But more problematic, I think, is Corsi's
claim that Obama has "extensive connections to Islam" and his
suggestion that Obama is a recent drug user. Those claims are, from everything
I can tell, unsubstantiated. (When challenged to produce the evidence, Corsi
counters with the "prove you're not beating your wife"
defense.)

For
example, Obama, who in his book admitted using drugs in his youth, says he
hasn't used any since he was 20 years old. Corsi, in an interview, said
Obama's words can't be trusted because "self-reporting, by
people who have used drugs, as to when they stopped is inherently
unreliable." And Corsi's effort to tie Obama to the Muslim
faith-claims based on questionable sources, reaching back to
Obama's youth in Indonesia-is especially troubling, since the
subtext here is attaching Obama to militant Islam and suggesting that
he's somehow alien to America and its values (when in fact his candidacy
is a confirmation of the viability of those values).

Corsi's
approach to politics is both destructive and self-destructive. If Senator Obama
loses, he should lose on the merits: his record in public life and his
political philosophy. And while it's legitimate to take into account
Obama's past associations with people like the Reverend Jeremiah
Wright-especially for someone like Obama, about whom relatively little is
known-it wrong and reckless to throw out unsubstantiated charges and
smears against Senator Obama.

Conservatism
has been an intellectual home to people like Burke and Buckley. The GOP is the
party that gave us Lincoln and Reagan. It seems to me that its leaders ought to
make it clear that they find what Dr. Corsi is doing to be both wrong and
repellent. To have their movement and their party associated with such a figure
would be a terrible thing and it will only help the cause of those who hold
both the GOP and the conservative movement in contempt.


From an August 12 Los Angeles Times article by Kate
Linthicum:


Right-wing
author Jerome Corsi hit it big in 2004 with a book attacking John F. Kerry.

"Unfit
for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" soared to
No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Now
Corsi has done it again -- taking aim at a different Democratic presidential
candidate.

Corsi's
latest, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," will top the Aug. 17 New York Times hard-cover nonfiction
bestseller list.

The
book lashes out at Barack Obama and alleges, among other things, that the
politician has a secret radical Islamic agenda.

But
being No. 1 doesn't necessarily mean being accurate. Obama is a
Christian.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Election Center:


CAMPBELL
BROWN (host): There's a new book out about Barack Obama. It's
number one right now on The New York Times
bestseller list. I can guarantee you, though, nobody in the Obama camp is happy
at all -- at all happy about that. And here's why.

It is
called Obama Nation:
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality. The author, Jerome Corsi, also co-wrote the book Unfit
for Command, which started the Swift Boating of John Kerry. Obama Nation is riddled with pretty much
every unsubstantiated rumor you ever heard about Obama. Jessica Yellin
found out for us that it's also turning into a major campaign headache. And, Jessica,
I know -- we know that some of the most damaging charges in this book just
aren't true. The author admits he's on a mission to take down Barack Obama. He's been slammed for books that he's written before. They're
also discredited. But it's still getting an awful lot of
traction.


From the August 13 edition of CNN's
Anderson Cooper 360:


JESSICA
YELLIN (CNN Capitol Hill correspondent): To prove his point, Corsi says the book is meticulously researched
and fact-checked. But when we checked his facts, we found he's wrong on
many points. Here are a few. The book claims Obama didn't
dedicate his first book, Dreams from My
Father, to his family members. He did. He dedicated it to his
mother, his grandmother, and his siblings. Corsi cites a report saying
Obama was in church when Reverend Jeremiah Wright made
comments about race on July 22. But Obama was out of state, a full time zone
away. And Corsi
writes Obama has yet to answer questions about whether he
ever stopped using drugs. But in his first book, Obama said he stopped getting
high during college.


From an August 12 New York Times article by Jim
Rutenberg and Julie Bosman:


In the
summer of 2004 the conservative gadfly Jerome R. Corsi shot to the top of the
best-seller lists as co-author of "Unfit for Command," the book
attacking Senator John Kerry's record on a Vietnam War Swift boat that
began the larger damaging campaign against Mr. Kerry's war credentials as
he sought the presidency.

Almost exactly four
years after that campaign began, Mr. Corsi has released a new attack book
painting Senator Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumed presidential
nominee, as a stealth radical liberal who has tried to cover up
"extensive connections to Islam" -- Mr. Obama is Christian -- and questioning
whether his admitted experimentation with drugs in high school and college ever
ceased.

Significant parts of the
book, whose subtitle is "Leftist Politics and the Cult of
Personality," have already been challenged as misleading or false in the
days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance
on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday --
at No. 1.

[...]

Several of the book's accusations, in fact, are unsubstantiated, misleading or inaccurate.


From the August 14 edition of Fox
News' Hannity & Colmes:


ALAN COLMES (co-host): The substance of the book --

[crosstalk]

COLMES: -- we have already seen in the book. He was wrong about a
sermon that Barack Obama attended. He got the date wrong. He was wrong about
the dedication in the book. He was wrong about Obama saying that he stopped
using drugs. He was not truthful about that. He was wrong about a number of
things in the book --

HUGH HEWITT (syndicated radio host): Actually, stop there, Alan.
That's not true --

COLMES: -- there have been a number of things in the book that have
been discredited.


From an August 14 Washington Post article by Eli
Saslow:


Corsi's
"The Obama Nation" lacks major revelations and has been dismissed by
Obama's campaign as a series of lies from a serial liar. Parts of the book have
also been disproved by the mainstream media. In 2004, Corsi co-wrote
"Unfit for Command," in which Swift boat veterans criticized Sen. John
F. Kerry's Vietnam War record. That book was also widely
disproved.


From an August 15 Washington Post editorial:


Unfortunately
but unsurprisingly, given his earlier hit job on the last Democratic nominee,
Mr. Corsi's latest is rife with inaccuracies and innuendo. If the fundamental
smear of "Unfit for Command" was that John F. Kerry was no war hero,
the insinuation of Mr. Corsi's latest is that Mr. Obama is a closet Muslim and
militant, black activist drug-user.

[...]

He gets
facts wrong, from the date of Mr. Obama's marriage to whether he dedicated his autobiography
to his family (he did) to whether he revealed that he took his future wife on
his second trip to Kenya (he did.) He makes offensive statements: "The
sexual attraction of his mother to her African husband jumps out from the
page." 

When
facts are lacking, Mr. Corsi makes his point by suggestive questions. Noting
that Life magazine could find no record of an article that Mr. Obama remembered
reading as a child about a black man who tried to lighten his skin, Mr. Corsi
asks, "How much more imagining, hypothetical lying, or just plain lying is
Obama capable of doing?" When facts are present, he twists them to make
Mr. Obama bad.


From an August 14 Associated Press article by Nedra
Pickler:


Jerome
Corsi's anti-Obama book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult
of Personality," claims the Illinois
senator is a dangerous, radical candidate for president. The book is a
compilation of all the innuendo and false rumors against Obama -- that he was
raised a Muslim, attended a radical, black church and secretly has a
"black rage" hidden beneath the surface.

In
fact, Obama is a Christian who attended Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

[...]

Corsi
suggests, without a shred of proof, that Obama may be using drugs today. Obama
has acknowledged using marijuana and cocaine as a teenager but says he quit
when he went to college and hasn't used drugs since.

Corsi
makes an issue of the fact that, before he quit smoking cigarettes, Obama
didn't want it widely known that he smoked. "If Obama takes pains to hide
his smoking from us, what else does he take pains to hide?" Corsi asks in
the book.

Corsi
also dwells on Obama's mother marrying Obama's African father and later
marrying someone from Indonesia
-- whom Corsi describes as "a second man of color to be her mate."
The Obama campaign says the description is one of many examples of Corsi's
"offensive language" in the book.

He
claims Obama received extensive Islamic religious education as a boy in Indonesia,
education that was only offered to the truly faithful. Actually, Obama is a
Christian and as a boy he attended both Catholic school and Indonesian public
schools where some basic study of the Koran was offered.

He
accuses Obama of wanting to weaken the military even though Obama's campaign
calls for adding 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.


From an August 13 post by Joe Klein on Time magazine's Swampland
blog:


I heard
about Jerome Corsi's book a few weeks ago from my mother, who said that her
great fear--that Barack Obama has covert Islamic associations--had been
confirmed by a new book. I told her not to worry, that many reputable people
had looked into the matter and Obama was more likely to be spotted in Whole
Foods than praying in a mosque. (Since my mother has never been to Whole Foods,
so she didn't quite get my wry allusion.) "I hope so," she said,
dubiously. 

So we
know the market for trash is there, and not so far from home. And we know, that
Mary Matalin, who appears regularly on mainstream media programs like Meet the Press
called the Corsi book in the New York Times today:

"a
piece of scholarship, and a good one at that."

But
hey, Mary stands to make big bucks off this scholarship, which I'm sure was
submitted for peer review and otherwise held to the highest editorial
standards--and I'm sure her reputation and mediagenicity won't be damaged by
this poisonous crap, and we're all friends here, aren't we? And, yknow, they
say politics ain't beanbag...and it's all in the game to tell innocent, well-intentioned
people that Barack Obama is a secret Muslim or that John Kerry wasn't really a
hero in Vietnam.
Or, as George W. Bush, once told a rightly outraged John McCain--whose wife and
daughter Bush's minions had smeared--"It's just politics."


An August 13 post on Jonathan
Martin's blog at Politico.com:


The
power of Fox News and talk radio: Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation "is to
make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction
hardcovers this Sunday -- at No. 1.," according to a front-page story by Jim Rutenberg
and Julie Bosman in the Times today that will only help sell more books.

As
Rutenberg and Bosman note, the book has its share of errors. 

But
Corsi delved into the drug-and-Muslim fever swamps, which, regardless of
accuracy, is what many on the right want to believe about Obama.

The
best part of the piece, though, is this: "He said he was planning to
aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr.
Obama this fall, though he would not name them."

A
third-party anti-Obama effort still may form, but methinks there is a reason
here why Corsi "would not name them."

    
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Media Matters - Media denounce Corsi&#39;s anti-Obama book {...} Many in the media are challenging Jerome Corsi&#39;s The Obama Nation , noting its numerous falsehoods and its author&#39;s track record. Their reaction stands in stark contrast to coverage of Corsi&#39;s 2004 book, Unfit for Command . The media were sharply criticized for taking too long to challenge that book&#39;s numerous smears and falsehoods. {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> August 16, 2008, 3:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> August 16, 2008, 12:22 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;39KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/">Society</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/">Issues</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/">Business</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/">Media</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/"><b>Bias and Balance</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{NORTH AMERICA &gt; LODGING} - Fall SPECIAL! Amazing OREGON Beachfront Home! Spectacular Views! (Yachats, Central Oregon Coast) $225 3bd</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/fall-special-amazing-oregon-beachfront-home-spectacular-2008105922.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">The Sand Castle in Yachats, Oregon!Location: Yachats, Oregon


Fall &amp; Winter Special!  Book 2+ night and get an extra night for FREE!







Visit our website to check availability: www.sandcastlehouse.com









Our 2,500+ square foot, 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2-story beach house will have you basking in relaxation and solitude.  Downstairs features the great room with breakfast bar, woodstove and even a piano!  There's a stunning ocean view from the kitchen, dining area, and living room; there's also a TV/computer room and a billiard/game room.  Upstairs you'll find yet another wonderful ocean-view sitting area with huge windows and a vaulted ceiling, a telescope and a stereo with ipod dock.  A spacious wraparound deck is perfect for outdoor enjoyment, there's even a traditional boardwalk to the beach, and a wind-protected bench for watching the children and your pets play on the beach below, or to just sit and be with the surf, sun and sand.  This luxury home has free WiFi, a new gas grill, movies, music and games for your enjoyment, a modern kitchen, a laundry room, and many other amenities.  










InformationContact Informationinfo@sweethomesrentals.comKate702.349.2543Pricing and AvailabilityRental Rate: $225.00 per dayDeposit: $225Taxes: 13.5%Cleaning Fees: $90Availability: check www.sandcastlehouse.comPayment Methods: Visa, AmexLinksOur WebsiteFeaturesBedrooms: 3Property Type: HouseBathrooms: 2Sleeps: 8Parking Spaces: 3Square Footage: 2500AttributesAppliancesFull RefrigeratorWasher/DryerDishwasherMicrowaveStoveGas GrillElectronicsTVDVD PlayerStereoAlarm ClocksVHS Video PlayerCableiPod DocsFree WifiDVD CollectionPlay Staion + GamesFurnishingsWater ViewPool Table400+ threadcount LinensLoft Living RoomWood StoveGame RoomOcean FrontPowered by vFlyer.comVFLYER ID: 1770037Photo GalleryPowered by vFlyer.comVFLYER ID: 1770037


51390372Casino Aztar Caruthersville 2006 2007 2008 Acre April 1 Aztar Caruthersville  Missouri Columbia Sussex Hectare Indiana in what was seen in Bulgaria as a very controversial judges' decision  After the Olympics  she took a one-year break  giving birth to her son Emil in 2001  At the Athens Olympics in 2004  she finished third in Single Sculls  behind Coquitlam Now British Columbia Canada Lower Mainland Newspaper Tri-Cities (British Columbia) Perfect stub article Stub - Black Republicans attacked whites on Broad Street in Charleston when somebody yelled incorrectly that with the granting of a conditional expansion franchise  named the Edmonton Oil Kings in homage to the former team Sergei Bagapsh Politics of Abkhazia 1949 1997 2004 2005 2008 Abkhaz language Abkhazia Abkhazian ASSR Abkhazian presidential election  2004 </summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/fall-special-amazing-oregon-beachfront-home-spectacular-2008105922.htm</id>
<issued>2008-10-04T02:13:14Z</issued>
<modified>2008-10-04T02:13:14Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Sfbay.Craigslist.Org</name>
<url>http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/vac/865634040.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/fall-special-amazing-oregon-beachfront-home-spectacular-2008105922.htm"><b>Fall SPECIAL! Amazing OREGON Beachfront Home! Spectacular Views! (Yachats, Central Oregon Coast) $225 3bd</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/fall-special-amazing-oregon-beachfront-home-spectacular-2008105922.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Sfbay.Craigslist.Org</span> - The Sand Castle in Yachats, Oregon!Location: Yachats, Oregon


Fall & Winter Special!  Book 2+ night and get an extra night for FREE!







Visit our website to check availability: www.sandcastlehouse.com









Our 2,500+ square foot, 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2-story beach house will have you basking in relaxation and solitude.  Downstairs features the great room with breakfast bar, woodstove and even a piano!  There's a stunning ocean view from the kitchen, dining area, and living room; there's also a TV/computer room and a billiard/game room.  Upstairs you'll find yet another wonderful ocean-view sitting area with huge windows and a vaulted ceiling, a telescope and a stereo with ipod dock.  A spacious wraparound deck is perfect for outdoor enjoyment, there's even a traditional boardwalk to the beach, and a wind-protected bench for watching the children and your pets play on the beach below, or to just sit and be with the surf, sun and sand.  This luxury home has free WiFi, a new gas grill, movies, music and games for your enjoyment, a modern kitchen, a laundry room, and many other amenities.  










InformationContact Informationinfo@sweethomesrentals.comKate702.349.2543Pricing and AvailabilityRental Rate: $225.00 per dayDeposit: $225Taxes: 13.5%Cleaning Fees: $90Availability: check www.sandcastlehouse.comPayment Methods: Visa, AmexLinksOur WebsiteFeaturesBedrooms: 3Property Type: HouseBathrooms: 2Sleeps: 8Parking Spaces: 3Square Footage: 2500AttributesAppliancesFull RefrigeratorWasher/DryerDishwasherMicrowaveStoveGas GrillElectronicsTVDVD PlayerStereoAlarm ClocksVHS Video PlayerCableiPod DocsFree WifiDVD CollectionPlay Staion + GamesFurnishingsWater ViewPool Table400+ threadcount LinensLoft Living RoomWood StoveGame RoomOcean FrontPowered by vFlyer.comVFLYER ID: 1770037Photo GalleryPowered by vFlyer.comVFLYER ID: 1770037


51390372Casino Aztar Caruthersville 2006 2007 2008 Acre April 1 Aztar Caruthersville  Missouri Columbia Sussex Hectare Indiana in what was seen in Bulgaria as a very controversial judges' decision  After the Olympics  she took a one-year break  giving birth to her son Emil in 2001  At the Athens Olympics in 2004  she finished third in Single Sculls  behind Coquitlam Now British Columbia Canada Lower Mainland Newspaper Tri-Cities (British Columbia) Perfect stub article Stub - Black Republicans attacked whites on Broad Street in Charleston when somebody yelled incorrectly that with the granting of a conditional expansion franchise  named the Edmonton Oil Kings in homage to the former team Sergei Bagapsh Politics of Abkhazia 1949 1997 2004 2005 2008 Abkhaz language Abkhazia Abkhazian ASSR Abkhazian presidential election  2004 <blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Fall SPECIAL! Amazing OREGON Beachfront Home! Spectacular Views! {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> October 4, 2008, 2:13 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> October 4, 2008, 1:00 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;21KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/">Regional</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/">North America</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/">United States</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/">California</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/">Metro Areas</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/">San Francisco Bay Area</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/">Travel and Tourism</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/regional/north-america/united-states/california/metro-areas/san-francisco-bay-area/travel-and-tourism/lodging/"><b>Lodging</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{LITERATURE &gt; CYBERPUNK} - Ken Hollings: Welcome To Mars radio series</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/ken-hollings-welcome-to-mars-radio-series-2008102596.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">Several weeks ago, I posted about a fantastic radio documentary on the RAND Corporation by my friend Ken Hollings, a UK journalist and chronicler of outré culture. Two years ago, Ken presented a radio series called Welcome To Mars, his reflections on the "fantasy of science in the early years of the American Century." In this unscripted, engaging, and mind-bending series Ken connects the dots between nuclear war, LSD, flying saucers, the occult, weird science, B movies, and the birth of the space age. Ken's words are supported by an incredible outer space score prdocued by Simon James. I can't recommend it highly enough. Hollings' book based on the radio series, Welcome To Mars: Fantasies of Science In The American Century 1947-1959, will be published in the UK later this month by Strange Attractor Press. Welcome To Mars podcast Previously on BB: ? Radio documentary on RAND Corporation...
  
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/ken-hollings-welcome-to-mars-radio-series-2008102596.htm</id>
<issued>2008-10-03T18:11:35Z</issued>
<modified>2008-10-03T18:11:35Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Boingboing.Net</name>
<url>http://www.boingboing.net/2008/10/03/ken-hollings-welcome.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/ken-hollings-welcome-to-mars-radio-series-2008102596.htm"><b>Ken Hollings: Welcome To Mars radio series</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/ken-hollings-welcome-to-mars-radio-series-2008102596.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Boingboing.Net</span> - Several weeks ago, I posted about a fantastic radio documentary on the RAND Corporation by my friend Ken Hollings, a UK journalist and chronicler of outré culture. Two years ago, Ken presented a radio series called Welcome To Mars, his reflections on the "fantasy of science in the early years of the American Century." In this unscripted, engaging, and mind-bending series Ken connects the dots between nuclear war, LSD, flying saucers, the occult, weird science, B movies, and the birth of the space age. Ken's words are supported by an incredible outer space score prdocued by Simon James. I can't recommend it highly enough. Hollings' book based on the radio series, Welcome To Mars: Fantasies of Science In The American Century 1947-1959, will be published in the UK later this month by Strange Attractor Press. Welcome To Mars podcast Previously on BB: ? Radio documentary on RAND Corporation...
  
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Ken Hollings: Welcome To Mars radio series - Boing Boing {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> October 3, 2008, 6:11 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> October 5, 2008, 10:37 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;41KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/">Arts</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/">Literature</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/">Genres</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/"><b>Cyberpunk</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{LITERATURE &gt; CYBERPUNK} - Birth of the presidential "sound bite"</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/birth-of-the-presidential-sound-bite-2008103643.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">The 1908 presidential campaign was the first time that the candidates, William Jennings Bryan and William Howard Taft, recorded their voices for voters to hear. The recordings on early phonographs were used to rally support, or simply demonstrate the technology, at political gatherings, concert halls, and even shops selling the Edison phonographs. Science News has a fascinating history of the "first sound bites," including audio samples. From Science News: ?Mr. Bryan seemed a little nervous when he first started, much more so, he said, than he ever felt in facing an audience of ten thousand people,? Harold Voorhis recalled. Voorhis, an agent for the National Phonograph Company, was partly responsible for the candidate?s discomfort: He had brought a phonograph into the library of Bryan?s house in Lincoln, Neb., to record some of his speeches, old and current. ?Considering that his words were to be reproduced all over the world in perhaps a million homes, ? I thought he showed remarkable composure,? Voorhis wrote in the July 1908 Edison Phonograph Monthly. Whether for profit or prestige, the 1908 campaign was the first in which presidential candidates recorded their own voices for the mass market. ?We now have Records by Mr. Bryan and Mr. Taft, so that no matter how the November election may result, we shall have Records by the next President,? an advertisement in the September 1908 Edison Phonograph Monthly exclaimed. ?Now, for the first time, one can introduce the rival candidates for the Presidency in one?s own home, can listen to their political views, expressed in their real voices, and make comparisons.? In New York City, an enterprising businessman set up a penny arcade featuring a Bryan-Taft ?debate.? Mannequins stood before a phonograph that spouted the candidates? voices... ?You could draw a genealogy from the televised presidential debates of today straight back to these? recordings, says record historian Patrick Feaster of Indiana University in Bloomington. ?An awful lot of political speechmaking nowadays is mediated; the idea of someone simply addressing a live audience [as] the target audience ?really doesn?t seem to pertain much anymore.? The 1908 recordings ?are really the first step in that direction.? First presidential "sound bites"...
  
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/birth-of-the-presidential-sound-bite-2008103643.htm</id>
<issued>2008-10-03T16:12:42Z</issued>
<modified>2008-10-03T16:12:42Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Boingboing.Net</name>
<url>http://www.boingboing.net/2008/10/03/birth-of-the-preside.html</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/birth-of-the-presidential-sound-bite-2008103643.htm"><b>Birth of the presidential "sound bite"</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/birth-of-the-presidential-sound-bite-2008103643.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Boingboing.Net</span> - The 1908 presidential campaign was the first time that the candidates, William Jennings Bryan and William Howard Taft, recorded their voices for voters to hear. The recordings on early phonographs were used to rally support, or simply demonstrate the technology, at political gatherings, concert halls, and even shops selling the Edison phonographs. Science News has a fascinating history of the "first sound bites," including audio samples. From Science News: ?Mr. Bryan seemed a little nervous when he first started, much more so, he said, than he ever felt in facing an audience of ten thousand people,? Harold Voorhis recalled. Voorhis, an agent for the National Phonograph Company, was partly responsible for the candidate?s discomfort: He had brought a phonograph into the library of Bryan?s house in Lincoln, Neb., to record some of his speeches, old and current. ?Considering that his words were to be reproduced all over the world in perhaps a million homes, ? I thought he showed remarkable composure,? Voorhis wrote in the July 1908 Edison Phonograph Monthly. Whether for profit or prestige, the 1908 campaign was the first in which presidential candidates recorded their own voices for the mass market. ?We now have Records by Mr. Bryan and Mr. Taft, so that no matter how the November election may result, we shall have Records by the next President,? an advertisement in the September 1908 Edison Phonograph Monthly exclaimed. ?Now, for the first time, one can introduce the rival candidates for the Presidency in one?s own home, can listen to their political views, expressed in their real voices, and make comparisons.? In New York City, an enterprising businessman set up a penny arcade featuring a Bryan-Taft ?debate.? Mannequins stood before a phonograph that spouted the candidates? voices... ?You could draw a genealogy from the televised presidential debates of today straight back to these? recordings, says record historian Patrick Feaster of Indiana University in Bloomington. ?An awful lot of political speechmaking nowadays is mediated; the idea of someone simply addressing a live audience [as] the target audience ?really doesn?t seem to pertain much anymore.? The 1908 recordings ?are really the first step in that direction.? First presidential "sound bites"...
  
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Birth of the presidential "sound bite" - Boing Boing {...} </blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> October 3, 2008, 4:12 pm - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> October 5, 2008, 10:37 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;41KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/">Arts</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/">Literature</a> &gt; <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/">Genres</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/arts/literature/genres/cyberpunk/"><b>Cyberpunk</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{NEWS &gt; BREAKING NEWS} - Oct. 3, 1947: Birth of Palomar's 'Giant Eye'</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/news/breaking-news/oct-3-1947-birth-of-palomar-s-giant-eye-2008109583.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">1947: After 13 years of grinding and polishing, the Palomar Observatory mirror is completed at Caltech.


It was, at the time, the largest telescope mirror ever made in the United States, measuring 200 inches in diameter. Following its completion, the disk was mounted in Palomar's Hale Telescope and first used in January 1949 to take pictures of the Milky Way. Edwin Hubble was the first astronomer to make images using the new scope.  


The mirror began as a 20-ton piece of molten Pyrex, a new glass blend, at the Corning Glass Works in upstate New York. Pyrex expands and contracts far less than regular glass, making it less prone to distortion, a problem that plagued the 100-inch mirror already in operation at Palomar.


After being heated to 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit, the Pyrex was poured into a ceramic mold. It was carefully cooled at an average rate of one or two degrees per day for 11 months,  then allowed to reach room temperature.1  After that it was shipped west to Caltech in Pasadena, where the glass was painstakingly ground to perfection in a process lasting more than a decade. 


The era of giant telescopic lenses began in the 1700s, when astronomers recognized that the bigger the lens (or reflecting mirror), the better the image. In 1774, English astronomer William Herschel mounted several 9-inch mirrors in a 10-foot-long telescope and recorded, with satisfaction, that he had spent the first night looking at "Saturn's rings and two belts in great...

Wired.com
</summary>
<id>http://articles.world-of-newave.info/news/breaking-news/oct-3-1947-birth-of-palomar-s-giant-eye-2008109583.htm</id>
<issued>2008-10-03T05:00:00Z</issued>
<modified>2008-10-03T05:00:00Z</modified>
<author>
<name>Wired.Com</name>
<url>http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/10/dayintech_1003</url>
</author>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.world-of-newave.info/"><![CDATA[
<table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="margin:9px;">
<tr><td colspan="2" style="font:bold 12pt Arial;vertical-align:top;"><a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/news/breaking-news/oct-3-1947-birth-of-palomar-s-giant-eye-2008109583.htm"><b>Oct. 3, 1947: Birth of Palomar's 'Giant Eye'</b></a> <sup style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;">{<a href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/news/breaking-news/oct-3-1947-birth-of-palomar-s-giant-eye-2008109583.htm" target="_blank">new window</a>}</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="font:6pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;text-align:center;vertical-align:top;">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="100%" style="font:9pt Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;font-variant:small-caps;">Www.Wired.Com</span> - 1947: After 13 years of grinding and polishing, the Palomar Observatory mirror is completed at Caltech.


It was, at the time, the largest telescope mirror ever made in the United States, measuring 200 inches in diameter. Following its completion, the disk was mounted in Palomar's Hale Telescope and first used in January 1949 to take pictures of the Milky Way. Edwin Hubble was the first astronomer to make images using the new scope.  


The mirror began as a 20-ton piece of molten Pyrex, a new glass blend, at the Corning Glass Works in upstate New York. Pyrex expands and contracts far less than regular glass, making it less prone to distortion, a problem that plagued the 100-inch mirror already in operation at Palomar.


After being heated to 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit, the Pyrex was poured into a ceramic mold. It was carefully cooled at an average rate of one or two degrees per day for 11 months,  then allowed to reach room temperature.1  After that it was shipped west to Caltech in Pasadena, where the glass was painstakingly ground to perfection in a process lasting more than a decade. 


The era of giant telescopic lenses began in the 1700s, when astronomers recognized that the bigger the lens (or reflecting mirror), the better the image. In 1774, English astronomer William Herschel mounted several 9-inch mirrors in a 10-foot-long telescope and recorded, with satisfaction, that he had spent the first night looking at "Saturn's rings and two belts in great...

Wired.com
<blockquote style="background:#FAFAFA;border:1px dotted #E6E6E6;font:italic 10pt Times New Roman;padding:9px;">Get the latest in science news, including space, physics, planet earth, discoveries, NASA, satellites, and space travel from Wired.com {...}</blockquote><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Published:</span> October 3, 2008, 5:00 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Indexed:</span> October 5, 2008, 11:18 am - <span style="color:#808080;">Page Size:</span>&nbsp;47KB</div><div style="font:8pt Verdana,Arial;vertical-align:top;"><span style="color:#808080;">Category:</span> <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/news/">News</a> &gt;  <a href="http://www.world-of-newave.info/news/breaking-news/"><b>Breaking News</b></a></div></td></tr></table>
<br/>
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>{ISSUES &gt; BIAS AND BALANCE} - Hewitt did not challenge Palin falsehood about Obama's "extreme position" on abortion</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://articles.world-of-newave.info/society/issues/business/media/bias-and-balance/hewitt-did-not-challenge-palin-falsehood-about-2008101123.htm"/>
<summary type="text/plain">During an interview on the September 30 broadcast of his
nationally syndicated radio show, Hugh Hewitt did not
challenge Gov. Sarah Palin's claim that the "extreme position" on abortion Sen.
Barack Obama took in the Illinois state Senate included "not even
supporting a measure that
would during a -- after a botched abortion and
that baby's born alive -- allowing medical care to cease and allowing that
baby to die." Palin's claim was based on Obama's opposition to a bill amending the
Illinois Abortion Law of 1975, which, as Media Matters for
America has
repeatedly noted, Obama and other opponents said
posed a threat to abortion rights and
was unnecessary because Illinois law
already prohibited the conduct being addressed by the bill.

Indeed, as Media Matters noted, when tasked by the Illinois attorney general's office with
investigating allegations that fetuses born
alive at an Illinois hospital were
abandoned without treatment, the
Illinois Department of Public Health reportedly said
it was unable to substantiate the allegations but
said that if the
allegations had proved true, the conduct alleged would have been a violation of then-existing Illinois law.
Obama himself has cited specific provisions of the
Illinois Compiled Statutes in stating that the
"born alive principle was
already the law in Illinois."

Palin went on to assert of her characterization of
Obama's position: "That, to me, is extreme. That's so far,
far left. It's out -- certainly out of the mainstream of America.
To me, that is the extreme position, not my position of just wanting that
culture of life to be respected and not wanting government to sanction the idea
of ending life." In response, Hewitt asked, "Do you think the
mainstream media and the left
understand your religious faith?" 

From the September 30 broadcast of Salem Radio Network's The Hugh Hewitt Show:


HEWITT: Governor, let's turn
to a couple of issues that the
MSM's not going to pick up. You're pro-life, and
how much of the
virulent opposition to you
on the left do you attribute to your pro-life position, and
maybe even to the
birth of -- your decision -- your and
Todd's decision to have
Trig?

PALIN: Yeah, you know, I think that that's been probably the
most hurtful and nonsensical slap
that we've been taking is our position that
we have taken -- pro-life, me personally, and saying that
you know, even though I knew that 13 weeks along that
Trig would be born
with Down syndrome, and
I said, you know, he's still going to be a most
precious ingredient in this
sometimes messed-up world that
we live in. 

I know
that my son is going to provide a lot of hope
and a lot of promise in this
world, and I'm so thankful of course that
I've had the opportunity to give him life
and to bring him
into this world. But
I think, yeah, truly that
that's been a hurtful slap
that we have taken, because people just
don't understand. Ironic, too, 